New Relic vs OpenText Real User Monitoring comparison

New Relic and OpenText are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. New Relic is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.0, while OpenText is ranked #42 with an average rating of 7.7. New Relic holds a 4.1% mindshare in APM, compared to OpenText’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of New Relic users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 58% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

New Relic

Read 168 New Relic reviews

12,960 Views
9,850 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

OpenText Real User Monitoring

Read 11 OpenText Real User Monitoring reviews

916 Views
861 Comparison Views

58% willing to recommend

New Relic

OpenText Real User Monitoring

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

OpenText Real User Monitoring and New Relic both compete in the real user monitoring category. New Relic seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive features and perceived value for the price.

What features are offered by OpenText Real User Monitoring in comparison to New Relic?

OpenText Real User Monitoring offers detailed analytics, ease of integration, and customization options with actionable insights. New Relic features extensive performance monitoring capabilities, real-time data processing, and intuitive alert systems.

What areas of improvement can be found in OpenText Real User Monitoring in comparison to New Relic?

OpenText Real User Monitoring users suggest improvements in reporting functionalities, dashboard interfaces, and faster data refresh rates. New Relic users seek better documentation, simpler setup processes, and enhanced customer support.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of OpenText Real User Monitoring in comparison to New Relic?

OpenText Real User Monitoring is straightforward to deploy with responsive support. New Relic has comprehensive support documentation and robust customer service, though some users experience initial complexities.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with OpenText Real User Monitoring in comparison to New Relic?

OpenText Real User Monitoring is valued for competitive pricing and cost-effectiveness in achieving ROI. New Relic, priced higher, justifies its cost through superior features and reliability, driving significant ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed New Relic vs. OpenText Real User Monitoring Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

New Relic vs. OpenText Real User Monitoring

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

New Relic

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

4th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

168

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (8th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (8th), IT Operations Analytics (3rd), Mobile APM (3rd), Cloud Monitoring Software (5th), AIOps (4th)

OpenText Real User Monitoring

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

42nd

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of New Relic is 4.1%, down from 7.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Real User Monitoring is 0.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
New Relic	4.1%
OpenText Real User Monitoring	0.6%
Other	95.3%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

BasilJiji

System Engineer at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

Real-time alerts have reduced server outage impact and support fast incident response

In the dashboard, if they could show a little more metrics regarding the application and related things, that would be how New Relic could be improved. Currently, there are things showing from the server level and application level, but it can be improved. That is what I felt. Regarding user interface, I do not feel much concern, but for some kind of issues when we are trying to get support from the New Relic team, their SLA seems to be long. They are taking seven to ten working days for resolving some kind of scenario or issue. That is a bit difficult for us. If they could improve the customer support by reducing their SLA within three to five days, if they could remediate everything, that will be so much helpful. When it comes to the customer support part, I felt they need to be a little more improved on that part. The support overall is good, but they can improve. That is the reason I have given it eight out of ten.

Read full review

Yasir Amin

Sr. Solution Architect, Project Manager at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

User-level monitoring with near-real-time analytics boosts service availability

The use case is about user-level monitoring and the availability of a service for a user. It's about whether the service is available, its performance, and the type of errors a user is receiving, from a user perspective The functions that Real User Monitor is intended for, which is to provide the…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Using New Relic speeds up troubleshooting and resolution, giving us a clearer picture of where issues are, thus saving time and effort."

"The most valuable features of New Relic are the reports and ease of use."

"New Relic helped with the mean time to detection, the MTDD metric tracked for applications, where the detection capability enabled a reduction from around 20 to 30 minutes down to three minutes, which has been really helpful in terms of detecting issues as well as helping to triage and troubleshoot issues faster, creating a positive impact on the organization."

"The stability of New Relic APM is very good."

"The breakdown of the response time of different components and getting in-depth details of the slow component are the most valuable features. It is easy to use, and it gets the job done."

"The synthetic alert is the most valuable feature in New Relic APM. I also like the time travel feature and find traceability useful in the solution. New Relic APM also has good response times."

"It has prevented failures from occurring in our production environment."

"End-user Synthetics and monitoring are very good."

