Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Rapid7 AppSpider vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) comparison

Rapid7 and Sonar are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. Rapid7 is ranked #32, while Sonar is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.3. Rapid7 holds a 0.5% mindshare in SAST, compared to Sonar’s 19.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Rapid7 users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of Sonar users who would recommend it.
Rapid7 AppSpider
Read 14 Rapid7 AppSpider reviews
  • 1,341 Views
  • 711 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
SonarQube Server (formerly ...
Read 117 SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) reviews
  • 38,362 Views
  • 28,004 Comparison Views
81% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 21, 2025

SonarQube Server and Rapid7 AppSpider compete in software quality and security analysis. Based on user reviews, SonarQube has an advantage in code quality features, while AppSpider is stronger in vulnerability scanning.

Features: SonarQube supports over 20 programming languages and allows custom coding rules, pre-commit checks, and strong CI/CD integration, making it useful for holistic code quality assessment. Rapid7 AppSpider is known for its detailed vulnerability reporting and web security with comprehensive international standards compliance, providing a valuable tool for compliance and risk management.

Room for Improvement: SonarQube users suggest enhancements in analysis speed, multi-language project configuration, and improved security scanning capabilities. Users feel better integration with tools like JIRA and more efficient plugins could be beneficial. For Rapid7 AppSpider, users report false positives and express the need for improved integration and stability. Mobile application scanning and more understandable reports are also desired.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SonarQube offers flexible deployment options including hybrid and on-premise environments, although official support is mainly for paid versions. It benefits from active community support. Rapid7 AppSpider can be deployed in both cloud and on-premise environments, but users note slower response times for support queries and integration setups.

Pricing and ROI: SonarQube offers an open-source version with commercial plugins available for additional capabilities. While professional and enterprise editions incur costs, their comprehensive features contribute to perceived ROI. Rapid7 AppSpider requires a purchased license, which can be costly at an enterprise level, but it provides effective ROI for its web security scanning and vulnerability reporting features.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Rapid7 AppSpider vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Report (Updated: September 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Rapid7 AppSpider vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
September 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 868,787 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Rapid7 AppSpider
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
32nd
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SonarQube Server (formerly ...
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
117
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (1st), Software Development Analytics (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Rapid7 AppSpider is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) is 19.7%, down from 27.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)19.7%
Rapid7 AppSpider0.5%
Other79.8%
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
 

Featured Reviews

Rizwan-Alam - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy automated web app scanning, but gives many false positives and isn't always stable
One of the challenges I have with AppSpider is that it gives you a lot of false positives, especially when compared to other solutions. This is the main aspect that I hope to see Rapid7 improve on. Beyond reducing false positives, I would also like to see them implement better reporting features, particularly in the executive summary type of reports which need to be user-friendly and easily understood by non-technical people. The recommendations and solutions on these reports could always be improved to make them more relevant, too. Lastly, the stability isn't that great, and sometimes it becomes non-responsive. I feel like the stability of the application is very average and currently needs more work.
Read full review
Sthembiso Zondi - PeerSpot reviewer
Consistent improvements in code quality and security with effective integration and reliable technical support
The features of SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) that I find most useful are the suggestions received from reviewing the code. When they review the code, they provide suggestions on how to fix it, and we find those very useful from a development perspective. We use SonarQube Server's (formerly SonarQube) centralized management and visualization of code quality metrics on the dashboard because that's the executive dashboard that we send to the executives to show where we are in terms of quality, security, and where the company can improve. We use that for organizational improvement purposes. The ability to tailor metrics tracking in SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) has been beneficial to my team. There are team-specific dashboards which are related to specific repositories they utilize, and we have that aggregative dashboard that shows the whole organization's performance. We can drill down per specific repository, which makes it easier for the team to improve specific things.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the reporting, which is compliant with international standards."
"It is really accurate and the rate of false positives is very low."
"When it is set up properly, it can do scanning on web apps with multiple engines automatically."
"I like the ability the product has to detect vulnerabilities quickly, when it has been released in our environment, then displaying them to us."
"Rapid7 AppSpider is good at managing different applications. It uses applets and generates reports to cover the PCA/GDPR compliance requirements."
"The setup is usually straightforward."
"I would say that it is stable, as I am not aware of any major issues."
"What I like most about AppSpider is that it's easy to use and its automated scan gives me all the details I need to know when it comes to vulnerabilities and their solutions."
More Rapid7 AppSpider pros
"It is an easy tool that you can deploy and configure. After that you can measure the history of your obligation and integrate it with other tools like GitLab or GitHub or Azure DevOps to do quality code analysis."
"This solution has helped with the integration and building of our CICD pipeline."
"The overall quality of the indicator is good."
"It is very good at identifying technical debt."
"I like that it helps us maintain our work quality and code security."
"The freemium version of SonarQube Server offers excellent value, especially compared to the high costs of Snyk."
"The SonarQube dashboard looks great."
"The integrations SonarQube provides with our software delivery pipeline are very seamless."
More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) pros
 

