Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Splunk AppDynamics Logo

Top 10 Splunk AppDynamics Alternatives

Vendor: Splunk
4.1 out of 5
Badge Ranked 1
Leave a review

Top Splunk AppDynamics Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Splunk AppDynamics based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Dynatrace, Zabbix, and Datadog. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Splunk AppDynamics surpasses its competitors by offering advanced real-time performance monitoring, seamless integration capabilities, and comprehensive analytics, enabling businesses to proactively resolve issues quickly, ensuring optimal application performance and enhancing user experiences.

Splunk Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Splunk, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Dynatrace
4.4 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Dynatrace
4.4 out of 5
Dynatrace offers dynamic reporting and AI-driven incident management for real-time insights. In comparison, Splunk AppDynamics provides comprehensive analytics with method-level performance insights. Dynatrace focuses on flexibility; Splunk AppDynamics emphasizes thorough analytics, making either solution suitable based on specific monitoring needs.
Download Dynatrace vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Dynatrace's setup cost is straightforward with predictable pricing, while Splunk AppDynamics involves more complex pricing structures and may incur additional charges.
View comparison
Pricing
Dynatrace's setup cost is straightforward with predictable pricing, while Splunk AppDynamics involves more complex pricing structures and may incur additional charges.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Zabbix
4.2 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Zabbix
4.2 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics offers comprehensive monitoring with transaction tracking and is suitable for enterprises needing deep analytics, though it requires integration improvements. In comparison, Zabbix's cost-effective open-source model attracts those valuing flexibility, despite needing enhanced UI and simpler configuration.
Download Splunk AppDynamics vs. Zabbix Report
Splunk AppDynamics has a high setup cost compared to Zabbix, which offers a more affordable setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics has a high setup cost compared to Zabbix, which offers a more affordable setup option.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Datadog
4.3 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Datadog
4.3 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics offers detailed application monitoring, beneficial for those prioritizing Java insights. In comparison, Datadog emphasizes infrastructure monitoring with cloud integration, appealing to users needing cross-platform support. Splunk's complexity contrasts with Datadog's simple deployment but variable costs.
Download Datadog vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics has a higher setup cost compared to Datadog, which offers a more budget-friendly alternative.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics has a higher setup cost compared to Datadog, which offers a more budget-friendly alternative.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
New Relic
4.2 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
New Relic
4.2 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics excels in transaction tracking and detailed performance data, aiding in optimization. In comparison, New Relic offers real-time insights and an intuitive dashboard, appealing for quick visibility. Each solution provides distinct pricing models, with varying strengths in deployment options and customer support.
Download New Relic vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics incurs high setup costs, while New Relic offers a more budget-friendly setup. Users seeking cost-effectiveness may prefer New Relic's affordable setup, contrasting with AppDynamics' higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics incurs high setup costs, while New Relic offers a more budget-friendly setup. Users seeking cost-effectiveness may prefer New Relic's affordable setup, contrasting with AppDynamics' higher initial investment.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Azure Monitor
3.8 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Azure Monitor
3.8 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics focuses on real-time insights with features like error analysis and transaction transparency. In comparison, Azure Monitor excels in integration with Azure services, offering customizable alerts and log analytics, making it attractive for businesses within the Azure ecosystem.
Download Azure Monitor vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics has a higher setup cost than Azure Monitor, making the latter a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics has a higher setup cost than Azure Monitor, making the latter a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Grafana
3.9 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Grafana
3.9 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics stands out for transaction tracking and user experience monitoring, ideal for businesses needing real-time performance insights. In comparison, Grafana excels in visualization with flexible dashboard creation and open-source support, fitting diverse needs. Splunk AppDynamics suits complex analytics, while Grafana emphasizes cost-effectiveness.
Download Grafana vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics typically involves a higher setup cost due to its comprehensive feature set, while Grafana often presents a more budget-friendly option with its open-source nature, appealing to businesses seeking cost-effective solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics typically involves a higher setup cost due to its comprehensive feature set, while Grafana often presents a more budget-friendly option with its open-source nature, appealing to businesses seeking cost-effective solutions.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Elastic Observability
4.0 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics provides detailed observability and AI anomaly detection, optimal for in-depth performance analysis but can be costly with complex setups. In comparison, Elastic Observability excels with cost-effective search capabilities and real-time log tracking, ideal for broader analytics in hybrid environments.
