New Relic vs OpenText Real User Monitoring comparison

New Relic and OpenText are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. New Relic is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.2, while OpenText is ranked #36 with an average rating of 7.7. New Relic holds a 3.8% mindshare in APM, compared to OpenText’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of New Relic users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 58% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

New Relic

Read 174 New Relic reviews

18,652 Views
13,056 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

OpenText Real User Monitoring

Read 11 OpenText Real User Monitoring reviews

1,991 Views
1,891 Comparison Views

58% willing to recommend

New Relic

OpenText Real User Monitoring

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

OpenText Real User Monitoring and New Relic both compete in the real user monitoring category. New Relic seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive features and perceived value for the price.

What features are offered by OpenText Real User Monitoring in comparison to New Relic?

OpenText Real User Monitoring offers detailed analytics, ease of integration, and customization options with actionable insights. New Relic features extensive performance monitoring capabilities, real-time data processing, and intuitive alert systems.

What areas of improvement can be found in OpenText Real User Monitoring in comparison to New Relic?

OpenText Real User Monitoring users suggest improvements in reporting functionalities, dashboard interfaces, and faster data refresh rates. New Relic users seek better documentation, simpler setup processes, and enhanced customer support.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of OpenText Real User Monitoring in comparison to New Relic?

OpenText Real User Monitoring is straightforward to deploy with responsive support. New Relic has comprehensive support documentation and robust customer service, though some users experience initial complexities.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with OpenText Real User Monitoring in comparison to New Relic?

OpenText Real User Monitoring is valued for competitive pricing and cost-effectiveness in achieving ROI. New Relic, priced higher, justifies its cost through superior features and reliability, driving significant ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed New Relic vs. OpenText Real User Monitoring Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

New Relic vs. OpenText Real User Monitoring

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 895,399 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

New Relic

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

4th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

174

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (9th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (9th), IT Operations Analytics (3rd), Mobile APM (3rd), Cloud Monitoring Software (3rd), AIOps (4th)

OpenText Real User Monitoring

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

36th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of New Relic is 3.8%, down from 6.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Real User Monitoring is 0.9%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
New Relic	3.8%
OpenText Real User Monitoring	0.9%
Other	95.3%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

BasilJiji

System engineer at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

Real-time alerts have reduced server outage impact and support fast incident response

In the dashboard, if they could show a little more metrics regarding the application and related things, that would be how New Relic could be improved. Currently, there are things showing from the server level and application level, but it can be improved. That is what I felt. Regarding user interface, I do not feel much concern, but for some kind of issues when we are trying to get support from the New Relic team, their SLA seems to be long. They are taking seven to ten working days for resolving some kind of scenario or issue. That is a bit difficult for us. If they could improve the customer support by reducing their SLA within three to five days, if they could remediate everything, that will be so much helpful. When it comes to the customer support part, I felt they need to be a little more improved on that part. The support overall is good, but they can improve. That is the reason I have given it eight out of ten.

Read full review

Yasir Amin

Sr. Solution Architect, Project Manager at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

User-level monitoring with near-real-time analytics boosts service availability

The use case is about user-level monitoring and the availability of a service for a user. It's about whether the service is available, its performance, and the type of errors a user is receiving, from a user perspective The functions that Real User Monitor is intended for, which is to provide the…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This is a really awesome tool, giving you in and out of your entire backend framework in a cohesive manner."

"We were able to integrate with the messaging tool, Slack, which meant that we got notifications whenever something was not quite right."

"To receive all the metrics for each system regarding its application, the user in the interface for all the dashboards can type the hostname and can see all the tools in that host, it is a very powerful view."

"They instrument up from the bottom to the top – every piece of code - they have a very perfect read of what’s being done, and how long it’s taking."

"It has helped us maintain a much higher uptime than we had previously."

"Its most valuable feature is application performance monitoring, as it gives me a complete x-ray of the application to understand where the bottlenecks are, then improve and fix issues."

"New Relic has positively impacted my organization by helping with our observability goals."

"We like the performance of the product."

More New Relic pros

"If you have an old-fashioned infrastructure with data center servers then this is a good solution for you."

"With the solution, you can easily access any issues in your infrastructure."

"The most valuable feature is application performance monitoring."

"This solution is very reliable; it's stable."

"Real User Monitoring tools help proactively identify problems before they become critical by monitoring thresholds. There is a threshold and an SOA threshold."

