Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

New Relic vs OpenText Real User Monitoring comparison

New Relic and OpenText are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. New Relic is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.8, while OpenText is ranked #43 with an average rating of 7.7. New Relic holds a 6.6% mindshare in APM, compared to OpenText’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of New Relic users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 58% of OpenText users who would recommend it.
New Relic
Read 158 New Relic reviews
  • 16,752 Views
  • 13,067 Comparison Views
94% willing to recommend
OpenText Real User Monitoring
Read 11 OpenText Real User Monitoring reviews
  • 441 Views
  • 309 Comparison Views
58% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

OpenText Real User Monitoring and New Relic both compete in the real user monitoring category. New Relic seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive features and perceived value for the price.

What features are offered by OpenText Real User Monitoring in comparison to New Relic?

OpenText Real User Monitoring offers detailed analytics, ease of integration, and customization options with actionable insights. New Relic features extensive performance monitoring capabilities, real-time data processing, and intuitive alert systems.

What areas of improvement can be found in OpenText Real User Monitoring in comparison to New Relic?

OpenText Real User Monitoring users suggest improvements in reporting functionalities, dashboard interfaces, and faster data refresh rates. New Relic users seek better documentation, simpler setup processes, and enhanced customer support.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of OpenText Real User Monitoring in comparison to New Relic?

OpenText Real User Monitoring is straightforward to deploy with responsive support. New Relic has comprehensive support documentation and robust customer service, though some users experience initial complexities.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with OpenText Real User Monitoring in comparison to New Relic?

OpenText Real User Monitoring is valued for competitive pricing and cost-effectiveness in achieving ROI. New Relic, priced higher, justifies its cost through superior features and reliability, driving significant ROI.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed New Relic vs. OpenText Real User Monitoring Report (Updated: March 2025).
Buyer's Guide
New Relic vs. OpenText Real User Monitoring
March 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 845,485 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

New Relic
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
5th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
158
Ranking in other categories
Network Monitoring Software (7th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (6th), IT Operations Analytics (3rd), Mobile APM (3rd), Cloud Monitoring Software (4th), AIOps (3rd)
OpenText Real User Monitoring
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
43rd
Average Rating
6.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of New Relic is 6.6%, down from 9.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Real User Monitoring is 0.2%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
 

Featured Reviews

Iqbal Khowaja - PeerSpot reviewer
Has a simple user interface and end-to-end monitoring and self-healing features
My organization uses many application performance management solutions, such as AppDynamics, New Relic APM, Splunk, and Datadog. I'm the CTO for the state of Hawaii, and across the board, different departments use different APM tools. I'm using the latest version of New Relic APM, but I cannot recall the exact version. My company has a dozen engineers using and monitoring New Relic APM. I'd tell anyone planning to use New Relic APM that it has to fit what you have. For example, most of my company's payload is in AWS, and the tool has adopters and features that CloudWatch cannot provide. Still, New Relic APM can, so you should do a demo or trial run first and see if it's a tool that'll help you with end-to-end monitoring. New Relic APM is working well for my company, so an excellent way to start is to do a trial run to see how the tool works out for your current applications. My rating for the tool is nine out of ten because my experience with it has been great. New Relic also worked closely with my company and has always been upfront on what's available and what's not. My company is a New Relic APM customer.
Read full review
Aphiwat Leetavorn. - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers back-end monitoring, so it can analyze user experience but when customers change the software or version, this tool is quite sensitive
Real User Monitoring tools help proactively identify problems before they become critical by monitoring thresholds. There is a threshold and an SOA threshold. For example, it starts to go yellow, and if it becomes red, the system will crash. When it starts to become yellow (Threshold Approaching), we have to resolve it. This is the same case where we'll know what happened before it's too late. So we can make an early decision to prevent it, maybe by kicking some users off the system before it crashes.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature is application monitoring."
"The most valuable feature is the New Relic APM module to deep-dive into the application, to get bottlenecks to the surface, and to improve application performance. Also, the New Relic Insights module creates a real-time dashboard on application performance to create awareness for the DevOps team."
"Every time there is a crisis, high traffic, or if we see a problem with a server, we go to New Relic and monitor it to determine the cause."
"The most valuable feature of New Relic is its ease of use."
"New Relic has helped us in terms of the optimizing our print and loading times."
"The alert mechanism is quite accurate when something goes wrong in your system. For example, if you have hundreds of APIs on your server, and any of the APIs is not performing well, you get an alert. When there is a drop or change in the threshold value, the beauty of New Relic is that within a fraction of seconds, all the stakeholders who are configured in the New Relic system will get an alert. That's one good thing."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its ability to execute queries and analyze the data."
"The initial setup is straightforward. It is easy to track and easy to follow."
More New Relic pros
"The technical support is good at resolving issues."
"The most valuable feature is application performance monitoring."
"With the solution, you can easily access any issues in your infrastructure."
"Real User Monitor has improved our productivity."
"It offers near-real-time analytics, which is helpful."
"The Real User Monitor, with its transaction and synthetic transaction monitoring, is the typical classic in APM cases when the customer would like to do transaction monitoring. Micro Focus scores better where the underlying infrastructure management is also covered by Micro Focus tools."
"The most useful feature of this solution is tracking. When the application's traffic has been monitored it is taken from that particular application and analyzed. It is then given a live session of that particular user. For example, if you are using your bank application to do some kind of transaction, everything that you do can be tracked by that application."
"Very easy to implement."
More OpenText Real User Monitoring pros
 