Cons

"The enterprise interface is too simple. It should be more customizable."
"There are some glitches with stability, and it is an area for improvement."
"AppSpider has some problems with the RAM needed while scanning."
"Support response times are slow and can be improved."
"The tech support is responsive but issues remain unresolved."
"It needs better integration with mobile applications."
"One of the challenges I have with AppSpider is that it gives you a lot of false positives, especially when compared to other solutions."
"AppSpider could improve in the area of integration. They need to add more integration opportunities."
More Rapid7 AppSpider cons
"In the next release, I would like to have notifications because now, it is a bit difficult. I think that's a feature which we could add there and it would benefit the users as well. For every full request, they should be able to see their bugs or vulnerability directly on the surface."
"It does not provide deeper scanning of vulnerabilities in an application, on a live session. This is something we are not happy about. Maybe the reason for that is we are running the community edition currently, but other editions may improve on that aspect."
"It should be user-friendly."
"We called support and complained but have not received any information as we use the free version. We had to fix it on our own and could not escalate it to the tool's developer."
"Lacks sufficient visibility and documentation."
"The product's pricing could be lower."
"A better design of the interface and add some new rules."
"The exporting capabilities could be improved. Currently, exporting is fully dependent on the SonarQube environment."
More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Rapid7 AppSpider cost 9,000 annually but there is limited usage. Large companies are able to negotiate a better price or a better deal for the usage with the vendor."
"AppSpider is closed-source software and you need to acquire a license in order to use it."
"It is expensive if you want to buy the Enterprise version that is able to scan multiple applications at once."
"The price is pretty fair."
"The licensing cost depends on the number of users."
"This solution is free."
"We are using the open-source version, which is available free of cost."
"The free version of SonarQube does everything that we need it to."
"This product is open source and very convenient."
"There is both a free and licensed version. The free version has limitations on development languages and support."
"On the pricing side, it's 3,000 Euros for 1 million lines of code."
"We are using the community version of the solution and we plan on purchasing licenses for the upgraded version soon. There is a limitation on how many lines of code can be scanned and this is why we are going to purchase a license for an increased amount."
"I think comparing the product to competitors it should be less expensive."
More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Educational Organization
7%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business11
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise1
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business32
Midsize Enterprise21
Large Enterprise75
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Rapid7 AppSpider?
The price is not high, but for Japanese customers, localization may incur additional costs.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Rapid7 AppSpider?
For Japanese customers, localization is needed. The product should offer a GUI in Japanese and provide Japanese reports for end-users.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Rapid7 AppSpider?
Our clients use AppSpider to address security concerns for their websites. It is particularly used by customers who require security assessments.
See all answers
Is SonarQube the best tool for static analysis?
I am not very familiar with SonarQube and their solutions, so I can not answer. But if you are asking me about which tools that are the best for for Static Code Analysis, I suggest you have a look...
See all answers
Which gives you more for your money - SonarQube or Veracode?
SonarQube is easy to deploy and configure, and also integrates well with other tools to do quality code analysis. SonarQube has a great community edition, which is open-source and free. Easy to use...
See all answers
How would you decide between Coverity and Sonarqube?
We researched Coverity, but in the end, we chose SonarQube. SonarQube is a tool for reviewing code quality and security. It helps to guide our development teams during code reviews by providing rem...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Rapid7 InsightAppSec vs Rapid7 AppSpider Logo
Rapid7 InsightAppSec vs Rapid7 AppSpider
Compared 33% of the time
Acunetix vs Rapid7 AppSpider Logo
Acunetix vs Rapid7 AppSpider
Compared 9% of the time
PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Rapid7 AppSpider Logo
PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Rapid7 AppSpider
Compared 9% of the time
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs Rapid7 AppSpider Logo
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs Rapid7 AppSpider
Compared 6% of the time
Invicti vs Rapid7 AppSpider Logo
Invicti vs Rapid7 AppSpider
Compared 6% of the time
More Rapid7 AppSpider Competitors
Checkmarx One vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Logo
Checkmarx One vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
Compared 20% of the time
GitHub Advanced Security vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Logo
GitHub Advanced Security vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
Compared 10% of the time
Coverity Static vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Logo
Coverity Static vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
Compared 10% of the time
Veracode vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Logo
Veracode vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
Compared 6% of the time
Semgrep vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Logo
Semgrep vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
Compared 6% of the time
More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Rapid7 AppSpider
September 2025
Rapid7 AppSpider reportDownload Rapid7 AppSpider product report
Buyer's Guide
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
September 2025
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) reportDownload SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) product report
 

