Odin Virtuozzo Containers [EOL] vs VMware vSphere comparison

Ingram Micro and Broadcom are both solutions in the Server Virtualization Software category. Additionally, 94% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution.

Odin Virtuozzo Containers [...

Read 2 Odin Virtuozzo Containers [EOL] reviews

0% willing to recommend

VMware vSphere

Read 459 VMware vSphere reviews

23,234 Views
20,678 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Odin Virtuozzo Containers [...

VMware vSphere

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 7, 2025

Odin Virtuozzo Containers EOL and VMware vSphere are competing products in the virtualization space. VMware vSphere is often viewed as superior due to its extensive features and value.

Features: Odin Virtuozzo Containers EOL focuses on lightweight containerization for rapid application deployment, easy resource management, and high efficiency. VMware vSphere provides comprehensive virtualization capabilities with features like vMotion, integrated backup solutions, and advanced networking options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Odin Virtuozzo Containers EOL has a straightforward deployment process, which is convenient for customers looking to quickly establish environments. VMware vSphere requires more setup but offers extensive support and resources for deployment.

Pricing and ROI: Odin Virtuozzo Containers EOL offers a cost-effective solution with competitive pricing, appealing to budget-conscious businesses while delivering a solid ROI through resource efficiency. VMware vSphere, despite its higher initial setup cost, provides substantial ROI due to its expansive feature set and infrastructure management capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Server Virtualization Software Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Server Virtualization Software

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Odin Virtuozzo Containers [...

Average Rating

6.0

Reviews Sentiment

4.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

VMware vSphere

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

459

Ranking in other categories

Server Virtualization Software (1st)

Featured Reviews

Ramon Ruiz

Director IT at Servnet

Significant backup for containers, but the customer service is terrible

Anyone considering this solution should not compare it to the old versions. They should be a partner with Virtuozzo and run all the certifications. Also, they need a good lab to understand the technology and how they can apply that technology conveniently. This is very commercial software. It does not have support, so you will need to be hands-on. I would rate Odin Virtuozzo a six out of 10 overall.

Read full review

IbrahimAysu

IT Director at Def Industry

Has improved infrastructure monitoring and resource management but requires better support and cost efficiency

The high availability feature's resilience is not bad, but it could be better. For example, whenever you lose any hardware, you will have interruptions on the services, and it reboots again on the other hardware host which is available at the crash time. That's good, but we would prefer to have zero downtime instead of the rebooting on the other server. We would prefer to have a zero downtime always-on configuration. VMware vSphere has a built-in feature called Fault Tolerance, but it's very limited for very limited VMs or very limited core count or CPU count, so it's not so useful for all the environment because of the limitations. The Fault Tolerance (FT) feature is very limited to very little core counts or very little VM counts, so you can't run the Fault Tolerance for all the servers or all the VMs, and that's very bad. If VMware vSphere could have any kind of built-in patch management environment with a repository, offline repository option, with test, non-production, and production environment separated, this would be perfect. Management of patch management with operating systems and including third-party applications which are running on the servers would enhance the VMware vSphere environment. VMware vSphere is very expensive. The worst aspect of VMware vSphere is the price. I can't tell you the exact cost at this time because the other team members in my teams are working on it, but I remember that the prices are very high. VMware vSphere is easy to scale, but it could be better, similar to a Kubernetes environment. It should have an automatic scale-out feature when the load gets high; if it gets some scale out automatically, it would be better than this, similar to Kubernetes or OpenShift.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"When you run templates on the containers on Virtuozzo they have a lot of back-ups."

"For me, the most valuable feature would be the EVC, but EVC has been changed to be per-VM which makes it possible for us to migrate the VMs to cloud and not take into account what hardware they're running on. Also, a big improvement from the previous version is that I'm now able to schedule backup for the VCSA. That is, in my opinion, a huge improvement. The last thing that I think is really great is, I'm not able to boot the OS and not the entire server. That's going to save me a lot of time."

