Recorded Future and CrowdStrike Falcon both compete in the cybersecurity landscape, focusing on threat intelligence and endpoint protection respectively. CrowdStrike Falcon appears to have the upper hand due to its scalability and comprehensive endpoint protection.
Features: Recorded Future offers a comprehensive threat intelligence platform with detailed reports and dark web monitoring, and it allows users to customize dashboards for receiving actionable alerts. CrowdStrike Falcon is noted for real-time analysis and threat detection, providing reliable endpoint protection with features like behavioral-based detection and real-time visibility.
Room for Improvement: Recorded Future could enhance its automation and streamline data processes, reduce false positives, and simplify usage. CrowdStrike Falcon could improve integration with diverse security technologies, such as email security and legacy systems. Both need to address pricing and complexity, offering more straightforward packages.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Recorded Future receives praise for smooth deployment across public and private clouds and knowledgeable technical support. CrowdStrike Falcon also excels in customer support and offers flexible deployment with strong options for public, private, and hybrid cloud setups.
Pricing and ROI: Recorded Future targets large enterprises with high service costs, though users see significant ROI through its detailed reporting. CrowdStrike Falcon's competitive yet high pricing is justified by its robust feature set, offering good ROI through comprehensive endpoint protection and real-time threat response. Both solutions incur additional costs, elevating overall pricing.
CrowdStrike Falcon saves time and offers good value for money, especially for enterprise companies, because it can stop breaches.
It's very easy to deploy without many IT admins, saving time.
On a scale of one to ten, I would rate the technical support as a 10 because they resolve many issues for us.
The CrowdStrike team is very efficient; I would rate them ten out of ten.
They could improve by initiating calls for high-priority cases instead of just opening tickets.
The customer support is frustrating and not efficient.
It has adequate coverage and is easy to deploy.
In terms of scalability, I find CrowdStrike to be stable, and I have not encountered any limitations with it.
There's no scalability limitation from CrowdStrike itself, as it just requires agent deployment.
Being a SaaS, Recorded Future generally does a good job in terms of scalability.
I have never seen instability in the CrowdStrike tool.
We are following N-1 versions across our environment, which is stable.
The biggest issue occurred when every computer worldwide experienced a blue screen.
Recorded Future is very stable, with a rating of nine.
Simplifying the querying process, such as using double quote queries or directly obtaining logs based on IP addresses or usernames, would be beneficial.
Another concern is CrowdStrike's GUI. It changes annually, making it hard to work and find options.
Threat prevention should be their first priority.
The Insikt Group covers a narrow range of areas, which doesn't reflect my needs.
It is expensive compared to SentinelOne, but as the market leader, it is worth it.
The licensing cost and setup costs are affordable.
The solution is a bit expensive.
Recorded Future is expensive, with a personal rating of eight for cost.
I can investigate by accessing the customer's host based on the RTR environment and utilize host search to know details for the past seven days, including logins, processes, file installations, malicious processes, and network connections.
The real-time analytics aspect of CrowdStrike performs well because we get all logs in real-time, with no delay, allowing us to take action immediately.
Being an EDR solution, it helps us identify attacks in real-time.
Having a layer of intelligence within my SIEM that reflects in Recorded Future, and being able to enrich the data at my SIEM, offers various angles that I wouldn't be able to see without it.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
CrowdStrike Falcon | 7.9% |
Recorded Future | 14.6% |
Other | 77.5% |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 46 |
Midsize Enterprise | 34 |
Large Enterprise | 61 |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 2 |
Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
Large Enterprise | 9 |
CrowdStrike Falcon offers comprehensive endpoint protection with real-time threat detection, AI-driven capabilities, and seamless integration with other platforms. Its cloud-native design provides robust security across diverse environments, making it a reliable choice for modern cybersecurity needs.
CrowdStrike Falcon is heralded for features like robust endpoint visibility, threat detection, and AI-driven capabilities. Users value its efficient real-time monitoring, which maintains low impact on performance while offering seamless integration with platforms. The lightweight design, coupled with comprehensive dashboards and automated threat responses, enhances security operations while reducing resource strain. CrowdStrike's cloud-native architecture ensures flexible, always-on protection, making it adaptable to a wide range of environments. However, improvements can be made in log management, compatibility with diverse operating systems, and integration with third-party technologies. Users also seek more robust reporting features, fewer false positives, and better support for legacy systems. Enhanced policy application, AI capabilities, and extended on-demand scanning are desired, while pricing and technical support responsiveness are concerns.
What are CrowdStrike Falcon's key features?CrowdStrike Falcon is implemented widely in industries relying on robust endpoint protection for monitoring, securing endpoints, forensic analysis, and malware detection. Its cloud-based AI capabilities ensure comprehensive security across devices, making it a preferred choice for networks, servers, and workstations globally. The efficient management of security threats and compliance with regulations is achieved with minimal resource consumption.
Recorded Future is a powerful and effective cyber threat intelligence (CTI) platform that aims to empower administrators to protect their organizations from threats, both known and unknown. The machine learning engine that Recorded Future utilizes can process the same amount of data that 9,000 analysts working five days a week, eight hours a day for an entire year can process. It simplifies threat detection and remediation so that organizations can focus on other tasks.
Recorded Future Benefits
Some of the ways that organizations can benefit by choosing to deploy Recorded Future include:
Recorded Future Features
Some of the many features Recorded Future offers include:
Reviews from Real Users
Recorded future is a solution that stands out when compared to its top competitors. Two major advantages it offers are the threat research tools that it provides and the threat monitoring capabilities that it enables users to leverage.
A security operations lead at a comms service provider writes, “Recorded Future covers a lot of different use cases. For example, we are using it for threat intelligence research. We do use the tool to make active research on what is found around the threat. We look at patterns, for example, and see what can be elaborated on from that.”
They also write, “We can also use it for active monitoring in the customer interface. We can monitor the business side of a campaign. We can monitor for specific threats or market activity on the dashboard. We can develop queries to run in a continuous mode in order to get the best reviews.”
We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.