Qwiet AI vs Snyk comparison

Harness and Snyk are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. Harness is ranked #35, while Snyk is ranked #7 with an average rating of 7.9. Harness holds a 0.9% mindshare in AS, compared to Snyk’s 5.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Harness users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Snyk users who would recommend it.

Qwiet AI

Read 1 Qwiet AI review

1,136 Views
659 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Snyk

Read 50 Snyk reviews

21,662 Views
8,448 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Qwiet AI

Snyk

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 11, 2026

Snyk and Qwiet AI are competitors in the application security sector, each with unique strengths. Snyk is generally preferred for its extensive feature set and infrastructure security solutions.

Features: Snyk offers a comprehensive suite of security tools, including open-source vulnerability scanning, container security, and seamless integration into existing workflows. Qwiet AI employs advanced machine learning algorithms for predictive vulnerability assessment and provides in-depth AI-driven analytics.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Snyk provides a straightforward deployment process supported by thorough documentation and support, ensuring quick integration into customer environments. Qwiet AI, while offering strong customer support, has a more complex deployment due to its AI-focused architecture.

Pricing and ROI: Snyk's pricing model is accessible and offers clear ROI across various organizational sizes. Qwiet AI's higher pricing aligns with its sophisticated features, providing significant long-term ROI for those utilizing its AI capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Security Tools Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,757 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Qwiet AI

Ranking in Application Security Tools

35th

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

33rd

Ranking in Software Composition Analysis (SCA)

20th

Average Rating

10.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Snyk

Ranking in Application Security Tools

7th

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

9th

Ranking in Software Composition Analysis (SCA)

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (17th), GRC (4th), Cloud Management (12th), Vulnerability Management (15th), Container Security (6th), Software Development Analytics (2nd), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (13th), DevSecOps (3rd), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (2nd), AI Security (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Qwiet AI is 0.9%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Snyk is 5.6%, down from 7.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Snyk	5.6%
Qwiet AI	0.9%
Other	93.5%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Shivendra S.

Senior Director of Engineering - Information Security at Apna

Effectively in identify and fix bugs early in the development lifecycle

When it comes to ShiftLeft, the most valuable feature is definitely its ease of use and cost-effectiveness. Previously, security professionals had to spend a lot of time and effort running around, asking people to fix issues in their products, architectures, code, and even networks. With ShiftLeft, everything becomes robust and secure from within. Instead of relying on external measures like Web Application Firewalls (WAF) that are applied from the outside in, ShiftLeft takes a proactive approach. It helps prevent issues from arising in the first place, making it much easier for both security teams and developers. It's also cost-effective because you don't have to constantly go back, make changes to the code, and then push it again. Writing secure code from the start ensures that there are no vulnerabilities when it goes live. So, I would say the main features of ShiftLeft are its cost-effectiveness and ease of adaptability or use.

Read full review

Abhishek-Goyal

Software Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Improves security posture by actively reducing critical vulnerabilities and guiding remediation

Snyk's main features include open-source vulnerability scanning, code security, container security, infrastructure as code security, risk-based prioritization, development-first integration, continuous monitoring and alerting, automation, and remediation. The best features I appreciate are the vulnerability checking, vulnerability scanning, and code security capabilities, as Snyk scans all open-source dependencies for known vulnerabilities and helps with license compliance for open-source components. Snyk integrates into IDEs, allowing issues to be caught as they appear in the code dynamically and prioritizes risk while providing remediation advice. Snyk provides actionable remediation advice on where vulnerabilities can exist and where code security is compromised, automatically scanning everything and providing timely alerts. Snyk has positively impacted my organization by improving the security posture across all software repositories, resulting in fewer critical vulnerabilities, more confidence in overall product security, and faster security compliance for project clients. Snyk has helped reduce vulnerabilities significantly. Initially, the repository had 17 to 31 critical and high vulnerabilities, but Snyk has helped manage them down to just five vulnerabilities, which are now lower and not high or critical.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"When it comes to ShiftLeft, the most valuable feature is definitely its ease of use and cost-effectiveness."

"The most valuable features of Snyk are vulnerability scanning and automation. The automation the solution brings around vulnerability scanning is useful."

"The solution's Open Source feature gives us notifications and suggestions regarding how to address vulnerabilities."

"Snyk is a developer-friendly product."

"Snyk's focus on security is a valuable feature. Also Snyk supports multiple programming languages, which has positively affected my security practices. I use only two or three languages, and when I change the language in a file, it detects it in the same suite. I find the AI-powered scanning overall beneficial.Using Snyk's AI-powered scanning, I can detect around ten or twenty errors in my project with about twenty thousand lines of code, so it helps improve my project by identifying a lot of potential vulnerabilities."

"Static code analysis is one of the best features of the solution."

"Snyk allows for scaling across large organizations, accommodating tens of thousands of applications and over 60,000 repositories, making it suitable for wide-scale deployment."

"They evolved their maturity because they could find the vulnerabilities before the pipeline runs."

"The most valuable features include enriched information around the vulnerabilities for better triaging, in terms of the vulnerability layer origin and vulnerability tree."

More Snyk pros

Cons

"Having support from senior management is crucial in making it mandatory for teams to collaborate with the security team throughout the development process."

"Scalability has some issues because we have a lot of code and its use is mandatory. Therefore, it can be slow at times, especially because there are a lot of projects and reporting. Some UI improvements could help with this."

"It can be improved from the reporting perspective and scanning perspective. They can also improve it on the UI front."

"Snyk should improve the scanning capabilities for other languages. For example, Veracode is strong with different languages such as Java, C#, and others."

