PVS‑Studio vs SonarQube comparison

PVS-Studio and SonarSource Sàrl are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. PVS-Studio is ranked #43, while SonarSource Sàrl is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.2. PVS-Studio holds a 0.5% mindshare in SAST, compared to SonarSource Sàrl’s 18.2% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of SonarSource Sàrl users are willing to recommend the solution.

PVS‑Studio

502 Views
497 Comparison Views

SonarQube

Read 134 SonarQube reviews

38,374 Views
28,013 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

PVS‑Studio

SonarQube

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 8, 2026

SonarQube and PVS-Studio provide code quality analysis solutions for organizations aiming to enhance software reliability. PVS-Studio is favored for its advanced features and deep code analysis, while SonarQube is noted for its comprehensive multi-language support, impacting user choice based on needs and budget.

Features: SonarQube offers broad language coverage vital for diverse development teams. It integrates with build pipelines, supporting seamless operations within different environments. The platform accommodates various programming languages, making it suitable for heterogeneous development projects. PVS-Studio specializes in static code analysis, aiming to catch coding errors and vulnerabilities that enhance security. Its focus on error detection provides an in-depth analysis crucial for safety-critical applications. The tool's ability to identify complex errors enables developers to improve code quality significantly.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SonarQube is known for its flexible deployment options, supporting on-premises and cloud setups, with comprehensive documentation easing the installation process. On the other hand, PVS-Studio offers a straightforward installation with responsive technical support, ensuring users receive timely assistance and smooth integration. While SonarQube is flexible, PVS-Studio’s installation simplicity and support are highly commendable for initial product deployment.

Pricing and ROI: SonarQube provides scalable options from small to large enterprises with multiple pricing tiers, potentially offering a favorable long-term ROI for businesses prioritizing broad language support. Meanwhile, PVS-Studio may involve higher upfront costs but ensures a justified investment through its specialized feature set and focus on improving software quality, likely leading to significant returns through lower maintenance and enhanced reliability over time.

To learn more, read our detailed Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

PVS‑Studio

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

43rd

Average Rating

0.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SonarQube

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

134

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (1st), Software Development Analytics (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of PVS‑Studio is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SonarQube is 18.2%, down from 26.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
SonarQube	18.2%
PVS‑Studio	0.5%
Other	81.3%

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

Use PVS‑Studio?

Leave a review

KarthikHarpanhalli

Sr Software Engineering Supervisor at Mozarc Medical

Gains control over rule customization and achieves reliable vulnerability assessment

The deployment process took me about 2 or 3 hours to deploy SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube), although I do not remember exactly since it was done about 2 years back. Currently, about 10 of my developers are using SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) in my company. I do not have plans to increase the usage of SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) in the future as there will not be any requirement to increase. I am a senior software engineer and supervisor at Mozark Medical. My corporate email address is karthik.k.a.r.t.h.i.k.h.a.r.p.a.n.h.a.l.l.i@mozarkmedical.com. Overall, I would rate SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) as a 9 out of 10.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	41
Midsize Enterprise	24
Large Enterprise	79

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Is SonarQube the best tool for static analysis?

I am not very familiar with SonarQube and their solutions, so I can not answer. But if you are asking me about which tools that are the best for for Static Code Analysis, I suggest you have a look...

See all answers

Which gives you more for your money - SonarQube or Veracode?

SonarQube is easy to deploy and configure, and also integrates well with other tools to do quality code analysis. SonarQube has a great community edition, which is open-source and free. Easy to use...

See all answers

How would you decide between Coverity and Sonarqube?

We researched Coverity, but in the end, we chose SonarQube. SonarQube is a tool for reviewing code quality and security. It helps to guide our development teams during code reviews by providing rem...

See all answers

Comparisons

Klocwork vs PVS‑Studio

Compared 12% of the time

Coverity Static vs PVS‑Studio

Compared 11% of the time

More PVS‑Studio Competitors

Checkmarx One vs SonarQube

Compared 28% of the time

Snyk vs SonarQube

Compared 9% of the time

GitHub Advanced Security vs SonarQube

Compared 6% of the time

Coverity Static vs SonarQube

Compared 5% of the time

Semgrep vs SonarQube

Compared 4% of the time

More SonarQube Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

February 2026

Download PVS‑Studio product report

Buyer's Guide

SonarQube

January 2026

Download SonarQube product report

Also Known As

No data available

Sonar, SonarQube Cloud

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

PVS-Studio

SonarSource Sàrl

Overview

An enterprise solution that enhances your code quality, security (SAST), and safety. PVS‑Studio is a static analyzer on guard of code quality, security (SAST), and code safety. PVS‑Studio detects various errors – typos, dead code, and potential vulnerabilities (Static Application Security Testing, SAST).
The analyzer matches warnings to the Common Weakness Enumeration, SEI CERT Coding Standards, and supports the MISRA standard.

PVS-Studio

SonarQube leads automated code review, enhancing code quality and security in AI-driven SDLCs. It analyzes pull requests, providing developers with actionable feedback and AI-driven fixes before code merges. Trusted by top enterprises, it supports SaaS and self-managed deployments.

SonarQube supports a wide range of programming languages and integrates seamlessly with CI/CD tools like Jenkins. It is renowned for its static code analysis, code coverage, and security vulnerability detection. While its open-source foundation and scalability are praised, users seek enhanced integration across multiple languages, better security features, and improved documentation. Despite challenges, its ability to automate code inspections and ensure compliance with coding standards makes it essential in software development processes, facilitating continuous improvement.

What are the most important features?

Language Support: Extensive support for multiple programming languages.
Custom Coding Rules: Allows defining project-specific rules.
Integration: Seamlessly works with Jenkins and CI/CD pipelines.
Quality Gates: Simplifies monitoring code quality.
Dashboards: Facilitates easy monitoring and management.
Static Code Analysis: Detects issues early in development.
Security Detection: Identifies vulnerabilities automatically.

What benefits should users look for?

Improved Code Quality: Enhances reliability and maintainability.
Security Assurance: Strengthens code against vulnerabilities.
Technical Debt Reduction: Ensures cleaner, maintainable code.
Efficient Feedback: Speeds up development cycles.
Standards Compliance: Aids in adhering to best practices.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and automotive, SonarQube is leveraged for static code analysis, automating code inspections, and ensuring compliance with stringent standards. Teams integrate it into their CI/CD pipelines to maintain high-quality code, identify security vulnerabilities, and enhance code maintainability.

SonarSource Sàrl

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Snowflake, Booking.com, Deutsche Bank, AstraZeneca, and Ford Motor Company.

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

February 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about SonarSource Sàrl, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Static Application Security Testing (SAST). Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.