"The emphasis isn't specifically on a particular feature, but rather on the ease of use. For instance, when building a test lab or setting up an entire environment from scratch, VMware products are notably more user-friendly compared to alternatives like Nutanix. I've had prior experience with Nutanix. From my personal perspective, I found it easier to adapt to using VMware than when I started using Dynamics. This ease of use is a strong point. It's largely about how straightforward it is to navigate through VMware's user interface. In contrast, with Nutanix, there's a need to delve into smaller configurations and navigate vendor-specific settings. VMware, on the other hand, offers a more accessible management page. This difference primarily centres around usability and the overall user-friendliness of the interface."

"We've found the High Availability and flexibility to be important."

"The GUI is very simple to use."

"It helps us with TCO."

"It's much more stable than other products. It is scalable and easy to implement as well."

"Some of the most valuable features are: the ability to Snapshot so that when we do updates we have a layer of protection for simplified rollback; the replication that we can leverage for data center failures and data center downtime; the ease of migrating workloads from physical device to physical device for maintenance that we have to do on physical servers."

"Its dynamic resource scheduling and its fault tolerance capabilities are two features that I've found to be valuable. I also like that VMware vSphere is stable, scalable, and easy to install."

More VMware vSphere pros

Cons

"Odin Virtuozzo has poor support and needs to improve."

"I would like having something that works on a smaller screen, so we can get to it on our iPads and have it more touch-centric versus having to sit at a laptop."

"It would be useful to have features like micro-segmentation, changing the mix as well as part of vSphere"

"Sometimes it's impossible to prevent problems from happening. With vSphere, you never know where the problem is going to come from, but you will always know that there is a problem. This is the problem."

"The cost can be better."

"The licensing costs are expensive and most of the important features require a license."

"I would like to see improvements in simplifying automation, cloud native deployment, administration, and fault resolution."

"I'm using vSphere at a high level. Sometimes, I find it challenging to integrate different networks, but I think it's just my lack of knowledge."

"One of the areas creating a crash is when you are cloning."

More VMware vSphere cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The license for Odin Virtuozzo is based on consumption on demand."

"The price is not an issue for our mid-sized or large-sized customers, but it can be expensive for our smaller customers."

"The price could improve for the enterprise versions."

"Our customers have the option of paying the licensing fee when they purchase the solution or renting it from us."

"The licensing price is fair compared to other similar solutions."

"In today's market, agility is the new currency. Without virtualization, and vSphere in particular, we wouldn't have the level of agility in the business that we have today."

"VMware does provide organizations with discounts. The customer service license fee we got discounts on from the supplier in order for us to get the best out of the license fees. That's our experience. We possibly paid less than our partner company. The partner is only local and not global like our firm."

"As the vSphere platform allows for a variety of additions, it is quite good."

"vSphere is an expensive solution."

More VMware vSphere pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Server Virtualization Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user234735

Technology Consultant, ASEAN at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

May 10, 2015

Hyper-V 2012 R2 vs. VMware vSphere 5.5

I was won with Hyper-V 2012R2 recently and the table below based on customer RFP (edited). This articles all about technical, there is not related with TCO/ROI, licensing cost, “political”, etc. Another to noted is the Windows Server 2012 licenses is based on 2 socket CPU, meanwhile…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	175
Midsize Enterprise	137
Large Enterprise	259

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is IOMMU?

DEEPEN DHULLA did explain well IOMMU. IOMMU has to be activated at the bios level. It exists on Intel and AMD platforms. It is used a lot inside virtualization platforms like VMware VSphere. It pr...

See all answers

Why KVM??? Help please!

We use VMware and KVM. We find that KVM is a lot simpler to use and it provides the virtualization we need for Linux and Windows. For us, VMware does not offer any advantage. Moreover, KVM is free.

See all answers

Proxmox vs ESXi/vSphere: What is your experience?

For me the biggest impact is the cost of licensing in the case of VMware despite its overall intuitiveness and ease of handling and management. However, KVM-based Open Source solutions are becoming...

