OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs TestObject comparison

OpenText and Sauce Labs are both solutions in the Mobile App Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.5, while Sauce Labs is ranked #14. OpenText holds a 6.1% mindshare in MTT, compared to Sauce Labs’s 2.2% mindshare. Additionally, 84% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Sauce Labs users who would recommend it.

OpenText Functional Testing...

Read 19 OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web reviews

2,235 Views
827 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

TestObject

Read 1 TestObject review

291 Views
291 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Functional Testing...

TestObject

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

OpenText Functional Testing Lab and TestObject compete in the software testing field. OpenText Functional Testing Lab has the upper hand with its comprehensive feature set overshadowing TestObject, which may offer advantages in pricing and customer service.

Features: OpenText Functional Testing Lab offers extensive mobile and web testing capabilities, robust integration, and advanced automation features. TestObject provides a cloud-based platform for mobile app testing with real-time environments, emphasizing accessibility and straightforward mobile testing scenarios.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Functional Testing Lab provides flexible deployment with hybrid cloud and on-premises solutions and substantial technical support. TestObject offers streamlined cloud-based deployment focusing on ease of setup and simplicity, appealing to those seeking quick installation with minimal customer service involvement.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Functional Testing Lab involves a higher setup cost due to its extensive features, potentially yielding a higher ROI for organizations needing a wide array of testing functionalities. TestObject has a lower initial investment with attractive ROI for mobile testing focused businesses, offering cost-effectiveness.

To learn more, read our detailed Mobile App Testing Tools Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Mobile App Testing Tools

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,221 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Functional Testing...

Ranking in Mobile App Testing Tools

6th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (18th)

TestObject

Ranking in Mobile App Testing Tools

14th

Average Rating

10.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Mobile App Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is 6.1%, up from 2.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TestObject is 2.2%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Mobile App Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web	6.1%
TestObject	2.2%
Other	91.7%

Mobile App Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer2356440

Senior Director at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Experienced ease in automation with strong support while seeking improvements in low-code options

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers flexibility of deployment, from on-premises to UFT One which is on the cloud. They provide capability for immediate deployment, and assets can be migrated easily. They include enablers specifically for quick migration of test assets. While I have not personally been involved in these migrations, I have observed some clients using it directly while others make a complete shift from OpenText to Tricentis platforms. There have not been many clients moving from OpenText platforms from on-premises to cloud because most shifts have been toward different product categories such as Tricentis altogether.

Read full review

RajeevSAwant

Head Automation CoE at Truglobal

Low-code testing platform used for API and visual testing as well as AI-based scriptless automation

This solution is very easy to use and this is one of the solutions best features. It has integrated seamlessly with our framework and provides very wide coverage. It offers very comprehensive reporting and allows us to drill down to the various levels of the automation and respective application performance. What TestObject provides is not available from other service providers. The kind of detailed reporting provided is very good.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"There are numerous valuable features such as automation, the ones that facilitate importing and synchronization capabilities between our platform, Jira, and Azure DevOps."

"In general, in my opinion, Mobile Center is a good product that allows us to do everything we need to automate application testing for mobile."

"The ideas and possibilities that this tool has are incredibly useful."

"We escalate tickets to HPE, and we don't have problems."

"The fact that it allows users to test on real mobile devices instead of emulators is something that projects have told us is beyond compare."

"This helped my prior organization immensely due to the ability to remotely manipulate devices, even by offshore vendors."

"The solution is easy to use. There are features to orchestrate mobile testing, including mobile testing automation. You can test different devices at the same time."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is virtualization."

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web pros

"TestObject have released new capabilities that have helped us to provide a comprehensive solution to our end customers. Customers do not need to provide upfront investment in mobile devices as these are pretty costly."

"This solution is very easy to use and this is one of the solutions best features."

Cons

"Deployment was an issue. Each time we set it up and deployed, it failed and we had to relaunch it again."

"We like to host the tools centrally. We would need them to be multi-tenants, so different projects could log on and have their own set of devices and their own set of apps, and they wouldn't see data from other projects that are using it."

"I think the interface is not very good and I have used other solutions that are easier to learn."

"With versions prior to 2.0 I found that configuration was trickier than it should be, particularly with aspects such as NV."

"Because of connection errors, we've haven't yet been able to set it up properly at my company."

"The documentation and user interface both need improvement."

"The product's object detection method needs to be improved since it can help testers do perfect testing."

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web cons

"In a future release, we would like to have the ARML model included."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product could be more affordable."

"While the pricing may seem relatively high, when compared to competitors, it often falls in line or can even be more cost-effective."