"Very easy to implement."

"It offers near-real-time analytics, which is helpful."

"The Micro Focus technical support is quite good."

More OpenText Real User Monitoring pros

Cons

"It is very difficult to award the service level cycles at an endpoint level."

"However, there could be problems or hiccups with the integration with Java-based services and microservices."

"The solution should include more detailed reports for SQL database requests."

"When you look at disk monitoring, it would be cool to see which folders are gobbling most space, so that when we get a full-disk alert, we can go into our servers to purge that without downloading a separate tool to see what’s contending for hard disk space."

"New Relic does enable frontend performance monitoring by default. However, when we are troubleshooting the issue, New Relic is not able to trace back to the service where the issue is. Other solutions, such as Dynatrace are better."

"We have had issues with our agents going offline."

"New Relic can be improved by incorporating an automated incident analysis solution."

"The integration and configuration of this product in our AWS environment needs improvement on the filtering part. I would like it to go more granular on accounts."

More New Relic cons

"Everybody is moving away from traffic and installing agents on the application to do the job, but Micro Focus is using traditional ways to collect the traffic. They should change their architecture completely."

"There have been some issues with customers implementing this solution and with login errors, which could be areas for improvement."

"One area to improve is the user interface, of course. The second one is their R&D has virtually stopped building a product roadmap."

"If it is a standalone solution, however, I would not recommend Micro Focus."

"The product needs more R&D to make it easier and more compatible with other software."

"The diagnostics perspective, particularly in terms of the root cause analysis of failures, should be improved."

"Recently we have been facing some stability issues."

More OpenText Real User Monitoring cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of New Relic could improve. It is expensive."

"This solution required a license and it is better than some other competitors."

"There is a picture which goes to your browser and it monitors requests from other users. However, it's impossible to use now because the price is very high. The feature is very nice, but I tried it during the trial period, and the current price makes it impossible to use."

"I rate the product price a five on a scale of one to ten, where one means cheap, and ten means very expensive."

"It would be nice if we could buy it annually instead of monthly."

"The solution is priced reasonably. New Relic APM is one of the best products for me because it's economical, so anyone can easily pick it over other solutions and use it."

"If I remember it correctly, the pricing was based on the core, and the monthly subscription used to cost us $1,500 or $2,000. We had pre-prod and production services. Costing was different for pre-prod and production. For pre-prod, it was 40% less than the production service cost. It was a combined package."

"We spend somewhere around $5,000 to $6,000 per month with an annual recommitment of maybe $60,000. These are just ballpark figures."

More New Relic pricing and cost advice

"If I compare with other vendors, other vendors are more expensive"

"Compared to other tools, OpenText Real User Monitoring is an expensive solution."

"Not expensive."

"The price is approximately €30,000 ($35,500 USD) for the enterprise edition."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

895,399 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	65
Midsize Enterprise	51
Large Enterprise	78

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

Any advice about APM solutions?

There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...

See all answers

What needs improvement with New Relic Insights?

I have noticed discrepancies between New Relic's documentation and Terraform resources. For example, there have been instances where new features launched in the New Relic UI have not been updated ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for New Relic Insights?

My day-to-day activities in New Relic include infrastructure monitoring, APM monitoring, browser monitoring, and database monitoring. In cloud environments, I monitor multiple clouds like AWS, GCP,...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Real User Monitor?

The diagnostics perspective, particularly in terms of the root cause analysis of failures, should be improved. There needs to be more development in this area, as the support and the number of peop...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Real User Monitor?

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Micro Focus Real User Monitor?

I rate the solution as nine. It is a good product. Everyone should have it as it is essential today, but choose the vendor accordingly. I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs New Relic

Compared 7% of the time

Datadog vs New Relic

Compared 6% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs New Relic

Compared 4% of the time

Elastic Observability vs New Relic

Compared 2% of the time

Azure Monitor vs New Relic

Compared 2% of the time

More New Relic Competitors

Dynatrace vs OpenText Real User Monitoring

Compared 8% of the time

Sematext Synthetics vs OpenText Real User Monitoring

Compared 7% of the time

LogicMonitor vs OpenText Real User Monitoring

Compared 6% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs OpenText Real User Monitoring

Compared 5% of the time

VMware Aria Operations for Applications vs OpenText Real User Monitoring

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText Real User Monitoring Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

New Relic

May 2026

Download New Relic product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Real User Monitoring

May 2026

Download OpenText Real User Monitoring product report

Also Known As

New Relic Browser, New Relic Applied Intelligence, New Relic Insights, New Relic Synthetics, New Relic Servers, New Relic APM

Micro Focus Real User Monitor, Micro Focus RUM, HPE RUM

Overview

New Relic offers real-time application monitoring and insight into performance bottlenecks. Its customizable dashboards and APM integration provide efficient operational support, while server performance alerts ensure quick issue detection.

