Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud comparison

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP and NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud are both solutions in the Cloud Migration category. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is ranked #1 with an average rating of 9.0, while NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud is ranked #18. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP holds a 14.9% mindshare in CM, compared to NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud users who would recommend it.
NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP
Read 62 NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP reviews
  • 1,095 Views
  • 582 Comparison Views
95% willing to recommend
NetApp Cloud Volumes Servic...
Read 3 NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud reviews
  • 173 Views
  • 16 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 17, 2024

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP and NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud compete in the cloud storage solutions category. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP stands out due to its flexibility and performance, while NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud is favored for its seamless integration and support.

Features: NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is praised for its efficient data management, backup capabilities, and versatility in various cloud environments. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud receives positive feedback for its automatic scaling, native integration with Google Cloud services, and efficient data management.

Room for Improvement: Users suggest that NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP could improve initial setup complexity, cost predictability, and provide better user documentation. For NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud, users recommend enhancing documentation, offering more detailed cost analytics, and improving data migration tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is noted for its complex but highly customizable deployment, supported by attentive customer service. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud is highlighted for its straightforward deployment and strong integration with Google Cloud's customer support.

Pricing and ROI: NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP users mention higher initial setup costs but value its long-term ROI and cost-efficiency in multi-cloud setups. Users of NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud find it offers competitive pricing and satisfactory ROI through Google's pay-as-you-go model.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud Report (Updated: May 2025).
Buyer's Guide
NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud
May 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 860,168 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP
Ranking in Cloud Migration
1st
Ranking in Cloud Storage
2nd
Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services
7th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
62
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Backup (14th), Cloud Software Defined Storage (1st)
NetApp Cloud Volumes Servic...
Ranking in Cloud Migration
18th
Ranking in Cloud Storage
18th
Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services
19th
Average Rating
9.4
Reviews Sentiment
8.4
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Cloud Migration category, the mindshare of NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is 14.9%, down from 18.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud is 1.6%, down from 2.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cloud Migration
 

Featured Reviews

Pramod-Talekar - PeerSpot reviewer
Allows customers to manage SAN and NAS data within a single storage solution
The tool's most valuable features are the SnapLock and SnapMirror features. If something goes wrong with the data, we can restore it. This isn't a mirror; we store data in different locations. If there's an issue on the primary site, we can retrieve data from the secondary site. Multiprotocol support in NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is beneficial because it allows customers to manage SAN and NAS data within a single storage solution. This feature eliminates the need to purchase different types of storage.
Read full review
CC
Enables us to fine-tune storage and capacity on the fly as our needs grow or shrink over time
NetApp delivers High Availability. It's critical to our work. That was the main driver for using NetApp. We have a highly resilient service and if you have a highly resilient service, you are only as resilient as the least resilient part of your infrastructure. That's what we were having trouble with our file system before. It was becoming troublesome, so we needed to find something that was much more highly resilient so that's why we moved to NetApp. The complexity of moving large numbers of files to the cloud depends on what you're trying to do. But for us, it was really simple. I imagine for large enterprise customers it is probably pretty tricky. They're probably on all different technologies inside a large corporation and they may or may not have very large pipes going to them. So if you're in a data center to the cloud then it's going to be easy, but if you have hundreds of branches like if you're a bank and have lots of branch banks, they might have very small pipes out to the internet. It might take forever. In our use case everything's brand new files, so it was pretty trivial. We didn't migrate to the cloud, we were already on the cloud, so it was a nonissue for us. NetApp enables us to share data across VMs. It actually reduced the amount of data storage we need. We were having to have storage attached to each VM. And now we can aggregate that storage across multiple VMs, so that actually gave us a net reduction, which was a good thing. We switched from using block storage to file storage to share data between our VMs. It made it easier, frankly but I worry about the scalability in the future. For the moment it made life easier. We were using block and then we moved back to file with NetApp.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It is much easier to control data since we can run queries across all our platforms with just one solution. Not only that, we can also monitor all the platforms with Active IQ, where we can see all the alerts, messages, and space consumption through a single application. This is regardless if the data is on-prem or AWS. It is much more efficient."
"The solution’s Snapshot copies and thin clones in terms of operational recovery are the best thing since sliced bread. Rollback is super easy. It's just simple, and it works. It's very efficient."
"We're able to use the SnapMirror function and SnapMirror data from our on-prem environment into Azure. That is super-helpful. SnapMirror allows you to take data that exists on one NetApp, on a physical NetApp storage platform, and copy it over to another NetApp storage platform. It's a solid, proven technology, so we don't worry about whether data is getting lost or corrupted during the SnapMirror."
"The most valuable features of this solution are SnapShot, FlexClone, and deduplication."
"This solution has made everything easier to do."
"So a lot of these licenses are at the rate that is required for capacity. So they're they're able to reduce the license consumption and also the consumption of the underlying cloud storage."
"For us, the value comes from the solution's flexibility, speed, and hopefully cost savings in the long term."
"ONTAP has been very stable for us, specifically in the cloud environment. It allows us to have high availability as well as standalone systems if that's what we want within our specific workloads. Also, on-premise has been a very stable environment. We have very few outages and when we do, we work with support to get systems back online in a timely manner."
More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP pros
"High availability is very important to us because we have a production environment. High availability is the highest priority for us to continue keeping our systems running."
"Storage was taking up maybe 10 to 20% of my life at the startup, and now it takes up zero. I was personally running all the infrastructure for the company. Now that we've moved to NetApp, I don't have to worry about making sure it's up and running. It's made my life personally much better."
"In terms of its storage snapshot efficiencies, the service is highly efficient. We are only doing things in small batches right now because we have not converted all of the data, but we have tested them in the Google Cloud and they work efficiently."
 