Cons

"The integration and configuration of this product in our AWS environment needs improvement on the filtering part. I would like it to go more granular on accounts."
"It gives you amazing statistics, but doesn’t give you enough information about what to do with the statistics."
"Compared to their competitors, they are missing some features at the moment."
"I would like to see the company implement the AI auto-baseline feature which Dynatrace has."
"New Relic needs to improve is the user data schema."
"I would like an infrastructure network that provides real-time views, showing the issues."
"In the next release, I'd like to see a better pricing structure."
"It is very difficult to award the service level cycles at an endpoint level."
More New Relic cons
"This technology is considered to be older."
"Some issues with login errors."
"Real User Monitor needs to cover more protocols to provide more in-depth information. It could also be better at monitoring voice-related traffic. There is currently no visibility in that channel."
"Everybody is moving away from traffic and installing agents on the application to do the job, but Micro Focus is using traditional ways to collect the traffic. They should change their architecture completely."
"One area to improve is the user interface, of course. The second one is their R&D has virtually stopped building a product roadmap."
"The product needs more R&D to make it easier and more compatible with other software."
"The diagnostics perspective, particularly in terms of the root cause analysis of failures, should be improved."
"Customer support needs to improve by bringing in more people who are knowledgeable about the tool, as there are very few left."
More OpenText Real User Monitoring cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing model is a little confusing for beginners. They find it a little expensive, and if you are using it already, then that is not good."
"We deploy everything on AWS. Purchasing the product on AWS Marketplace made it easier for us."
"Comparatively, the pricing is expensive."
"We spend somewhere around $5,000 to $6,000 per month with an annual recommitment of maybe $60,000. These are just ballpark figures."
"We feel it's a little bit pricey."
"The solution is cheap, but prices can go up when users grow."
"The solution is quite expensive. It costs around $5,000 a month. There aren't any additional costs above that."
"I recommend using the free version of New Relic. If you like the free version and understand its importance for your company, you can move to the trial. Then, you can migrate to the paid version."
More New Relic pricing and cost advice
"Not expensive."
"The price is approximately €30,000 ($35,500 USD) for the enterprise edition."
"If I compare with other vendors, other vendors are more expensive"
"Compared to other tools, OpenText Real User Monitoring is an expensive solution."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
845,485 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
54%
Computer Software Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Manufacturing Company
4%
Financial Services Firm
27%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Government
8%
Computer Software Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Any advice about APM solutions?
There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...
See all answers
What do you like most about New Relic Insights?
The product's initial setup phase was very easy.
See all answers
What needs improvement with New Relic Insights?
Email alert customization is limited; it cannot be tailored much, which makes the system more rigid than optimal. The handling of logs from integration tools is not as advanced compared to other to...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Micro Focus Real User Monitor?
The diagnostics perspective, particularly in terms of the root cause analysis of failures, should be improved. There needs to be more development in this area, as the support and the number of peop...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Real User Monitor?
The use case is about user-level monitoring and the availability of a service for a user. It's about whether the service is available, its performance, and the type of errors a user is receiving, f...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering Micro Focus Real User Monitor?
I rate the solution as nine. It is a good product. Everyone should have it as it is essential today, but choose the vendor accordingly. I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs New Relic Logo
Dynatrace vs New Relic
Compared 12% of the time
Elastic Observability vs New Relic Logo
Elastic Observability vs New Relic
Compared 12% of the time
Datadog vs New Relic Logo
Datadog vs New Relic
Compared 9% of the time
Azure Monitor vs New Relic Logo
Azure Monitor vs New Relic
Compared 6% of the time
Splunk AppDynamics vs New Relic Logo
Splunk AppDynamics vs New Relic
Compared 5% of the time
More New Relic Competitors
OpenText SiteScope vs OpenText Real User Monitoring Logo
OpenText SiteScope vs OpenText Real User Monitoring
Compared 100% of the time
More OpenText Real User Monitoring Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
New Relic
March 2025
New Relic reportDownload New Relic product report
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Real User Monitoring
March 2025
OpenText Real User Monitoring reportDownload OpenText Real User Monitoring product report
 

