ReadyAPI vs Testim comparison

Read 10 Testim reviews

2,934 Views
1,643 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ReadyAPI

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

ReadyAPI and Testim are competing in the field of testing automation. Testim leads in ease of use and innovative automation capabilities, while ReadyAPI is acknowledged for comprehensive API testing features and flexibility in support.

Features: ReadyAPI offers end-to-end API testing, focusing on virtual services, API security, and detailed reporting. Testim is known for quick test creation, AI-driven automation, and strong integration capabilities.

Room for Improvement: ReadyAPI could enhance its user interface, streamline integration processes, and simplify the initial setup for beginners. Testim may benefit from more robust reporting features, enhanced support for complex test scenarios, and expanded documentation for new users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ReadyAPI provides various deployment options with strong customer support, enabling smooth integration into workflows. Testim offers rapid cloud-based deployment with community-driven support, favoring speed and simplicity.

Pricing and ROI: ReadyAPI is considered to have a moderate setup cost, offering substantial returns for large API environments. Testim is praised for budget-friendly setup and scalable pricing models, promising high ROI through fast testing and lower maintenance efforts.

To learn more, read our detailed ReadyAPI vs. Testim Report (Updated: December 2025).

Download the complete report

ReadyAPI vs. Testim

December 2025

Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ReadyAPI

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

15th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Performance Testing Tools (7th)

Testim

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

13th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Automation Tools (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of ReadyAPI is 1.7%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Testim is 2.9%, up from 2.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Testim	2.9%
ReadyAPI	1.7%
Other	95.4%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

PrashanthKumar

Lead QA Engineer at Msys Technologies

Experience effective testing with flexible licensing alongside pivotal insights on essential improvements

For non-functional testing, I focus on performance and security. For performance and security tests, I used REST API, SoapUI, and JMeter. These tools help us conduct thorough testing across these dimensions. I find ReadyAPI helpful especially in overcoming security issues, as we experienced slowness in the application after merging our JAR files. For instance, if a person wants to access a university database and encounters a timeout error, we learned through ReadyAPI that the issue was due to HTML protocol limits with the payload. We fine-tuned this process to display the expected data effectively. I consider ReadyAPI a cost-effective solution because it covers three verticals without needing to purchase separate tools for security, performance, or functional testing. ReadyAPI is a versatile tool for creating multiple testing frameworks and validating various parameters seamlessly. REST API is the tool I use to test all three types of articles, meaning I validate the APIs I send to my peers or clients for functional testing, and I also perform security testing to ensure the URL and data passed through multiple components adhere to policies and user privileges. This is done through functional security testing using the REST API tool, and for performance, I ensure that applications can be accessed simultaneously by multiple users without hindrance or slowness through thorough performance testing.

Read full review

Jyoti Mittal

Director - Quality Engineering at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees

Smart locators and small learning curve streamline test automation, minimizing maintenance and boosting efficiency.

Testim has a specific feature called a smart locator. Anyone experienced in test automation knows this is one of the most complex parts of developing automated scripts. The Testim feature automatically finds the locators, which helps us build stable test scripts. Stable scripts are crucial for receiving faster and more reliable feedback. I have also seen reduced maintenance due to smart locators, as it automatically finds locators for us even with minor application changes.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"When you are working in sprints, you need to have continuous feedback. ReadyAPI definitely helps in automating very fast and rapidly. We have less coding, and we can more easily define our assertions. We don't use it for full-blown performance testing, but normally if you are doing your functional testing, it gives you the request and response time. Anybody who is doing functional testing can see what the request and response times are and raise a flag based upon their business affiliates, that is, whether it is meeting their affiliates. You can identify this during functional testing."

"ReadyAPI enhances my workflows by allowing us to use Docker containers based on the ReadyAPI test runner."

"The interface is ok and they have the ability to re-load tests so that you can reuse them."

"It's easy to implement."

"It is the best solution you can get across the globe for API, test automation, and API penetration testing."

"The most valuable features are the integration with Jira and the test management tools."

"The feature that allows you to import an API collection or a project is valuable."

"It's easy to learn how to use it."

Cons

"The performance in some cases needs improvement. Sometimes it requires too many resources."

"Can be improved by including an inherent feature for UI automation."

"I don't like how they don't have a clear way to manage tests between multiple projects."

"They have performance testing also. However, it's not that great."

"The reporting is not very robust and needs to be improved."

"The UI should be flexible. Currently, the UI isn't."

"To generate a test suite in API, I had to create a separate one each time because otherwise it was just override the test. Each API had to be added separately. I thought I could just have one and then create different methods, but I had to add each API separately to create the test for that. That is an area that could be improved."

"The reporting in ReadyAPI could be better. It can become sloppy, sometimes it works and other times it does not."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"For each license, they charge the same amount, which is less than $1,000 for each desktop license."

"There are costs in addition to the licensing fee. For example, if you want to add the load testing you would pay more."

"ReadyAPI is moderately priced, with added costs for more plugins."

"The thing with ReadyAPI is that you have to buy different licenses for different purposes."

"The price was around $6,000 for one license, but I don't remember exactly. It is definitely expensive. Our organization was planning on having multiple licenses for this year."

