Odin Virtuozzo Containers vs VMware vSphere comparison

Odin and VMware are both solutions in the Server Virtualization Software category. Odin is ranked #19, while VMware is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.3. Odin holds a 0.2% mindshare in SVS, compared to VMware’s 17.3% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of VMware users are willing to recommend the solution.

Odin Virtuozzo Containers

Read 2 Odin Virtuozzo Containers reviews

301 Views
257 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

VMware vSphere

Read 454 VMware vSphere reviews

29,259 Views
24,243 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Odin Virtuozzo Containers

VMware vSphere

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 6, 2024

Odin Virtuozzo Containers and VMware vSphere compete in the virtualization solutions category. VMware vSphere has the upper hand, offering advanced features that justify its higher cost, appealing to technical buyers.

Features: Odin Virtuozzo Containers provides efficient resource management, lightweight virtualization, and rapid deployment capabilities. VMware vSphere offers comprehensive management tools, high-performance computing support, and robust security options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: VMware vSphere is known for streamlined deployment processes and strong technical support, simplifying setup for larger systems. Odin Virtuozzo Containers offers easier deployment for smaller to mid-sized operations with personalized customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Odin Virtuozzo Containers often has lower upfront costs and faster ROI in small to medium enterprises. VMware vSphere's higher setup cost is offset by extensive features and scalability, leading to long-term ROI in large-scale enterprises.

To learn more, read our detailed Server Virtualization Software Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Server Virtualization Software

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Odin Virtuozzo Containers

Ranking in Server Virtualization Software

19th

Average Rating

6.0

Reviews Sentiment

4.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

VMware vSphere

Ranking in Server Virtualization Software

2nd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

454

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Server Virtualization Software category, the mindshare of Odin Virtuozzo Containers is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMware vSphere is 17.3%, down from 19.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Server Virtualization Software

Featured Reviews

Ramon Ruiz

Director IT at Servnet

Significant backup for containers, but the customer service is terrible

Anyone considering this solution should not compare it to the old versions. They should be a partner with Virtuozzo and run all the certifications. Also, they need a good lab to understand the technology and how they can apply that technology conveniently. This is very commercial software. It does not have support, so you will need to be hands-on. I would rate Odin Virtuozzo a six out of 10 overall.

Read full review

Neeraj Mehra

Manager of Solutions and Support at Esconet Technologies Pvt. Ltd.

Streamlines virtualization and has features like high availability and vMotion

The primary use case is for virtualization, including the implementation of vSphere, vCloud Foundation, vCloud Director, and cloud automation with vSphere My customers, particularly SMBs, mainly utilize High Availability (HA), DRS, and vMotion features. The vMotion feature is beneficial for…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"When you run templates on the containers on Virtuozzo they have a lot of back-ups."

"The vMotion feature is beneficial for online migration of virtual machines from one host to another without downtime."

"It provides a new environment in an expedient manner."

"Its DR facility is good. Within a moment, data can be retrieve from another physical location over the Internet. The speed to recover data is good."

"Virtualised automation is a useful feature."

"VMware vSphere is highly scalable in terms of the number of users and the number of servers it can handle."

"VMware vSphere has a lot of features that are valuable, such as multiple clusters, VM mobility, VDI, and virtual desktop."

"The virtualization is set by itself. vSphere is the best way to have a non-host based fixed solution. We always try to find an agnostic environment where we can restore agnostics or just say, "I need resources, capacity." That's why VMware vSphere in particular, has been the best in the past but now also with the evolution of their product. Nowadays, you don't have to use any STEM infrastructure anymore because the bandwidth and the land speeds are getting steeper."

"The solution's flexibility allows us to implement it widely."

More VMware vSphere pros

Cons

"Odin Virtuozzo has poor support and needs to improve."

"The platform's main area for improvement has increased, particularly after Broadcom acquired VMware."

"I would like to see VDP and other features included to back up the VMs in a native manner."

"I recommend that VMware vSphere continue to release more features."

"Given that I've been using version seven, it seems that some of the bugs I faced during that version have already been addressed in subsequent updates. Although I haven't personally tested them yet, it appears that these issues have been resolved. In version seven, there was a problem with the network interface not responding due to certain configurations not being properly filtered. However, in version eight, this requirement has been minimized, so the mentioned bug is less likely to occur. Instead of solely addressing these fixes in newer versions, it might be beneficial for them to consider applying these improvements to the older versions as well. This approach could prevent users from feeling compelled to upgrade to version eight solely to avoid encountering the issue, and instead provide updates for version seven users."

"the HTML version of things needs to get a little bit better. The vSphere side of things gets a little difficult to manage; right-click, in some browsers, doesn't work as well as it used to. I'm seeing a little bit of general latency that we didn't used to get with the thick client, although it's getting there."

"The biggest problem in this solution is the incompatibility of some of the features with some of the drivers installed on servers. For example, if I want to install vSphere on an HPE server, the driver is really different from a Dell server or a Fujitsu server. I need to download different drivers and install them manually, which can be improved by VMware. They can offer a special image to match different servers. We face different problems when we install vSphere on an ESXi server and have different drivers on the storage. ESXi cannot detect different kinds of storage, and they should improve this. We updated our existing version to vSphere 7 in a private environment, but it seems that this version is not very stable. We are facing issues with restarting the host. In earlier versions, such as vSphere 6 or 6.5, we didn't have any such problems. It would be good if VMware can offer specific applications for mobiles to enable us to control the management of all servers by mobile. They should also improve the vCenter GUI because it is currently not compatible, and there are a lot of problems. Some of the options do not appear well in the browser. VMware should spend more time resolving the problems in the GUI."

