OpenText Static Application Security Testing vs PyCharm comparison

OpenText and JetBrains are both solutions in the Static Code Analysis category. OpenText is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.5, while JetBrains is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.4. OpenText holds a 6.4% mindshare in SCAS, compared to JetBrains’s 2.2% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of JetBrains users who would recommend it.

OpenText Static Application...

Read 19 OpenText Static Application Security Testing reviews

4,414 Views
1,412 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

PyCharm

Read 15 PyCharm reviews

809 Views
809 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Static Application...

PyCharm

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

OpenText Static Application Security Testing and PyCharm compete in the software development tools market. PyCharm leads for individual developers due to its usability and pricing, while OpenText offers superior security features for enterprises.

Features: OpenText provides extensive integration capabilities for seamless code scanning, consistent updates to maintain secure code, and support for multiple development environments. PyCharm is known for its integrated coding support features, GitHub integration, and a wide range of plugins, enhancing Python development and coding productivity.

Room for Improvement: OpenText needs to enhance language support, reduce noise in static code analysis, and incorporate modern infrastructure capabilities such as container scanning. PyCharm could benefit from performance optimizations to reduce memory usage and loading time, better integration with workflow products, and expanded language support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText offers versatile on-premises and hybrid cloud deployment options but faces challenges in user support responsiveness. PyCharm primarily uses on-premises deployment and is generally reliable with positively-rated support, though users desire improvements in the support experience.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText is costly, with high licensing fees suitable for enterprises but yields significant ROI in vulnerability identification. PyCharm offers a free community edition and a competitively priced professional edition, accessible for individuals and small businesses, providing good value for its development features.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Static Application Security Testing vs. PyCharm Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Static Application Security Testing vs. PyCharm

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,797 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Static Application...

Ranking in Static Code Analysis

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

PyCharm

Ranking in Static Code Analysis

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Static Code Analysis category, the mindshare of OpenText Static Application Security Testing is 6.4%, down from 11.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PyCharm is 2.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Code Analysis Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Static Application Security Testing	6.4%
PyCharm	2.2%
Other	91.4%

Static Code Analysis

Featured Reviews

Dristi Kurre

Lead Information Security Analyst at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Focuses on detailed scans to find critical vulnerabilities while ensuring minimal false positives

I think Fortify Static Code Analyzer could be improved by updating the number of rule packs according to the latest vulnerabilities we find each year. We have updated to a version that is one less than the current latest version. It would be really helpful to include trending vulnerabilities and how to manage them. While it includes all the OWASP top factors, AI has come into the picture, so those updates should also be considered. I haven't thought much about additional features for improvement since I am using it daily. Most of our work revolves around scanning and providing the results, which sometimes feels like a crunch. However, I believe rule pack updates should be implemented. It feels easy to upgrade to the latest version as well.

Read full review

Sahil Sanskar Jha

Assistant Manager at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Advanced machine learning workflows have become faster but still need better memory efficiency

In PyCharm, I find several components and libraries to be the most valuable. The support that Jupyter Notebook offers is essential, as we work through Jupyter regularly. Scientific libraries such as NumPy, Pandas, Matplotlib, and Plotly are integral to our work. Machine learning libraries including scikit-learn, PyTorch, and TensorFlow are used extensively. Hugging Face integration is particularly valuable because it is easily findable, the documentation is comprehensive, and it can be directly integrated with the IDEs we work with. The intelligent code editor in PyCharm definitely helps me manage code quality and efficiency in my projects. When using these libraries, it makes parallelization of data very efficient, allowing me to use multi-thread programming architecture. The code can work for multiple datasets rather than one at a time. With native Python code, a machine learning deployment taking 45 to 50 minutes to calculate can be efficiently reduced to a minute or half a second using these libraries.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We've found the documentation to be very good."

"Its flexibility is most valuable. It is such a flexible tool. It can be implemented in a number of ways. It can do anything you want it to do. It can be fully automated within a DevOps pipeline. It can also be used in an ad hoc, special test case scenario and anywhere in between."

"Fortify Static Code Analyzer tells us if there are any security leaks or not. If there are, then it's notifying us and does not allow us to pass the DevOps pipeline. If it is finds everything's perfect, as per our given guidelines, then it is allowing us to go ahead and start it, and we are able to deploy it."