More New Relic pros

"The reporting feature is good for us."

"Real User Monitor has improved our productivity."

"The most valuable feature is application performance monitoring."

"The most useful feature of this solution is tracking. When the application's traffic has been monitored it is taken from that particular application and analyzed. It is then given a live session of that particular user. For example, if you are using your bank application to do some kind of transaction, everything that you do can be tracked by that application."

"Very easy to implement."

"The technical support is good at resolving issues."

"It is a good product."

"The Real User Monitor, with its transaction and synthetic transaction monitoring, is the typical classic in APM cases when the customer would like to do transaction monitoring. Micro Focus scores better where the underlying infrastructure management is also covered by Micro Focus tools."

More OpenText Real User Monitoring pros

Cons

"However, there could be problems or hiccups with the integration with Java-based services and microservices."

"I would like to have storage monitoring. E.g., being able to monitor SANS, specifically protocols, like NFS and CIFS metrics."

"For some kind of issues when we are trying to get support from the New Relic team, their SLA seems to be long."

"I would like if it could have predictive analysis. Today, we only have the option to configure thresholds."

"The solution is quite expensive."

"There are times when you restart the engines and the servers have a unique ID for the host and you need to remove the server. It is difficult because some are on-premise and others are production hosts. Having downtime is not very good when updating. However, it is not a constant issue."

"New Relic needs to improve is the user data schema."

"There are certain features that are not supported in New Relic, such as CATSEARCH, which allows you to do a full-text search."

More New Relic cons

"This technology is considered to be older."

"Some issues with login errors."

"Real User Monitor needs to cover more protocols to provide more in-depth information. It could also be better at monitoring voice-related traffic. There is currently no visibility in that channel."

"The solution's technical support presents a lot of issues with too many delays."

"Everybody is moving away from traffic and installing agents on the application to do the job, but Micro Focus is using traditional ways to collect the traffic. They should change their architecture completely."

"The diagnostics perspective, particularly in terms of the root cause analysis of failures, should be improved."

"Customer support needs to improve by bringing in more people who are knowledgeable about the tool, as there are very few left."

"One area to improve is the user interface, of course. The second one is their R&D has virtually stopped building a product roadmap."

More OpenText Real User Monitoring cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"New Relic is either free with low retention and minimal functionalities, or expensive with full options and retention."

"I recommend using the free version of New Relic. If you like the free version and understand its importance for your company, you can move to the trial. Then, you can migrate to the paid version."

"We're paying for the New Relic APM license annually."

"The pricing could be better. We did not purchase the full version. Maybe if we applied all the other features of the full version of New Relic, we could get all the features that we feel are missing."

"The solution is priced reasonably. New Relic APM is one of the best products for me because it's economical, so anyone can easily pick it over other solutions and use it."

"The solution is less expensive than AppNeta."

"The solution is quite expensive. It costs around $5,000 a month. There aren't any additional costs above that."

"I rate the product price a five on a scale of one to ten, where one means cheap, and ten means very expensive."

More New Relic pricing and cost advice

"Not expensive."

"If I compare with other vendors, other vendors are more expensive"

"The price is approximately €30,000 ($35,500 USD) for the enterprise edition."

"Compared to other tools, OpenText Real User Monitoring is an expensive solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

12%

Performing Arts

10%

Computer Software Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	65
Midsize Enterprise	50
Large Enterprise	71

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

Any advice about APM solutions?

There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...

See all answers

What do you like most about New Relic Insights?

The product's initial setup phase was very easy.

See all answers

What needs improvement with New Relic Insights?

For our end-to-end use case, New Relic is completely satisfactory, and we extensively rely on its features for our day-to-day life. I would like to have more AI and ML-based suggestions and algorit...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Real User Monitor?

The diagnostics perspective, particularly in terms of the root cause analysis of failures, should be improved. There needs to be more development in this area, as the support and the number of peop...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Real User Monitor?

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Micro Focus Real User Monitor?

