Oracle Java Cloud Service vs Red Hat OpenShift comparison

Oracle and Red Hat are both solutions in the PaaS Clouds category. Oracle is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.0, while Red Hat is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.3. Oracle holds a 0.9% mindshare in PSP, compared to Red Hat’s 8.6% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.

Oracle Java Cloud Service

Read 16 Oracle Java Cloud Service reviews

610 Views
512 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Red Hat OpenShift

Read 64 Red Hat OpenShift reviews

11,157 Views
6,136 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Oracle Java Cloud Service

Red Hat OpenShift

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Oracle Java Cloud Service and Red Hat OpenShift are both strong contenders in cloud application deployment. Red Hat OpenShift has the upper hand due to its Kubernetes-based flexible container orchestration capabilities, making it ideal for scalability and microservices.

Features: Oracle Java Cloud Service seamlessly integrates with Oracle's databases and enterprise applications, creating a unified environment for Java solutions. It notably supports on-premise application development using popular IDEs and boasts easy middleware platform deployment. Red Hat OpenShift is valued for its automation and containerization features, customization with Kubernetes, and fast application deployment using source-to-image conversion.

Room for Improvement: Oracle Java Cloud Service could improve scalability and flexibility outside Oracle's ecosystem, ease integration with non-Oracle tools, and enhance native support for containers. Red Hat OpenShift might benefit from more straightforward deployment processes, less complexity in managing Kubernetes, and improved out-of-the-box performance monitoring tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle Java Cloud Service offers straightforward setup, tapping into Oracle's extensive support channels, favorably fitting existing Oracle users. Red Hat OpenShift, while more complex to deploy because of Kubernetes architecture, provides robust support for containerized applications helping organizations committed to DevOps and microservices architectures.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle Java Cloud Service generally involves a higher setup cost aligned with its premium enterprise focus, yet it offers good ROI for Oracle users through optimized enterprise integrations. Red Hat OpenShift offers a flexible pricing model potentially leading to lower upfront costs, with long-term savings from operational efficiency gains in container-driven strategies.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle Java Cloud Service vs. Red Hat OpenShift Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Java Cloud Service vs. Red Hat OpenShift

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Java Cloud Service

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

19th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Red Hat OpenShift

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

3rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Virtualization Software (10th), Container Management (8th), Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms (5th), Agile and DevOps Services (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the PaaS Clouds category, the mindshare of Oracle Java Cloud Service is 0.9%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat OpenShift is 8.6%, down from 11.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

PaaS Clouds Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Red Hat OpenShift	8.6%
Oracle Java Cloud Service	0.9%
Other	90.5%

PaaS Clouds

Featured Reviews

Adam Elguennioui

SAP Consultant at SA&BC

Offers flexibility and better accessibility to users

The security part of the tool is not so strong, making it an area I would like to see improved in the solution. When working with a cloud tool, it's never 100 percent secure and it is always something to take into account. I would like to be more comfortable working with it and feeling safer. In the future, the tool can be made faster. In the future, I would like to see maybe some AI features in the tool to help automate stuff. You need to be able to create your own models to help create some automated actions.

Read full review

Pratul Shukla

Vice President at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Adopting a flexible and efficient approach with noticeable improvements in operational costs and continued challenges in job management

Currently, one of the biggest challenges we face is with services and jobs. For spawning batches, although it has crons, it is not easy to integrate with enterprise systems such as Autosys. The entire company uses Autosys, but we are not able to integrate it effectively. We need intermediate servers to run OC utility commands and initiate the cron job. We have to do a lot of modifications to ensure our batches work properly. With physical or virtual servers, even in AWS, we are able to write and manage multiple jobs. Managing batches in Red Hat OpenShift has been a significant challenge. Integrating third parties is a challenge with Red Hat OpenShift. For example, with Elasticsearch, onboarding itself was difficult, running file beats and dealing with routing issues. It is not straightforward, especially since we have some components in AWS as. AWS has many capabilities that come out of the box and are easier to work with compared to Red Hat OpenShift. Red Hat OpenShift's biggest disadvantage is they do not provide any private cloud setup where we can host on our site using their services. The main reason we went with Red Hat OpenShift was because it is a private cloud, and we have regulatory requirements that prevent us from using public cloud.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Cloud has provided less maintenance."

