No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Palantir Foundry vs Splunk AppDynamics comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 1, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
5.1
Users report time and cost savings with Palantir Foundry, but quantifying ROI and financial specifics remains challenging.
Sentiment score
5.5
Organizations achieve cost savings, increased client satisfaction, and efficiency with Splunk AppDynamics, justifying the high initial investment.
With traditional development requiring many specialized roles, Palantir Foundry allows us to operate efficiently with fewer personnel.
Data Engineering Specialist at LTM
We saved approximately 20 to 35 percent in man-hours needed and the timing improved our project timelines by approximately 50 to 55 percent.
Consultant at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
One clear example was the pipeline optimization I mentioned, where we reduced execution time by thirty to forty percent.
PALANTIR DATA ENGINEER at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
Overall, as a production gatekeeper, we achieve at least 50% efficiency immediately, with potential savings ranging from 60 to 70% as well, reinforcing why it is a popular tool in the banking industry.
Technology lead at Infosys
According to errors, exceptions, and code-level details related to their application performance on a daily basis, the application development team tries to help with Splunk AppDynamics to reduce errors and exceptions, which helps the end users get application availability and feel more confident.
Back office at Reliance Industries Ltd
To understand the magnitude of it, when the company asked to replace Splunk AppDynamics with another tool, I indicated that for the proposed tool, we would need five people to do the analysis that Splunk AppDynamics enables me to do.
Digital Performance Tester at Amdocs
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.2
Palantir Foundry's customer service is competent and proactive, though experiences vary based on contract and user needs.
Sentiment score
6.9
Splunk AppDynamics customer service is praised for professionalism and support, though some desire faster issue resolution.
They are knowledgeable, and their boot camps demonstrate solutions in just three days, which typically takes months or years.
Enterprise Architect at a mining and metals company with 10,001+ employees
When I seek help regarding code in Slate, it can take considerable time for the team to find the right answer or documentation, especially since the responses depend on the level of support provided, and specific queries regarding coding usually require reaching out to more experienced developers.
Data Analyst at BP Exploration Caspian Sea Ltd
The support staff are extremely knowledgeable and good at what they are doing.
Operations And Integration Chief at a aerospace/defense firm with 10,001+ employees
It dives deep into questions, leading to effective solutions, often making it feel that a human is resolving issues at the back end.
Project Manager at AGRICULTURE SKILL COUNCIL OF INDIA (ASCI)
AppDynamics is much more helpful.
Director of Technical Part at NOS SGPS
We got a contact, an account manager, to work directly with for technical support.
Performance Engineer at a pharma/biotech company with 10,001+ employees
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.1
Palantir Foundry is praised for scalability, flexibility, and adaptability across business sizes, despite cloud cost concerns.
Sentiment score
7.1
Splunk AppDynamics offers adaptable scalability but faces challenges with large-scale environments and cost, though generally rated positively.
We work with large volumes of healthcare data, and it has been able to handle all the large-scale ingestion, transformation, and distributed processing workflows effectively.
PALANTIR DATA ENGINEER at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
For scalability, I would rate it ten out of ten because you have a lot of flexibility.
Associate Vice President at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees
Regarding scalability, if you have billions and trillions of records, Palantir Foundry accommodates ETL pipelines with a dedicated compute profile.
Data Engineering Specialist at LTM
Our operational efficiency increases multifold, and service delivery has contributed to revenue growth and business expansion.
Project Manager at AGRICULTURE SKILL COUNCIL OF INDIA (ASCI)
We have reached maximum capacity in our tier, and extending capacity has not been cost-effective from Splunk's perspective.
Senior Principal, Enterprise Architect at a computer software company with 201-500 employees
I would rate the scalability of Splunk AppDynamics as a nine out of ten.
Digital Performance Tester at Amdocs
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.7
Palantir Foundry is stable and reliable, with minor issues quickly resolved, though some suggest marketing may overstate capabilities.
Sentiment score
7.8
Splunk AppDynamics is highly rated for stability and reliability, despite occasional performance issues during upgrades or specific interactions.
Live data streaming is very hard and it keeps breaking, so it is not very stable and depends a lot on the satellite network.
Product Manager
I get more technical support from Palantir.
Data Development Manager at a healthcare company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Palantir Foundry has been a stable and reliable enterprise platform.
PALANTIR DATA ENGINEER at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
It is necessary to conduct appropriate testing before deploying them in production to prevent potential outages.
Senior Principal, Enterprise Architect at a computer software company with 201-500 employees
There are no issues or bugs with the 20.4 version; it is very stable with no functionality or operational issues.
Back office at Reliance Industries Ltd
Splunk AppDynamics is superior to any alternative, including Dynatrace.
Technology lead at Infosys
 