I rate the solution as nine. It is a good product. Everyone should have it as it is essential today, but choose the vendor accordingly. I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs New Relic

Compared 10% of the time

Datadog vs New Relic

Compared 8% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs New Relic

Compared 6% of the time

Elastic Observability vs New Relic

Compared 4% of the time

Azure Monitor vs New Relic

Compared 3% of the time

More New Relic Competitors

Dynatrace vs OpenText Real User Monitoring

Compared 14% of the time

OpenText SiteScope vs OpenText Real User Monitoring

Compared 13% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs OpenText Real User Monitoring

Compared 13% of the time

LogicMonitor vs OpenText Real User Monitoring

Compared 9% of the time

Instana Dynamic APM vs OpenText Real User Monitoring

Compared 8% of the time

More OpenText Real User Monitoring Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

New Relic

January 2026

Download New Relic product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Real User Monitoring

January 2026

Download OpenText Real User Monitoring product report

Also Known As

New Relic Browser, New Relic Applied Intelligence, New Relic Insights, New Relic Synthetics, New Relic Servers, New Relic APM

Micro Focus Real User Monitor, Micro Focus RUM, HPE RUM

Overview

New Relic offers real-time application monitoring and insight into performance bottlenecks. Its customizable dashboards and APM integration provide efficient operational support, while server performance alerts ensure quick issue detection.

New Relic provides comprehensive monitoring of application performance, tracking bottlenecks across databases and front-end components. Users employ it for server and infrastructure monitoring, as well as analyzing key metrics such as CPU and memory usage. The solution's ability to integrate with tools like PagerDuty enhances incident management capabilities. However, users have expressed a need for improvements in query language simplicity, more detailed historical insights, and better mobile app monitoring support.

What are New Relic's most important features?

Real-Time Monitoring: Provides instant visibility into application performance.
Detailed Transaction Tracing: Identifies specific transaction issues quickly.
Error Rate Tracking: Monitors and reports on error occurrences efficiently.
Customizable Dashboards: Tailors dashboard views for specific needs.
APM Integration: Seamlessly integrates with application performance management tools.

What benefits and ROI should be considered?

Operational Efficiency: Quick issue detection reduces downtime.
Improved Debugging: Enhanced error analysis supports rapid problem resolution.
Comprehensive Monitoring: Offers a holistic view of application performance and user behavior.
Incident Management: Integration with incident tools helps streamline responses.
Efficient Alerts: Rapid alert systems ensure timely notifications of issues.

In industries like e-commerce and financial services, New Relic supports application performance monitoring to enhance user experience and system reliability. Organizations leverage its insights for optimizing performance, particularly in server operations and infrastructure management. Its ability to monitor API failures through synthetic monitoring is crucial for maintaining high service levels.

New Relic

Real User Monitoring (RUM) an End user monitoring that gives you visibility into user behavior for fast, targeted problem resolution. It monitors the performance and availability of business-critical application services for all users at all locations all the time. It automatically discovers underlying infrastructure and classifies user actions - giving you instant visibility into session and whole service health over web, cloud, and mobile user experience. It allows you to trace user experience across tiers, capture live sessions, see where customers clicked, measure response times, and see pages that caused problems. And you can easily capture and replay user sessions to create test scripts that reflect real user behavior. All this data gives you new ability to analyze which application transactions your users are performing and what application response they are experiencing. RUM currently supports over 20 application protocols and applications such as SAP, Citrix, and native mobile application monitoring on Android.

OpenText

Sample Customers

World Fuel Services, Verizon, FootLocker, McDonald's, Trainline, Mondia Media, Confused, Costa Coffee, Ryanair, Marks & Spencer, William Hill, Delivery Hero, Skyscanner, BASF, DAZN, Veygo, Virtuo, movingimage, talabat, Australia Post, Tokopedia, Seven Network, Virgin Australia, Zomato, BigBasket, Mercado Libre, Lending Club

Avea, Maccabi Healthcare Services, TEB

Buyer's Guide

New Relic vs. OpenText Real User Monitoring

December 2025

Free Report: New Relic vs. OpenText Real User Monitoring

Find out what your peers are saying about New Relic vs. OpenText Real User Monitoring and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our New Relic vs. OpenText Real User Monitoring report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.