Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText Static Application Security Testing vs PyCharm comparison

OpenText and JetBrains are both solutions in the Static Code Analysis category. OpenText is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.5, while JetBrains is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.6. OpenText holds a 6.4% mindshare in SCAS, compared to JetBrains’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of JetBrains users who would recommend it.
OpenText Static Application...
Read 19 OpenText Static Application Security Testing reviews
  • 4,557 Views
  • 1,367 Comparison Views
89% willing to recommend
PyCharm
Read 14 PyCharm reviews
  • 712 Views
  • 712 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

OpenText Static Application Security Testing and PyCharm compete in the software development tools market. PyCharm leads for individual developers due to its usability and pricing, while OpenText offers superior security features for enterprises.

Features: OpenText provides extensive integration capabilities for seamless code scanning, consistent updates to maintain secure code, and support for multiple development environments. PyCharm is known for its integrated coding support features, GitHub integration, and a wide range of plugins, enhancing Python development and coding productivity.

Room for Improvement: OpenText needs to enhance language support, reduce noise in static code analysis, and incorporate modern infrastructure capabilities such as container scanning. PyCharm could benefit from performance optimizations to reduce memory usage and loading time, better integration with workflow products, and expanded language support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText offers versatile on-premises and hybrid cloud deployment options but faces challenges in user support responsiveness. PyCharm primarily uses on-premises deployment and is generally reliable with positively-rated support, though users desire improvements in the support experience.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText is costly, with high licensing fees suitable for enterprises but yields significant ROI in vulnerability identification. PyCharm offers a free community edition and a competitively priced professional edition, accessible for individuals and small businesses, providing good value for its development features.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Static Application Security Testing vs. PyCharm Report (Updated: December 2025).
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Static Application Security Testing vs. PyCharm
December 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Static Application...
Ranking in Static Code Analysis
4th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
19
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
PyCharm
Ranking in Static Code Analysis
6th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Static Code Analysis category, the mindshare of OpenText Static Application Security Testing is 6.4%, down from 11.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PyCharm is 2.1%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Static Code Analysis Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
OpenText Static Application Security Testing6.4%
PyCharm2.1%
Other91.5%
Static Code Analysis
 

Featured Reviews

DK
Dristi Kurre
Lead Information Security Analyst at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Focuses on detailed scans to find critical vulnerabilities while ensuring minimal false positives
I think Fortify Static Code Analyzer could be improved by updating the number of rule packs according to the latest vulnerabilities we find each year. We have updated to a version that is one less than the current latest version. It would be really helpful to include trending vulnerabilities and how to manage them. While it includes all the OWASP top factors, AI has come into the picture, so those updates should also be considered. I haven't thought much about additional features for improvement since I am using it daily. Most of our work revolves around scanning and providing the results, which sometimes feels like a crunch. However, I believe rule pack updates should be implemented. It feels easy to upgrade to the latest version as well.
Read full review
EB
Elio_Bonazzi
Senior Consultant at Mark Gurry & Associates
Seamless integration streamlines tasks and boosts productivity with efficient task handling
PyCharm's utility supports various Python frameworks such as Django and Flask for development projects. Uvicorn is well supported in project creation. Users can choose which framework to create and it handles all the code scaffolding automatically. I use PyCharm Intelligent Code Editor for context-aware code completion, and I also use the new AI extensions that JetBrains provided recently. I find it particularly useful in code refactoring. It saves me time on boilerplate code, such as interaction with the database. I can ask the AI facility in PyCharm to create all the boilerplate code for various databases. I don't write boilerplate code for mundane tasks anymore and focus on the business logic rather than the usual ancillary functions such as collecting records from the database or making network calls. This type of work is all done by AI.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Fortify Static Code Analyzer tells us if there are any security leaks or not. If there are, then it's notifying us and does not allow us to pass the DevOps pipeline. If it is finds everything's perfect, as per our given guidelines, then it is allowing us to go ahead and start it, and we are able to deploy it."
"My initial setup of Fortify Static Code Analyzer was good."
"Fortify integrates with various development environments and tools, such as IDEs (Integrated Development Environments) and CI/CD pipelines."
"The most valuable features include its ability to detect vulnerabilities accurately and its integration with our CI/CD pipeline."
"I like Fortify Software Security Center or Fortify SSC. This tool is installed on each developer's machine, but Fortify Software Security Center combines everything. We can meet there as security professionals and developers. The developers scan their code and publish the results there. We can then look at them from a security perspective and see whether they fixed the issues. We can agree on whether something is a false positive and make decisions."
"We've found the documentation to be very good."
"The reference provided for each issue is extremely helpful."
"We write software, and therefore, the most valuable aspect for us is basically the code analysis part."
More OpenText Static Application Security Testing pros
"The integrated code structure makes coding more organized and manageable compared to using Python alone."
"The product's IDE feature is quite user-friendly."
"The automated package installation is helpful. I like the code highlighting features. A huge library of plugins is available, including AI coding tools, though I don't use those myself. The debugging tools are good, showing errors and problem lines."
"The recent AI-powered code completion is pretty cool."
"The best feature of PyCharm is that it gives you hints whenever it detects any issues while you are coding. This is important because it helps us code faster and without any errors."
"It is an excellent, fully integrated IDE with smart code analysis capability and a built-in debugger. It is a fantastic tool."
"Good syntax highlighting and very it's very customizable."
"The solution has a nice environment and extensions that make it easy to develop software."
More PyCharm pros
 

