Recorded Future and ThreatConnect compete in the threat intelligence platform category. ThreatConnect seems to have the upper hand due to its robust automation and centralized threat management features, offering greater operational efficiency and a streamlined response.
Features: Recorded Future provides comprehensive data protection, customizable dashboards, and effective integration with existing infrastructures. Its alert system and anonymous search capabilities are particularly beneficial. ThreatConnect excels with its centralized threat library, advanced detection capabilities, and automated playbooks, supporting real-time data correlation and automation for streamlined responses.
Room for Improvement: Recorded Future faces challenges with complexity, high pricing, and false positives, suggesting a need for improved automation and algorithm accuracy. Data export limitations and user training are also areas for enhancement. ThreatConnect needs a simpler user interface and reduced complexity in playbook configurations, along with more accommodating pricing models for smaller organizations.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Recorded Future mainly operates on public cloud infrastructures, offering strong technical support, though occasionally criticized. ThreatConnect provides more flexibility with hybrid and on-premises deployment options and is well-regarded for its technical support, offering broader deployment adaptability.
Pricing and ROI: Recorded Future is expensive, particularly for smaller enterprises, due to its module-based pricing. However, it delivers strong ROI if utilized effectively. ThreatConnect is moderately priced but can be costly for single users. Its features and integration capabilities offer good value, though pricing can deter smaller teams. Both solutions require significant investment, with varying returns depending on user expertise and organizational application.
We have reduced manual analyst effort by thirty to forty percent.
Many ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) customers report saving more than fifty percent of analyst time previously spent on manual threat data processing.
This trust has led to an increase in sales because customers are confident we can protect their data.
The customer support is frustrating and not efficient.
The customer support team was responsive and knowledgeable, helping to resolve my issues efficiently and providing valuable assistance during onboarding and troubleshooting.
They have been responsive, knowledgeable, and helpful.
I just like their customer support because, within a short period of contacting them, they are able to help navigate issues.
Being a SaaS, Recorded Future generally does a good job in terms of scalability.
The platform handles increased volumes of threat data, large numbers of users, and expanded deployments across multiple offices without performance degradation.
ThreatConnect supports scalability by allowing us to identify threats and share information within our team networks.
Recorded Future is very stable, with a rating of nine.
The platform handles significant traffic while maintaining performance across cloud and on-premises deployments.
Sometimes, when using the solution, it slows down, affecting our ability to mitigate threats.
The Insikt Group covers a narrow range of areas, which doesn't reflect my needs.
The pricing is high for smaller organizations, so it would be beneficial to have tiered pricing.
ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) could be improved by simplifying the user interface to better fit day-to-day analyst workflow.
Improved pricing or tiered options could make it more accessible, especially for smaller organizations that do not require all enterprise features.
Recorded Future is expensive, with a personal rating of eight for cost.
Some clients reported that the entry cost started around six figures, depending on deployment, configuration, and support options chosen.
The pricing seems a bit high for smaller companies.
Generally, the pricing and setup cost are on the higher side.
Having a layer of intelligence within my SIEM that reflects in Recorded Future, and being able to enrich the data at my SIEM, offers various angles that I wouldn't be able to see without it.
The features are simple to use, and the interface is user-friendly, making it easy to navigate and apply the solutions.
ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) can ingest and normalize threat intelligence from various internal and external sources including OSINT feeds, commercial feeds, internal logs, and EDR tools, centralizing it in one place and enriching that data with context to make it more actionable.
The API-first architecture that enables us to perform custom integration with other products and real-time distribution.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Recorded Future | 7.7% |
| ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) | 3.7% |
| Other | 88.6% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 2 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 9 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 8 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 23 |
| Large Enterprise | 4 |
Recorded Future is a powerful and effective cyber threat intelligence (CTI) platform that aims to empower administrators to protect their organizations from threats, both known and unknown. The machine learning engine that Recorded Future utilizes can process the same amount of data that 9,000 analysts working five days a week, eight hours a day for an entire year can process. It simplifies threat detection and remediation so that organizations can focus on other tasks.
Recorded Future Benefits
Some of the ways that organizations can benefit by choosing to deploy Recorded Future include:
Recorded Future Features
Some of the many features Recorded Future offers include:
Reviews from Real Users
Recorded future is a solution that stands out when compared to its top competitors. Two major advantages it offers are the threat research tools that it provides and the threat monitoring capabilities that it enables users to leverage.
A security operations lead at a comms service provider writes, “Recorded Future covers a lot of different use cases. For example, we are using it for threat intelligence research. We do use the tool to make active research on what is found around the threat. We look at patterns, for example, and see what can be elaborated on from that.”
They also write, “We can also use it for active monitoring in the customer interface. We can monitor the business side of a campaign. We can monitor for specific threats or market activity on the dashboard. We can develop queries to run in a continuous mode in order to get the best reviews.”
ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform provides a comprehensive solution for operational threat intelligence. It effectively ingests and enriches data, aligning with intelligence requirements for seamless application across security operations.
ThreatConnect TIP stands out by integrating threat intelligence with orchestration for streamlined threat management. It simplifies the user experience with a customizable interface assisting security teams in operationalizing insights across multiple teams without disruption. The platform automates threat scoring and optimizes threat correlation and response, ensuring timely threat detection and protection. Collaboration with Polarity and Risk Quantifier accelerates actionable intelligence, while support and patch management enhance overall user experience. Although improvements in integration processes and training accessibility are necessary, the platform aggregates threat data for efficient threat mitigation.
What are the key features of ThreatConnect TIP?In industries focusing on security, ThreatConnect TIP supports teams in identifying and mitigating security threats through automation. Integrated with cybersecurity networks, it assists in endpoint protection, SOC management, and vulnerability management, being pivotal in threat investigation and intelligence dissemination.
We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