Cons

"NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP needs to have customizable pricing options such as 10 TB increments. They seem to have only two options: 10 TB or 250 TB."
"I would like to see better integration with Active IQ."
"Something we would like to see is the ability to better manage the setup and tie it to our configuration management database. We manage our whole IT infrastructure out of that database."
"We would like to have support for high availability in multi-regions."
"I'm very happy with the solution, the only thing that needs improvement is the web services API. It could be a little bit more straightforward. That's my only issue with it. It can get pretty complex."
"The product is more restricted with underlying cloud."
"We are getting a warning alert about not being able to connect to Cloud Manager when we log into it. The support has provided links, but this particular issue is not fixed yet."
"The solution could be better when we're connecting to our S3 side of the house. Right now, it doesn't see it, and I'm not sure why."
More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP cons
"I would like for the sales team to get in contact more often and let me know what I should be doing next, what we should be doing about new features. So it would be nice if I heard a little bit more from him. From a technology perspective, I have no complaints."
"It would help if they increased the area in which they employ artificial intelligence, by starting to do assessments on the environments, to project those. They're not using any AI tools, currently, on the administrative side."
"The user interface has room for improvement. We would like this service to be more integrated with Azure, which is very easy to manage and use. It was easy to create volumes and add capacity pools in Azure, but in Google Cloud, we can only create separate volumes. We need more management or configuration options in the user interface."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our licensing is based on a yearly subscription. That is an additional cost, but because of the storage efficiencies that the NetApp gives, even with the additional cost of the NetApp license, you still end up saving money versus straight Azure native for storage. It's definitely worth it."
"It is expensive. There are no costs in addition to their standard licensing fees."
"Cloud is cloud. It's still expensive. Any good solution comes with a price tag. That's where we are looking to see how well we can manage our data in the cloud by trying to optimize the costs."
"They have a very good price which keeps our customers happy."
"Compared to other storage vendors, NetApp, is not always able to compete with their pricing. Yet, we acknowledge the ease of use ONTAP brings with the AWS integration."
"The standard pricing is online. Pricing depends. If you're using the PayGo model, then it's just the normal costs on the Microsoft page. If you're using Bring Your Own License, which is what we're doing, then you get with your sales contact at NetApp and start figuring out what price is the best, in the end, for your company."
"The AWS consumer-based pricing model makes it easy for developers to use their credit cards to spin up virtual servers immediately."
"The solution's pricing is reasonable."
More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP pricing and cost advice
"We don't need so much space, and there is no option to pay as we go or use just what we need. Also, the only way to increase performance is by increasing the level of the service."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Migration solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
29%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Educational Organization
31%
Manufacturing Company
18%
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
14%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP?
So a lot of these licenses are at the rate that is required for capacity. So they're they're able to reduce the license consumption and also the consumption of the underlying cloud storage.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP?
The solution's pricing is reasonable.
See all answers
What needs improvement with NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP?
NetApp's support could improve.
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

