OpenText Application Quality Management vs Tricentis LiveCompare comparison

Why PeerSpot?

OpenText and Tricentis are both solutions in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category. OpenText is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.0, while Tricentis is ranked #28. OpenText holds a 8.5% mindshare in ALM, compared to Tricentis’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Tricentis users who would recommend it.

OpenText Application Qualit...

Read 208 OpenText Application Quality Management reviews

22,317 Views
13,837 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Tricentis LiveCompare

Read 1 Tricentis LiveCompare review

1,398 Views
769 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Application Qualit...

Tricentis LiveCompare

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 1, 2026

OpenText Application Quality Management and Tricentis LiveCompare compete in the application testing domain. Tricentis LiveCompare often appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced testing capabilities, which justify its cost advantage over OpenText's pricing and support.

Features: OpenText offers comprehensive test management, integration with various development tools, and a focus on quality assurance throughout the application lifecycle. Tricentis offers automated impact analysis, intelligent testing powered by AI, and features that significantly reduce testing time, enhancing efficiency.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText provides a straightforward deployment process with strong customer support, making it accessible for first-time deployments. Tricentis offers cloud-based deployment for quick scalability but requires a steeper learning curve. OpenText offers better customer service with more direct support channels for deployment assistance.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText is generally more affordable, appealing to organizations with budget constraints, and offers satisfactory ROI from its functionalities and services. Tricentis, while more costly, delivers superior ROI by reducing overall testing time and improving test accuracy, providing substantial value with its advanced testing automation.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Application Qualit...

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

208

Ranking in other categories

Quality Management Software (1st), Test Management Tools (1st)

Tricentis LiveCompare

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

28th

Average Rating

0.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

SAP Service Providers (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category, the mindshare of OpenText Application Quality Management is 8.5%, up from 4.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tricentis LiveCompare is 0.8%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Application Quality Management	8.5%
Tricentis LiveCompare	0.8%
Other	90.7%

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

Featured Reviews

Greg Stone

Partner at IS Nordic AS

Manages multiple releases seamlessly

We have done some work with companies, probably four or five years ago and found the ability to manage multiple releases simultaneously as a main advantage, especially in complex programs with multiple concurrent releases. Running automated tests against back-level versions in certain environments is possible, and newer versions can be tested as well. It creates constant visibility into the test process, showing the status, bugs, and automated test results. It is a solid product in large corporations in Denmark, ensuring everyone knows where the process stands. There is a good understanding of what is critical, allowing prioritization of test cases.

Read full review

it_user713811

Product Manager at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Accurately identifies what will be affected in production after a change or upgrade

The LiveCompare apps that my customers and I have benefitted from the most are analyses and reports on the following: * Upgrades – LiveCompare's Impact Analysis functionality accurately identifies what will be affected in production as the result of a change or an upgrade. It can also pinpoint accurately the scope of testing needed in anticipation of an upgrade. * Migration to SAP Hana – LiveCompare's unique reporting and advanced analytics streamline the entire migration process to SAP Hana, while minimizing costs, risk, and time. * SAP License management optimization. * Custom code analytics – Includes usage monitoring, quality and performance monitoring, Java analysis, and ABAP code quality. * Testing - LiveCompare optimizes the entire testing phase in upgrade projects.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"My clients were able to implement an end-to-end process for software testing."

"Most of the features that I like the best are more on the analytics side."

"The solution's support team was always there to help."

"It has improved our testing designs and test reporting."

"ALM makes functional testing much easier for our customers."

"ALM/Quality Center is expensive, but it has its value and, in certain cases, the Enterprise edition is way too much, but it is very stable and reliable."

"For me and for our organization, it's a really good product; I'm really happy with it and it meets my needs completely."

"You can plan your test execution very thoroughly with configurations and setups in the test lab."

More OpenText Application Quality Management pros

"Using LiveCompare allows us to automate many of the required tasks while gaining access to data needed to optimize our SAP environments with fewer resources than before."

"LiveCompare's Impact Analysis functionality identifies accurately what will be affected in production as the result of a change or an upgrade. It can also pinpoint accurately the scope of testing needed in anticipation of an upgrade."

"LiveCompare's unique reporting and advanced analytics streamline the entire migration process to SAP Hana, while minimizing costs, risk, and time."

Cons

"The solution needs to offer support for Agile. Currently, ALM only supports Waterfall."

"It is nice, but it does have some weaknesses. It's a bit hard to go back and change the requirement tool after setup."

"There are scalability issues."

"HPE has one of the most rigid, inflexible, and super expensive license models."

"This will take a lot of training and convincing of end-users."

"Release management and integration with other tools."

"Setup and upgrades are complex. Probably one of my biggest issues with the product is that it's so complex and hard to do."

"Reporting is almost useless, but it does allow you to extract information directly from the database through a robust API and report with your favorite tool [excel, Crystal]."

More OpenText Application Quality Management cons

"From my experience with the product, I would suggest adding a feature that would allow a customer who is reviewing the LiveCompare results to be able to connect remotely with one of IntelliCorp's experts (aside from their support) in order to assist the customer to better understand the results."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The full ALM license lets you use the requirements tab, along with test automation and the Performance Center. You can also just buy the Quality Center edition (Manual testing only), or the Performance Center version (Performance Testing only)."