"If I remember correctly, ReadyAPI costs between $5,000 to $7,000 for five thousand virtual users running it at a given point in time. Other tools, for example, Apache JMeter, can run millions of users at a given time. ReadyAPI is a tool that requires you to pay more money if you want more users to run it for performance testing. For functional testing, each ReadyAPI license costs $1,000, and you do get basic testing, and it's inclusive of one hundred users. In my company, if there's a need for more than one hundred users, my team uses Apache JMeter because it's futile to end up paying $5,000 or $6,000 annually just for performance testing, which can be done in Apache JMeter as well. Given the circumstances, my team does performance testing only towards the end of the fiscal year when the regulatory testing of applications takes place. If I have to run ReadyAPI just for two days or just for ten or fifteen odd days, then it's not worth paying $5,000 for the license with the small number of users provided by ReadyAPI."

"The price of the solution has been fine."

"It is expensive. Each user needs to be licensed, and there are different licenses within the product. It starts with 750 euros for a single user per year, but for the full product features, you need to pay a lot more. There are three versions. This cost is for functional testing, and then there is a cost for load testing and virtual services. If you want to use these areas with the functional test license, you are limited. You hit some limits in these functions. If you have all three licenses, then you have full functionality for the API."

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Insurance Company

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	28

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ReadyAPI?

The performance testing capabilities are very good.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ReadyAPI?

Currently, we don't extensively use the performance testing due to license costs. License prices can be a factor in considering which technologies to adopt.

What needs improvement with ReadyAPI?

One issue I found with ReadyAPI is related to event listeners compared to JMeter or SoapUI. We created an in-house dashboard to display automation runs across projects, which required manual updati...

What do you like most about Testim?

The tool's most valuable feature is the recently added AI feature.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Testim?

I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten compared to other tools.

What needs improvement with Testim?

More advanced AI-based features and features on the API side would help us create better end-to-end test suites.

Apache JMeter vs ReadyAPI

Comparisons

Compared 14% of the time

Parasoft SOAtest vs ReadyAPI

Compared 8% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs ReadyAPI

Compared 7% of the time

Katalon Studio vs ReadyAPI

Compared 7% of the time

BlazeMeter vs ReadyAPI

Compared 3% of the time

Product Reports

Download ReadyAPI product report

ReadyAPI

January 2026

Download Testim product report

January 2026

Also Known As

Ready API

No data available

Overview

ReadyAPI is an all-in-one automated testing platform that allows teams to create, manage, and execute automated functional, security, and performance tests in one centralized interface.

ReadyAPI Features

Some of ReadyAPI’s key features include:

Continuous integration
Comprehensive dashboard
API discovery
Central, standardized reporting function
Plugin architecture
ReadyAPI Projects
Multiple options for scripting to create functional, load, or security tests

ReadyAPI Benefits

Some of the benefits of using ReadyAPI include:

Easy and flexible test creation and execution: ReadyAPI has visual editors and wizards that make testing easy, saving time and simplifying onboarding.
Test APIs continuously: With ReadyAPI you can run consistent tests on local environments, Docker containers, or other distributed staging environments.
Team friendly: ReadyAPI enables software teams with the ability to easily share testing projects and artifacts, share licenses between team members, and report issues directly from the testing IDE.
Powerful, data-driven testing capabilities: With ReadyAPI, you can save time by checking for numerous real world conditions.
Supports multiple specifications, schemas, and protocols: ReadyAPI includes legacy SOAP services, microservices powered by Apache Kafka, and mainstream REST services, as well as IoT use cases leveraging MQTT. It allows you to test and virtualize the most popular API protocols and also to import APIs from specifications and schemas instantly.

Reviews from Real Users

Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by Dell EMC Unity users.

PeerSpot user Vallalarasu P., Test Architect at a tech services company, states, “ReadyAPI is one of the best tools for API testing because they have made a single platform for functional testing, load testing security, and also service actualization. We also have virtual work that can be an add-in within ReadyAPI. For integration for CACD, they have something called TestEngine, which can also be an add-on for ReadyAPI. We use Python request library and things like that but if you're a bigger organization with hundreds of APIs, then ReadyAPI is a one-stop solution for complete API testing. If you consider TestComplete and other products for an equivalent outcome, you might get something nearly comparable, butReadyAPI is the outstanding product.”

An IT Manager at an insurance company says the solution has “Fast automation, less coding, and is pretty lightweight. When you are working in sprints, you need to have continuous feedback. ReadyAPI definitely helps in automating very fast and rapidly. We have less coding, and we can more easily define our assertions. We don't use it for full-blown performance testing, but normally if you are doing your functional testing, it gives you the request and response time. Anybody who is doing functional testing can see what the request and response times are and raise a flag based upon their business affiliates, that is, whether it is meeting their affiliates. You can identify this during functional testing."

Balamurugan A., Manager at a financial services firm, comments, “We like the user interface. The most valuable features are the integration with Jira and the test management tools.

They have interfaces with our performance tools, so we were able to leverage all of these integrations and plugins. It is very good from an integrative solution standpoint.”

SmartBear

Testim is an end-to-end agile testing automation solution which utilizes machine learning for test authoring, execution, and maintenance. Users can create tests in minutes, run thousands of tests in parallel across different browsers, integrate with their existing CI/CD and collaboration tools, and more.

Sample Customers

Healthcare Data Solutions (HDS)

Microsoft, salesforce, JFrog, USA Today, Globality