Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL] vs Recorded Future comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 16, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
8.2
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence offers cost-effective security, saving 62% on budgets and reducing analyst needs with comprehensive threat intel.
Sentiment score
6.1
Recorded Future offers valuable features like dark web monitoring, but its modular structure limits comprehensive coverage and financial returns.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.5
Microsoft Defender's customer service is mostly satisfactory, with excellent technical support, but some users experience delays and access issues.
Sentiment score
6.9
Recorded Future's customer service is efficient with varying user satisfaction due to agent limitations and irrelevant information requests.
Level two support is knowledgeable and knows how the product works, which is very good.
I would give Microsoft an eight for their technical support.
The customer support is frustrating and not efficient.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.4
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence is scalable, adaptable, and cloud-managed, providing seamless expansion for large organizations with positive user feedback.
Sentiment score
7.2
Recorded Future is praised for scalability and versatility, though some users have concerns about value and usage.
If there were some customizations available, I would rate its scalability as nine out of ten.
Being a SaaS, Recorded Future generally does a good job in terms of scalability.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.0
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence is stable and reliable, praised for high performance despite occasional regional outages.
Sentiment score
8.2
Recorded Future is highly reliable with a 99.7% uptime, minimal issues, and is rated nine out of ten for stability.
It provides a high level of security and avoids phishing and scam emails.
Recorded Future is very stable, with a rating of nine.
 

Room For Improvement

Microsoft Defender faces challenges with pricing, integration, AI enhancements, false positives, support, documentation, licensing, and compatibility improvements.
Recorded Future should automate processes, simplify its system, and enhance capabilities for better threat intelligence and user experience.
Providing code customization would help keep pace with new vulnerabilities and threats.
If Microsoft could direct critical messages regarding updates or vulnerabilities affecting users' environments, it would help users understand the importance of security updates.
From the telemetry data standpoint, I would prefer Defender data to be more open in future updates.
The Insikt Group covers a narrow range of areas, which doesn't reflect my needs.
 

Setup Cost

Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence pricing is bundled in Microsoft 365, seen as cost-effective but complex or pricey when standalone.
Recorded Future's high pricing, beneficial for large enterprises, poses a challenge for smaller companies due to its cost.
Recorded Future is expensive, with a personal rating of eight for cost.
 

Valuable Features

Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence integrates with Microsoft tools, offering real-time threat insights, seamless deployment, and advanced security features.
Recorded Future offers customized threat intelligence, integrating diverse data and dark web insights, enhancing security solution efficacy and user experience.
If it wasn't for that real-time threat detection on the vulnerability, I think we would not have survived the attack.
Our threat detection is enhanced due to the AI agents in Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence, which helps in detecting automatically.
One of the best features is that it provides a certain level of customization, allowing us to set our spam confidence levels.
Having a layer of intelligence within my SIEM that reflects in Recorded Future, and being able to enrich the data at my SIEM, offers various angles that I wouldn't be able to see without it.
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Defender Threat I...
Ranking in Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)
4th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
32
Ranking in other categories
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (10th), Microsoft Security Suite (16th)
Recorded Future
Ranking in Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)
2nd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
Digital Risk Protection (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) category, the mindshare of Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL] is 2.8%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Recorded Future is 14.6%, down from 19.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Recorded Future14.6%
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence2.8%
Other82.6%
Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)
 

Featured Reviews

Charles Mokoena - PeerSpot reviewer
Has strengthened our ability to detect threats in real time and improved internal security decision-making
The features that I find most valuable in Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence include the Sentinel part of it. There are several features we've looked at, including Sentinel as well as extended Defender, which is XDR. I've used those two, and that's what I've found quite useful for us, especially in the hardening and analysis part of the whole threat analysis. We use the real-time threat detection features in Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence. If it wasn't for that real-time threat detection on the vulnerability, I think we would not have survived the attack. The integration capabilities of Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence with other Microsoft security tools have benefited our organization's threat management process by initially being quite a challenge, especially coming from other security tools such as Fortinet and Check Point. However, once you've gotten used to it, it's quite easy and user-friendly. The dashboard, especially the threat analysis dashboard, is quite detailed in terms of providing a view of which areas in our environment need attention, making it quite useful.
Dr. Merrick Watchorn - PeerSpot reviewer
Traceless online searches, stable, and scalable
There is a semantic oncology dynamic relationship between how the MIGR Tech framework needs more data infusion enrichment capabilities. To be clear, what the vendor is doing is of a high standard, and my only critique is that they need to make new enhancements. I am aware that the vendor is making a concerted effort to add additional information to their repository, and it is something they actively do. The vendor has publicly stated that they will work on this, and I always pay attention to make sure they adhere to that. This does not change over time. The export feature of the recording needs to stop being so restricted. When they record in order to save themselves by operations, I would expect that as a super user, if I asked to download the dataset I'm looking for, I would not be limited in my data downloads. One of the cool things is, let's say we do our entire research and we want to save all of the materials that were returned, and that special custom search that we made, we can export that into a CSV file. The problem is it gets restricted. So sometimes when I say it's restricted, we don't get all the data that we saw online. So then we have to go and manually search for the specific thing we're looking for. I would like to have the URI and whatever value set that I search off, and for the NLP package to not be stripped out. It's like saying I want to do a Pcap analysis. Don't strip out the Pcap when I asked to see Pcap. That's what they're doing. They do this for many different reasons. One of them is, imagine if everyone downloaded datasets that are very large and it brings the whole system down.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) solutions are best for your needs.
870,697 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
13%
Educational Organization
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
13%
Government
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business16
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise15
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise9
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence?
It just runs in the background. I don't have to worry about, making sure it's Intelligence. So, you know, this kind of makes it very easy, have to worry about installing. It is easy to use.
What needs improvement with Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence?
From the telemetry data standpoint, I would prefer Defender data to be more open in future updates.
What is your primary use case for Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence?
We have tried Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence. I have expertise with Microsoft Defender products. I am not familiar with Microsoft Defender for IoT because we did not use that in our environ...
What do you like most about Recorded Future?
The most valuable feature of Recorded Future is how it detects everything regarding our domain.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Recorded Future?
I am not the person responsible for purchases, but it's known that Recorded Future is expensive, with a personal rating of eight for cost.
What needs improvement with Recorded Future?
Their research capabilities and the human aspect should be more effective. The Insikt Group covers a narrow range of areas, which doesn't reflect my needs. Their research should be wider and more i...
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Fujitsu, Regions, SITA, St. Jude Medical, Accenture, T-Mobile, TIAA, Intel Security, Armor, Alert Logic, NTT, Splunk
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence [EOL] vs. Recorded Future and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
870,697 professionals have used our research since 2012.