"I use Snyk alongside Sonar, and Snyk tends to generate a lot of false positives. Improving the overall report quality and reducing false positives would be beneficial. I don't need additional features; just improving the existing ones would be enough."

"The log export function could be easier when shipping logs to other platforms such as Splunk."

"Although Snyk is strong, sometimes it flags vulnerabilities that are not reachable, not exploitable, and not relevant to a project."

"The product is very expensive."

"We would like to have upfront knowledge on how easy it should be to just pull in an upgraded dependency, e.g., even introduce full automation for dependencies supposed to have no impact on the business side of things. Therefore, we would like some output when you get the report with the dependencies. We want to get additional information on the expected impact of the business code that is using the dependency with the newer version. This probably won't be easy to add, but it would be helpful."

More Snyk cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Compared to Veracode, Snyk is definitely a cheaper tool."

"With Snyk, you get what you pay for. It is not a cheap solution, but you get a comprehensiveness and level of coverage that is very good. The dollars in the security budget only go so far. If I can maximize my value and be able to have some funds left over for other initiatives, I want to do that. That is what drives me to continue to say, "What's out there in the market? Snyk's expensive, but it's good. Is there something as good, but more affordable?" Ultimately, I find we could go cheaper, but we would lose the completeness of vision or scope. I am not willing to do that because Snyk does provide a pretty important benefit for us."

"Despite Snyk's coverage, scalability, reliability, and stability, it is available at a very competitive price."

"It's inexpensive and easy to license. It comes in standard package sizing, which is straightforward. This information is publicly found on their website."

"The pricing is acceptable, especially for enterprises. I don't think it's too much of a concern for our customers. Something like $99 per user is reasonable when the stakes are high."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"It's good value. That's the primary thing. It's not cheap-cheap, but it's good value."

"I didn't think the price was that great, but it wasn't that bad, either. I'd rate their pricing as average in the market."

More Snyk pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Retailer

16%

Computer Software Company

13%

Recreational Facilities/Services Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	21
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	21

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does Snyk compare with SonarQube?

Snyk does a great job identifying and reducing vulnerabilities. This solution is fully automated and monitors 24/7 to find any issues reported on the internet. It will store dependencies that you a...

See all answers

What do you like most about Snyk?

The most effective feature in securing project dependencies stems from its ability to highlight security vulnerabilities.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Snyk?

There are a lot of false positives that need to be identified and separated. The inclusion of AI to remove false positives would be beneficial. So far, I've not seen any AI features to enhance vuln...

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube vs Qwiet AI

Compared 14% of the time

preZero platform by Qwiet AI vs Qwiet AI

Compared 8% of the time

Black Duck SCA vs Qwiet AI

Compared 7% of the time

Veracode vs Qwiet AI

Compared 7% of the time

Semgrep vs Qwiet AI

Compared 6% of the time

More Qwiet AI Competitors

SonarQube vs Snyk

Compared 15% of the time

Trivy vs Snyk

Compared 4% of the time

GitHub Advanced Security vs Snyk

Compared 4% of the time

Black Duck SCA vs Snyk

Compared 2% of the time

Wiz vs Snyk

Compared 2% of the time

More Snyk Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

February 2026

Download Qwiet AI product report

Buyer's Guide

Snyk

January 2026

Download Snyk product report

Also Known As

ShiftLeft

Fugue, Snyk AppRisk

Overview

Shipping secure code is painful and time-consuming – slowing down development teams and AppSec teams alike. ShiftLeft is on a mission to make vulnerabilities history. Our revolutionary Code Property Graph (CPG) enables us to seamlessly insert 10x faster code analysis, prioritized OSS vulnerability findings and real-time security education in one single SaaS platform integrated directly into modern development workflows. Combining our OWASP-benchmark dominating NG-SAST, Intelligent SCA, instant secrets detection, and contextual security education, ShiftLeft CORE code security platform turns every developer into an AppSec expert.

Harness

Snyk excels in integrating security within the development lifecycle, providing teams with an AI Trust Platform that combines speed with security efficiency, ensuring robust AI application development.

Snyk empowers developers with AI-ready engines offering broad coverage, accuracy, and speed essential for modern development. With AI-powered visibility and security, Snyk allows proactive threat prevention and swift threat remediation. The platform supports shifts toward LLM engineering and AI code analysis, enhancing security and development productivity. Snyk collaborates with GenAI coding assistants for improved productivity and AI application threat management. Platform extensibility supports evolving standards with API access and native integrations, ensuring comprehensive and seamless security embedding in development tools.

What are Snyk's standout features?

Simplicity and Integration: Easy to integrate across platforms like GitLab, GitHub, and Jira.
Comprehensive Vulnerability Database: Offers accurate reporting for effective vulnerability management.
Developer-Friendly Design: Supports multiple programming languages, appealing to developers.
Automation and Flexibility: Enhances workflow efficiency with automated capabilities.

What benefits can users expect?

Efficiency in Vulnerability Detection: Streamlines prioritization and remediation processes.
Cost-Effectiveness: Offers a competitive pricing model compared to alternatives.
Enhanced Workflow: Integration with DevOps tools improves development processes.

Industries leverage Snyk for security in CI/CD pipelines by automating checks for dependency vulnerabilities and managing open-source licenses. Its Docker and Kubernetes scanning capabilities enhance container security, supporting a proactive security approach. Integrations with platforms like GitHub and Azure DevOps optimize implementation across diverse software environments.

Snyk

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

StartApp, Segment, Skyscanner, DigitalOcean, Comic Relief

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

February 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about SonarSource Sàrl, Checkmarx, Veracode and others in Application Security Tools. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors, best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors, and best Software Composition Analysis (SCA) vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.