Download Elastic Observability vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics involves higher setup costs, offering detailed analytical capabilities, while Elastic Observability provides a cost-effective setup with flexible deployment options.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics involves higher setup costs, offering detailed analytical capabilities, while Elastic Observability provides a cost-effective setup with flexible deployment options.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Sentry
4.3 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Sentry
4.3 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics offers extensive visibility into application performance with comprehensive monitoring features, while Sentry excels in error tracking and developer tool integration. In comparison, Sentry provides cost-effective solutions with agile deployment, whereas AppDynamics supports large enterprises with advanced real-time monitoring capabilities.
Download Sentry vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics typically involves higher initial setup costs, while Sentry offers a more cost-effective setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics typically involves higher initial setup costs, while Sentry offers a more cost-effective setup option.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
PRTG Network Monitor
4.0 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics excels in stack trace viewing and transactional awareness. In comparison, PRTG Network Monitor offers a user-friendly interface and broad monitoring. Splunk is versatile across environments, while PRTG is noted for its simplicity and licensing, making each appealing to different tech buyers.
Download PRTG Network Monitor vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics has a substantial setup cost, whereas PRTG Network Monitor offers a more budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics has a substantial setup cost, whereas PRTG Network Monitor offers a more budget-friendly option.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Palantir Foundry
3.9 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Palantir Foundry
3.9 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics offers comprehensive monitoring features ideal for tracking performance and diagnosing issues. In comparison, Palantir Foundry excels in data integration and visualization for complex analysis. Splunk's flexible deployment contrasts with Palantir's public-cloud optimization, targeting different business infrastructure needs.
Download Palantir Foundry vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics offers a competitive setup cost, while Palantir Foundry's initial investment is notably higher.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics offers a competitive setup cost, while Palantir Foundry's initial investment is notably higher.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
AWS X-Ray
3.9 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
AWS X-Ray
3.9 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics excels in deep-dive diagnostics for complex environments with transactional awareness, while AWS X-Ray provides seamless AWS integration focused on quick insights. In comparison, users find AWS X-Ray easier to configure, whereas Splunk AppDynamics offers comprehensive performance monitoring.
Download AWS X-Ray vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics setup costs are higher, offering robust integration features, while AWS X-Ray provides a cost-effective solution with essential functionalities.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics setup costs are higher, offering robust integration features, while AWS X-Ray provides a cost-effective solution with essential functionalities.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Prometheus Group
4.1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Prometheus Group
4.1 out of 5
AppDynamics offers deep insights into application performance and robust support. In comparison, Prometheus, with its strong flexibility and integration, excels in cost-effectiveness and faster deployment. Both suit different needs: AppDynamics for comprehensive features, Prometheus for budget-friendly, adaptable environments.
Download Prometheus Group vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics offers competitive setup costs, while Prometheus Group presents a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment. These differences highlight distinct pricing structures between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics offers competitive setup costs, while Prometheus Group presents a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment. These differences highlight distinct pricing structures between the two solutions.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Checkmk
4.2 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Checkmk
4.2 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics offers detailed features for troubleshooting, including Java monitoring and transaction tracking, which can aid in resolving complex issues. In comparison, Checkmk is cost-effective and focuses on essential monitoring, making it suitable for businesses prioritizing affordability and basic functionalities.
Download Checkmk vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics has higher setup costs but offers comprehensive features, while Checkmk presents a more affordable initial investment with essential functionalities.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics has higher setup costs but offers comprehensive features, while Checkmk presents a more affordable initial investment with essential functionalities.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
ServiceNow IT Operations Management
4.1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics excels in application performance monitoring with deep insights. In comparison, ServiceNow IT Operations Management offers comprehensive IT service management and automation. Splunk AppDynamics supports various deployments, while ServiceNow provides strong integration, despite higher costs and complexity.
