Panorama Necto vs QlikView comparison

Panorama Necto and QlikView compete in the business intelligence software market. QlikView appears to have the upper hand, thanks to its superior data visualization, integration capabilities, and comprehensive feature set.

Features: Panorama Necto prioritizes social business intelligence, collaboration, and self-service data exploration, which enhances decision-making through narrative reporting. Its intuitive data discovery process is also a highlight. On the other hand, QlikView offers dynamic data exploration through its associative data model and extensive data visualization options, providing an advanced analytics experience to users who seek comprehensive capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Panorama Necto could improve in areas such as big data analysis, predictive capabilities, and reporting customizations for advanced users. Additionally, it could benefit from a more extensive community forum. QlikView could enhance user ease by simplifying its initial setup and continuing to expand its support for database connections and integration options in SaaS environments. Its pricing strategy could also be reconsidered to address cost concerns, despite its high-value features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Panorama Necto offers quick deployment with minimal IT intervention and is noted for its responsive customer support services. In contrast, while QlikView has a more complex setup, it is supported by a robust and reliable support framework.

Pricing and ROI: Panorama Necto is competitively priced, offering a quick return on investment through low setup costs and effective utilization. Although QlikView requires a higher initial investment, it promises substantial long-term savings due to its powerful data analysis capabilities. The higher initial costs of QlikView are justified by the long-term value, making it favorable for organizations focused on deep data analytics.