Room For Improvement

Palantir Foundry needs enhanced training, cost-efficiency, ease of use, integration, automation, and AI for improved user experience.
Splunk AppDynamics requires enhancements in analytics, integration, usability, and support to improve functionality and user experience.
The platform is extremely capable, but improvements around usability, debugging experience, DevOps flexibility, and ecosystem openness would make it even more effective for enterprise engineering teams.
PALANTIR DATA ENGINEER at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
I want to build conversational BI or conversational agents quickly that can connect to MCPs, and other MCPs that I can communicate with in Palantir Foundry, which are areas to advance forward.
Principal Architect at HCLTech
An improvement would be that in case of any changes done by the Palantir team, those changes need to be tested thoroughly so there are no downstream impacts, ensuring that the business is not affected by any modifications in the system.
Engineer, Data Engineering at GlobalFoundries
Splunk AppDynamics does not support the complete MELT framework, which includes metrics, events, logging, and tracing for the entire stack.
Senior Principal, Enterprise Architect at a computer software company with 201-500 employees
AI could provide more insights for annual or half-yearly reports and forecast future changes in the asset landscape.
Senior Delivery Manager at GE Vernova
Functionality-wise, I would like to see more cognitive solutions in Splunk AppDynamics, ideally with a single agent that can implement policies and provide predictive insights regarding application performance degradation during peak times.
Technology Architect at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
 

Setup Cost

Palantir Foundry's high cost is justified for enterprises by reduced development needs and centralized capabilities despite complex licensing.
Splunk AppDynamics pricing is variable, commonly high, influenced by negotiation, organization size, and requiring separate licenses for features.
Its high initial pricing can be intimidating, but it becomes cost-effective as it reduces the need for a development team.
Enterprise Architect at a mining and metals company with 10,001+ employees
In terms of getting a contractor to work on that, I would probably say it is more expensive because there are fewer people with that skillset compared to, say, Databricks or Azure.
Data Development Manager at a healthcare company with 5,001-10,000 employees
We can consult it in the right way regarding Palantir Foundry use, as it is still a gray area right now concerning costing.
Principal Architect at HCLTech
We completed a three-year deal for Splunk and for AppDynamics, which costs millions of dollars.
Development Operations Engineer at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
Overall, I consider Splunk AppDynamics an expensive product; it's very expensive.
Manager, System Scom at Handelsbanken
The resource team finds the best prices, ensuring that Splunk AppDynamics is an acceptable option for the end user.
Senior Delivery Manager at GE Vernova
 

Valuable Features

Palantir Foundry enhances data-driven decisions with strong AI, user-friendly tools, robust security, and seamless integration for all users.
Splunk AppDynamics enhances application performance with real-time monitoring, anomaly detection, and AI-driven insights for fast, effective troubleshooting.
The predictive analytics capability within Palantir Foundry impacts financial forecasting strategies through its AIP functionality, which includes numerous pre-built models, LLMs, and data science application libraries.
Architect at L&T Technology Services
The main advantage is you can decentralize the analytics, and you will have everything in one place, so that you do not need to rely on multiple departments working on different tools.
Associate Vice President at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees
The low-code solutions made our lives easier because not everybody is too technical to get started and the barrier to entry is very low.
Consultant at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
We have multiple tools, but end users prefer to use Splunk AppDynamics because their portal navigation is very simple and clear.
Back office at Reliance Industries Ltd
The real user monitoring and digital experience monitoring effectively track actual user experience with the applications, including page loading, interaction time for both desktop and mobile applications.
Regional Director at iSecureMind Integrated Solutions
This is the best feature because, although you can't monitor a whole application at once, Splunk AppDynamics gives you the option that if there is any failure—simple failure regarding anything set up as per our use cases—you will get an alert.
Technology lead at Infosys
 