Download ServiceNow IT Operations Management vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics has a higher setup cost compared to ServiceNow IT Operations Management, highlighting its more advanced initial investment needs. In contrast, ServiceNow offers a more budget-friendly approach to initial deployment expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics has a higher setup cost compared to ServiceNow IT Operations Management, highlighting its more advanced initial investment needs. In contrast, ServiceNow offers a more budget-friendly approach to initial deployment expenses.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
LogicMonitor
4.5 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
LogicMonitor
4.5 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics focuses on application performance with end-to-end transaction visibility and detailed insights. In comparison, LogicMonitor emphasizes infrastructure monitoring with advanced alerting and ease of integration. A tech buyer might choose Splunk AppDynamics for performance insights or LogicMonitor for integration and simplicity.
Download LogicMonitor vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics entails a moderate setup cost, providing a comprehensive analytics platform, while LogicMonitor presents a more streamlined setup at a lower cost, ideal for users seeking efficiency without compromising on essential features.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics entails a moderate setup cost, providing a comprehensive analytics platform, while LogicMonitor presents a more streamlined setup at a lower cost, ideal for users seeking efficiency without compromising on essential features.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Amazon OpenSearch Service
3.8 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics offers comprehensive stack trace capabilities and detailed monitoring, ideal for performance troubleshooting. In comparison, Amazon OpenSearch Service provides robust search and analytics with managed services, desired for ease of use without infrastructure concerns.
Download Amazon OpenSearch Service vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics typically has a higher setup cost compared to Amazon OpenSearch Service, which offers more budget-friendly initialization.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics typically has a higher setup cost compared to Amazon OpenSearch Service, which offers more budget-friendly initialization.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Cribl
4.2 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Cribl
4.2 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics excels in comprehensive monitoring, aiding DevOps with detailed diagnostics and transaction tracking. In comparison, Cribl enhances log management and data transformation, ideal for environments requiring cost-effective data handling. Splunk offers superior customer support; Cribl provides notable cost savings in data routing.
Download Cribl vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics typically involves higher setup costs, while Cribl offers a more budget-friendly initial setup, highlighting a significant financial contrast for organizations considering both solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics typically involves higher setup costs, while Cribl offers a more budget-friendly initial setup, highlighting a significant financial contrast for organizations considering both solutions.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
OpsRamp
3.9 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
OpsRamp
3.9 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics provides detailed application insights, making it ideal for tracking complex environments. In comparison, OpsRamp offers broader infrastructure visibility, suitable for managing diverse infrastructures efficiently. Splunk AppDynamics prioritizes application performance, while OpsRamp excels in network monitoring and cost-effective resource management.
Download OpsRamp vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics offers a more affordable setup cost compared to OpsRamp, which has a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics offers a more affordable setup cost compared to OpsRamp, which has a higher initial investment.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
ScienceLogic
4.3 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
ScienceLogic
4.3 out of 5
ScienceLogic excels in customizable dashboards and infrastructure coverage, appealing to those seeking adaptability. In comparison, AppDynamics attracts with real-time transaction tracking and comprehensive monitoring, ideal for detailed application performance analysis. ScienceLogic offers cost-effective device-based pricing, while AppDynamics excels in high-end environments with detailed license structures.
Download ScienceLogic vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
ScienceLogic offers flexible setup costs, while Splunk AppDynamics presents a more structured pricing model. Notably, ScienceLogic excels in providing cost-effective solutions during implementation, contrasting with Splunk AppDynamics' higher initial setup investment.
View comparison
Pricing
ScienceLogic offers flexible setup costs, while Splunk AppDynamics presents a more structured pricing model. Notably, ScienceLogic excels in providing cost-effective solutions during implementation, contrasting with Splunk AppDynamics' higher initial setup investment.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor
4.0 out of 5
Users favor Splunk AppDynamics for its diagnostic capabilities and flexible deployments. In comparison, SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor offers valuable hardware monitoring with competitive pricing. Splunk provides comprehensive insights while SolarWinds offers straightforward on-premises setups with reliable customer service.
