Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System comparison

Palo Alto Networks and Trend Micro are both solutions in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category. Palo Alto Networks is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.4, while Trend Micro is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.3. Palo Alto Networks holds a 7.4% mindshare in ID, compared to Trend Micro’s 7.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Palo Alto Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Trend Micro users who would recommend it.
Palo Alto Networks Advanced...
Read 26 Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention reviews
  • 2,813 Views
  • 1,841 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Trend Micro TippingPoint Th...
Read 19 Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System reviews
  • 3,070 Views
  • 1,703 Comparison Views
83% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention and Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System compete in the network security product category. Palo Alto seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced features and ease of management.

Features: Palo Alto offers next-generation firewall capabilities, WildFire sandboxing, and machine learning for threat detection. It provides advanced URL filtering and comprehensive bandwidth management. Trend Micro TippingPoint provides extensive IPS signatures and intelligent filtering capabilities. It features a central command center and seamless integration with other security solutions.

Room for Improvement: Palo Alto could enhance its email filtering capabilities, fix bugs, and reduce setup complexity. Additionally, licensing costs need attention. Trend Micro TippingPoint should improve integration with other vendors and reduce interface complexity. Both solutions could benefit from price competitiveness improvements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both solutions offer on-premises and hybrid cloud deployment. Palo Alto is known for supportive technical service but sometimes relies on third-party support in some regions. Trend Micro provides satisfactory support, though it can lag outside Europe and the USA.

Pricing and ROI: Palo Alto is effective but priced higher than some competitors, providing good ROI with discounts. Trend Micro is also expensive but offers bundled features and support services. Both solutions could adopt more competitive pricing strategies.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs. Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System Report (Updated: March 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs. Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System
March 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Palo Alto Networks Advanced...
Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
6th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
26
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Trend Micro TippingPoint Th...
Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
9th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
19
Ranking in other categories
Cloud and Data Center Security (16th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (25th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category, the mindshare of Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is 7.4%, down from 8.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System is 7.1%, down from 7.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
 

Featured Reviews

Carlos Bracamonte - PeerSpot reviewer
Robust, reliable, simple to install and good technical support
We are attempting to improve the use of URL filtering beyond threat protection. I'm not sure what the remaining threat protection features are off the top of my head. But beyond that, we use URL filtering. We have three approved cases for using external dynamic lists that are stored in a bucket repository. Then, for each URL site that needs to be whitelisted, we add it to the external dynamic list in order to gain access to this email. I would like Wildfire to be implemented. We use the equivalent in Cisco is the integration policies. We have the Wildfire but we are not currently implementing it. We don't have the license to use it, but we are not currently implementing it until we present the use cases that the company gives some value to and they approve the use of it.
Read full review
Subhendu Dhar - PeerSpot reviewer
Operates in-line in the network, blocking malicious and unwanted traffic
A standout feature of TippingPoint is its strong integration with various solutions. It stands out as one of the leading network Intrusion Prevention Systems (IPS) in the current market and is known for its seamless integration with other solutions. For instance, when it identifies a potential threat within the traffic stream, it meticulously analyzes the data. Even in multilayer security scenarios, Tipping Point's network IPS can serve as a bypass for the basic firewall. If a threat is identified by Tipping Point, it promptly shares this information with the other systems. This ensures that they're updated and can employ the necessary solutions from their signature databases. The entire network gets safeguarded automatically. This integration extends to components like security and FX. This linkage streamlines our operations, offering a consolidated point of control for managing threats effectively.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It is a stable product."
"The most valuable feature of Palo Alto Threat Prevention for our company is the next generation firewall."
"I find the malware protection very handy."
"The user interface is a bit more professional than some free products."
"The most valuable features are that it's user-friendly, has interesting features, URL filtering, and threat prevention."
"Everything has been okay with the solution. We are using all of the features."
"The sandboxing tools offer great prevention for cloud feeds."
"With the IP address flag, I was able to see that I was being hacked. The moment there was an interaction between somebody on my network and that IP, the solution was able to flag it, and we were able to protect ourselves."
More Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention pros
"The most valuable feature is the central command center, where we can control and manage the solution."
"The monitoring is the most valuable feature."
"What I like about Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System is that it works okay. I don't have time to mess with the tool most of the time because I have way too many tasks to do, but Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System tells you when there's a problem, then it blocks the problem, so that's what I like most about it."
"What I found most valuable in Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System is its accuracy. It's the best IPS solution in the market."
"You don't need any hardware because the solution is on the cloud. I like that Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System is easy to install and manage."
"The IPS signatures and the IPS database that are given are much better than what is commonly available."
"It integrates easily."
"I would rate TTPS's stability eight out of ten."
More Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System pros
 

