

PostgreSQL and MongoDB Enterprise Advanced are competitors in the database solutions category. PostgreSQL may have the upper hand due to its feature-rich offerings and cost-effectiveness, although MongoDB offers strengths in flexibility and ease of scaling.
Features: PostgreSQL is known for ACID compliance, SQL standards support, and robust indexing capabilities. It effectively handles complex queries and offers comprehensive documentation. MongoDB Enterprise Advanced features flexible schema design, a JSON-like document structure, and ease of horizontal scaling. It also has advanced security measures and real-time analytics.
Room for Improvement: PostgreSQL can improve on backend storage engines and efficiency in read-only and COUNT(*) queries. It also needs better partitioning and enhanced documentation. MongoDB could enhance its indexing and transactional support, particularly with complex joins and ensuring better security features. Improvements in integration and support affordability are also needed.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: PostgreSQL is utilized across on-premises and cloud environments and supported by a large community but lacks formal customer service. MongoDB Enterprise Advanced works well in both setups and offers robust enterprise support, although specific areas for customer service improvement have been noted.
Pricing and ROI: PostgreSQL is favored for its open-source, zero-cost licensing, offering excellent ROI for small to medium-sized businesses utilizing in-house expertise. MongoDB provides a free community edition and reasonably priced enterprise licenses, viewed as cost-effective by many users, although some find it comparatively expensive. Both solutions offer satisfactory ROI, with PostgreSQL's open-source nature providing immediate cost benefits.
Actually, with MongoDB, it's difficult to calculate the return on investment; it's too expensive for our use.
I would say we see value in money and return on investment with MongoDB Enterprise Advanced.
We have received fairly good support whenever we reached out to the technical teams; they were prompt.
I think they resolved it, but it was very long.
If PostgreSQL is hosted on cloud services such as Amazon RDS or Google Cloud SQL, the support is handled by the cloud provider, who provides automated backups, monitoring, infrastructure management, and technical support tickets.
Overall, we have a very small customer service team and a good engineering team with no overburden or bandwidth issues.
In CosmoDB, the scalability is much better than with the MongoDB ReplicaSet models.
MongoDB is highly scalable.
Overall, on a scale of one to ten, I would rate MongoDB an eight; it's mostly because we're still running a monolithic environment on old hardware, so there are some limitations with read-write access.
Now, we are doing the same level of transactions in PostgreSQL, around 100,000 transactions, and we are getting good throughput with no latency.
It's pretty much stable; we have not faced any major challenges or difficulties with MongoDB Enterprise Advanced.
I have never seen any performance issue in PostgreSQL.
While solutions for other databases like SQL or PostgreSQL already exist, MongoDB requires additional integrations for developing AI solutions.
We have not contracted the security options in our contract because they're too expensive; thus, we implement just encrypted databases and not the security pack.
From the AWS standpoint, if robust integration and data warehouse integration specific tools are added in the advanced suite, that would definitely be helpful.
Query optimization improves slow queries by using proper indexes, avoiding unnecessary joins, and using EXPLAIN ANALYZE to inspect query plans.
If I need to increase the dimension to 3,000 or 5,000, that option should be available.
We use the free version of MongoDB, so there are no licensing costs.
We have to pay approximately 2,000 euros per month for MongoDB.
For a small company, the cost of MongoDB Enterprise Advanced is reasonable, but for heavy data usage, we see a little bit of cost pressure but it's acceptable.
Even with doing 100,000 transactions right now within PostgreSQL, we are happy with PostgreSQL and not seeing that it is expensive or going out of budget.
It offers flexibility in schema adaptation, allowing us to change the schema and add new data points.
In ReplicaSet, it's acceptable, but if your workload needs more performance, and you must pass to a Sharding model, it becomes complicated in MongoDB; in Cosmos DB, however, it's simple.
MongoDB has definitely helped us improve our network monitoring and reporting dashboard.
PostgreSQL improves reliability, performance, and scalability in production. Since it is ACID compliant, it ensures that database transactions are safe and consistent, preventing partial data updates, maintaining data integrity, and allowing multiple users to read or write data simultaneously using MVCC.
The best feature is performance, because of which I decided on PostgreSQL.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| PostgreSQL | 13.3% |
| MongoDB Enterprise Advanced | 5.9% |
| Other | 80.8% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 36 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 39 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 57 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 27 |
| Large Enterprise | 47 |
MongoDB Enterprise Advanced is a comprehensive platform renowned for its scalability, user-friendliness, and high performance, underpinned by its flexible document-based storage and open-source model. JSON compatibility, clustering, and security elevate its standing among professionals.
The platform facilitates efficient data management through developer-friendly tools and a strong aggregation framework. MongoDB’s no-schema requirement, supported by community expertise, underlines its adaptability. While its sharding capabilities and affordably support large data volumes, there are aspects such as security enhancement and enterprise tool integration that need attention. Indexing and query optimization pose challenges, alongside high costs. Improvements in analytics and UI could advance its infrastructure further.
What are the key features of MongoDB Enterprise Advanced?Industries leverage MongoDB Enterprise Advanced for significant roles in data storage within IoT platforms, healthcare apps, public service monitoring, and big data analytics. Companies in logistics and telecommunications find it instrumental for business process management and video content management, benefiting from its seamless integration and unstructured data support.
PostgreSQL is a versatile and reliable database management system commonly used for web development, data analysis, and building scalable databases.
It offers advanced features like indexing, replication, and transaction management. Users appreciate its flexibility, performance, and ability to handle large amounts of data efficiently. Its robustness, scalability, and support for complex queries make it highly valuable.
Additionally, PostgreSQL's extensibility, flexibility, community support, and frequent updates contribute to its ongoing improvement and stability.
We monitor all Open Source Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.