Also Known As

AppSpider
Sonar
 

Overview

SPAs, APIs, mobile—the evolution of application technology is measured in months, not years. Is your web application security testing tool designed to keep up? AppSpider lets you collect all the information needed to test all the apps so that you aren’t left with gaping application risks.

Our dynamic application security testing (DAST) solution crawls to the deepest, darkest corners of even the most modern and complex apps to effectively test for risk and get you the insight you need to remediate faster. With AppSpider on your side (or, rather, all of your sides), you’ll be able to scan all the apps today and always be ready for whatever comes next.

Rapid7

SonarQube Server enhances code quality and security via static code analysis. It detects vulnerabilities, improves standards, and reduces technical debt, integrating into CI/CD pipelines.

SonarQube Server is a comprehensive tool for enhancing code quality and security. It offers static code analysis to identify vulnerabilities, improve coding standards, and reduce technical debt. By integrating into CI/CD pipelines, it provides automated checks for adherence to best practices. Organizations use it for code inspection, security testing, and compliance, ensuring development environments with better maintainability and fewer issues.

What are the key features of SonarQube Server?
  • Support for 20+ languages: Extensive programming language support suitable for diverse coding environments.
  • Custom coding rules: Allows for tailored rule sets to match specific coding standards.
  • Flexible quality gates: Define criteria for code acceptance at various intervals.
  • CI/CD integration: Seamless integration with Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment tools.
  • Rich interface: User-friendly dashboard with detailed visual insights.
What benefits should users expect from SonarQube Server?
  • Improved code quality: Enhanced analysis contributes to fewer bugs and improved coding practices.
  • Security enhancements: Identifies and mitigates security vulnerabilities pre-emptively.
  • Maintainability: Reduces technical debt, yielding long-term development efficiency.
  • Customizable: Flexibility in configuration aligns with specific project needs.

Many industries implement SonarQube Server to uphold coding standards, maintain security protocols, and streamline their software development lifecycle. In sectors like finance and healthcare, adhering to regulations and ensuring reliable software is critical, making SonarQube Server invaluable. It is often integrated into CI/CD pipelines, ensuring that code changes meet set standards before deployment. This approach enhances productivity and maintains compliance with industry-specific requirements.

Sonar
 

Sample Customers

Microsoft
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
Rapid7 AppSpider vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
September 2025
Free Report: Rapid7 AppSpider vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
Find out what your peers are saying about Rapid7 AppSpider vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Rapid7 AppSpider vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) report.
See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.