

Ubuntu Linux and Kali Linux compete in the operating system market, particularly focusing on different aspects of security and usability. Ubuntu seems to have the upper hand due to its extensive community support and broader hardware compatibility, making it more user-friendly and versatile for everyday use and enterprise environments.
Features: Ubuntu Linux is favored for its extensive repository, ease of use, stability, scalability, flexibility, and excellent security measures. It supports a wide range of hardware and is backed by a robust community. Kali Linux is known for its focus on security and penetration testing, offering an array of pre-installed tools effective for vulnerability assessment, along with its Debian-based architecture that supports cybersecurity tasks and real-time security analysis.
Room for Improvement: Ubuntu users often express a need for a friendlier interface, enhanced security features, and better integration with other systems. There is also a desire for improved documentation and expanded hardware support. Kali Linux users wish for an improved UI, increased user-friendliness, more GUI-based tools, better documentation, and enhanced hardware integration.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ubuntu Linux is recognized for its versatility across both on-premises and cloud environments, with robust community support that facilitates ease of deployment. It lacks official support in certain regions due to specific regulations but benefits from a large online community. Kali Linux is primarily used on-premises but also supports cloud environments, relying mainly on community forums for technical support.
Pricing and ROI: Both Ubuntu Linux and Kali Linux are open-source and free to use, reducing deployment costs and promising a high return on investment. Ubuntu offers enterprise support options for those needing professional assistance, while Kali Linux typically incurs no cost unless additional premium services are chosen. Ubuntu is economical on older equipment due to its low resource requirements, whereas Kali Linux offers value by bundling comprehensive security tools without extra costs.
Integrating Kali Linux with DevOps tools has resulted in reduced operational costs due to automated test cases, making it a worthwhile investment with significant returns by decreasing the attack surface area and the frequency of attack incidents.
If we had installed it on-premises or through other means, it would have incurred significant money and effort to create the VMs, deploy it on machines, and then delete and format it after use.
I have saved time by avoiding the lag I sometimes face on the TryHackMe in-built machine, and I have learned more efficiently.
Since most of the tools and other things are community-based, the documentation and other community support are very good.
I was able to solve the problems I was experiencing.
They responded well, understood that the issue was not on my end, and provided a patch within two days.
The community around Ubuntu Linux is beneficial, providing answers to questions and assisting with issues.
Ubuntu Linux has a comprehensive knowledge base for self-help.
You can use it on cloud, VPS, and on-premises.
I would describe Kali Linux's scalability as very scalable because I can deploy it on a range of different machines, whether that is my laptop or using maybe Raspberry Pi or Android.
Regarding the scalability of Kali Linux for my work and projects, whenever I was conducting brute force attacks and provided more than two or three million lines of payload, the system would freeze.
In a server environment, it can seamlessly adapt to increased customer demand.
Any Linux is scalable in terms of capacity, and on a day-to-day basis, we use scalability options with the help of Kubernetes clusters.
So far, I do not have any issues related to security in Ubuntu Linux.
Due to the huge user base that uses it, it is kept up to date regularly.
Kali Linux is stable for my use cases, though not the latest version.
Kali Linux is very stable for my needs.
The system has been completely stable, which makes it deserve a perfect score.
Ubuntu Linux is extremely stable and maintains uptime effectively.
Ubuntu Linux is generally stable, though there can be occasional issues with new hardware integration.
If real-time customized port scanning can be added, for example, instead of a default port such as 8080 or 443, if we can use a customized port such as 9876, that capability would be great.
I face significant challenges with Kali Linux regarding a major issue with the Grub loader becoming corrupted, which makes it very difficult to recover data.
If there were video courses attached to how to safely use it, especially for absolute beginners with no previous experience using Linux operating systems, I think that could be very useful.
There is a push towards integrating AI into software for various purposes like video and sound processing.
Stability issues occur when integrating new components due to physical or technical challenges.
Unlike CentOS, Ubuntu Linux lacks an easily accessible inbuilt repository where dependencies or packages are easily found.
Kali Linux is free software, an operating system that's available to download without any cost or licensing fees.
I simply create a VM, so there are no costs involved.
My experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing for Kali Linux has been positive, as it operates under an open-source model.
For an enterprise-wide scalable operating system with professional services, you can select Ubuntu Linux at a reasonable price.
The setup cost is free.
Ubuntu Linux is open-source, leading to cost savings through its free availability.
Kali Linux has positively impacted my organization by improving efficiency in penetration testing; its open-source nature permits extensive customization and inclusion of numerous comprehensive pre-installed tools, contributing to a secure network environment with effective monitoring of network applications.
A unique and really helpful feature of Kali Linux, compared to other operating systems, is that many of the offensive security tools are already pre-configured and pre-installed.
Kali Linux positively impacts my organization by allowing us to monitor changes and security posture for the company.
Ubuntu Linux's open-source nature supports community contributions, bolstering its development and support ecosystem.
Ubuntu Linux supports remote troubleshooting via SSH, allowing connection from anywhere, which is beneficial for troubleshooting server issues.
In terms of security, I am satisfied with Ubuntu Linux and I can rely on its security features more than I can with Windows.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Ubuntu Linux | 9.4% |
| Kali Linux | 3.2% |
| Other | 87.4% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 10 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 16 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 84 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 21 |
| Large Enterprise | 53 |
Kali Linux is widely used by organizations for penetration testing, vulnerability assessments, web application security, network audits, ethical hacking, and open-source intelligence, providing extensive free features.
Organizations run Kali Linux in virtualized environments alongside other operating systems, employing tools for automated scans, malware identification, infrastructure testing, and application development or hosting. These users benefit from lower maintenance requirements and a smaller footprint. The toolset includes Nmap, SQLMap, Metasploit, and Hydra, ensuring effective security assessments. Its high scalability, performance, user-friendly interface, and extensive documentation enhance the platform's usability. Known for stability, flexibility, and virus resistance, Kali Linux supports web security, troubleshooting, and configuration tasks comprehensively.
What are the most important features of Kali Linux?
What benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?
Kali Linux can support industries in improving security through stable and flexible environments that resist viruses and provide extensive documentation. Users employ it for web security, troubleshooting, and configuring capabilities. Necessary improvements include automation, user-friendliness, and integrating AI and blockchain. Enhancements in security features, faster installations, and better learning tools are also essential. Machine learning integration and non-enterprise user functionalities can address current limitations.
Ubuntu Linux is an open-source platform known for its robust security, ease of use, and rapid performance. Its lightweight design and comprehensive support system make it ideal for diverse IT environments, providing seamless management and scalability options.
Ubuntu Linux stands out with its open-source nature that allows extensive customization and access to a broad range of free software. It is widely praised for its stability and a vast package repository offering regular updates, enhancing its usefulness across different sectors. The platform is equipped with a lightweight design and excellent community support, making it scalable and easy to manage. While it could improve in areas like Windows software compatibility and user interface refinement, its benefits in enterprise management and development projects are undeniable. Improved documentation, better hardware integration, and enhanced third-party application compatibility are additional focal points to consider.
What are the key features of Ubuntu Linux?
What benefits should be considered from reviews?
Ubuntu Linux is prominently implemented in industries for tasks such as server management, application deployment, and software development. Its resource efficiency and open-source tool compatibility make it a favorite for programming, research, and cybersecurity. Companies frequently use it for web hosting, cloud services, and managing multi-user enterprise solutions.
We monitor all Operating Systems (OS) for Business reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.