"OpenText UFT Digital Lab's pricing is average, and I rate it a five out of ten."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile App Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

10%

Construction Company

Non Profit

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	13

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

Digital Lab is a pretty solid product with areas that could be continuously improved on.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

I deal with OpenText Analysis Database and Core Performance Engineering, which are categories of software rather than individual pieces. We focus on the ADM area, which includes ALM, UFT One, UFT D...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

I do have experience with OpenText products and OpenText ALM. I have been using ALM Quality Center, which has had a few names for it over time, but it is the old Quality Center that was then rename...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Perfecto vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 7% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 5% of the time

Sauce Labs vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 5% of the time

ReadyAPI vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 4% of the time

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web Competitors

Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs TestObject

Compared 66% of the time

Perfecto vs TestObject

Compared 20% of the time

More TestObject Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

April 2026

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web report

Download OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web product report

Buyer's Guide

Mobile App Testing Tools

April 2026

Download TestObject product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus UFT Digital Lab, Micro Focus UFT Mobile, Mobile Center, Micro Focus Mobile Center, HPE Mobile Center

No data available

Overview

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers integration with HPE and non-HPE tools, real device testing, and device management. It supports real-time analytics and multi-platform testing, ensuring traceability and flexibility with decentralized devices.

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is designed to enhance testing efficiency for mobile and desktop applications by allowing ease of integration with different testing environments. It features real-time analytics, supports automated device management, and provides the flexibility of decentralized testing on real devices. With a focus on robust traceability, it stands out as a comprehensive choice for optimizing software development life cycles, especially notable for its ability to support multiple devices simultaneously and strategic scaling through network virtualization and AWS device farm.

What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing Lab?

Ease of Use: Intuitive interface facilitating user engagement.
Integration: Compatible with HPE and non-HPE tools for improved workflow.
Real Device Testing: Ensures testing on actual devices for accurate results.
Automation: Advanced capabilities streamline repetitive testing.
Device Management: Flexible management of decentralized devices.
Multi-Platform Support: Simultaneous testing across various platforms.
Traceability: Strong application delivery traceability for robust tracking.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Scalability: Ability to handle multiple devices and scale as needed.
Flexibility: Deployment options include both on-premises and cloud-based solutions.
Real-Time Analytics: Provides actionable insights for data-driven decisions.
Enhanced Performance: Optimizes the software development lifecycle.
Comprehensive Testing: Facilitates thorough functional and performance testing.

Financial services companies utilize OpenText Functional Testing Lab for optimizing mobile solutions and applications, ensuring a streamlined integration into their Application Lifecycle Management and Unified Functional Testing processes. It aids in functional and performance testing, adapting to both on-premises and cloud deployments to suit industry-specific demands.

OpenText

TestObject is a specialized testing tool designed to enhance software development through comprehensive testing capabilities, delivering quality assurance for enterprises seeking effective app testing solutions.

Known for facilitating mobile app testing, TestObject offers a cloud-based platform that provides real device testing, enabling developers to ensure app performance across different environments. Its support of automated testing frameworks enhances test efficiency and accuracy. TestObject's integration capabilities with development tools foster a streamlined workflow, making it a strategic choice for companies focusing on improving app quality and reducing time-to-market.

What are the key features of TestObject?

Real Device Testing: Access a wide range of devices for accurate real-world testing.
Automation Frameworks: Supports popular automation frameworks to increase testing speed.
Cloud Integration: Easily integrate with cloud services for scalable testing operations.
Scalability: Efficiently manage multiple tests and devices simultaneously.

What benefits can users expect?

Time Efficiency: Faster testing processes reduce development cycle times.
Improved Quality: Comprehensive testing ensures high-performance applications.
Cost Reduction: Decreases resource allocation by utilizing cloud-based testing.
Flexibility: Supports a variety of testing scenarios and configurations.

In industries like finance and healthcare, TestObject is utilized to deliver secure, reliable applications. Its ability to conduct rigorous tests in cloud environments ensures that apps meet strict regulatory standards while providing seamless user experience. By facilitating automated and manual testing, it helps companies maintain competitiveness through high-quality software solutions.

Sauce Labs

Sample Customers

Bci, BPER Services, Die Mobiliar, Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, HPE, Independent Health, Shanghai OnStar Telematics, Pick n Pay, UCB

BW Bank, Telefonica

Buyer's Guide

Mobile App Testing Tools

April 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Digital.ai and others in Mobile App Testing Tools. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Mobile App Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Mobile App Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.