Splunk AppDynamics and Zabbix compete in the monitoring software category. Splunk AppDynamics appears to have an edge in providing detailed application performance insights, making it more suitable for enterprises needing in-depth performance tracking, while Zabbix stands out for infrastructure monitoring with its scalability and flexibility.
Features: Splunk AppDynamics provides application performance monitoring, deep-dive analytics, and user journey visibility, which are valuable for enterprises requiring detailed transaction tracking. Zabbix offers flexibility, high scalability, and extensive network monitoring features, making it ideal for infrastructure monitoring.
Room for Improvement: Splunk AppDynamics's complex interface needs better integration with other tools and environments, improved navigation, enhanced scalability, and robust real-time monitoring capabilities. Zabbix's UI and reporting features could be improved, and it lacks native support for modern tech stacks like cloud-native applications and AI/ML capabilities.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Splunk AppDynamics supports deployment across public, private, and hybrid clouds, with comprehensive customer support, though support responsiveness is intermittent. Zabbix is favored in on-premises environments for its simplicity and open-source model, but customer service primarily relies on community support unless enterprise support is purchased.
Pricing and ROI: Splunk AppDynamics is considered a premium solution, with complex licensing and perceived high pricing, yet users find its detailed insights justify the expense through improved performance and customer satisfaction. Zabbix is a cost-effective, open-source option with no licensing fees, attractive to organizations with small budgets, though additional investment in support may be necessary.
It's very hard to find ROI because we are currently focused only on the on-premises applications.
We got a contact, an account manager, to work directly with for technical support.
AppDynamics is much more helpful.
The customer service and support are helpful and responsive.
It is so straightforward that I have never had to use the support.
We have reached maximum capacity in our tier, and extending capacity has not been cost-effective from Splunk's perspective.
I did not find any Docker solution available with it, and a separate instance has to be installed.
We have tried it with a maximum of 500 concurrent users, and it provided all the required information.
Zabbix has high scalability.
Zabbix is very scalable and lightweight.
I would rate its scalability ten out of ten.
It is necessary to conduct appropriate testing before deploying them in production to prevent potential outages.
I can rate it nine out of ten.
Zabbix is very scalable and lightweight.
Zabbix is quite stable, and we haven't had any problems with Zabbix itself.
Splunk AppDynamics does not support the complete MELT framework, which includes metrics, events, logging, and tracing for the entire stack.
If AppDynamics could develop a means to monitor without an agent, it could significantly improve application performance and reduce potential problems.
It is lacking some documentation, which is why we are always with the AppDynamics team for support to get the details.
The only issue I can note is that it's Linux-based, and Linux documentation is not the best.
Customers have to pay a premium price, however, they receive considerable value from the product.
We find its pricing reasonable and competitive.
All these solutions at the moment are cheap, but it is like paying for insurance; you pay insurance to avoid major damage.
It is literally free.
What I like the most about Splunk AppDynamics is the end-to-end observability for the application, along with traces.
I work with the AI-powered anomaly detection and root cause analysis for troubleshooting. Users can see the error and the message with the error on the dashboard, and they can see exactly what error they are encountering.
The feature that I appreciate in AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring is the intuitive and user-friendly dynamic mapping it creates for workflows.
If disk usage surpasses a threshold, say 70%, I receive alerts and can take proactive action.
Zabbix has a lot of features, including monitoring, status updates, and collecting information telemetry from storages and servers as well.
Splunk AppDynamics enhances application performance monitoring with advanced diagnostics and real-time insights, offering seamless end-to-end transaction tracking and infrastructure visibility.
AppDynamics provides critical tools for businesses to analyze application behavior and performance. Through innovative features like transaction snapshot analysis and adaptable dashboards, users can quickly identify and address issues, ensuring high levels of system uptime and efficiency. It is designed to support complex environments including Kubernetes and AWS, enhancing user experience by detecting performance issues early. Despite needing improvements in network monitoring and integration, it remains a robust option for tracking application health.
What are the key features of AppDynamics?In industries like financial services and e-commerce, AppDynamics facilitates performance tracking across distributed systems, optimizing infrastructure to meet consumer demands. It excels in environments needing precise transaction monitoring and is pivotal in delivering high value and satisfaction.
Zabbix is an open-source monitoring software that provides real-time monitoring and alerting for servers, networks, applications, and services.
It offers a wide range of features including data collection, visualization, and reporting.
With its user-friendly interface and customizable dashboards, Zabbix helps organizations ensure the availability and performance of their IT infrastructure.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