"We are satisfied with this solution."

"The most valuable features include its ability to detect vulnerabilities accurately and its integration with our CI/CD pipeline."

"Integrating the Fortify Static Code Analyzer into our software development lifecycle was straightforward. It highlights important information beyond just syntax errors. It identifies issues like password credentials and access keys embedded in the code."

"The Software Security Center, which is often overlooked, stands out as the most effective feature."

"You can really see what's happening after you've developed something."

More OpenText Static Application Security Testing pros

"The solution has a great debugging feature."

"The recent AI-powered code completion is pretty cool."

"PyCharm has an excellent user experience, and I appreciate its cross-platform capabilities."

"The product's IDE feature is quite user-friendly."

"Good syntax highlighting and very it's very customizable."

"The latest AI features and tab completion features are good."

"The solution has a nice environment and extensions that make it easy to develop software."

"The integrated code structure makes coding more organized and manageable compared to using Python alone."

More PyCharm pros

Cons

"False positives need improvement in the future. Fortify's vulnerability remediation guidance helps improve code security, but I think they need to improve the focus of the solution, as it still contains many bugs and needs a thorough review."

"It can be tricky if you want to exclude some files from scanning. For instance, if you do not want to scan and push testing files to Fortify Software Security Center, that is tricky with some IDEs, such as IntelliJ. We found that there is an Exclude feature that is not working. We reported that to them for future fixing. It needs some work on the plugins to make them consistent across IDEs and make them easier."

"The product shows false positives for Python applications."

"Fortify Static Code Analyzer has a bit of a learning curve, and I don't find it particularly helpful in narrowing down the vulnerabilities we should prioritize."

"Fortify Static Code Analyzer is a good solution, but sometimes we receive false positives. If they could reduce the number of false positives it would be good."

"The troubleshooting capabilities of this solution could be improved. This would reduce the number of cases that users have to submit."

"The generation of false positives should be reduced."

"Streamlining the upgrade process and enhancing compatibility would make it easier for us to keep our security tools up-to-date."

More OpenText Static Application Security Testing cons

"There is room for improvement in memory usage. It uses too much memory. It can get a bit heavy, especially when you have too many open files and the system becomes very slow."

"PyCharm's use of system resources can get pretty heavy. Loading, in particular, takes longer than I would like and I think they should optimize it so that it's a bit lighter on the system."

"A potential area of improvement in PyCharm at this point would be memory efficiency."

"There should be support for the RUST plugin in the Community edition for debugging."

"The user interface and overall user experience could be more intuitive to make it easier for users to navigate and utilize the software effectively."

"The refactor facility in PyCharm is not on par with the refactor facility in IntelliJ. It could be improved since IntelliJ offers many more options for refactoring."

"The solution does not support some features of OpenCV even though it is part of a PyCharm package."

"The solution is heavy because running it on laptops consumes a lot of memory and power. Typically, a laptop battery might last about eight to nine hours, but with the tool running, it reduces to two hours or one and a half hours at most. It is designed to handle large projects and heavy tasks, making it resource-intensive. For smaller projects, use IDEs like Visual Studio Code."

More PyCharm cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the pricing of Fortify Static Code Analyzer as a seven out of ten since it is a bit expensive."

"The setup costs and pricing for Fortify may vary depending on the organization's needs and requirements."

"From our standpoint, we are significantly better off with Fortify due to the favorable pricing we secured five years ago."

"The price of Fortify Static Code Analyzer could be reduced."

"There is a licensing fee, and if you bring them to the company and you want them to do the installation and the implementation in the beginning, there is a separate cost. Similarly, if you want consultation or training, there is a separate cost. I see it as suitable only for enterprises. I do not see it suitable for a small business or individual use."

"It has a couple of license models. The one that we use most frequently is called their flexible deployment. We use this one because it is flexible and based on the number of code-contributing developers in the organization. It includes almost everything in the Fortify suite for one developer price. It gives access to not just the secure code analyzer (SCA) but also to FSC, the secure code. It gives us accessibility to scan central, which is the decentralized scanning farm. It also gives us access to the software security center, which is the vulnerability management platform."

"The licensing is expensive and is in the 50K range."

"Although I am not responsible for the budget, Fortify SAST is expensive."