"OS templates should be readily available, so there is no need to get an OS separately. Only the activation part should be different, which is not presently available due to the need to get the OS from a different location, then create VMs."

"To manage it properly, you have to know this product really well."

More VMware vSphere cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The license for Odin Virtuozzo is based on consumption on demand."

"The licensing could be lower."

"It saves us money because we don't have to buy as many physical servers."

"Do not buy based on price alone. Many of my customers chose the lowest cost option only to discover that the additional funds needed to access even a few more features would have been money well spent. Likewise, if you are going to spend more money on additional features, then have a plan to actually deploy and integrate those features into your infrastructure. Many customers never take full advantage of the many features that they are paying for and that can be avoided by being proactive in developing your overall vision for the infrastructure."

"The pricing is justified. It may be a bit high, but the features are worth it."

"The price could be lower."

"VMware is expensive, from the baseline, initial investment. It depends, though, because if someone goes for ESXi—the latest version, ESXi Essential, or even the opensource—then it is not available in Microsoft. ESXi opensource is totally free, and the only features that aren't available are some API features. But if someone has a small office with less than 50 users, and they just need to run the hypervisor, then VMware is a free solution for that. If someone is considering the price and comparing Business ESXi with Hyper-V, if they already have an existing Windows license, then I would suggest going for Hyper-V because it's much cheaper. Aside from that, I would recommend going for VMware."

"Licensing fees are not paid yearly, or monthly."

"I currently use the yearly licensing option, and I think that the pricing is fine for this solution."

More VMware vSphere pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Server Virtualization Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user234735

Technology Consultant, ASEAN at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

May 10, 2015

Hyper-V 2012 R2 vs. VMware vSphere 5.5

I was won with Hyper-V 2012R2 recently and the table below based on customer RFP (edited). This articles all about technical, there is not related with TCO/ROI, licensing cost, “political”, etc. Another to noted is the Windows Server 2012 licenses is based on 2 socket CPU, meanwhile…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Educational Organization

30%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is IOMMU?

DEEPEN DHULLA did explain well IOMMU. IOMMU has to be activated at the bios level. It exists on Intel and AMD platforms. It is used a lot inside virtualization platforms like VMware VSphere. It pr...

See all answers

Why KVM??? Help please!

We use VMware and KVM. We find that KVM is a lot simpler to use and it provides the virtualization we need for Linux and Windows. For us, VMware does not offer any advantage. Moreover, KVM is free.

See all answers

What is the biggest difference between Nutanix Acropolis and VMware vSphere?

We found the reduced power consumption with Nutanix Acropolis AOS a very attractive feature. We also like the interface that allows you to talk directly to your VM from the present software. We fou...

See all answers

Comparisons

Proxmox VE vs Odin Virtuozzo Containers

Compared 46% of the time

Nutanix AHV Virtualization vs Odin Virtuozzo Containers

Compared 23% of the time

Hyper-V vs Odin Virtuozzo Containers

Compared 15% of the time

More Odin Virtuozzo Containers Competitors

Hyper-V vs VMware vSphere

Compared 24% of the time

Oracle VM vs VMware vSphere

Compared 14% of the time

Proxmox VE vs VMware vSphere

Compared 13% of the time

RHEV vs VMware vSphere

Compared 10% of the time

KVM vs VMware vSphere

Compared 8% of the time

More VMware vSphere Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Server Virtualization Software

March 2025

Download Odin Virtuozzo Containers product report

Buyer's Guide

VMware vSphere

March 2025

Download VMware vSphere product report

Also Known As

Virtuozzo Containers

No data available

Overview

Parallels Virtuozzo Containers creates isolated containers on a single physical server and OS instance.

Odin

VMware vSphere is a versatile virtualization platform known for its ease of use, flexibility, and high availability. It supports seamless migration, optimal resource allocation, and centralized management, making it highly suitable for diverse infrastructure needs.

VMware vSphere is widely adopted for its virtualization capabilities that enhance hardware efficiency and ensure minimal downtime through features like High Availability and Distributed Resource Scheduler. Despite criticisms about high licensing costs and limited fault tolerance, it remains a preferred choice due to its stability, scalability, and robust integration options. Users appreciate its efficiency in managing virtual machines and hosting enterprise applications, although challenges with web client performance and hardware compatibility are noted. Organizations often look for better integration with cloud services and enhanced automation and scalability.

What are the core features of VMware vSphere?

vMotion: Enables seamless migration of virtual machines without downtime.
Distributed Resource Scheduler: Optimizes resource allocation across hosts.
High Availability: Minimizes downtime by automatically restarting virtual machines.
Centralized Management: Facilitates easy management of virtualized environments.
Advanced Security: Provides robust security measures and compliance features.

What benefits and ROI can businesses look for?

Reduced Operational Costs: Efficiently utilizes hardware, saving on expenses.
Scalability: Easily scales to meet growing business demands.
Business Continuity: Ensures high availability and disaster recovery.
Integration Flexibility: Supports integration with various technologies.

VMware vSphere is implemented across sectors like healthcare, finance, and education for server virtualization, data center management, and private cloud creation. Its use in facilitating business-critical operations ensures high availability and efficient resource use, supporting both development and production environments.

VMware

Sample Customers

OzHosting.com, Triple C, ServerNest, Vastspace, Conetix

Abu Dhabi Ports Company, ACS, AIA New Zealand, Consona, Corporate Express, CS Energy, and Digiweb.

Buyer's Guide

Server Virtualization Software

March 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Proxmox, VMware, Microsoft and others in Server Virtualization Software. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Server Virtualization Software vendors.

We monitor all Server Virtualization Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.