Logpoint vs Snare comparison

Logpoint and Intersect Alliance are both solutions in the Log Management category. Logpoint is ranked #28 with an average rating of 8.3, while Intersect Alliance is ranked #48. Logpoint holds a 1.0% mindshare in Log Management, compared to Intersect Alliance’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Logpoint users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Intersect Alliance users who would recommend it.

Logpoint

Read 24 Logpoint reviews

5,046 Views
2,119 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Snare

Read 3 Snare reviews

2,457 Views
1,769 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Logpoint

Snare

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Logpoint and Snare compete in the SIEM space. User reviews suggest Logpoint has an edge in pricing and support, while Snare excels in feature richness and value for cost.

Features:Logpoint is praised for its comprehensive security capabilities, ease of use, and integration features. Snare is valued for its robust performance in log collection and analysis, as well as its high level of customization. Users find Snare’s features more advanced, but some prefer Logpoint for its simplicity.

Room for Improvement:Users suggest Logpoint could improve with better reporting capabilities and more advanced analytics. Snare needs to streamline its configuration process and enhance its user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Logpoint users report a straightforward and quick deployment process, backed by responsive and supportive customer service. Snare’s deployment is noted to be more complex, with some experiencing challenges during setup, although customer service for Snare is well-regarded.

Pricing and ROI:Logpoint is viewed as cost-effective, offering solid ROI due to its lower setup costs and comprehensive support. Snare has a higher initial setup cost but delivers considerable ROI through its advanced feature set.

To learn more, read our detailed Logpoint vs. Snare Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Logpoint vs. Snare

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,747 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Logpoint

Ranking in Log Management

28th

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

30th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (15th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (36th), Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (18th)

Snare

Ranking in Log Management

48th

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

56th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Logpoint is 1.0%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Snare is 1.0%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Logpoint	1.0%
Snare	1.0%
Other	98.0%

Log Management

Featured Reviews

Rifat Hasan

System Engineer at Corporate Projukti Limited

Has lacked proper integration and consistent support communication

I selected Logpoint for the pricing as it is reasonable. I am located in Bangladesh, South Asia, Dhaka. I have tried to contact Exabeam by mail repeatedly, but there has been no response. My company, Corporate Projukti Limited, including my Bangladesh area head, technical director, and team manager, have sent emails to contact Exabeam solution, but there is no response. There is already a distributor in Bangladesh. The weakness with Logpoint is UEBA. UEBA is recommended, but not extra. Exabeam's UEBA is an extra feature. SOAR is extra, but Logpoint's product measurement is 40 or 50. There is a 10% difference with the UEBA and SOAR, so Logpoint is weak there. I would appreciate extra features in Logpoint such as SOAR. SOAR and UEBA are included features in Logpoint. Logpoint's UEBA is a weak point, while Exabeam's UEBA has extra AI through automation. Exabeam has a license included, and the extra license is an add-on. In Logpoint, it is included, which makes it a weak point.

Read full review

Frank Eargle

Information Security Engineer at Glasshouse Systems

A highly scalable solution that is easy to manage and super easy to set up

We use Snare for picking up Windows logs, and we used to use it for SQL as well. We had used it for Linux once or twice. We're mainly using it for Windows and Windows flat files The most valuable feature of Snare is flexibility or the ability to filter all things you don't want and don't have…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"In my experience with medium-sized operations, LogPoint's scalability is excellent, so I would rate it a ten out of ten."

"The integration is very user-friendly. There are not many CLI commands. Everything is directly accessible from the web interface."

"I would say that it's a good product; it's very stable, and the support is very good."

"The solution is user-friendly."

"The most valuable feature of LogPoint is that they have the SIEM and SOAR combined in one solution. They are not on a separate platform."

"The solution's most valuable aspect is the combination of the software and the support that they have."

"It is a good cost proposition, and it works extremely well and very fast."