Download SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics incurs a higher setup cost compared to the more budget-friendly SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics incurs a higher setup cost compared to the more budget-friendly SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
ITRS Geneos
4.1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
ITRS Geneos
4.1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics offers deep visibility and comprehensive monitoring for application performance, ideal for diverse environments. In comparison, ITRS Geneos targets real-time financial monitoring with extensive plugin support, appealing to sectors demanding infrastructure oversight.
Download ITRS Geneos vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics typically incurs higher setup costs, while ITRS Geneos offers a more economical initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics typically incurs higher setup costs, while ITRS Geneos offers a more economical initial setup.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Cisco Intersight
4.0 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Cisco Intersight
4.0 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics excels in application stack trace analysis and code-level performance insights. In comparison, Cisco Intersight integrates with data centers and multi-cloud setups. Tech buyers might choose Splunk for detailed app performance, while Cisco offers comprehensive hybrid infrastructure management.
Download Cisco Intersight vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics features a straightforward setup cost, whereas Cisco Intersight offers a more flexible pricing model.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics features a straightforward setup cost, whereas Cisco Intersight offers a more flexible pricing model.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
BMC TrueSight Operations Management
4.1 out of 5
BMC TrueSight Operations Management excels in event management and comprehensive monitoring across hardware, while Splunk AppDynamics focuses on granular transaction details and JVM memory monitoring. In comparison, TrueSight offers centralized alert consolidation, whereas AppDynamics provides extensive business transaction insights.
Download BMC TrueSight Operations Management vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
BMC TrueSight Operations Management has a higher setup cost than Splunk AppDynamics, which offers a more affordable initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
BMC TrueSight Operations Management has a higher setup cost than Splunk AppDynamics, which offers a more affordable initial investment.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
VMware Aria Operations for Applications
4.0 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics excels in detailed diagnostics, providing insights into code-level issues. In comparison, VMware Aria Operations for Applications offers centralized management and performance statistics. Splunk's diagnostic strengths contrast with VMware Aria's versatile management, appealing to tech buyers based on specific needs.
Download Splunk AppDynamics vs. VMware Aria Operations for Applications Report
Splunk AppDynamics incurs higher setup costs compared to VMware Aria Operations for Applications, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics incurs higher setup costs compared to VMware Aria Operations for Applications, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)
4.0 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics offers deep stack-trace analysis and transactional awareness for pinpointing issues in complex environments. In comparison, Google Cloud's operations suite provides strong cloud integration for managing Google Cloud-hosted applications. Each solution has unique strengths tailored to specific operational needs.
Download Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics has a higher setup cost compared to Google Cloud's operations suite, which is more cost-effective.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics has a higher setup cost compared to Google Cloud's operations suite, which is more cost-effective.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Honeycomb Enterprise
4.3 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics offers comprehensive data analysis and sophisticated monitoring, appealing to those seeking detailed insights. In comparison, Honeycomb Enterprise targets environments needing scalability and powerful tracing. Splunk AppDynamics justifies higher costs with extensive features, while Honeycomb Enterprise attracts with cost-effective scalability.
Download Honeycomb Enterprise vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics has a higher setup cost compared to Honeycomb Enterprise, reflecting a more premium pricing model.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics has a higher setup cost compared to Honeycomb Enterprise, reflecting a more premium pricing model.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)
4.2 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics is preferred for transaction tracking and application monitoring, ideal for troubleshooting. In comparison, IBM SevOne NPM excels in network performance monitoring, making it suitable for scalability. Splunk prioritizes application insights; IBM focuses on network management.
Download IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics has a higher setup cost compared to IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM), highlighting a cost-sensitive difference for users considering ease of deployment versus initial financial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics has a higher setup cost compared to IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM), highlighting a cost-sensitive difference for users considering ease of deployment versus initial financial investment.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
WhatsUp Gold
3.9 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
WhatsUp Gold
3.9 out of 5
WhatsUp Gold shines for its cost-effectiveness and ease of deployment, appealing to those seeking affordable network monitoring. In comparison, Splunk AppDynamics offers advanced features and comprehensive analytics, attracting buyers aiming for deep performance insights despite higher initial costs.
