Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

SentinelOne Singularity Hologram vs Tenable Vulnerability Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

SentinelOne Singularity Hol...
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (28th), Threat Deception Platforms (5th)
Tenable Vulnerability Manag...
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
45
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (5th), Patch Management (11th), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

SentinelOne Singularity Hologram and Tenable Vulnerability Management aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. SentinelOne Singularity Hologram is designed for Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) and holds a mindshare of 0.8%, up 0.4% compared to last year.
Tenable Vulnerability Management, on the other hand, focuses on Vulnerability Management, holds 3.1% mindshare, down 6.5% since last year.
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
SentinelOne Singularity Hologram0.8%
Microsoft Defender for Office 3657.6%
Palo Alto Networks WildFire7.5%
Other84.1%
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
Vulnerability Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Tenable Vulnerability Management3.1%
Wiz6.4%
Tenable Nessus5.0%
Other85.5%
Vulnerability Management
 

Featured Reviews

Graham Peck - PeerSpot reviewer
Data Security Manager at Leeds United FC
Lockdown devices and ports on endpoints so that you can stop propagation of any virus if it's detected but performance utilization can be better
It's scalable in the form of it now covers mobile devices as well as a number of other different types of devices, not just Windows. Also, there's no limit as to how many devices you can install it on. We plan to expand the number of devices/users as we get more people onboard or upgrade to more mobile devices; we will then increase the number of licenses for mobile devices. We've got 450 licenses, but we've got about 375 devices and users currently. I would rate the scalability a ten out of ten. There's not a product yet that I've found that I can't put it on, especially now that they've got the new release, which was the mobile agents.
Chethan Gowda - PeerSpot reviewer
Windows Security Patching Operation III (Cyber Operations) at CBTS
Have maintained accurate vulnerability scans and gained actionable remediation insights across thousands of servers
Tenable Vulnerability Management agents are very lightweight, and the results we get are very accurate. The solutions they provide to us, assuming if one vulnerability exists, there will be a solution. The resolution they give us in wording will be the best solution. The exploit rates and the reports we get provide a lot of information, making it very easy for us to verify.The main benefit of integration with Tenable Vulnerability Management is that there will be no lack of missing vulnerabilities when it comes to the patching environment. That is one of the key aspects of why we have integrated Tenable to our patching tools. It has a vast capacity of pushing the data to our tools due to its capability and compatibility. That is also one of the reasons why we are using Tenable Vulnerability Management.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The automated response capability in SentinelOne enhances security operations. It means I don't have to worry about having too many security people watching it because you can automate a lot of the tasks."
"The most valuable feature for me is container scanning because I am interested in CICD security."
"It is easy to manage. Most of the information the tool provided helped to further investigate the vulnerability and its impact."
"It is quite straightforward to set up."
"The dashboard is pretty intuitive, and it lets you do a drill-down analysis of each vulnerability. That is something that brings a lot of value to the organization."
"The initial setup is pretty straightforward."
"Tenable is user-friendly and excels in reporting."
"The solution is quite friendly."
"The solution's most valuable feature is providing a single pane of visibility on all the infrastructure and its status."
 

Cons

"The performance utilization on the device that it's monitoring. This aspect needs improvement."
"I'd like to see them improve their support."
"t needs additional reporting and intelligence features, as well as enhancements in AI-driven detection, which is still in its early stages."
"I don't recommend Tenable.io Vulnerability Management for web scanning"
"The UI has room for improvement."
"Tenable.io Vulnerability Management could be improved with an increased number of dashboards and MSSP integration."
"The solution must be promoted more in the market."
"There needs to be better dashboard navigation."
"The product is a bit expensive."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the pricing a three out of ten; one is very expensive, and ten is an absolutely cheap product."
"Compared to other VM solutions, Tenable.io Vulnerability Management is expensive."
"The product costs us around $137,000 annually for 4000 to 5000 assets."
"A yearly payment has to be made toward the solution's licensing costs."
"The total cost we pay for this solution is over 45K. This is for a large education organization."
"I would rate the pricing a five out of ten. It is in the middle."
"The tool is reasonably priced."
"Yearly payments are to be made toward the licensing cost of the product. It is neither a cheap nor an expensive product."
"The cost is determined by the number of endpoints, which is approximately one dollar per endpoint."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions are best for your needs.
884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
15%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Computer Software Company
8%
University
8%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business20
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise21
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SentinelOne Singularity Hologram?
It's obviously increased my cost when it comes to security management because I didn't have it before, and it isn't the cheapest one on the market. But at the same time, it has brought down my cybe...
What needs improvement with SentinelOne Singularity Hologram?
The performance utilization on the device that it's monitoring. This aspect needs improvement.
What advice do you have for others considering SentinelOne Singularity Hologram?
Overall, I would rate the solution a seven out of ten. I won't give it a ten. I've seen some others that I may next time decide to go with rather than SentinelOne.
What's the difference between Tenable Nessus and Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?
Tenable Nessus is a vulnerability assessment solution that is both easy to deploy and easy to manage. The design of the program is such that if a company should desire to handle the installation t...
What needs improvement with Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?
I don't think that there is any very specific area where enhancements need to happen in Tenable Vulnerability Management's feature sets. The only area which possibly is not a part of the feature, b...
 

Also Known As

Attivo Networks
Tenable.io
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

NSS Labs., Fierce IT security, FireEye
Global Payments AU/NZ
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Microsoft, Proofpoint and others in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP). Updated: February 2026.
884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.