Categories and Ranking

Palantir Foundry
Ranking in IT Operations Analytics
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
62
Ranking in other categories
Data Integration (3rd), Supply Chain Analytics (1st), Cloud Data Integration (5th), Data Migration Appliances (3rd), Data Management Platforms (DMP) (1st), Data and Analytics Service Providers (1st)
Splunk AppDynamics
Ranking in IT Operations Analytics
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
278
Ranking in other categories
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (1st), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (4th), Mobile APM (1st), Container Monitoring (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the IT Operations Analytics category, the mindshare of Palantir Foundry is 4.1%, up from 4.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Splunk AppDynamics is 10.0%, down from 18.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
IT Operations Analytics Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Splunk AppDynamics10.0%
Palantir Foundry4.1%
Other85.9%
IT Operations Analytics
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2846265 - PeerSpot reviewer
PALANTIR DATA ENGINEER at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
Unified healthcare pipelines have improved data trust and accelerated operational decisions
One challenge regarding how Palantir Foundry can be improved is the learning curve. Foundry has a very broad ecosystem with Ontology, Pipeline Builder, Code Repositories, and AI integrations. For new engineers or business users onboarding, it can take time, especially if they are coming from more traditional data platforms. Better documentation, simplified onboarding paths, and more beginner-friendly examples would help accelerate adoption. Another area is debugging complexity. While lineage and monitoring are strong features, troubleshooting deeply interconnected pipelines can still become difficult in a large enterprise environment. Sometimes error logs and pipeline failure messages could be more descriptive or developer-friendly, especially for distributed PySpark jobs. Another pain point is customization limitations in certain UI-driven components. While low-code tools are great for rapid development, highly customized workflows sometimes still require engineering workarounds or deeper technical implementation. The platform is extremely capable, but improvements around usability, debugging experience, DevOps flexibility, and ecosystem openness would make it even more effective for enterprise engineering teams.
YA
Sr. Solution Architect, Project Manager at The National Commercial Bank
Root cause analysis has become possible but complex setup and agent issues still slow investigations
The limitations I notice include the instability of the agent, which crashes, and the application itself consuming memory under heavy loads. Additionally, the customizations are not easy to build, especially for new parsers and functionalities that are just supported out-of-the-box. Splunk AppDynamics needs to be more user-friendly so that even someone who does not know what is happening should be able to easily find the root cause of issues, as the tool is specifically designed for application developers, not from a user perspective for problem identification. My experience with the application performance monitoring capabilities of Splunk AppDynamics indicates that it is complex. The correlation from the front end to the back end is not working properly. In an application using the EUM feature and having the app agent, the app agent gives me the transaction data, but the EUM data does not correlate to the backend transactions, and I do not know why. It can be very complex to find the root cause in those scenarios, as there is a disparity in metrics, making it challenging. Even though Splunk AppDynamics is trying, my very large environment presents hurdles that medium-scale organizations might not experience. After spending around three to four years trying to get value from it, I still feel a lack of satisfaction. To get closer to a rating of 10 in the future, I would like to see whatever features are being provided made to work, particularly in large environments. Splunk AppDynamics claims it can do 100 things, but if those things are not functioning cohesively, it is ineffective. Instead of offering 100 features that do not work together, it would be better to focus on a smaller set of features that operate effectively. Changes happen daily with new applications and technologies, and Splunk AppDynamics needs to adapt more swiftly to keep up. The feature that helps detect and protect against vulnerabilities does raise concerns. I experience vulnerabilities in Splunk AppDynamics that I communicate to support for fixes, and they often respond by indicating that some fixes are available in new versions. This creates a continuous cycle of raising issues and waiting for resolutions through version updates.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Operations Analytics solutions are best for your needs.
920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Outsourcing Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
20%
Outsourcing Company
10%
Construction Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business11
Midsize Enterprise7
Large Enterprise51
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business64
Midsize Enterprise38
Large Enterprise208
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Palantir Foundry?
The Workshop application could be improved because it is not very customizable, but it is still very strong. We also have the React OSK apps, but it does not allow the inbuilt applications such as ...
What is your primary use case for Palantir Foundry?
My main use case for Palantir Foundry is to solve business problems, such as in healthcare. I also worked on a project for a law firm where thousands of PDFs were coming in, and we needed to check ...
What advice do you have for others considering Palantir Foundry?
I believe they should get started by completing all the free certificates, then they could apply to the paid certificates to get a master of Palantir Foundry, solve some real use cases, do examples...
Any advice about APM solutions?
There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...
What needs improvement with AppDynamics Server Monitoring?
There is room for improvement in auto-discovery and mapping. While it is very good, sometimes we need customization to match our application or business needs, but currently it is satisfactory. If ...
What is your primary use case for AppDynamics Server Monitoring?
I use Splunk AppDynamics data collection features with agents. It is on-premises, particularly in hybrid and on-premises environments. I have used Splunk AppDynamics for business transaction monito...
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Merck KGaA, Airbus, Ferrari,United States Intelligence Community, United States Department of Defense
Cisco, Sony, Nasdaq, Reserve Bank of New Zealand, Edmunds.com, Puma, Fox News, DirecTV, Pizza Hut, T-Systems, Cornell University, OpenTable, BITMARCK, Green Mountain Power, Care.com, Overstock, Paddy Power, eHarmony, Kraft, The Motley Fool, The Container Store, and more See more customers
Find out what your peers are saying about Palantir Foundry vs. Splunk AppDynamics and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.