SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite vs Skyvia comparison

The compared Seeburger and Skyvia solutions aren't in the same category. Seeburger is ranked #3 in BBM , with an average rating of 9.0, and holds a 10.6% mindshare in the category. Skyvia is ranked #26 in CDI , and holds a 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Seeburger users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Skyvia users who would recommend it.

SEEBURGER Business Integrat...

Read 39 SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite reviews

5,184 Views
1,711 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Skyvia

Read 1 Skyvia review

1,330 Views
359 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SEEBURGER Business Integrat...

Skyvia

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite and Skyvia based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Salesforce, Informatica, Seeburger and others in Business-to-Business Middleware.

To learn more, read our detailed Business-to-Business Middleware Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Business-to-Business Middleware

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 886,077 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

SEEBURGER Business Integrat...

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (3rd), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (12th), API Management (22nd), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (14th)

Skyvia

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (57th), Cloud Data Integration (26th)

Mindshare comparison

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite and Skyvia aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is designed for Business-to-Business Middleware and holds a mindshare of 10.6%, up 10.2% compared to last year.
Skyvia, on the other hand, focuses on Cloud Data Integration, holds 1.4% mindshare, up 0.1% since last year.

Business-to-Business Middleware Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite	10.6%
IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services	11.5%
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform	8.7%
Other	69.2%

Business-to-Business Middleware

Cloud Data Integration Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Skyvia	1.4%
AWS Glue	8.2%
AWS Database Migration Service	6.7%
Other	83.7%

Cloud Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Shaik Saifuddin

Senior Software Engineer at HCLTech

Exceptional support and reliability drive optimal data flow and integration

The features of SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite that I found most valuable are related to entity flow. We can find the entity flow to be very useful so we can grab the flow accordingly. There is no disturbance in the connections, and it is very clear to check the connection flow with applicable queues. When comparing to other applications, SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is the easiest way to understand the application. I have also worked on the cloud services where SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is moving to cloud. I have worked on cloud services where the mapping part is in the cloud itself, along with the connection setup.

Read full review

Robert-Harris

CTO & Developer at a consultancy with self employed

The product works, is simple to use, and is reliable.

Error handling. This has caused me many problems in the past. When an error occurs, the event on the connection that is called does not seem to behave as documented. If I attempt a retry or opt not to display an error dialog, it does it anyway. In all fairness, I have never reported this. I think it is more important that a unique error code is passed to the error event that identifies a uniform type of error that occurred, such as ecDisconnect, eoInvalidField. It is very hard to find what any of the error codes currently passed actually mean. A list would be great for each database engine. Trying to catch an exception without displaying the UniDAC error message is impossible, no matter how you modify the parameters in the OnError of the TUniConnection object. I have already implemented the following things myself. They are suggestions rather than specific requests. Copy Datasets: This contains an abundance of redundant options. I think that a facility to copy one dataset to another in a single call would be handy. Redundancy: I am currently working on this. I have extended the TUniConnection to have an additional property called FallbackConnection. If the TUniConnection goes offline, the connection attempts to connect the FallbackConnection. If successful, it then sets the Connection properties of all live UniDatasets in the app to the FallbackConnection and re-opens them if necessary. The extended TUniConnection holds a list of datasets that were created. Each dataset is responsible for registering itself with the connection. This is a highly specific feature. It supports an offline mode that is found in mission critical/point of sale solutions. I have never seen it implement before in any DACs, but I think it is a really unique feature with a big impact. Dataset to JSON/XML: A ToSql function on a dataset that creates a full SQL Text statement with all parameters converted to text (excluding blobs) and included in the returned string. Extended TUniScript:- TMyUniScript allows me to add lines of text to a script using the normal dataset functions, Script.Append, Script.FieldByName(‘xxx’).AsString := ‘yyy’, Script.AddToScript and finally Script.Post, then Script.Commit. The AddToScript builds the SQL text statement and appends it to the script using #e above. Record Size Calculation. It would be great if UniDac could estimate the size of a particular record from a query or table. This could be used to automatically set the packet fetch/request count based on the size of the Ethernet packets on the local area network. This I believe would increase performance and reduce network traffic for returning larger datasets. I am aware that this would also be a unique feature to UniDac but would gain a massive performance enhancement. I would suggest setting the packet size on the TUniConnection which would effect all linked datasets.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite (BIS) has been good at communicating between two applications, changing formats and using the required protocols... We can have one site communicating in an old FTP or SFTP style, or via file transfer. And with other applications, we could have API or a web service call or some other protocol used to send information."

"It is stable and reliable. We have not had any issues."

"The ease of integration of the SEEBURGER product into SAP was pretty seamless. There wasn't any trouble, there weren't any complexities."

"With SEEBURGER BIS, you can string as many different activities together in your workflows as you want. You can put them in any order, like a piece of code. One leads into the next, which leads into the next. It is just very flexible from that vantage point. This makes it so easy to use and reduces the number of moving parts that you need to have. It is just a lot less frustrating not having to conform to how some other vendor software works."

