

ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus and Microsoft System Center Service Manager (SCSM) compete in the IT service management category. Based on the data, ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus appears to have the upper hand due to its ease of deployment, cost-effective pricing, and flexible integration capabilities.
Features: ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus offers integration with modules like asset management and project management, customizable SLAs, and a robust knowledge base. SCSM presents strong integration with Microsoft suites, offering seamless operations and a powerful CMDB, which users find beneficial. It excels in ticketing and reporting features.
Room for Improvement: SCSM needs enhancement in self-service portals, a mobile interface, and customization ease. Report creation could be simpler. ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus should aim to improve integration, expand customization options, and improve report intuitiveness. It also faces challenges with support ticket handling.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SCSM is mainly deployed on-premises and struggles with limited technical support. The Microsoft support response can be slow. ManageEngine provides flexibility with hybrid and public cloud deployment, offering a simpler deployment process, though their customer support responsiveness could improve.
Pricing and ROI: SCSM's pricing is complicated by bundled systems and add-ons, making it more expensive with potentially high ROI if fully utilized. In contrast, ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus offers a transparent, cost-effective licensing model with a reasonable ROI, allowing significant savings on manpower and efficient remote operations.
For example, previously incidents had to be resolved manually, requiring communication to respective teams via email, but now automatically generated tickets streamline this process while adhering to SLA times, ultimately saving resources.
ManageEngine has been particularly beneficial for small and medium-sized businesses in terms of value for money since they receive similar service at a lower cost compared to ServiceNow.
Their response time could be quicker.
The ManageEngine technical support team deserves a rating of ten out of ten because we receive up-to-date support.
They respond to emails based on time zone considerations.
Response times are slow, and engineers often lack the necessary product knowledge.
When we get up to Microsoft, I would rate it an eight or nine.
It is trickier to expand across endpoints with Help Desk.
Scaling ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus is easy, and I would rate its scalability as nine out of ten.
The tool is suitable for medium to large-scale operations and can be used effectively by mid-size companies.
From an admin point of view, Intune has more features and is easier to manage.
We have not experienced any significant issues.
We have not faced any stability issues or challenges with this tool.
ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus has shown stability with no downtime and no major issues identified thus far.
The SCSM is stable.
It would be beneficial to have an option to assign approvals to a user group or a variable.
There could be improvements in licensing flexibility, like the ability to use a single license for multiple users simultaneously.
They might consider creating a bundled ERP solution for all these tools where purchasing one license would enable access to all functionalities.
From an admin point of view, Intune has more features and is easier to manage compared to SCCM.
We have to always try to hire some maintenance hours from external companies to fix small things that maybe would be faster if we could get it in-house, but because of the lack of information, we lose a lot of time solving some small problems.
The cost of ManageEngine is more affordable, making it viable for small to medium-sized businesses.
The licensing is based on the number of technicians or analysts providing support as well as the number of IT assets, with no limitation on adding IT assets in ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus.
It is not as expensive as ServiceNow, which has a very high cost.
The best features ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus offers for my team include automating manual tasks, which allows whatever tasks we previously did manually to be converted into automatic tasks.
It provides a simpler and more intuitive interface for creating semi-automated use cases and managing problem solutions.
The automation capabilities are good, with the workflow being an integral part of it.
SCCM provides remote tool functionality, which is not in Intune.
If it is correctly configured, you can access and give service quickly to all the end users.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus | 3.6% |
| SCSM | 2.0% |
| Other | 94.4% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 32 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 24 |
| Large Enterprise | 19 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 8 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 14 |
ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus is an ITIL-compliant tool designed for IT help desk and incident management. It offers user-friendly ticketing, automation, and integration features, assisting businesses in effective IT service management.
ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus provides comprehensive solutions for ticketing, automation, and integration with third-party tools. Its features include project, change, and asset management, which are essential for streamlining IT operations. The intuitive interface supports both technical and non-technical users. The platform's reporting, SLA management, and CMDB functions significantly enhance business operations. Despite its strengths, there are areas for improvement, such as customization and integration capabilities. Users often seek better automation for active and asset management, enhanced search functionality, and improved security.
What are the key features of ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus?Industries implement ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus to address specific challenges such as IT help desk management and asset tracking. Companies use the platform to log incidents, automate workflows, and ensure compliance with ITIL standards, supporting effective management of daily operations, system auditing, and improved client interaction.
SCSM integrates with Microsoft tools, offering robust ticketing, incident management, and a scalable architecture. It automates orchestration tasks, provides comprehensive reporting, and enhances IT environments through SCCM integration, supporting various service management needs.
SCSM is known for integrating well with Microsoft suites and is valued for its ease of use and scalable design. Organizations utilize its capabilities for managing customer service, system deployments, and ticket handling. Its essential components include activity management, remote access, and comprehensive security updates. However, improvements are needed in areas such as integration with Azure and open-source tools, simplicity of the self-service portal, mobile support, and reporting complexity. Despite these challenges, many rely on SCSM for IT operations management, HR onboarding, and cloud functionality integration.
What are the most valuable features?SCSM finds application in industries ranging from IT service management to HR onboarding and system administration. Enterprises use it for remote assistance, device management, and patch management, while some leverage its cloud capabilities. This broadens the scope of how IT operations are supported and managed effectively in different settings.
We monitor all IT Service Management (ITSM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.