"The framework supports auto-configuration. A lot of features are already there. It is reliable and user-friendly to develop code, back-end engineering, or locate specific information such as addresses."

"The automated features of auto-purging in 12c helps clear disk space on a routine basis."

"The ability to manage security and access the server from any location with complete security using SSH is perfect for performing crucial tasks, even while travelling."

"Self-provisioning, easy to choose from WebLogic 11g to 12c."

"The auto-backup, incremental backup and restoration features can be invaluable for management."

"Backing up and recovery for my domain is very easy and fast. In addition, applying patches and undoing applied patches is effective and easy to do."

"The solution's technical support is good."

More Oracle Java Cloud Service pros

"OpenShift's superior dashboard is a notable strength, especially when compared to Kubernetes."

"Two stand-out features are the security model and value-add features that don't exist in Upstream Kubernetes."

"The solution provides a lot of flexibility to the application team for running their applications in the container platform, without needing to monitor the entire infrastructure all the time. It automatically scales and automatically self-heals. There is also a mechanism to alert the team in case it is over-committing or overutilizing the application."

"I am impressed with the product's security features."

"Valuable features include time to market, avoiding vendor lock-in, and the ease of working in a multi-cloud environment."

"The stability has been good."

"I would recommend Red Hat OpenShift, especially for its automation capabilities."

"The security is good."

More Red Hat OpenShift pros

Cons

"The product's high price is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"There are issues with the application's development, including small glitches and errors."

"The product is satisfactory but we need more training on managing the machine itself. For example, how do we add more storage, how do we extend a specific portion? I would like to see videos illustrating some of the technical tasks that we often need to do."

"The security part of the tool is not so strong, making it an area I would like to see improved in the solution."

"Needs better integration with other Oracle/non-Oracle products."

"We experienced issues around desktop security, that stopped us implementing a new feature that had been developed."

"I had to frequently upgrade my cluster due to OpenShift's rolling updates every six months, which I found to be excessive."

"I want easier node management and more user-friendly scripts for installing master and worker nodes."

"The speed of deploying new applications can be improved."

"One of the features that I've observed in Tanzu Mission Control is that I can manage multiple Kubernetes environments. For instance, one of my lines of business is using OpenShift OKD; another one wants to use Google Anthos, and somebody else wants to use VMware Tanzu. If I have to manage all these, Tanzu Mission Control is giving me the opportunity to completely manage all of my Kubernetes clusters, whereas, with OpenShift, I can only manage a particular area. I can't manage other Kubernetes clusters. I would like to have the option to manage all Kubernetes clusters with OpenShift."

"The platform's documentation could be more comprehensive to cover the full spectrum of user needs. Sometimes, achieving specific goals is challenging due to a lack of detailed guidance."

"There is no orchestration platform in OpenShift."

"My team has found some bugs in OpenShift due to continuous integration, and this is an area for improvement in the platform. RedHat should fix the bugs. Another area for improvement in OpenShift is that upgrading clusters can be challenging, resulting in downtime. Application support also needs improvement in OpenShift because the platform doesn't support all applications in the cloud. I'd like upgraded storage in the next release of OpenShift, especially when I need to do a DR exercise. It would also be good if the platform allows mirroring with another cluster, or more portability in terms of moving applications to another cluster."

More Red Hat OpenShift cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is somewhat expensive."

"Oracle is a little more expensive right now, but not much compared to SAP. Oracle's prices are very much dependent on the scale of the project and how many users are there."

"Oracle Java Cloud Service is an expensive product."

"The product's support is expensive. I would rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."

"The licensing cost for OpenShift is expensive when compared to other products. RedHat also charges you additional costs apart from the standard licensing fees."

"We are currently using the open version, OKD. We plan to get the enterprise version in the future."

"The pricing for OpenShift includes support and licensing, which costs approximately $400."

"This solution is fairly expensive but comes at an average cost compared to other solutions in the market."

"The product has reasonable pricing."

"It's expensive. It may be cheaper to invest in building Vanilla Kubernetes, especially if security is not the number one motivation or requirement. Of course, that's difficult, and in some business areas, such as banking, that's not something you can put as a second priority. In other situations, a Vanilla Kubernetes with a sufficiently strong team can be cheaper and almost as effective."

"It's important to start small because the solution is scalable. We can build our cluster and look at the bundle option, not the external subscriptions. Talking to the people at Red Hat can save us money."