"Compared to the market, the price is high."

"Quality Center is pricey, but cheaper is not always less expensive."

"It has several limitations in adapting its agility easily."

"This is an expensive solution."

"We pay around $30,000 for thirty users, translating to approximately $6,000 to $10,000 per user, which is high."

"Only major companies that can afford it use OpenText ALM."

"The solution is priceed high."

More OpenText Application Quality Management pricing and cost advice

"IntelliCorp is flexible in terms of licensing and the pricing structure. They are open to discussing a customer's specific requirements."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Construction Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	41
Midsize Enterprise	32
Large Enterprise	161

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?

The on-premises setup tends to be on the expensive side. It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?

Regarding integration with various development tools, I can provide examples, and I am using customizable dashboards in OpenText ALM _ Quality Center, which definitely help identify project bottlen...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?

People are using OpenText ALM _ Quality Center for recording user cases, testing and hand documentation, defect tracking, business purposes, and reporting.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Compared 25% of the time

Jira vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Compared 5% of the time

Zephyr Enterprise vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Compared 4% of the time

TFS vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Compared 3% of the time

OpenText Software Delivery Management vs OpenText Application Quality Management

Compared 3% of the time

More OpenText Application Quality Management Competitors

Jira vs Tricentis LiveCompare

Compared 16% of the time

Avantra vs Tricentis LiveCompare

Compared 12% of the time

SmartShift vs Tricentis LiveCompare

Compared 8% of the time

Deloitte SAP Services vs Tricentis LiveCompare

Compared 8% of the time

IBM SAP Services vs Tricentis LiveCompare

Compared 7% of the time

More Tricentis LiveCompare Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Application Quality Management

October 2026

OpenText Application Quality Management report

Download OpenText Application Quality Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

October 2026

Download Tricentis LiveCompare product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, HPE ALM, Quality Center, Quality Center, Micro Focus ALM, OpenText Quality Manager

No data available

Overview

OpenText Application Quality Management offers centralized data management, traceability, and integration capabilities. It aids in handling requirements, test planning, and defect tracking while supporting both manual and automated testing. Challenges exist in deployment and browser compatibility.

Known for its robust reporting and flexibility, OpenText Application Quality Management is tailored for large organizations requiring a comprehensive solution supporting lifecycle coverage and seamless tool integration. Users can consolidate testing processes, manage requirements, and centralize reporting across manual and automated testing. While some face issues with project tracking, outdated interfaces, and limited browser compatibility beyond Internet Explorer, it remains widely used for regression and performance testing. Integration with tools like JIRA and support for tools such as UFT and ALM PC underscore its utility.

What are the key features of OpenText Application Quality Management?

Centralized Data Management: Consolidates and organizes testing data efficiently.
Traceability: Ensures traceability across all stages of the testing lifecycle.
Integration Capabilities: Connects seamlessly with automation and other essential tools.
Test Planning and Execution: Supports both manual and automated tests in a streamlined manner.
Advanced Reporting: Provides robust options to generate insightful test reports.
Customization: Offers tailored solutions to fit specific organizational needs.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Efficiency: Increases test management efficiency across projects.
Scalability: Adapts to the varying scope of large-scale projects.
Lifecycle Coverage: Comprehensive management from requirement to defect tracking.
User-Friendly Interface: Designed for ease of use despite needing updates.
Cost-Effectiveness: Balances high initial costs with long-term savings through efficient testing management.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, OpenText Application Quality Management is implemented to ensure rigorous testing standards. It supports test case creation and execution, defect tracking, and requirements management. Integration with JIRA and performance testing tools make it suitable for organizations needing synchronized testing environments.

OpenText

Tricentis LiveCompare provides advanced analytics and smart automation, enhancing testing efficiency and accuracy for SAP landscapes.

Designed for complex environments, Tricentis LiveCompare specializes in impact analysis, offering real-time insights that minimize risks and enhance decision-making processes in SAP system updates and changes. Its intelligent analytics help identify and prioritize critical test cases, reducing unnecessary tests.

What are the most valuable features of Tricentis LiveCompare?

Impact Analysis: Identifies changed elements to focus on critical areas.
Test Optimization: Reduces test volumes while maintaining quality.
Smart Analytics: Provides actionable insights for informed decisions.
Automation Integration: Seamlessly supports continuous testing frameworks.

What benefits and ROI should users look for when evaluating Tricentis LiveCompare?

Cost Efficiency: Lowers testing costs with targeted approaches.
Time Savings: Accelerates test cycles through optimized processes.
Risk Reduction: Decreases deployment risks with precise impact assessments.
Quality Assurance: Enhances product quality with thorough testing insights.

Tricentis LiveCompare is implemented in industries such as finance and retail where maintaining high system reliability during updates is crucial. Its analytical capabilities support robust testing processes, ensuring operational stability and efficiency across complex SAP systems.

Tricentis

Sample Customers

Airbus Defense and Space, Vodafone, JTI, Xellia, and Banco de Creìdito e Inversiones (Bci)

Coca-Cola, eBay, BP, British American Tobacco, Surrey Country Council, AES, P66, MUD, Bentley Motors, Coats, Hershey, Kimberly Clark

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

October 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Microsoft, OpenText and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.