"SEEBURGER BIS helps us automate processes. When something is manual and we have to fix the data, then it is really complicated. However, when it's automated, we trust it and the process in the system, so we don't have to go back and fix it. For example, we had a problem with a partner sending 17 files every week, but a few times a year, they wouldn't send files during a certain window. We would escalate this with them. Then, when they caught up and sent the files again, they weren't authenticated. We had to fix this situation before it became a nightmare because our financials were impacted. Also, it was really messy. So, I worked with SEEBURGER to have something automated to pick up the files within a certain window and validate them as accurate. If the files come outside of this window, then we have to approve the loading of them."

"The solution helps us automate processes, more on the insurance side. Where they used to have to babysit monthly files, because of size, they don't have to do that with SEEBURGER BIS. They just run the monthly process. Files get collected, translated, and sent to the proper systems, so the babysitting is gone."

"What would have been a manual process of transmitting data items around between us and third-parties has been automated. SEEBURGER BIS handles the automation and mapping side of the communications. The automation, along with the efficiency around time and cost, has improved our organization. Around 20,000 messages a month have been automated. These typically would be financial/order transactions and confirmations in invoicing that have been automated."

"SEEBURGER is a global company who offers a presence not only in the United States, but is also international across the globe, offering world-class services, a 24/7 support model, and managed services, with about 95 percent of a million files a month SLA, 99.9 percent uptime, and a response time normally under four hours if there is an issue at all."

More SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite pros

"For what it offers, I think this solution is a must for any Delphi programmer."

Cons

"The ability to bind a mapping to an agreement seems a bit clunky. It would be nice to have a better way of navigating to a map name rather than using a drop down list."

"A person whom I work with, and is not very technical, found the setup complex, as there are a lot of steps."

"It's rather difficult to understand, from the application, what's broken and why it doesn't work. We typically need to get support from them directly, and it's usually in a consulting role, to fix issues."

"When we got SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite (BIS), it was clear that it was going to take more of a technical person. It does take a technically-rooted individual to operate it."

"API connectivity needs improvement as well as the GUI. The GUI hasn't changed that much in 10 years, but of course, that's already been updated. I would say I'm excited about the screenshots but that's about it."

"The connectivity of the Data Distribution Center (DDC) and the repository need improvement."

"Java is very old technology and they should move away from it, to anything that's better."

"We don't have much access to the logs or what's happening. So we have to log a ticket with SEEBURGER. We only get a message that something has failed... we have to open a ticket with SEEBURGER for them to tell us exactly what the issue is... I would like us to be able to be more self-sufficient."

More SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite cons

"Error handling has caused me many problems in the past; when an error occurs, the event on the connection that is called does not seem to behave as documented."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Sometimes it seems a little pricey, especially when some of the stuff is available through freeware, like SFTP communications... It costs a lot more money to buy this stuff from SEEBURGER but I think it's worth it in the long run."

"Our licensing model is based on transactions. We have a base service contract which is priced against a volume of transactions and another volume of individual transactions, which are covered by one service agreement. Then, we have development services on top of that. Our annual spend is around £80,000. It's about mid-priced, as there are some cheaper alternatives out there and some more expensive ones. It's neither cheap nor expensive. It's somewhere in the middle."

"We pay maintenance of between $75,000 and $100,000 per year, per box."

"I had a problem at one time with their invoicing. I told them, then we worked on the process and improved it. They installed the connection between SAP and SEEBURGER BIS in Europe first. This was awhile ago. When I came along, I became involved in the project and started working with them. Every time that I made a request, the work was done well, but I was not receiving my invoices. I knew I had to pay for the work and was trying to find someone to send me the invoices or a report of what was being done. From that end, it was really not working. After a few years, I was complaining and not happy. At the end of the year, they would come with a long list of invoices to pay, which was really bad. So, I asked for a change. We worked on the process, and since five years ago, I have worked with SEEBURGER based in North America. Now, when I have a question, I know who to contact. They send me a report with invoices every month. They really reacted to my concern, and we improved the process. Since then, I have had no problem."

"I have had exposure to other big vendors over the years and would have to say the pricing is pretty typical. They all fall into a common pricing range, at least the bigger vendors: Axway, IBM Sterling, Globalscape, and SEEBURGER. They all fall into that mid-tier pricing. So, SEEBURGER is commensurate with other large integration vendors operating in this space. Maybe it is lower than some of the really high-end ones. You can get some of these high-end transactional messaging integration systems, like TIBCO, that tend to be kind of on a higher echelon of pricing. I would say SEEBURGER is more mid-level."

"The cost-based model is slightly different now in SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite (BIS). They changed the licensing, based on adapters and other things. In the old style of licensing, the whole suite was one license..."

"We have additional ad hoc development costs, but those vary depending on if we're bringing on another third-party into our systems via the EDI integration. So, that's highly variable."

"All the new adapters are individually priced, which is good. You don't buy the whole system and then if you don't use it, you don't use it. You only buy the stuff you want..."

More SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

886,077 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Retailer

Construction Company

Performing Arts

20%

Construction Company

12%

Outsourcing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	38

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite?

