SAS Access vs Teradata comparison

SAS and Teradata are both solutions in the Data Integration category. SAS is ranked #61, while Teradata is ranked #14 with an average rating of 7.7. SAS holds a 0.7% mindshare in DI, compared to Teradata’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of SAS users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Teradata users who would recommend it.

SAS Access

Read 3 SAS Access reviews

927 Views
714 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Teradata

Read 83 Teradata reviews

11,391 Views
1,367 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

SAS Access

Teradata

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 4, 2026

SAS Access and Teradata compete in data management and analysis. Teradata stands out with its scalability and powerful analytics for large organizations.

Features: SAS Access offers excellent data integration, seamless access to multiple data sources, and flexibility in integration. Teradata handles large data volumes, delivers high reliability, and offers powerful analytical tools for top performance and scalability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Teradata features a sophisticated deployment model with extensive customer support, suited for large-scale environments. SAS Access, lighter to deploy, is backed by well-regarded robust customer service.

Pricing and ROI: SAS Access is cost-effective, appealing to smaller organizations with quicker ROI. Teradata requires higher initial investment yet offers superior ROI in data-intensive environments due to advanced analytics and processing.

To learn more, read our detailed SAS Access vs. Teradata Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

SAS Access vs. Teradata

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

SAS Access

Ranking in Data Integration

61st

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Teradata

Ranking in Data Integration

14th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Customer Experience Management (6th), Backup and Recovery (17th), Relational Databases Tools (6th), Data Warehouse (3rd), BI (Business Intelligence) Tools (9th), Marketing Management (5th), Cloud Data Warehouse (3rd), Database Management Systems (DBMS) (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of SAS Access is 0.7%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Teradata is 0.9%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Teradata	0.9%
SAS Access	0.7%
Other	98.4%

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Robert Heck

Co Owner at Hecht und Heck GmbH

The solution is stable, scalable, and flexible

I rate the solution eight out of ten. The number of people required to maintain the solution is dependent on the other applications running. The solution in itself does not require a lot of maintenance. The solution is flexible and I recommend it when you have more complex applications with special requirements.

Read full review

David Durand Velásquez

Engineers at a consultancy with 11-50 employees

Delivers consistent performance and enables advanced analytics across complex data environments

Teradata stands out as a solid platform for managing and analyzing large volumes of data. Its architecture allows information to be processed efficiently while maintaining stable performance, even in highly demanding environments. One of its most notable strengths is the ability to run complex queries at high speed, which is essential for organizations that require timely and reliable analytics. Teradata offers a well-integrated ecosystem that supports working with different types of data and enables scalability as organizational needs grow. Its focus on advanced analytics, integration with modern business intelligence tools, and the ability to operate both on-premise and in the cloud make it a versatile solution for data warehousing and large-scale processing. Teradata's stability, technological maturity, and the availability of strong documentation and best practices are noteworthy. I consider Teradata to be a tool with great potential for any organization looking to enhance its analytical capabilities, optimize data processing, and move toward more data-driven decision-making. Teradata stands out as a solid platform for managing a large volume of data in different projects. Its architecture allows information to be processed efficiently while maintaining stable performance, even in high-demanding environments. A well-integrated AI ecosystem that supports working with different types of data and enables scalability as organizational needs grow across different kinds of enterprises or organizations. The focus on advanced analytics integration with modern business intelligence tools is particularly valuable. Teradata combines a powerful parallel process and optimizing SQL engine with a highly scalable architecture allowing businesses to execute complex queries and analytics in real-time. It supports multi-cloud, hybrid, and on-premise environments, giving organizations flexibility to choose the setup that best aligns with their strategy. One of the biggest strengths is the ability to unify disparate data sources and support high concurrency, enabling different teams, such as analytics, operations, BI, and data science, to access consistent, trusted data across the enterprise.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable part of SAS/ACCESS is what it is made for: connecting to remote systems that are not part of your physical SAS environment."

"The most valuable feature is you have native access to the external databases."

"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the ease of access to the data in those databases."

"Teradata is a great, industry-leading data warehousing product that has MPP architecture."

"It has massive parallel processing ability to do large amounts of concurrent querying."

"Teradata's MPP feature allowed the team to handle huge data sets on the scale of petabytes and perform analytics on those in near real-time when users queried for that data."

"I like this solution's ease of design and the fact that its performance is quite good. It is stable as well."

"When it comes to integration, tools like Informatica seamlessly connect with Teradata. We ensure the Teradata database is configured correctly in Informatica, including the proper hostname and properties for the load process. We didn't find any major complexity or issues with integration."

"The ease of deployment is useful so clients are up and running quickly in comparison to other products."

"Teradata's pretty fast."

"It's very mature from a technology perspective."

More Teradata pros

Cons

"The pricing model needs to be reconsidered and adjusted."

"I can't really recall any missing feature or general improvement that is needed. We don't really add too many new kinds of databases and therefore our needs are already met."

"The solution can provide access to the newer databases that come out sooner."

"The tool's flexibility and capacity for expansion are areas of concern where improvements are required."

"Data synchronization to the DR site."

"It would help to make scaling easier with a reduced cost. "

"Teradata needs to expand the kind of training that's available to customers. Teradata only offers training directly and doesn't delegate to any third-party companies. As a result, it's harder to find people trained on Teradata in our market relative to Oracle."

"We tried to use case Teradata for a data warehouse system, but we had some problems in relation to the Teradata system, CDC tools, and source databases. We were unable to transfer data from HPE Integrity mainframe to Teradata."

"The setup is not straightforward."

