

Vulcan Cyber and Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management are competitors in the cybersecurity space, focusing on vulnerability management. Vulcan Cyber seems to have an edge in customer support and pricing, while Microsoft Defender stands out for its integrated features that enhance value through integration within Microsoft environments.
Features: Vulcan Cyber features comprehensive vulnerability remediation capabilities, extensive integrations, and automation for streamlined threat management. Microsoft Defender focuses on robust integration with Microsoft ecosystems, strong threat detection, and integration capabilities.
Room for Improvement: Vulcan Cyber could enhance its integration with non-common environments, simplify user interface navigation, and expand reporting features. Microsoft Defender might improve on broader third-party compatibility, flexibility for non-Microsoft environments, and user-friendly customization options.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Vulcan Cyber provides flexible deployment for diverse environments and is known for responsive customer service. Microsoft Defender benefits from simple deployment in Microsoft-centric environments, utilizing existing Microsoft support channels.
Pricing and ROI: Vulcan Cyber is cost-effective, focusing on delivering rapid ROI through efficient vulnerability management. Microsoft Defender has higher setup costs but offers value for enterprises using Microsoft solutions, resulting in favorable ROI.
Organizations typically do not rely solely on Microsoft products to avoid putting all eggs in one basket, which presents a challenge for maximizing ROI.
As a Microsoft partner, we receive significant discounts, making the solution affordable for us.
With our vulnerability management platform, I used to get reports weekly, but with Vulcan Cyber, I get them daily.
Our security team probably spends 15 minutes instead of two hours daily notifying the teams.
They are sometimes responsive, however, often issues cannot be reproduced on their end, making it challenging.
The support we receive from Microsoft is declining, and for example, after taking advanced support, we have not received satisfactory answers.
They are familiar with Microsoft products but are not direct Microsoft staff, which is an area needing improvement.
We do not necessarily have visibility of when those feature requests are going into the development pipeline.
It would enhance my experience if Vulcan informed customers of forthcoming maintenance or changes that might cause website downtime.
Their technical support team is very good, knowledgeable, and helpful.
The integration is straightforward for those who understand it, though documentation needs improvement.
It is scalable; I evaluated the product and decided to use Defender on over 700 of our company servers.
We have a lot of assets under management, and it effectively scales up to accommodate hundreds or even thousands of assets.
I'd rate the scalability ten out of ten.
I would rate it ten out of ten for scalability, as integration with multiple connectors is possible without exceeding licensing limits.
There are compatibility issues occasionally arising with false positives when other security tools are not whitelisted in Microsoft Defender.
It is very resource-intensive, consuming a lot of memory and CPU.
If Microsoft experiences downtime, this solution goes down as it is a SaaS-based solution where we have no control.
It would be better if Vulcan notified me, the customer, about upcoming maintenance or changes, indicating when the website might be down.
The product's stability is commendable, with no noticeable lags or slowness.
I would rate it a nine out of ten in terms of stability.
This scoring should be for specific industries as well. If I belong to the healthcare industry using Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, it should provide me with a risk score and show how I fare against the risk score of my industry.
A vulnerability I patch within 15 minutes takes 24 additional hours for an update.
The product is not stable; it often uses excessive memory and CPU, which makes it slow.
It would be beneficial if the platform allowed remote access to devices for immediate remedies.
Providing real-world examples of how to construct a ticket format for Jira, Azure DevOps, or ServiceNow with specific examples would help us understand how it might work in our environment.
Having it more customized or providing more customization options for me would be beneficial.
Overall, every organization wishes for cheaper options, but we look at the security side as well, so we are good for now.
For non-partners, however, the cost could be seen as higher, between seven to ten.
The pricing is reasonable, and it's included in the whole Microsoft E5 bundle, so it's all-inclusive.
For our use case, the solution is lacking some features, and the cost savings don't make it worth it.
The main advantage of Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is that it can locate and prevent most threats even when the endpoints are not connected to the corporate network, as long as the internet is available.
The feature for customizing to region-specific and domain-specific requirements in healthcare is particularly beneficial.
The most valuable aspect is the kind of assessment results I get, and the recommendations provided in Microsoft products really help in taking care of the resources.
It offers a comprehensive view of the assets and their associated vulnerabilities, which aids in assessing and mitigating threats.
The automation capabilities using the Vulcan API platform or the API feature allow me to easily automate scripts and reports and schedule them.
Instead of having 100 vulnerabilities and not knowing how to prioritize and assign all your FTEs there, you now have only ten that you know you need to fix, and you're assigning the right number of FTEs.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management | 2.3% |
| Vulcan Cyber | 0.6% |
| Other | 97.1% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 10 |
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management enables organizations to identify vulnerabilities, manage patches, and fortify threat detection. It offers endpoint assessments, cloud incident management, and dynamic security through Microsoft's Security Scorecard integration.
Organizations leverage Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management for advanced threat detection and response. It provides robust tools for vulnerability assessment and cloud incident management, integrated with Microsoft's Security Scorecard to enhance dynamic security profiling. Key features include automatic patch deployment, security configuration management, and seamless integration with Microsoft platforms, benefiting both on-prem and cloud environments. Organizations can track vulnerabilities with severity-based reports, helping manage outdated software and minimizing threat exposure.
What are the key features of Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management?In healthcare, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management helps manage compliance with health regulations, while in finance, it aids in securing sensitive data from cyber threats. Manufacturing sectors benefit from its patch management, keeping operational technology systems less vulnerable to disruptions.
Vulcan Cyber is used by leading cyber security organizations to manage exposure risk created by unmitigated infrastructure, application, code and cloud vulnerabilities.
The Vulcan Cyber ExposureOS starts by correlating and normalizing risk and asset data aggregated from hundreds of vulnerability scanners, asset repositories and threat intelligence feeds. These signals are then used to create a singular view of your organization's attack surfaces to make exposure risk and vulnerability prioritization accurate and actionable.
Vulcan Cyber ExposureOS reduces mean time to remediation by fostering efficient collaboration among security teams, asset and remediation owners through orchestrated workflows and automated remediation tasks.
Use Vulcan Cyber to measure security posture improvement, efficacy of vulnerability risk mitigation campaigns, and compliance with SLAs and regulatory frameworks such as PCI DSS, DORA, NIS2 and HIPPA.
Vulcan Cyber is the only vulnerability risk management solution provider to be named a "Leader" in both the Forrester Wave and Omdia Universe evaluations in 2023.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.