Regarding the pricing of SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite, I would rate it as 7 out of 10.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite?

Regarding areas of improvement for SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite, the cloud functionality needs enhancement. The cloud interface is currently too cluttered, especially when creating new tran...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite?

I have worked around 3.5 years with SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite ( /products/seeburger-business-integration-suite-reviews ). Currently, I am working with WebMethods. Previously, I worked fo...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

Compared 8% of the time

SAP Integration Suite vs SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

Compared 7% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

Compared 6% of the time

IBM B2B Integrator vs SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

Compared 5% of the time

webMethods.io vs SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

Compared 4% of the time

More SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite Competitors

SSIS vs Skyvia

Compared 33% of the time

Matillion Data Productivity Cloud vs Skyvia

Compared 16% of the time

Zapier vs Skyvia

Compared 8% of the time

Azure Data Factory vs Skyvia

Compared 7% of the time

Coupler.io vs Skyvia

Compared 6% of the time

More Skyvia Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

March 2026

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite report

Download SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite product report

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Data Integration

March 2026

Download Skyvia product report

Also Known As

SEEBURGER BIS

Skyvia, Skyvia Data Integration

Overview

With SEEBURGER’s experienced team behind you, and SEEBURGER BIS as the foundation of your hybrid integration strategy, you’re prepared for whatever comes your way – even as your business gains complexity and integration requirements increase.

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite (BIS) is a unified, agile, secure and scalable platform that solves integration challenges across your business and ecosystem, so that you can make valuable connections between clouds, applications and people.

Our platform provides integration across all scenarios, including B2B/EDI, MFT, API and ERP on-premises, in the cloud and hybrid, in addition to expert support that is unmatched in the industry for your simplest to your most complex integrations.

Your APIs are likely multiplying quickly, and if you’re looking for a solution to manage, secure and scale them properly, you get all of the benefits and less of the hassle with our API Management toolkit.

Bring us your toughest B2B/EDI challenges. We help with difficult onboarding and partner connections, and will save you time and effort to complete complex projects. We make B2B easy with pre-packaged, re-usable content and automation capability, so your team can make the connection, and move on to the next mission.

Simplify your workload with our iPaaS solution. SEEBURGER iPaaS enables your team to save man-hours connecting data, applications and systems, by letting us handle all the time-consuming platform operations. We cover maintenance, updates, security, scalability and more.

Did you know that without managed file transfer (MFT), your company is at greater risk for a data breach? It’s as simple, and as dangerous, as that. The security and control you get with our centralized, easy-to-use solution ensures less risk for the company, and more sleep at night for you.

Our customers say it best! Check out our reviews you’ll see that SEEBURGER’s rock-solid, built-from-the-ground-up platform, is combined with an expert team, and stellar service. We power your connections, future-proof your vision and give you a competitive edge.

Seeburger

Skyvia is a leading data integration and management platform designed to centralize data consolidation efforts for businesses, acting as a versatile tool for seamless data exchange across cloud apps and on-premises systems.

Skyvia integrates with a multitude of cloud services and databases, facilitating efficient data synchronization, replication, and backup. Users benefit from its intuitive wizard-driven interface which simplifies complex integration tasks without requiring extensive technical knowledge. This accessibility makes it ideal for IT professionals looking to streamline data handling.

What are Skyvia's most valuable features?

Data Integration: Simplifies cloud-to-cloud, cloud-to-ground, and ground-to-ground data connections without coding.
Data Backup: Ensures data safety by providing automated backups of essential information, enabling quick recovery.
Query Tool: Offers a powerful SQL editor for running ad-hoc queries and visualizing data with ease.
Data Synchronization: Keeps data up-to-date across platforms ensuring consistency and reliability.
Connectors: Extensive library of connectors catering to top cloud services and databases for flexibility.

Which benefits and ROI factors should users look for in reviews?

Ease of Use: Users appreciate the intuitive setup and integration process requiring minimal technical input.
Cost-Effective: Offers competitive pricing aligning with budget-conscious strategies while delivering high value.
Scalability: Flexible solutions that scale with business growth, adapting to increasing data demands effortlessly.
Time Efficiency: Reduces time spent on data handling tasks, allowing more focus on analytical and strategic initiatives.

Industries such as retail, healthcare, and finance implement Skyvia for seamless integration across multiple databases and cloud applications. Retail chains use it for consistent product data management across platforms, while healthcare providers employ it to consolidate patient data securely. Financial institutions leverage its robust data synchronization to maintain accurate financial records. Skyvia proves effective in enabling industry-specific solutions tailored to improve data accessibility and ensure integrity.

Skyvia

Sample Customers

Altis, Autoliv, Cebi, Cofresco, MoneyGram International, Samsonite Europe, VSP Global, BMW Group, OSRAM, Magna, Lavazza

Boeing, Sony, Honda, Oracle, BMW, Samsung

Buyer's Guide

Business-to-Business Middleware

March 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Salesforce, Informatica, Seeburger and others in Business-to-Business Middleware. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

886,077 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.