"Since I was working on the very basic, legacy systems, the memory thing was always a challenge. If Teradata is moving to the cloud, the space constraint or the memory issue that my company generally faces will eventually resolve, in time. What I'd like to see in the next release of Teradata is that it becomes full-fledged on the cloud, apart from better connectivity to various systems. For example, if I have to read or include a Python script, if I write some basic codes, I should be able to read even unstructured data. I know that it's not supported even in Snowflake, but at least semi-structured data support, if that can be a little more enhanced, that would be good."

"Teradata's UI could be more user-friendly."

More Teradata cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing model is complex and is based on modular packages as well as the size of the applicable environment."

"The solution's pricing and licensing are expensive."

"Teradata pricing is fine, and it's competitive with all the legacy models. On a scale of one to five, with one being the worst and five being the best, I'm giving Teradata a three, because it can be a little expensive, when compared to other solutions."

"We are looking for a more flexible cost model for the next version that we use, whether it be cloud or on-premise."

"It comes at a notably high cost for what it offers."

"In this day and age, we want to get things done quickly. So, we go to the AWS Marketplace."

"The cost is substantial, totaling around $1.2 million, solely dedicated to upgrading the hardware."

"I am using the free version of Teradata."

"I rate the product price a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive."

"The tool costs about 30,000 euros a month, while Azure Synapse SQL only costs 10,000."

More Teradata pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user232068

Senior Data Architect at a pharma/biotech company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Aug 5, 2015

Netezza vs. Teradata

Original published at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/should-i-choose-net Two leading Massively Parallel Processing (MPP) architectures for Data Warehousing (DW) are IBM PureData System for Analytics (formerly Netezza) and Teradata. I thought talking about the similarities and differences…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

23%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	28
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	52

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparing Teradata and Oracle Database, which product do you think is better and why?

I have spoken to my colleagues about this comparison and in our collective opinion, the reason why some people may declare Teradata better than Oracle is the pricing. Both solutions are quite simi...

See all answers

Which companies use Teradata and who is it most suitable for?

Before my organization implemented this solution, we researched which big brands were using Teradata, so we knew if it would be compatible with our field. According to the product's site, the comp...

See all answers

Is Teradata a difficult solution to work with?

Teradata is not a difficult product to work with, especially since they offer you technical support at all levels if you just ask. There are some features that may cause difficulties - for example,...

See all answers

Comparisons

Qlik Talend Cloud vs SAS Access

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Graph Data Connect vs SAS Access

Compared 13% of the time

SAP Analytics Hub vs SAS Access

Compared 11% of the time

Toad Data Point vs SAS Access

Compared 11% of the time

Talend Data Fabric vs SAS Access

Compared 10% of the time

More SAS Access Competitors

Snowflake vs Teradata

Compared 6% of the time

Oracle Exadata vs Teradata

Compared 6% of the time

Oracle Database vs Teradata

Compared 5% of the time

SQL Server vs Teradata

Compared 5% of the time

IBM Db2 Database vs Teradata

Compared 4% of the time

More Teradata Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Data Integration

January 2026

Download SAS Access product report

Buyer's Guide

Teradata

January 2026

Download Teradata product report

Also Known As

SAS/Access

IntelliFlex, Aster Data Map Reduce, , QueryGrid, Customer Interaction Manager, Digital Marketing Center, Data Mover, Data Stream Architecture, Teradata Vantage Enterprise (DIY)

Overview

SAS/ACCESS is an out-of-the-box solution for integrating SAS and third-party databases. You can read, write and update data regardless of the database or platform. Because the data appears native to SAS, there is no need to learn Structured Query Language (SQL) or any other database-specific query languages.

SAS

Teradata is a powerful tool for handling substantial data volumes with its parallel processing architecture, supporting both cloud and on-premise environments efficiently. It offers impressive capabilities for fast query processing, data integration, and real-time reporting, making it suitable for diverse industrial applications.

Known for its robust parallel processing capabilities, Teradata effectively manages large datasets and provides adaptable deployment across cloud and on-premise setups. It enhances performance and scalability with features like advanced query tuning, workload management, and strong security. Users appreciate its ease of use and automation features which support real-time data reporting. The optimizer and intelligent partitioning help improve query speed and efficiency, while multi-temperature data management optimizes data handling.

What are the key features of Teradata?

Parallel Processing Architecture: Enables efficient handling of substantial data volumes.
Cloud and On-Premise Deployment: Offers seamless adaptability across environments.
Query Tuning: Improves speed and performance of data retrieval processes.
Workload Management: Ensures optimal resource allocation for enhanced performance.
Robust Security: Provides high levels of data protection and system integrity.
Data Integration: Facilitates cohesive data management from multiple sources.
Automation for Real-time Reporting: Enhances timely data insights and decision-making.
Optimizer and Intelligent Partitioning: Further increase query speed and system efficiency.
Multi-Temperature Data Management: Optimizes the handling and retrieval of data.

What benefits and ROI do users look for?

Efficient Data Management: Facilitates smooth integration and processing of diverse data sets.
Scalability: Easy adjustment to increasing or decreasing data requirements.
Improved Performance: Fast query speeds and optimized resource use.
Comprehensive Security: Safeguards data integrity and accessibility.
Ease of Use: Simplifies data handling and operational processes.

In the finance, retail, and government sectors, Teradata is employed for data warehousing, business intelligence, and analytical processing. It handles vast datasets for activities like customer behavior modeling and enterprise data integration. Supporting efficient reporting and analytics, Teradata enhances data storage and processing, whether deployed on-premise or on cloud platforms.

Teradata

Sample Customers

Los Angeles County, West Midlands Police, Credit Guarantee Corporation, Canada Post, Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty

Netflix

Buyer's Guide

SAS Access vs. Teradata

February 2026

Free Report: SAS Access vs. Teradata

Find out what your peers are saying about SAS Access vs. Teradata and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our SAS Access vs. Teradata report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.