Download Splunk AppDynamics vs. WhatsUp Gold Report
WhatsUp Gold has a low setup cost, appealing to budget-conscious users, while Splunk AppDynamics requires a higher initial investment, suggesting a more robust feature set.
View comparison
Pricing
WhatsUp Gold has a low setup cost, appealing to budget-conscious users, while Splunk AppDynamics requires a higher initial investment, suggesting a more robust feature set.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Coralogix
4.1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Coralogix
4.1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics offers robust application performance management tools, ideal for in-depth transaction monitoring. In comparison, Coralogix excels in real-time log analysis, offering significant insights. Splunk AppDynamics suits enterprises needing detailed monitoring, while Coralogix provides value for those focused on log management and analysis.
Download Coralogix vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics has a higher setup cost compared to Coralogix, which offers more affordable initial implementation expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics has a higher setup cost compared to Coralogix, which offers more affordable initial implementation expenses.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
BigPanda
3.8 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
BigPanda
3.8 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics offers real-time tracking and deep-dive transaction analytics ideal for comprehensive application management. In comparison, BigPanda provides superior alert automation and correlation, making it effective for high-volume data environments. Both solutions cater to distinct needs, enhancing operational efficiency.
Download BigPanda vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics typically requires a significant setup cost, while BigPanda offers a more budget-friendly initial investment, highlighting a clear distinction in entry costs between the two platforms.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics typically requires a significant setup cost, while BigPanda offers a more budget-friendly initial investment, highlighting a clear distinction in entry costs between the two platforms.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
OpenTelemetry
1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
OpenTelemetry
1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics is favored for its ease of deployment and comprehensive support, offering ready-to-deploy solutions with strong application monitoring capabilities. In comparison, OpenTelemetry provides extensive customization and flexibility within its open-source framework, appealing to users seeking innovative and feature-rich configurations.
Splunk AppDynamics has a higher initial setup cost, while OpenTelemetry offers a more cost-effective entry point. This pricing difference highlights OpenTelemetry's appeal to budget-conscious organizations, whereas Splunk AppDynamics may suit those prioritizing advanced analytics features.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics has a higher initial setup cost, while OpenTelemetry offers a more cost-effective entry point. This pricing difference highlights OpenTelemetry's appeal to budget-conscious organizations, whereas Splunk AppDynamics may suit those prioritizing advanced analytics features.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Instana Dynamic APM
3.8 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics excels in business transaction monitoring and integration across platforms. In comparison, Instana Dynamic APM offers real-time insights with ease due to auto-instrumentation. Splunk AppDynamics serves enterprise needs, whereas Instana Dynamic APM is priced competitively for smaller scales.
Download Instana Dynamic APM vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics has a complex setup process, often incurring additional costs, while Instana Dynamic APM offers a streamlined setup with lower initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics has a complex setup process, often incurring additional costs, while Instana Dynamic APM offers a streamlined setup with lower initial expenses.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance
4.4 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics excels in performance tracing across environments, while Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance focuses on network diagnostics. In comparison, AppDynamics offers flexibility in deployment, and Cisco emphasizes integration with infrastructure tools. Both solutions provide distinct advantages depending on performance tracing or network assurance needs.
Download Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics requires a higher initial setup cost compared to Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance, where setup costs are more affordable.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics requires a higher initial setup cost compared to Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance, where setup costs are more affordable.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Moogsoft
3.9 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Moogsoft
3.9 out of 5
Moogsoft delivers AI-driven event correlation and noise reduction, enhancing alert management. In comparison, Splunk AppDynamics provides transaction tracking with code-level diagnostics, aiding performance insights. Moogsoft offers competitive pricing, while Splunk AppDynamics may appeal with comprehensive monitoring and strong customer support.
Download Moogsoft vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics requires a higher initial investment for setup, whereas Moogsoft offers a more cost-effective installation process.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics requires a higher initial investment for setup, whereas Moogsoft offers a more cost-effective installation process.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Alluvio Aternity
4.2 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Alluvio Aternity
4.2 out of 5
Alluvio Aternity excels in trend analysis and desktop monitoring, ideal for endpoints, while AppDynamics offers detailed transaction tracking and comprehensive dashboards. In comparison, Alluvio seeks customization, whereas AppDynamics demands investment for powerful analytics within complex environments.