"It is an AI technology because it is using machine learning technology. So far, there is nothing better out there for UEBA in terms of monitoring endpoints and user activity. It is using machine learning language, so it is right at the top. It provides that capability and monitors all the activities. It devises a baseline and monitors if there is any deviation from the baseline."

More Logpoint pros

"Snare has good agents, especially for Windows."

"The most valuable feature of Snare is flexibility or the ability to filter all things you don't want and don't have security value."

"The best thing about Snare is its format and consistency."

Cons

"Logpoint is not flexible. Its documentation is not user-friendly."

"One of the downsides is it is not a SaaS solution. It must be on-premises."

"They are not in the US market, and the quality of support has declined."

"I know that they have user behavior analytics, but it's an extra cost for this feature. It would be nice if it was in with the standard products."

"It is a good product, but its interface or GUI could be better."

"Our customers were not happy with firewalling and the endpoint antivirus."

"What could be improved in LogPoint is its UI because it's less friendly to users than LogRhythm. The UI could be more aesthetically appealing to users. It's completely outdated."

"One of the things we faced last year was that we had some memory issues with the server running. We were running them as virtual services, and we were facing some performance issues. Back then, there were some things that had already been solved at the end, but one of the small issues we had was that it was quite memory-consuming. After one upgrade that we did, we faced some performance issues."

More Logpoint cons

"Snare should modernize its GUI a little bit."

"Users will initially find it difficult to identify the event types and installation in Snare."

"The solution is now developing a SIEM-like feature on Snare Central Server, but it's not complete yet."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"My company used to pay for LogPoint costs annually. It's a cost-effective solution. I'm not part of the Finance team, though, so I'm not sure exactly what the licensing fee is or what license my company had."

"It has a fixed price, which is what I like about LogPoint. I bought the system and paid for it, and I pay maintenance. It is not a consumption model. Most SIEMs or most of the log management systems are consumption-based, which means that you pay for how many logs you have in the system. That's a real problem because logs can grow very quickly in different circumstances, and when you have a variable price model, you never know what you're going to pay. Splunk is notoriously expensive for that reason. If you use Splunk or QRadar, it becomes expensive because there are not just the logs; you also have to parse the logs and create indexes. Those indexes can be very expensive in terms of space. Therefore, if they charge you by this space, you can end up paying a significant amount of money. It can be more than what you expect to pay. I like the fact that LogPoint has a fixed cost. I know what I'm going to pay on a yearly basis. I pay that, and I pay the maintenance, and I just make it work."

"Logpoint's pricing is mid-ranged and depends on the number of devices."

"For a hundred user deployment the cost is about $10,000. The next year it would be the same because it's a subscription-based license. There are separate costs as well, for example, if a customer asks for training for their staff."

"It's less expensive than the competitors. The Logpoint marketing team is very accommodating and client-friendly. They offer very good reductions in price. They are pretty good in this aspect. They are transparent in their licensing and pricing."

"It was on a yearly basis at about $100K. It was not a huge environment. We were running it on our own virtual server environment, which, of course, had a cost. There was hardware and some energy cost, and then there were Microsoft Windows licenses for servers. That's all, but there was nothing in comparison to the licensing costs."

"LogPoint seemed like it was a good product, but it was expensive and there wasn't any room to move the pricing when customers needed a lower-costing solution."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I would rate LogPoint's pricing a seven. It is not very expensive compared to some of the more costly products, and it is not very cheap compared to some of the cheaper products in the SIEM market."

More Logpoint pricing and cost advice

"Snare has reasonable pricing."

"Snare is a cheap solution because a lot of customers are using it."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate Snare's pricing a four out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

15%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	18
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LogPoint?

I rate the pricing at eight, suggesting it's relatively good or affordable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with LogPoint?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for LogPoint?

