Klocwork and SonarQube Cloud are leaders in static code analysis. Klocwork seems to have the upper hand in industries requiring high safety and reliability due to its deep static analysis and low false positives, whereas SonarQube Cloud excels as a SaaS solution ideal for continuous integration without maintenance needs.
Features: Klocwork offers extensive customization capabilities, supports industry standards, and integrates seamlessly into CI pipelines, helping find defects early with low false positives. It also supports a wide range of IDEs, enhancing developer experience. SonarQube Cloud provides excellent vulnerability detection, efficient GitLab integration, and offers continuous insights into code quality with minimal false positives. It also caters to mono and multi-report needs, enhancing its adaptability to different project requirements.
Room for Improvement: Klocwork could expand language support and improve handling of global variables, addressing integration challenges and the efficiency of upgrading processes. SonarQube Cloud needs better documentation and customization to improve dynamic analysis capabilities. Addressing false positives and offering more detailed solutions to code issues are other suggested improvements.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Klocwork is traditionally on-premises but is known for strong support and responsiveness. It has an extensive global presence and offers a comprehensive reporting structure. SonarQube Cloud, as a cloud solution, provides flexibility and requires no maintenance but faces potential integration issues. Users report good customer service, though some documentation clarity issues remain.
Pricing and ROI: Klocwork is competitively priced with flexible licensing but can be costly due to licensing restrictions. Its ROI is praised for compliance ease and code quality improvements. SonarQube Cloud, typically less expensive for smaller codebases, charges based on analyzed lines of code. It's economical but perceived as expensive for small companies. Users value its ROI for improved code quality and reducing developmental defects.
The main ROI factors include efficiency and how we meet compliance standards for various automotive requirements.
It is easily integrable with the CI/CD pipeline and supports multiple projects with its extensive plugin options.
The product is designed for bigger clients, while smaller companies are often put aside.
The issue is not about the knowledge of the support but about the prioritization of the tickets they handle.
The customer support team is very responsive, proactive, and engages in conversations to ensure our needs are met.
During the initial phase when I did interact with the vendor, the support was satisfactory.
Integrating it into different solutions is straightforward.
The customer service and support for SonarQube Cloud are responsive and helpful.
Klocwork supports our scalability needs without issues, even as project volumes increase.
The program-to-program enablement is scalable.
It has been used in multiple projects and performs well.
There are limitations, and it seems to have fewer capabilities than Veracode.
SonarQube Cloud is a scalable product, and I rate its scalability at seven out of ten.
Installation is easy, and the solution is stable.
It is a quite stable solution.
From my team's feedback, it is almost an eight out of ten.
We would like Klocwork to connect to Git and notify developers of issues tied to specific commits.
Klocwork sometimes provides too many additional warnings which require expertise to manage.
There are too many warnings, and it requires expertise to determine the correct category for them.
Static code analysis is good, but the product lacks dynamic code scanning capabilities, an area where Veracode excels.
To improve SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud), it should excel in all these domains.
I would like to see SonarQube Cloud provide more detailed solutions for fixing code issues, especially solutions related to CVEs.
It is less expensive than Coverity.
Klocwork was competitively priced, making it a cost-effective solution for us.
Klocwork's pricing seems attractive, as it uses a per-user license model that does not have a lot of overhead.
SonarQube Cloud is roughly equivalent in cost to Veracode, maybe a little cheaper.
From my experience, SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) is very expensive for small companies.
We used the open-source version of SonarQube Cloud for its minimum features and did not license its extensive capabilities.
The most valuable feature of Klocwork is the static analysis tools, which help identify potential security threats and errors.
Its integration with the CI/CD pipeline has helped streamline the software development process.
It takes just half a day to set up.
The most valuable features of SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) include code inspection, addressing technical debt, and identifying security vulnerabilities.
I use SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) to check the quality of developer code and identify vulnerabilities.
It gives precise reports compared to Coverity and has a slightly lower number of false positives.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) | 4.2% |
Klocwork | 1.5% |
Other | 94.3% |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 12 |
Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
Large Enterprise | 12 |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 8 |
Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
Large Enterprise | 4 |
Klocwork detects security, safety, and reliability issues in real-time by using this static code analysis toolkit that works alongside developers, finding issues as early as possible, and integrates with teams, supporting continuous integration and actionable reporting.
SonarQube Cloud offers static code analysis and application security testing, seamlessly integrating into CI/CD pipelines. It's a vital tool for identifying vulnerabilities and ensuring code quality before deployment.
SonarQube Cloud is widely used for its ability to integrate with tools like GitHub, Jenkins, and Bitbucket, providing critical feedback at the pull request level. It's designed to help organizations maintain clean code by acting as a quality gate. This service supports development methodologies including sprints and Kanban for ongoing vulnerability management. While appreciated for its dashboard and integration capabilities, some users find initial setup challenging and note the need for enhanced documentation. The recent addition of mono reports and microservices support offers deeper insights into security and code quality, though container testing limitations and false positives are noted drawbacks. Manual intervention is sometimes required to address detailed reporting, with external tools being necessary for comprehensive analysis. Notifications for larger teams during serious issues and streamlined integration of new features are also areas of improvement.
What are the key features of SonarQube Cloud?In specific industries, SonarQube Cloud finds application in finance and healthcare where code integrity and security are paramount. It allows teams to identify critical vulnerabilities early and ensures that software development aligns with industry regulations and standards. By continuously analyzing code, it aids organizations in deploying secure and reliable applications, fostering trust and compliance.
We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.