Download Alluvio Aternity vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Alluvio Aternity offers lower initial setup costs compared to Splunk AppDynamics, making it a more budget-friendly option. However, Splunk AppDynamics may offer additional features that justify its higher setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
Alluvio Aternity offers lower initial setup costs compared to Splunk AppDynamics, making it a more budget-friendly option. However, Splunk AppDynamics may offer additional features that justify its higher setup cost.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
LiveAction LiveNX
3.6 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
LiveAction LiveNX
3.6 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics enhances application monitoring with detailed baselining and deep-dive features. In comparison, LiveAction LiveNX excels in visualizing real-time network traffic. Splunk AppDynamics offers comprehensive monitoring, while LiveNX is cost-effective for budget-conscious buyers seeking enhanced network analysis.
Download LiveAction LiveNX vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics involves higher setup costs, whereas LiveAction LiveNX offers a more cost-effective setup, highlighting the potential for budget efficiency.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics involves higher setup costs, whereas LiveAction LiveNX offers a more cost-effective setup, highlighting the potential for budget efficiency.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Catchpoint
4.1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Catchpoint
4.1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics provides in-depth transaction analysis and detailed diagnostics for system health. In comparison, Catchpoint excels in synthetic monitoring with precise network visibility, making each suitable for different monitoring needs based on their specialized features.
Download Catchpoint vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics’ setup cost is higher with a comprehensive feature set, while Catchpoint offers a more affordable setup, appealing to smaller budgets.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics’ setup cost is higher with a comprehensive feature set, while Catchpoint offers a more affordable setup, appealing to smaller budgets.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
eG Enterprise
4.1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
eG Enterprise
4.1 out of 5
eG Enterprise offers cost-effective monitoring with a single-pane-of-glass approach and superior customer service. In comparison, Splunk AppDynamics excels in performance monitoring and complex analysis but may be more expensive, appealing to users needing advanced features and willing to invest.
Download Splunk AppDynamics vs. eG Enterprise Report
eG Enterprise offers a lower setup cost, while Splunk AppDynamics requires a more significant initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
eG Enterprise offers a lower setup cost, while Splunk AppDynamics requires a more significant initial investment.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
FortiMonitor
4.2 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
FortiMonitor
4.2 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics excels in advanced analytics and seamless integration for performance and security insights. In comparison, FortiMonitor offers cost-effective, straightforward deployment and essential monitoring, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. Splunk AppDynamics suits those seeking comprehensive features, while FortiMonitor attracts with its simplicity and affordability.
Download FortiMonitor vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics offers a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, while FortiMonitor may involve higher setup expenses, emphasizing their diverse financial approaches.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics offers a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, while FortiMonitor may involve higher setup expenses, emphasizing their diverse financial approaches.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Broadcom DX Application Performance Management
4.0 out of 5
Broadcom DX Application Performance Management excels in transaction monitoring and flexible pricing, ideal for budget-conscious clients. In comparison, Splunk AppDynamics provides comprehensive business transaction tracking and code-level visibility, suitable for organizations needing deep insights and complex scenario support across diverse environments.
Download Broadcom DX Application Performance Management vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Broadcom DX Application Performance Management has a lower setup cost compared to Splunk AppDynamics. Splunk AppDynamics offers advanced features that justify its higher price, making it suitable for complex environments.
View comparison
Pricing
Broadcom DX Application Performance Management has a lower setup cost compared to Splunk AppDynamics. Splunk AppDynamics offers advanced features that justify its higher price, making it suitable for complex environments.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
ManageEngine Applications Manager
3.8 out of 5
ManageEngine Applications Manager appeals with competitive pricing and strong support for smaller businesses. In comparison, Splunk AppDynamics's advanced analytics and robust AIOps capabilities cater to enterprises needing deeper insights, justifying its higher cost for those seeking long-term value and extensive customization.