More Red Hat OpenShift pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

25%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	10

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	43

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Oracle Java Cloud Service?

The solution's technical support is good.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Java Cloud Service?

I did a comparative study on the pricing between Oracle and SAP S/4HANA, but it was related to databases and in the areas associated with the clouds. I can tell that Oracle is a little more expensi...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Java Cloud Service?

See all answers

How does OpenShift compare with Amazon AWS?

Open Shift makes managing infrastructure easy because of self-healing and automatic scaling. There is also a wonderful dashboard mechanism to alert us in case the application is over-committing or ...

See all answers

Which would you recommend - Pivotal Cloud Foundry or OpenShift?

Pivotal Cloud Foundry is a cloud-native application platform to simplify app delivery. It is efficient and effective. The best feature is how easy it is to handle external services such as database...

See all answers

What do you like most about OpenShift?

OpenShift facilitates DevOps practices and improves CI/CD workflows in terms of stability compared to Jenkins.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure vs Oracle Java Cloud Service

Compared 21% of the time

Oracle Application Container Cloud Service vs Oracle Java Cloud Service

Compared 21% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Oracle Java Cloud Service

Compared 20% of the time

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service vs Oracle Java Cloud Service

Compared 17% of the time

Amazon Lightsail vs Oracle Java Cloud Service

Compared 10% of the time

More Oracle Java Cloud Service Competitors

Microsoft Azure vs Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 8% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 8% of the time

Pivotal Cloud Foundry vs Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 6% of the time

Proxmox VE vs Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 6% of the time

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 5% of the time

More Red Hat OpenShift Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Java Cloud Service

January 2026

Download Oracle Java Cloud Service product report

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat OpenShift

January 2026

Download Red Hat OpenShift product report

Overview

Oracle Java Cloud Service is a complete platform and infrastructure cloud solution for building, deploying, and managing Java EE applications. Use Oracle Java Cloud Service to rapidly provision an application environment with Oracle WebLogic Server as the application container, Oracle Coherence as a caching and data grid tier, and Oracle Traffic Director as the software load balancer—all on top of infrastructure provided by Oracle Compute Cloud Service.

For more information on Oracle Java Cloud Service, visit Oracle.com

Oracle

Red Hat OpenShift offers a robust, scalable platform with strong security and automation, suitable for container orchestration, application deployment, and microservices architecture.

Designed to modernize applications by transitioning from legacy systems to cloud-native environments, Red Hat OpenShift provides powerful CI/CD integration and Kubernetes compatibility. Its security features, multi-cloud support, and source-to-image functionality enhance deployment flexibility. While the GUI offers user-friendly navigation, users benefit from its cloud-agnostic nature and efficient lifecycle management. However, improvements are needed in documentation, configuration complexity, and integration with third-party platforms. Pricing and high resource demands can also be challenging for wider adoption.

What are the key features of Red Hat OpenShift?

Security: Comprehensive security features ensure safe deployments and operations.
Scalability: Auto-scaling and monitoring capabilities cater to high-demand environments.
CI/CD Integration: Seamless integration for efficient continuous deployment processes.
Cloud Compatibility: Supports multi-cloud and on-premise solutions with ease.
GUI: Simplifies platform management and enhances usability.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Improved Efficiency: Streamlined operations reduce time and resource investments.
Enhanced Flexibility: Adapt quickly to changing demands and environments.
Quick Deployment: Fast application deployment supports agile project timelines.
Robust Support: Access to dependable customer support services.

Red Hat OpenShift is strategically implemented for diverse industries focusing on container orchestration and application modernization. Organizations leverage it for migrating applications to cloud-native environments and managing CI/CD pipelines. Its functionality facilitates efficient resource management and microservices architecture adoption, supporting enterprise-level DevOps practices. Users employ it across cloud and on-premises platforms to drive performance improvements.

Red Hat

Sample Customers

Avaya, ADNOC Distribution, DocuSign, Zamil Industrial Investment Company

UPS, Cathay Pacific, Hilton

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Java Cloud Service vs. Red Hat OpenShift

February 2026

Free Report: Oracle Java Cloud Service vs. Red Hat OpenShift

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Java Cloud Service vs. Red Hat OpenShift and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Oracle Java Cloud Service vs. Red Hat OpenShift report.

See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.

We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.