"The price is reasonable."

"I don't have much info on the pricing, but I would say it is somewhat competitive."

"The community edition is free, which is good."

"They have a free Community edition, and they also have a licensed version. They definitely have an annual license. They probably also have a monthly license. Its pricing is good and reasonable. It is a little bit more expensive than the others, but it is well worth it. I would rate it a four out of five in terms of pricing."

"I use the free community version, so I'm saving money there."

"The community edition is free and the professional edition has a licensing fee."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Code Analysis solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,797 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

28%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Government

Performing Arts

15%

Marketing Services Firm

13%

University

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Fortify Static Code Analyzer?

Integrating the Fortify Static Code Analyzer into our software development lifecycle was straightforward. It highlights important information beyond just syntax errors. It identifies issues like pa...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortify Static Code Analyzer?

My experience with the pricing, setup costs, and licensing has been good. We have the scan machines, and we are planning to request more from Micro Focus now. We have calls every month or every oth...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Fortify Static Code Analyzer?

See all answers

What do you like most about PyCharm?

The integrated code structure makes coding more organized and manageable compared to using Python alone.

See all answers

What needs improvement with PyCharm?

A potential area of improvement in PyCharm at this point would be memory efficiency. PyCharm is based on its IntelliJ platform, which is Java-based, meaning it can be very memory-intensive, especia...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for PyCharm?

My main use case for PyCharm is for machine learning operations.

See all answers

Comparisons

Black Duck SCA vs OpenText Static Application Security Testing

Compared 17% of the time

Veracode vs OpenText Static Application Security Testing

Compared 11% of the time

Snyk vs OpenText Static Application Security Testing

Compared 11% of the time

Sonatype Lifecycle vs OpenText Static Application Security Testing

Compared 7% of the time

GitLab vs OpenText Static Application Security Testing

Compared 3% of the time

More OpenText Static Application Security Testing Competitors

Mend.io vs PyCharm

Compared 36% of the time

More PyCharm Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Static Application Security Testing

March 2026

OpenText Static Application Security Testing report

Download OpenText Static Application Security Testing product report

Buyer's Guide

PyCharm

March 2026

Download PyCharm product report

Also Known As

Fortify Static Code Analysis SAST

No data available

Overview

OpenText Static Application Security Testing empowers teams with efficient vulnerability detection and streamlined secure coding practices, offering comprehensive language support and seamless integration with development tools.

OpenText Static Application Security Testing enhances software security during development by accurately identifying vulnerabilities with minimal false positives. It integrates seamlessly with IDEs and CI/CD pipelines, making it highly efficient for early detection of security issues. Users benefit from its easy setup, clear documentation, and centralized portal for managing security findings. Despite facing challenges like high costs and complex configurations for certain languages, its role in facilitating compliance and streamlining secure coding processes is indispensable. Improvements are needed in areas such as outdated design, language support, and integration capabilities to meet evolving user expectations.

What features does OpenText Static Application Security Testing offer?

Seamless IDE Integration: Integrates effortlessly with development environments for real-time feedback.
Comprehensive Language Support: Covers a wide range of programming languages, enhancing detection accuracy.
Centralized Security Portal: Provides a streamlined interface for managing vulnerabilities.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Enhanced Security: Identifies vulnerabilities early, preventing potential breaches.
Time Efficiency: Automates processes and speeds up remediation efforts.
Compliance Facilitation: Assists in adhering to security standards and regulations.

Organizations across diverse sectors implement OpenText Static Application Security Testing primarily to secure applications during development phases. Its integration with tools like GitLab, Jenkins, and Azure DevOps ensures a robust security pipeline. By combining with Sonatype Nexus, secure code, and library management is achieved effectively.

OpenText

Be More Productive
Save time while PyCharm takes care of the routine. Focus on the bigger things and embrace the keyboard-centric approach to get the most of PyCharm's many productivity features.

JetBrains

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Static Application Security Testing vs. PyCharm

February 2026

Free Report: OpenText Static Application Security Testing vs. PyCharm

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Static Application Security Testing vs. PyCharm and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,797 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Static Application Security Testing vs. PyCharm report.

See our list of best Static Code Analysis vendors.

We monitor all Static Code Analysis reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.