Layer7 API Management and Microsoft Azure API Management compete in the API management category. Layer7 API Management seems to have an upper hand due to its robust security features and protocol translation capabilities, essential for enterprises with legacy integration needs, while Azure excels in integration within its ecosystem, making it favorable for Microsoft-centric environments.
Features: Layer7 API Management offers robust security with features like OAuth and content-based routing. It enables seamless protocol translation, crucial for legacy system integrations. Microsoft Azure API Management is well-integrated within the Azure ecosystem, providing easy setup, multifactor authentication, and Active Directory integration, making it ideal for existing Microsoft environment users.
Room for Improvement: Layer7 API Management needs to improve its developer portal and the overall user experience regarding API documentation and discovery. Microsoft Azure API Management could benefit from a simpler pricing model and better out-of-the-box integration with third-party platforms, alongside enhanced analytics capabilities.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Layer7 API Management provides deployment flexibility for on-premises and hybrid cloud setups but has noted initial deployment challenges. Its customer service is generally acceptable, though there could be improvements in response times. Microsoft Azure API Management is optimized for cloud deployment with responsive customer service, although more flexibility in meeting unique customer needs is desired.
Pricing and ROI: Layer7 API Management is cost-effective for large enterprises but potentially expensive for smaller entities due to high-availability setup costs, emphasizing the need for careful pricing negotiations. Microsoft Azure API Management offers competitive entry-level pricing; however, costs rise significantly with premium features and scaling. Both products demonstrate clear ROI, especially with enterprise-centric features, yet budgeting for initial costs and premium tiers require attention.
Proper configuration of the solution, implementation strategy and correct scaling tier selection are other factors that influence the ROI.
It helps connect all multi-environment applications to a single dashboard and give beautiful reports.
If I am working in AWS and with Azure, I see that Azure is much easier and helps save time while also being able to manage and deploy the API services.
Technical support is excellent, and I would rate them as ten.
The documentation from Microsoft helps our company to solve issues on our own.
The initial support engineers are often not qualified.
I logged an incident, and it was resolved promptly within three hours.
All nodes communicate with one primary database, affecting connections and causing crashes under high load.
I've worked with multiple tools from an observability perspective, such as Dynatrace, AppDynamics, Splunk, and Elasticsearch, and I find KQL and APIM amazing and filled with useful features.
It handles our current workload well, and I'm optimistic it can scale effectively as our needs grow.
There are no limitations to adding any number of devices.
Without rebooting for ninety to one hundred eighty days, cache builds up in Linux boxes, causing memory utilization issues.
I can't guarantee its stability or flexibility until all our databases and financial systems are integrated.
Microsoft Azure API Management is very stable.
With high scalability and availability, it supports many users and endpoints without significant issues.
Broadcom's push for upgrades from version nine to ten, ten to 10.3, and onwards to twelve needs improvement in migration processes, especially with service dependencies.
The service is extensive and expensive, and this added flexibility would make it more manageable and less prone to errors.
It's quite expensive, which could be a barrier for some users.
Documentations for the product should include examples of implementation.
Seeing other products makes the tool's pricing seem high.
It's an expensive solution.
However, once you scale up to your full volume, it'll be more expensive.
Microsoft Azure is an expensive solution not for the large enterprises but for medium and small.
The flexibility to develop APIs for various platforms, from front-end applications to ATM machines, is valuable.
The platform's most valuable features are its rule-based permissions and comprehensive API lifecycle management capabilities.
The ability to create a subscription model for APIs allows companies to monetize valuable data and share it securely.
The analytics phase of API Management is very beneficial for tracking API usage and identifying suspicious users.
Layer7 API Management is a comprehensive solution that enables organizations to securely expose, manage, and monetize their APIs.
It provides features such as API gateway, developer portal, analytics, and security to ensure seamless integration and control over API traffic.
With Layer7 API Management, businesses can streamline their API operations and drive innovation.
Microsoft Azure API Management is essential for managing APIs, facilitating integration, and ensuring secure internal and external communication.
Organizations leverage Microsoft Azure API Management for seamless integration and effective API management. It supports microservices, legacy modernization, and platform orchestration in sectors like healthcare, telecom, and finance. Features such as developer portals and centralized libraries simplify usage. While it showcases strengths in hybrid cloud support and scalability, improvements are suggested in versioning and multi-tenancy.
What key features does it offer?Microsoft Azure API Management aids modernization across healthcare, telecom, and financial services by enabling legacy system updates and facilitating smooth platform orchestration.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
