OpenText Application Quality Management vs Polarion ALM comparison

OpenText Application Quality Management vs. Polarion ALM

Download the complete report

Helped 916,197 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Application Qualit...

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

208

Ranking in other categories

Quality Management Software (1st), Test Management Tools (1st)

Polarion ALM

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category, the mindshare of OpenText Application Quality Management is 8.2%, up from 4.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Polarion ALM is 4.2%, down from 7.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Application Quality Management	8.2%
Polarion ALM	4.2%
Other	87.6%

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

Featured Reviews

Greg Stone

Partner at IS Nordic AS

Manages multiple releases seamlessly

We have done some work with companies, probably four or five years ago and found the ability to manage multiple releases simultaneously as a main advantage, especially in complex programs with multiple concurrent releases. Running automated tests against back-level versions in certain environments is possible, and newer versions can be tested as well. It creates constant visibility into the test process, showing the status, bugs, and automated test results. It is a solid product in large corporations in Denmark, ensuring everyone knows where the process stands. There is a good understanding of what is critical, allowing prioritization of test cases.

Read full review

LasseMikkonen

CEO at byte

Has provided mature traceability and configuration features while supporting complex product development for mid-to-large companies

Polarion ALM can learn from Atlassian tools a lot, as the usability is not the best, and it is really narrowly focused on requirements management only. For example, if you want to do testing and test result management with it, it is very limited. Jama Connect has similar limitations, and both should really focus on developing the integrations and extendability. For example, Jama Connect does not even have an extension marketplace, whereas Polarion has a small one. However, compared to the Atlassian Marketplace where you can get whatever applications for whatever price, it is a totally different ballgame. I would highly recommend Polarion ALM add more AI features to it. I know they have started to do something, but for example, I have been developing widgets for IBM DOORS Next, AI widgets, so that you can write and analyze requirements with the AI, and I have also done the same for Jira, creating a couple of Jira applications in the marketplace as well.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We are happy, it is a good product, we have benefited from the tool and recommend it, and we have received very good feedback regarding its use."

"In the case of the software development company, the use of HPE QC helped us to become compliant with GAMP and ISO requirements."

"It has improved our testing designs and test reporting."

"The ability to keep test cases and defects centrally located, accessible to multiple people instead of in document format, is the most valuable feature."

"It empowers us to do more testing, our testing is being done for customers, and the solution enables us to conduct risk-based testing by linking requirements of a certain risk factor and showing in a report once they are covered."

"ALM/Quality Center is expensive, but it has its value and, in certain cases, the Enterprise edition is way too much, but it is very stable and reliable."

"The user interface is fully web-capable; it's a website, and it runs on a browser."

"If you want an end to end testing lifecycle product, I think HP is the winner."

More OpenText Application Quality Management pros

"Polarion ALM has some valuable tools for managing our targets and requirements. I think that's its best feature."

"There are similar solutions out there such as Jira and Confluence, but they are not as good."

"The best feature of Polarion ALM to me is its traceability link."

"You can see the work ticket and you can circulate that within the teams. You can define your flows, customize according to your needs, and you can create dashboards and create the reports according to your needs."

"Polarion ALM delivers both document views and table views simultaneously and organizes configurations according to norms and standards."

"I am impressed with the solution’s stability."

"The features I find the most valuable are requirement tracking and schematics."

"It's extremely flexible. Configuring items is straightforward and doesn't require involving the supplier each time. We find the requirement management, test management, documentation, and dashboards very effective."

More Polarion ALM pros

Cons

"Tighter integration between ALM and UFT, especially from a reporting perspective, for automation reporting. We currently run into reporting issues."

"One issue I have faced was that while I was importing test cases from Excel to Quality Center, it was not asking to check out the test cases but instead it would overwrite the default test cases and create a new version for it."

"This is for big software houses, so costs and especially yearly renewal of support is very very expensive."

"My personal satisfaction level with HP service and support website is low."

"It's doing what it should do, but it's a little bit costly. I would like to see some kind of testing analytics."

"The solution is not browser-based, which modern users prefer."

"I'd like to see the concept of teams put into it."

"I've faced a couple of bugs in the product whereby we were not able to open attachments on a particular ticket."

More OpenText Application Quality Management cons

"Based on my understanding, the tool's integration capabilities with multiple tools is an area of concern that Polarion needs to focus on more."

"The most important thing for them to improve should be platform-independent features. They should also provide extensive pipelines and release pipelines that we can define and we can work on."

"The solution can be improved by making it more user-friendly, and a server-based application rather than client based."

"The solution needs to improve its user experience and graphics."

"Technical support needs some improvement."

"As Polarion ALM is a development-oriented tool, easy support or easy access is provided by default, but if I want to use detailed features, I need to write the script, particularly the VM script, and this is its area for improvement. I want Polarion ALM to have a graphical user interface that doesn't need scripting. In the next release of the tool, I'd like for it to not require scripting and programming because needing to run script language is time-consuming."

"If you were to say that everything is integrated and it's a complete solution, I would say it's not."

"The user interface of Polarion ALM needs improvement as it can experience changes that disrupt workflows, especially during major updates."

More Polarion ALM cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is an expensive tool. I think one needs to pay 10,000 USD towards the perpetual licensing model."

"I'd rate the pricing as 3/10 as it's very expensive."

"ALM Quality Center is a little bit costly."

"Pricing is managed by our headquarters. I am able to get from them for very cheap. The market price is horribly expensive."

"It is very expensive as compared to other tools. We didn't get their premier version. It is a lesser version, and to upgrade, there will be an additional cost for us."

"The full ALM license lets you use the requirements tab, along with test automation and the Performance Center. You can also just buy the Quality Center edition (Manual testing only), or the Performance Center version (Performance Testing only)."