Cons

"There is a potential drawback with the lack of support for the ICAP protocol."
"The pricing has improved with the newer generation of their Firewalls, but the price could always be lower. In comparison with other solutions, I believe they're quite competitive."
"The installation was complicated."
"The cost involves the price of the hardware, which is expensive. However, most of the Palo Alto solutions are expensive."
"The solution needs to improve its local technical support services. There is no premium support offered in our market."
"The solution could benefit from improved AI analytics to predict potential attacks before they occur, similar to NDR systems."
"Sometimes when you want to group a set of ports, and communicate with Palo Alto, you cannot group TCP and UDP ports together. This needs to be adjusted."
"Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention could improve the commercial offing. Other solutions, such as Fortinet provide better commercial features."
More Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention cons
"The solution is pretty expensive."
"I find Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System a bit clunky, and updating it can be a pain in the neck because you need to do it from time to time, so this is what needs to be improved in it. I would also rather have an all-in-one system that does intrusion detection, protection, web filtering, and also serves as a firewall, and my company is moving to an all-in-one solution, but I'm unsure of how soon that's going to be. Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System also doesn't have enough bandwidth to handle the required traffic within my company, so it's going to be replaced."
"It takes a lot of time before you're connected to an engineer, so an area for improvement in Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System is the response time of its technical support team."
"We need more integration. It would be good if Azure IPS and TippingPoint IPS and other products from Trend Micro like their DBI and IWSVA could talk between each other."
"TTPS is a bit behind in visuals, the UI, and some data elements."
"The solution should provide the possibility to mix traffic and the traffic's geographical source to have improved functionality."
"It integrates well but it takes time."
"The firewall rules are limited."
More Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost involves the price of the hardware, which is expensive. However, most of the Palo Alto solutions are expensive."
"The pricing could be lower."
"Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention could improve by having consistent pricing at system levels."
"If you want to have all of the good features then you have to pay extra for licensing."
"The pricing has improved with the newer generation of their Firewalls, but the price could always be lower."
"There is an initial, expensive investment but the return is good."
"From one to ten, with one being the most expensive, I would rate the pricing of Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention a one out of ten. It is my understanding that Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention is the most expensive one."
"The price of the solution is higher than others on the market. A price reduction would be beneficial if it does not impact their database quality."
More Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention pricing and cost advice
"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten."
"It's an expensive product."
"We pay for Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System yearly. The cost increases if you add more users."
"The price is in a market-suitable price range. So it's not expensive, but it's also not cheap either. The price is a strong point."
"TTPS is reasonably priced."
"It is an expensive solution and I would rate it three out of ten."
"Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System is an expensive product."
"TippingPoint is not as expensive as Palo Alto but it's not as cheap as Fortigate."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
9%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Which is the best DDoS protection solution for a big ISP for monitoring and mitigating?
Arbor would be the best bid, apart from Arbor, Palo Alto and Fortinet have good solutions. As this is an ISP, I would prefer Arbor.
See all answers
What do you like most about Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention?
It is a stable product.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention?
The pricing is competitive, and with current campaigns and discounts, it provides an excellent device for a reasonable price.
See all answers
What do you like most about Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System?
The solution's IDS functionality filters the traffic and blocks malware by blocking the connections.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System?
On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System?
The way we can build the filters could be improved. The solution should provide the possibility to mix traffic parameters with traffic's geographical source to have improved functionality able to d...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Fortinet FortiGate IPS vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Logo
Fortinet FortiGate IPS vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Compared 16% of the time
Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Logo
Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Compared 12% of the time
Check Point IPS vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Logo
Check Point IPS vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Compared 12% of the time
Darktrace vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Logo
Darktrace vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Compared 10% of the time
Cisco Sourcefire SNORT vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Logo
Cisco Sourcefire SNORT vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Compared 6% of the time
More Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Competitors
Trend Micro Deep Discovery vs Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System Logo
Trend Micro Deep Discovery vs Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System
Compared 26% of the time
Fortinet FortiGate IPS vs Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System Logo
Fortinet FortiGate IPS vs Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System
Compared 16% of the time
Trellix Intrusion Prevention System vs Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System Logo
Trellix Intrusion Prevention System vs Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System
Compared 15% of the time
Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) vs Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System Logo
Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) vs Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System
Compared 11% of the time
Check Point IPS vs Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System Logo
Check Point IPS vs Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System
Compared 9% of the time
More Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
March 2025
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention reportDownload Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention product report
Buyer's Guide
Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System
March 2025
Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System reportDownload Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
TippingPoint Digital Vaccine, TippingPoint DV, Trend Micro Digital Vaccine, Trend Micro DV, Trend Micro TippingPoint NGIPS
 

Overview

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is a cloud-based security service that combines cutting-edge technologies, including machine learning, artificial intelligence, and expert human monitoring, to effectively thwart advanced threats like malware, zero-day attacks, and command-and-control threats. It offers inline protection, scrutinizing all network traffic irrespective of port, protocol, or encryption. An integral component of Palo Alto Networks' security platform, it enjoys widespread adoption across diverse organizations. With its robust security capabilities, it's an ideal choice for entities of all sizes, particularly those in high-risk sectors such as finance, healthcare, and government agencies, seeking to safeguard their networks from a broad spectrum of advanced threats.

Palo Alto Networks

Keep ahead of the latest threats and protect your critical data with ongoing threat prevention and analysis.

Trend Micro
 

Sample Customers

University of Arkansas, JBG SMITH, SkiStar AB, TRI-AD, Temple University, Telkom Indonesia
Yapi Kredi
Buyer's Guide
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs. Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System
March 2025
Free Report: Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs. Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs. Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs. Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System report.

We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.