Also Known As

New Relic Browser, New Relic Applied Intelligence, New Relic Insights, New Relic Synthetics, New Relic Servers, New Relic APM
Micro Focus Real User Monitor, Micro Focus RUM, HPE RUM
 

Overview

New Relic is a powerful tool for optimizing web pages, tracking user behavior, and monitoring application performance. It helps detect anomalies, generate metrics, and create dashboards for synthetics monitoring, container workloads, stress tests, and more.

New Relic provides organizations with comprehensive insights into APIs, infrastructure, and scalability. It supports mobile and web applications with features like java tracking, health maps, customizable dashboards, and drill-downs. Users benefit from its easy initial setup, accurate alerts, UI monitoring, error tracking, and traceability. New Relic supports multiple ecosystems with straightforward pricing and new feature introductions, offering end-to-end monitoring, thorough data analysis, and effective problem resolution.

What are New Relic's most important features?
  • Java Tracking: Efficiently monitor Java applications.
  • Infrastructure Monitoring: Comprehensive overview of infrastructure health.
  • APM: In-depth application performance monitoring.
  • Tight Integration: Seamless integration across different system layers.
  • Health Maps: Visual representation of system health.
  • Customizable Dashboards: Personalized data display and insights.
  • Drill-Downs: Detailed analysis at multiple levels.
What benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?
  • Application Insights: Detailed understanding of application performance.
  • Accurate Alerts: Immediate notifications for issues.
  • Traceability: Enhanced end-to-end traceability for problem resolution.
  • Scalability: Accommodation of growing infrastructure.
  • Flexible Query Design: Adaptable search and analysis functionality.
  • Reliable Performance: Consistent application monitoring and upkeep.

New Relic is leveraged in industries such as e-commerce, finance, and technology. It helps monitor web traffic, evaluate load balancing, and ensure applications meet performance standards. Companies use it for stress tests, container-based workloads, API monitoring, and infrastructure management. Its integration capabilities are valuable for maintaining performance and scalability across diverse ecosystems, aiding in thorough data analysis and problem resolution.

New Relic

Real User Monitoring (RUM) an End user monitoring that gives you visibility into user behavior for fast, targeted problem resolution. It monitors the performance and availability of business-critical application services for all users at all locations all the time. It automatically discovers underlying infrastructure and classifies user actions - giving you instant visibility into session and whole service health over web, cloud, and mobile user experience. It allows you to trace user experience across tiers, capture live sessions, see where customers clicked, measure response times, and see pages that caused problems. And you can easily capture and replay user sessions to create test scripts that reflect real user behavior. All this data gives you new ability to analyze which application transactions your users are performing and what application response they are experiencing. RUM currently supports over 20 application protocols and applications such as SAP, Citrix, and native mobile application monitoring on Android.

OpenText
 

Sample Customers

World Fuel Services, Verizon, FootLocker, McDonald's, Trainline, Mondia Media, Confused, Costa Coffee, Ryanair, Marks & Spencer, William Hill, Delivery Hero, Skyscanner, BASF, DAZN, Veygo, Virtuo, movingimage, talabat, Australia Post, Tokopedia, Seven Network, Virgin Australia, Zomato, BigBasket, Mercado Libre, Lending Club
Avea, Maccabi Healthcare Services, TEB
Buyer's Guide
New Relic vs. OpenText Real User Monitoring
March 2025
Free Report: New Relic vs. OpenText Real User Monitoring
Find out what your peers are saying about New Relic vs. OpenText Real User Monitoring and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
845,485 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our New Relic vs. OpenText Real User Monitoring report.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.