See all answers

Comparisons

Proxmox VE vs Odin Virtuozzo Containers [EOL]

Compared 22% of the time

Nutanix AHV Virtualization vs Odin Virtuozzo Containers [EOL]

Compared 16% of the time

Hyper-V vs Odin Virtuozzo Containers [EOL]

Compared 13% of the time

Oracle VM vs Odin Virtuozzo Containers [EOL]

Compared 11% of the time

Oracle VM VirtualBox vs Odin Virtuozzo Containers [EOL]

Compared 10% of the time

More Odin Virtuozzo Containers [EOL] Competitors

Hyper-V vs VMware vSphere

Compared 52% of the time

Oracle VM vs VMware vSphere

Compared 10% of the time

Proxmox VE vs VMware vSphere

Compared 8% of the time

KVM vs VMware vSphere

Compared 5% of the time

Citrix XenServer vs VMware vSphere

Compared 3% of the time

More VMware vSphere Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Server Virtualization Software

February 2026

Download Odin Virtuozzo Containers [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

VMware vSphere

January 2026

Download VMware vSphere product report

Also Known As

Virtuozzo Containers

No data available

Overview

Odin Virtuozzo Containers [EOL] facilitated efficient virtualization by providing container-based solutions, optimizing resource management, and reducing overhead costs. Its capabilities included enhanced server implementations, making it suitable for professional environments.

With Odin Virtuozzo Containers [EOL], enterprises managed multiple isolated instances on a single server, enhancing control and flexibility. Its lightweight nature allowed for rapid deployment and minimal resource consumption, ideal for high-density environments. Businesses leveraged its modular approach to scale efficiently while maintaining stability and performance.

What are the standout features?

Container Isolation: Ensures security and stability by isolating environments.
Efficient Resource Allocation: Dynamically manages system resources for optimal performance.
Rapid Deployment: Facilitates quick instance launches to meet business demands.
Scalability: Supports seamless scaling based on enterprise needs.
Lightweight Architecture: Reduces overhead, enhancing server efficiency.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces hardware investment by maximizing server use.
Enhanced Security: Provides robust isolation to protect against threats.
Increased Agility: Adapts quickly to changing requirements.
Improved Performance: Optimizes workloads with reduced resource strain.
Operational Simplicity: Streamlines management and maintenance efforts.

Odin Virtuozzo Containers [EOL] found application in industries like web hosting, where rapid provisioning and cost efficiency are crucial. It allowed providers to host numerous customer environments economically. In the education sector, it supported labs with diverse setups, improving accessibility and operational management.

Ingram Micro

VMware vSphere offers robust virtualization capabilities with features that enhance data center performance and optimize workloads. Centralized management and ease of deployment make it a cost-effective choice for many industries.

VMware vSphere is recognized for its high availability, vMotion, and Distributed Resource Scheduler, essential for efficient server infrastructure management. Users value its virtual machine management, seamless live migration, and strong resource allocation across data centers. Though the web client can be slow, and individual management of multiple ESXi hosts is challenging without central management, vSphere remains popular due to its flexibility and integration capabilities. While fault tolerance and free version features have their limitations, the product supports private clouds and hybrid cloud deployments effectively.

What are the key features of VMware vSphere?

High Availability: Ensures uptime through automatic failover and load balancing.
vMotion: Facilitates live migration without downtime.
Distributed Resource Scheduler: Optimizes workload distribution across servers.
Centralized Management: Simplifies administration tasks through single-pane control.
Resource Allocation: Allocates computing power and memory efficiently.

What benefits and ROI does VMware vSphere offer?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces hardware requirements and energy usage.
Scalability: Easily scales to meet growing business requirements.
Improved Performance: Enhances application performance and reliability.
Flexibility: Supports integration with other technologies for operational agility.
Ease of Management: Simplifies monitoring and administrative efforts.

VMware vSphere is widely used in industries to manage server infrastructure effectively, hosting mission-critical applications like ERP and SQL servers. It supports development, testing, and backup environments, contributing to data center consolidation and cost reduction while enabling private and hybrid cloud setups.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

OzHosting.com, Triple C, ServerNest, Vastspace, Conetix

Abu Dhabi Ports Company, ACS, AIA New Zealand, Consona, Corporate Express, CS Energy, and Digiweb.

Buyer's Guide

Server Virtualization Software

February 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, Microsoft, Proxmox and others in Server Virtualization Software. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Server Virtualization Software vendors.

We monitor all Server Virtualization Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.