I had experience with Logpoint before, and I contacted the Exabeam solution, but there was no response; they did not contact me. Bangladesh already has a Logpoint distributor. In terms of complianc...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

IBM Security QRadar vs Logpoint

Compared 8% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Logpoint

Compared 7% of the time

Elastic Security vs Logpoint

Compared 6% of the time

USM Anywhere vs Logpoint

Compared 3% of the time

Wazuh vs Logpoint

Compared 3% of the time

More Logpoint Competitors

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Snare

Compared 10% of the time

Elastic Security vs Snare

Compared 9% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs Snare

Compared 5% of the time

Cribl vs Snare

Compared 5% of the time

ClearSkies SaaS NG SIEM vs Snare

Compared 4% of the time

More Snare Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Logpoint

June 2026

Download Logpoint product report

Buyer's Guide

Log Management

June 2026

Download Snare product report

Overview

Logpoint offers a robust SIEM system tailored for compliance with regulations like PCI DSS and GDPR, enhancing security monitoring and enabling efficient incident response.

Logpoint strengthens cybersecurity by offering essential tools for log collection, security monitoring, and forensic analysis. Its features include an intuitive dashboard, a powerful correlation engine, and extensive third-party integrations, making it a versatile asset for security operations centers. Despite its advantages, areas for improvement include ransomware protection, cloud-native deployment, and more flexible pricing. Improvements in features like SOAR and UEBA functionality can boost its competitiveness.

What are the most important features of Logpoint?

Easy-to-use dashboard: Simplifies interaction with intuitive design.
Correlation engine: Connects data for in-depth security insights.
Comprehensive log collection: Facilitates extensive data gathering.
Third-party integrations: Connects seamlessly with other tools.
UEBA and SOAR components: Enhance threat response and automation.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Cost-effectiveness: Provides significant value for its pricing.
User-friendly interface: Enhances usability with straightforward design.
Compliance navigation: Eases PCI DSS and GDPR compliance.
Quick support service: Provides responsive customer assistance.

Many organizations utilize Logpoint across industries as part of their security infrastructure. It supports standard compliance, orchestrating incident responses and security threat monitoring. Logpoint empowers businesses by integrating and correlating security data, improving cybersecurity posture in varied environments.

Logpoint

Snare provides scalable log management solutions tailored for enterprises seeking efficient security and compliance. It collects logs from diverse environments, enabling real-time monitoring and response.

Snare is designed to facilitate seamless integration of log data to aid in security intelligence and policy adherence. It's versatile in capturing logs across platforms, offering organizations the ability to centralize monitoring efforts. With its robust analytics framework, businesses can detect anomalies and ensure regulatory compliance more effectively.

What are Snare’s most important features?

Centralized log management: Consolidates logs from various sources for comprehensive analysis.
Real-time monitoring: Allows immediate threat detection and response across networks.
Compliance reporting: Provides built-in templates to facilitate quick compliance checks.
Scalability: Supports growing data volumes with ease, ensuring performance consistency.
Cross-platform support: Enables integration with systems like Windows, Linux, and more.

What benefits should users seek in reviews?

Operational efficiency: Reduces time spent on manual log aggregation and analysis.
Enhanced threat detection: Improves security posture by identifying risks proactively.
Cost-effectiveness: Offers competitive pricing compared to traditional log solutions.
User-friendly configuration: Streamlines setup processes without extensive training.
Flexible deployment options: Allows adaptable implementation in cloud, on-premises, or hybrid environments.

In finance, Snare helps meet compliance standards by providing comprehensive audit trails. Retail sectors use it for detecting fraud while maintaining data integrity. Technology companies leverage its scalability to monitor expansive infrastructures effectively.

Intersect Alliance

Sample Customers

AP Pension, Copenhagen Airports, KMD, Terma, DISA, Danish Crown, Durham City Council, Game, TopDanmark, Lahti Energia, Energi Midt, Synoptik, Eissmann Group Automotive, Aligro, CG50...

Military, Defence and Security Agencies, Banking Finance and Insurance companies, Retail, Health and Utilities.

Buyer's Guide

Logpoint vs. Snare

June 2026

Free Report: Logpoint vs. Snare

Find out what your peers are saying about Logpoint vs. Snare and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Logpoint vs. Snare report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors and best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.