"The licensing fee is a little expensive."

"The cost of licensing depends on the number of VMs that you are running test cases on and it is not cheap."

More OpenText Application Quality Management pricing and cost advice

"The license model is okay for large companies but would be quite expensive for smaller enterprises."

"Software for medical devices is always expensive."

"Our license for Polarion ALM is yearly. And it's not the cheapest tool that we've looked at. So if we had made our decision purely based on the licensing cost, we wouldn't have selected Polarion."

"It is an expensive product."

"The solution is expensive."

"You have to pay around 50-60 euros per user."

"If the pricing would come down and it was more affordable then we wouldn't have to switch."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

916,197 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

32%

Comms Service Provider

Healthcare Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	41
Midsize Enterprise	32
Large Enterprise	161

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	13

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?

The on-premises setup tends to be on the expensive side. It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.

What needs improvement with Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?

Regarding integration with various development tools, I can provide examples, and I am using customizable dashboards in OpenText ALM _ Quality Center, which definitely help identify project bottlen...

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?

People are using OpenText ALM _ Quality Center for recording user cases, testing and hand documentation, defect tracking, business purposes, and reporting.

What needs improvement with Polarion ALM?

What is your primary use case for Polarion ALM?

We are in our product development using Polarion ALM's functionalities. I am a power user, partly responsible for configuring the tool. We are using it for many things. The idea was to go for a req...

What advice do you have for others considering Polarion ALM?

The pricing of Polarion ALM and IBM ELM is pretty much aligned. They are not at the same level, but I would say aligned according to the capabilities of the tools, with DOORS being more expensive b...

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Comparisons

Compared 25% of the time

Jira vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Compared 5% of the time

Zephyr Enterprise vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Compared 4% of the time

OpenText Software Delivery Management vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Compared 3% of the time

TFS vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Compared 3% of the time

More OpenText Application Quality Management Competitors

Codebeamer vs Polarion ALM

Compared 14% of the time

Jira vs Polarion ALM

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Polarion ALM

Compared 9% of the time

OpenText Software Delivery Management vs Polarion ALM

Compared 9% of the time

Rally Software vs Polarion ALM

Compared 4% of the time

More Polarion ALM Competitors

Product Reports

OpenText Application Quality Management

Download OpenText Application Quality Management product report

OpenText Application Quality Management report

Polarion ALM

Download Polarion ALM product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, HPE ALM, Quality Center, Quality Center, Micro Focus ALM, OpenText Quality Manager

No data available

Overview

OpenText Application Quality Management offers centralized data management, traceability, and integration capabilities. It aids in handling requirements, test planning, and defect tracking while supporting both manual and automated testing. Challenges exist in deployment and browser compatibility.

Known for its robust reporting and flexibility, OpenText Application Quality Management is tailored for large organizations requiring a comprehensive solution supporting lifecycle coverage and seamless tool integration. Users can consolidate testing processes, manage requirements, and centralize reporting across manual and automated testing. While some face issues with project tracking, outdated interfaces, and limited browser compatibility beyond Internet Explorer, it remains widely used for regression and performance testing. Integration with tools like JIRA and support for tools such as UFT and ALM PC underscore its utility.

What are the key features of OpenText Application Quality Management?

Centralized Data Management: Consolidates and organizes testing data efficiently.
Traceability: Ensures traceability across all stages of the testing lifecycle.
Integration Capabilities: Connects seamlessly with automation and other essential tools.
Test Planning and Execution: Supports both manual and automated tests in a streamlined manner.
Advanced Reporting: Provides robust options to generate insightful test reports.
Customization: Offers tailored solutions to fit specific organizational needs.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Efficiency: Increases test management efficiency across projects.
Scalability: Adapts to the varying scope of large-scale projects.
Lifecycle Coverage: Comprehensive management from requirement to defect tracking.
User-Friendly Interface: Designed for ease of use despite needing updates.
Cost-Effectiveness: Balances high initial costs with long-term savings through efficient testing management.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, OpenText Application Quality Management is implemented to ensure rigorous testing standards. It supports test case creation and execution, defect tracking, and requirements management. Integration with JIRA and performance testing tools make it suitable for organizations needing synchronized testing environments.

OpenText

Polarion ALM focuses on requirements management, offering structured management and traceability across projects. Known for integration and flexibility, it supports collaboration with user-friendly navigation.

Polarion ALM is recognized for its ability to streamline tasks, enabling comprehensive project management without external plugins. Its interface supports real-time collaboration and advanced reporting, while document control and workflow configuration provide additional value. Despite needing enhancements in integration and automation, it serves application lifecycle management across industries like medical device development and automotive, integrating with SVN and GitLab.

What are the key features of Polarion ALM?

Traceability: Ensures seamless tracking of project requirements.
Document Control: Manages comprehensive documentation efficiently.
Workflow Configuration: Simplifies tasks with customizable workflows.
Integration: Connects well with tools like SVN and GitLab.
Collaboration: Supports teamwork with real-time sync and interaction.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Efficiency: Reduces time through streamlined task management.
Flexibility: Adapts to diverse project requirements.
Scalability: Grows with organizational needs.
Compliance: Supports regulatory requirements effectively.
Comprehensive Features: Minimizes need for external plugins.

Polarion ALM finds application in sectors such as medical device development and automotive, utilized for application lifecycle management, requirements engineering, and documentation. Organizations benefit from its support for DevOps, task management, and traceability, effectively capturing customer needs and managing test cases.

Siemens

Sample Customers

Airbus Defense and Space, Vodafone, JTI, Xellia, and Banco de Creìdito e Inversiones (Bci)

Engineering Ingegneria Informatica, IBS AG, Zumtobel Group

OpenText Application Quality Management vs. Polarion ALM