Download ManageEngine Applications Manager vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
ManageEngine Applications Manager offers a straightforward setup with affordable costs, while Splunk AppDynamics involves a more complex setup process with higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
ManageEngine Applications Manager offers a straightforward setup with affordable costs, while Splunk AppDynamics involves a more complex setup process with higher initial expenses.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
OmniPeek
3.9 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
OmniPeek
3.9 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics excels in application performance monitoring with robust features like transaction tracking and database monitoring. In comparison, OmniPeek focuses on network diagnostics. Splunk's premium pricing offers extensive features, while OmniPeek's cost-efficiency caters to those prioritizing network analysis.
Download OmniPeek vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics requires a substantial initial setup investment, while OmniPeek offers a more budget-friendly setup cost, highlighting a key financial difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics requires a substantial initial setup investment, while OmniPeek offers a more budget-friendly setup cost, highlighting a key financial difference between the two solutions.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
OpenText SiteScope
3.9 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
OpenText SiteScope
3.9 out of 5
OpenText SiteScope offers attractive pricing with robust support, making it ideal for infrastructure monitoring through features like agentless monitoring. In comparison, Splunk AppDynamics provides advanced application monitoring with detailed analytics and enhanced insights, appealing to those needing comprehensive application visibility.
Download OpenText SiteScope vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
OpenText SiteScope involves a moderately higher setup cost, while Splunk AppDynamics offers a more cost-effective setup solution. This cost difference impacts budget considerations for organizations evaluating these monitoring tools.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenText SiteScope involves a moderately higher setup cost, while Splunk AppDynamics offers a more cost-effective setup solution. This cost difference impacts budget considerations for organizations evaluating these monitoring tools.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Zenoss Cloud
4.2 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Zenoss Cloud
4.2 out of 5
Zenoss Cloud offers comprehensive real-time monitoring ideal for seamless IT integration. In comparison, Splunk AppDynamics provides superior analytics suited for complex environments. Zenoss Cloud attracts budget-conscious buyers, while Splunk AppDynamics appeals to those needing deep application insights despite higher costs.
Download Splunk AppDynamics vs. Zenoss Cloud Report
Zenoss Cloud's setup costs are generally lower, offering more predictable initial expenses, while Splunk AppDynamics presents higher setup costs with potential for more extensive feature customization.
View comparison
Pricing
Zenoss Cloud's setup costs are generally lower, offering more predictable initial expenses, while Splunk AppDynamics presents higher setup costs with potential for more extensive feature customization.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Apache SkyWalking
1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics offers seamless integration and strong support, appealing to those prioritizing ease of deployment. In comparison, Apache SkyWalking attracts buyers needing flexibility and lower costs with its open-source model, despite requiring more technical expertise and configuration.
Splunk AppDynamics entails higher setup costs compared to Apache SkyWalking, which offers a more budget-friendly setup alternative.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics entails higher setup costs compared to Apache SkyWalking, which offers a more budget-friendly setup alternative.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations
4.3 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics offers strong integration and analytics for extensive monitoring. In comparison, ExtraHop Reveal(x) excels with real-time analytics and machine learning for anomaly detection. Splunk appeals to those focused on network visibility, while ExtraHop is ideal for security-centric performance monitoring.
Download ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics setup costs are higher due to extensive features and customization, while ExtraHop Reveal(x) offers a more budget-friendly setup with straightforward implementation, allowing businesses to choose based on financial priorities and deployment needs.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics setup costs are higher due to extensive features and customization, while ExtraHop Reveal(x) offers a more budget-friendly setup with straightforward implementation, allowing businesses to choose based on financial priorities and deployment needs.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
SolarWinds AppOptics
3.9 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics excels in robust monitoring and customizability, ideal for advanced infrastructure handling. In comparison, SolarWinds AppOptics is streamlined for ease of use and integration, suitable for those prioritizing simple setup and centralized monitoring with reasonable ROI.
Download SolarWinds AppOptics vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics has a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, while SolarWinds AppOptics offers a more flexible pricing structure that may vary depending on configuration needs.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics has a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, while SolarWinds AppOptics offers a more flexible pricing structure that may vary depending on configuration needs.

Related categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
IT Operations Analytics