Azure NetApp Files vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Logo
Azure NetApp Files vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP
Compared 18% of the time
Amazon S3 vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Logo
Amazon S3 vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP
Compared 12% of the time
Red Hat Ceph Storage vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Logo
Red Hat Ceph Storage vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP
Compared 10% of the time
Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Logo
Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP
Compared 9% of the time
Portworx Enterprise vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Logo
Portworx Enterprise vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP
Compared 6% of the time
More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Competitors
Google Cloud Storage vs NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud Logo
Google Cloud Storage vs NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud
Compared 32% of the time
Amazon FSx vs NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud Logo
Amazon FSx vs NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud
Compared 29% of the time
More NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP
June 2025
NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP reportDownload NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP product report
Buyer's Guide
NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud
June 2025
NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud reportDownload NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud product report
 

Also Known As

ONTAP Cloud, CVO, NetApp CVO
CVS for Google Cloud, NetApp CVS for Google Cloud, Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud, Cloud Volumes Service for GCP, NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for GCP
 

Overview

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is an efficient storage management solution for managing and storing data in the cloud. It offers seamless integration with cloud providers, advanced data replication capabilities, and high data protection. With reliable performance, it is ideal for industries like healthcare and finance.

NetApp

NetApp® Cloud Volumes for Google Cloud is a fully managed or self-managed file service that is integrated into Google Cloud with the multiprotocol support, performance, and availability required to run business-critical applications. It is designed to provide massively parallel shared access to thousands of Google Compute Engine and Google Kubernetes Engine instances, enabling your applications to achieve high levels of aggregate throughput and IOPS with consistent low latencies.

Use cases. Customers can use the service to migrate existing enterprise applications to Google Cloud. Other use cases include hybrid deployments, multicloud mobility, big data analytics, web serving and content management, application development and testing, media and entertainment workflows, database backups, container storage, and more.

Features. Multiple performance tiers, standard file interfaces, advanced data management, metered service, fully managed service, native service experience, integrated support, and integrated billing.

For more information:

NetApp: https://cloud.netapp.com/cloud-volumes-service-for-gcp

Google: https://cloud.google.com/netapp

NetApp
 

Sample Customers

1. Accenture 2. Acer 3. Adidas 4. Aetna 5. AIG 6. Apple 7. Bank of America 8. Barclays 9. Bayer 10. Berkshire Hathaway 11. BNP Paribas 12. Cisco 13. Coca-Cola 14. Comcast 15.ConocoPhillips 16. CVS Health 17. Dell 18. Deutsche Bank 19. eBay 20. Eli Lilly 21. FedEx 22. Ford 23. Freescale Semiconductor 24. General Electric 25. Google 26. Honeywell 27. IBM 28. Intel 29. Intuit 30. JPMorgan Chase 31. Kellogg's 32. KeyCorp 33. Liberty Mutual 34. L'Oréal 35. Mastercard
Atos, Bandwidth, Wuxi NextCode
Buyer's Guide
NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud
May 2025
Free Report: NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud and other solutions. Updated: May 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud report.
See our list of best Cloud Migration vendors, best Cloud Storage vendors, and best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Migration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.