

OpenText Core Application Security and Tenable.io Web Application Scanning compete in the application security market. OpenText Core seems to have the upper hand, as it gains traction with strong support ratings and value in reducing security incidents, though Tenable.io is noted for user-friendly adaptability and detailed scanning capabilities.
Features: OpenText Core offers detailed application security insights, 24/7 technical support, and correlates static and dynamic results to reduce false positives. Tenable.io provides scalable, reliable performance with versatile deployment options, seamless integration in various environments, and is straightforward to use.
Room for Improvement: OpenText Core could enhance its reporting with better visualizations and improve incident management integration. User feedback suggests reducing false positives and speeding up scans. Tenable.io could refine its reporting and dashboard for a better user experience and improve API scanning features and vulnerability management.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Core provides on-premises and hybrid cloud deployments, with high technical support ratings, though response speed and clarity could improve. Tenable.io favors cloud deployment, offering scaling and integration flexibility, with commendable customer service for availability and effectiveness.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText Core's pricing can be perceived as expensive but is justified by its comprehensive security capabilities. Tenable.io's pricing is competitive but lacks transparency. Both solutions offer significant value in reducing security risks and improving security posture, enhancing ROI from a prevention perspective.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Core Application Security | 3.2% |
| Tenable.io Web Application Scanning | 1.4% |
| Other | 95.4% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 17 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 8 |
| Large Enterprise | 44 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 7 |
OpenText Core Application Security offers robust features like static and dynamic scanning, real-time vulnerability tracking, and seamless integration with development platforms, designed to enhance code security and reduce operational costs.
OpenText Core Application Security is a cloud-based, on-demand service providing accurate and deep scanning capabilities with detailed reporting. Its integrations with development platforms ensure an enhanced security layer in the development lifecycle, benefiting users by lowering operational costs and facilitating efficient remediation. The platform addresses needs for intuitive interfaces, API support, and comprehensive vulnerability assessments, helping improve code security and accelerate time-to-market. Despite its strengths, challenges exist around false positives, report clarity, and language support, alongside confusing pricing and package options. Enhancements are sought in areas like CI/CD pipeline configuration, report visualization, scan times, and integration with third-party tools such as GitLab, container scanning, and software composition analysis.
What features define OpenText Core Application Security?Industries like mobile applications, e-commerce, and banking leverage OpenText Core Application Security for its ability to identify vulnerabilities such as SQL injections. Integrating seamlessly with DevSecOps and security auditing processes, this tool supports developers in writing safer code, ensuring secure application deployment and enhancing software assurance.
Tenable.io Web Application Scanning safely, accurately and automatically scans your web applications, providing deep visibility into vulnerabilities and valuable context to prioritize remediation.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.