New Relic provides comprehensive monitoring of application performance, tracking bottlenecks across databases and front-end components. Users employ it for server and infrastructure monitoring, as well as analyzing key metrics such as CPU and memory usage. The solution's ability to integrate with tools like PagerDuty enhances incident management capabilities. However, users have expressed a need for improvements in query language simplicity, more detailed historical insights, and better mobile app monitoring support.

What are New Relic's most important features?

Real-Time Monitoring: Provides instant visibility into application performance.
Detailed Transaction Tracing: Identifies specific transaction issues quickly.
Error Rate Tracking: Monitors and reports on error occurrences efficiently.
Customizable Dashboards: Tailors dashboard views for specific needs.
APM Integration: Seamlessly integrates with application performance management tools.

What benefits and ROI should be considered?

Operational Efficiency: Quick issue detection reduces downtime.
Improved Debugging: Enhanced error analysis supports rapid problem resolution.
Comprehensive Monitoring: Offers a holistic view of application performance and user behavior.
Incident Management: Integration with incident tools helps streamline responses.
Efficient Alerts: Rapid alert systems ensure timely notifications of issues.

In industries like e-commerce and financial services, New Relic supports application performance monitoring to enhance user experience and system reliability. Organizations leverage its insights for optimizing performance, particularly in server operations and infrastructure management. Its ability to monitor API failures through synthetic monitoring is crucial for maintaining high service levels.

New Relic

OpenText Real User Monitoring enables effective application performance tracking with end-to-end visibility. It features easy setup and helps organizations identify and resolve issues efficiently.

OpenText Real User Monitoring works by providing a single view dashboard that integrates seamlessly with BSM, facilitating application performance monitoring. It is valued for its proactive issue identification via monitoring thresholds and efficient incident resolution. Organizations can leverage its comprehensive tracking capabilities for mobile and website monitoring, yielding near-real-time analytics. However, they may face challenges like an outdated interface and limited support for non-Windows environments. Dependency on additional purchases and traditional data collection methods can be limitations. Modernizing architecture and enhancing protocol support are often desired.

What are the important features?

End-to-end application monitoring: Provides comprehensive insights and tracking.
Single view dashboard: Enables integrated monitoring experience with BSM.
Near-real-time analytics: Offers timely data on user interactions and performance.
Proactive issue identification: Utilizes monitoring thresholds to detect issues early.
Mobile and website monitoring: Extends tracking capabilities across multiple platforms.

What benefits should users look for?

Improved incident resolution: Leads to efficient problem-solving and maintenance.
Enhanced user experience: Ensures optimal application performance monitoring.
Business service agreements insights: Offers data to calculate business performance metrics.
Real-time transaction monitoring: Provides real-time data for network and performance analysis.
Comprehensive error identification: Helps pinpoint issues within application workflows.

Industries employing OpenText Real User Monitoring often use it for real-time and transaction monitoring by capturing network data to analyze performance from user perspectives. It is particularly useful for assessing availability and providing insights in environments where backend analysis and automation are essential.

OpenText

Sample Customers

World Fuel Services, Verizon, FootLocker, McDonald's, Trainline, Mondia Media, Confused, Costa Coffee, Ryanair, Marks & Spencer, William Hill, Delivery Hero, Skyscanner, BASF, DAZN, Veygo, Virtuo, movingimage, talabat, Australia Post, Tokopedia, Seven Network, Virgin Australia, Zomato, BigBasket, Mercado Libre, Lending Club

Avea, Maccabi Healthcare Services, TEB

Buyer's Guide

New Relic vs. OpenText Real User Monitoring

April 2026

Free Report: New Relic vs. OpenText Real User Monitoring

Find out what your peers are saying about New Relic vs. OpenText Real User Monitoring and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

895,399 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our New Relic vs. OpenText Real User Monitoring report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.