Cons

"Fortify Static Code Analyzer has a bit of a learning curve, and I don't find it particularly helpful in narrowing down the vulnerabilities we should prioritize."
"I'm not sure if Fortify Static Code Analyzer has AI capabilities. Currently, this solution doesn't quite have what we need."
"False positives need improvement in the future. Fortify's vulnerability remediation guidance helps improve code security, but I think they need to improve the focus of the solution, as it still contains many bugs and needs a thorough review."
"The pricing is a bit high."
"The price can be improved."
"Fortify Static Code Analyzer is a good solution, but sometimes we receive false positives. If they could reduce the number of false positives it would be good."
"Not all languages are supported in Fortify."
"Their licensing is expensive."
More OpenText Static Application Security Testing cons
"The refactor facility in PyCharm is not on par with the refactor facility in IntelliJ. It could be improved since IntelliJ offers many more options for refactoring."
"They should improve the product's interactiveness."
"The navigation can be better."
"PyCharm's use of system resources can get pretty heavy. Loading, in particular, takes longer than I would like and I think they should optimize it so that it's a bit lighter on the system."
"The solution is heavy because running it on laptops consumes a lot of memory and power. Typically, a laptop battery might last about eight to nine hours, but with the tool running, it reduces to two hours or one and a half hours at most. It is designed to handle large projects and heavy tasks, making it resource-intensive. For smaller projects, use IDEs like Visual Studio Code."
"There should be support for the RUST plugin in the Community edition for debugging."
"One issue with JetBrains tools, including PyCharm, is their heavy resource usage. They can be slow to start, especially when beginning a new project, as it takes some time to index."
"There is room for improvement in memory usage. It uses too much memory. It can get a bit heavy, especially when you have too many open files and the system becomes very slow."
More PyCharm cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the pricing of Fortify Static Code Analyzer as a seven out of ten since it is a bit expensive."
"It has a couple of license models. The one that we use most frequently is called their flexible deployment. We use this one because it is flexible and based on the number of code-contributing developers in the organization. It includes almost everything in the Fortify suite for one developer price. It gives access to not just the secure code analyzer (SCA) but also to FSC, the secure code. It gives us accessibility to scan central, which is the decentralized scanning farm. It also gives us access to the software security center, which is the vulnerability management platform."
"There is a licensing fee, and if you bring them to the company and you want them to do the installation and the implementation in the beginning, there is a separate cost. Similarly, if you want consultation or training, there is a separate cost. I see it as suitable only for enterprises. I do not see it suitable for a small business or individual use."
"The price of Fortify Static Code Analyzer could be reduced."
"From our standpoint, we are significantly better off with Fortify due to the favorable pricing we secured five years ago."
"The licensing is expensive and is in the 50K range."
"Although I am not responsible for the budget, Fortify SAST is expensive."
"The setup costs and pricing for Fortify may vary depending on the organization's needs and requirements."
"I don't have much info on the pricing, but I would say it is somewhat competitive."
"The community edition is free, which is good."
"The community edition is free and the professional edition has a licensing fee."
"They have a free Community edition, and they also have a licensed version. They definitely have an annual license. They probably also have a monthly license. Its pricing is good and reasonable. It is a little bit more expensive than the others, but it is well worth it. I would rate it a four out of five in terms of pricing."
"I use the free community version, so I'm saving money there."
"The price is reasonable."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Code Analysis solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
28%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
6%
Performing Arts
15%
University
14%
Marketing Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise11
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise5
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Fortify Static Code Analyzer?
Integrating the Fortify Static Code Analyzer into our software development lifecycle was straightforward. It highlights important information beyond just syntax errors. It identifies issues like pa...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortify Static Code Analyzer?
My experience with the pricing, setup costs, and licensing has been good. We have the scan machines, and we are planning to request more from Micro Focus now. We have calls every month or every oth...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Fortify Static Code Analyzer?
I think Fortify Static Code Analyzer could be improved by updating the number of rule packs according to the latest vulnerabilities we find each year. We have updated to a version that is one less ...
See all answers
What do you like most about PyCharm?
The integrated code structure makes coding more organized and manageable compared to using Python alone.
See all answers
What needs improvement with PyCharm?
The breakpoints could be improved as they are not that intuitive to use.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for PyCharm?
I use PyCharm for work, specifically for coding.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Black Duck SCA vs OpenText Static Application Security Testing Logo
Black Duck SCA vs OpenText Static Application Security Testing
Compared 23% of the time
Snyk vs OpenText Static Application Security Testing Logo
Snyk vs OpenText Static Application Security Testing
Compared 13% of the time
Veracode vs OpenText Static Application Security Testing Logo
Veracode vs OpenText Static Application Security Testing
Compared 11% of the time
Sonatype Lifecycle vs OpenText Static Application Security Testing Logo
Sonatype Lifecycle vs OpenText Static Application Security Testing
Compared 7% of the time
Codacy vs OpenText Static Application Security Testing Logo
Codacy vs OpenText Static Application Security Testing
Compared 2% of the time
More OpenText Static Application Security Testing Competitors
No data available
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
OpenText Static Application Security Testing
January 2026
OpenText Static Application Security Testing reportDownload OpenText Static Application Security Testing product report
Buyer's Guide
Static Code Analysis
January 2026
PyCharm reportDownload PyCharm product report
 

