Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Oracle Database In-Memory vs kdb+ comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

kdb+
Ranking in Relational Databases Tools
25th
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Oracle Database In-Memory
Ranking in Relational Databases Tools
9th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.9
Number of Reviews
31
Ranking in other categories
Embedded Database (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Relational Databases Tools category, the mindshare of kdb+ is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Database In-Memory is 1.6%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Relational Databases Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Nitin Garg - PeerSpot reviewer
An easy-to-deploy solution that can be used for data ingestion and usage
I work for a fintech company where we create several strategies generally built on finance data, which are like one-time series data. We deal with huge bulk data on a daily basis, and we use kdb+ for data ingestion and usage The most valuable feature of kdb+ is the speed at which it returns the…
Amit Rajora - PeerSpot reviewer
On-premises solution provides security for BFSIs and banking systems
I would rate this solution 8 out of 10. For someone with small architecture and a small volume of data, they can go for the cloud services. If they have a huge volume or some security perspective like BFSI data and a banking system, they should definitely go for the on-premise solution. If we go for any BFSI or some banking or card solution, we can easily see that most of the companies are working with the on-premise solution only. They aren't considering the cloud solution to be secure. In terms of security, they are going for the on-premise version because everything is in their hands only.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution returns data quickly, and data retrieval is fast in kdb+."
"Oracle Database In-Memory is a suite of features that improves performance for real-time analytics and mixed workloads."
"The application development is very user-friendly."
"The valuable features of Oracle Database In-Memory include its capability to bypass disk storage for faster memory operations, which is critical for transactions and analytics."
"Security is the most valuable feature."
"The product offers high scalability."
"The scalability is very good."
"The scalability of the solution is very good. It's able to support large amounts of data."
"It efficiently handles low-code data and supports read-and-write operations for clustering."
 

Cons

"The solution should have a more user-friendly user interface."
"It would be good if Oracle could reduce downtime when transferring from non-In-Memory to In-Memory."
"The solution should move to the new way of writing software code with AI that is intelligent and learns."
"The query optimization and backup features should be added."
"Lacks sufficient integration with other tools."
"The high cost of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"I would like Oracle Database In-Memory to include a data replication feature."
"Oracle Database In-Memory could improve by better supporting generative AI challenges, such as hallucination management."
"Oracle should include column store or advanced query optimization so a database can be optimized by enabling analytic queries to run faster."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"I rate the pricing a zero out of ten because Database In-Memory is too costly."
"It's quite costly and it comes with a fixed price."
"Oracle Database In-Memory is expensive."
"The platform's licensing cost needs improvement."
"Database In-Memory is priced a bit higher than its competitors like Microsoft."
"There is a need to make a yearly payment towards the licensing costs, after which there is any to pay towards the support cost attached to the solution."
"The solution's pricing is high."
"The product is expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.
851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
43%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Real Estate/Law Firm
7%
Computer Software Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
20%
Computer Software Company
11%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about kdb+?
The solution returns data quickly, and data retrieval is fast in kdb+.
What needs improvement with kdb+?
The solution should have a more user-friendly user interface.
What is your primary use case for kdb+?
I work for a fintech company where we create several strategies generally built on finance data, which are like one-time series data. We deal with huge bulk data on a daily basis, and we use kdb+ f...
What do you like most about Oracle Database In-Memory?
We can integrate it with any data sources as well.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Database In-Memory?
Pricing is justified by the performance and business value offered by Oracle Database In-Memory. Although slightly higher, recent reductions in cloud costs and learning opportunities, such as free ...
What needs improvement with Oracle Database In-Memory?
Oracle Database In-Memory could improve by better supporting generative AI challenges, such as hallucination management. Enhancing features like CAG augmentation and cache augmentation could signif...
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

UniCredit, AIRBUS
Shanghai Customs
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, SAP and others in Relational Databases Tools. Updated: May 2025.
851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.