Also Known As

Fortify Static Code Analysis SAST
No data available
 

Overview

OpenText Static Application Security Testing empowers teams with efficient vulnerability detection and streamlined secure coding practices, offering comprehensive language support and seamless integration with development tools.

OpenText Static Application Security Testing enhances software security during development by accurately identifying vulnerabilities with minimal false positives. It integrates seamlessly with IDEs and CI/CD pipelines, making it highly efficient for early detection of security issues. Users benefit from its easy setup, clear documentation, and centralized portal for managing security findings. Despite facing challenges like high costs and complex configurations for certain languages, its role in facilitating compliance and streamlining secure coding processes is indispensable. Improvements are needed in areas such as outdated design, language support, and integration capabilities to meet evolving user expectations.

What features does OpenText Static Application Security Testing offer?
  • Seamless IDE Integration: Integrates effortlessly with development environments for real-time feedback.
  • Comprehensive Language Support: Covers a wide range of programming languages, enhancing detection accuracy.
  • Centralized Security Portal: Provides a streamlined interface for managing vulnerabilities.
What benefits and ROI should users consider?
  • Enhanced Security: Identifies vulnerabilities early, preventing potential breaches.
  • Time Efficiency: Automates processes and speeds up remediation efforts.
  • Compliance Facilitation: Assists in adhering to security standards and regulations.

Organizations across diverse sectors implement OpenText Static Application Security Testing primarily to secure applications during development phases. Its integration with tools like GitLab, Jenkins, and Azure DevOps ensures a robust security pipeline. By combining with Sonatype Nexus, secure code, and library management is achieved effectively.

OpenText

Be More Productive
Save time while PyCharm takes care of the routine. Focus on the bigger things and embrace the keyboard-centric approach to get the most of PyCharm's many productivity features.

JetBrains
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Static Application Security Testing vs. PyCharm
December 2025
Free Report: OpenText Static Application Security Testing vs. PyCharm
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Static Application Security Testing vs. PyCharm and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our OpenText Static Application Security Testing vs. PyCharm report.
See our list of best Static Code Analysis vendors.

We monitor all Static Code Analysis reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.