Tenable Security Center vs Tenable Vulnerability Management comparison

Tenable Security Center and Tenable Vulnerability Management are both solutions in the Vulnerability Management category. Tenable Security Center is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.5, while Tenable Vulnerability Management is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.9. Additionally, 96% of Tenable Security Center users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Tenable Vulnerability Management users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 16, 2025

Tenable Security Center and Tenable Vulnerability Management compete in the vulnerability management category. Tenable Security Center seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive asset management and reporting capabilities, vital for large enterprise environments.

Features: Tenable Security Center provides a valuable Assurance Report Card for real-time security posture insights, a robust dashboard for threat landscape assessment, and extensive asset management features. Tenable Vulnerability Management offers flexible policy creation, wide integration capabilities, including cloud environments, and a predictive prioritization feature that assists in risk management.

Room for Improvement: Tenable Security Center could improve in report flexibility, web application scanning, and integration with custom configurations. Tenable Vulnerability Management needs better support for detailed vulnerability analysis, report customization, and integration enhancements in penetration testing and risk management.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tenable Security Center is primarily on-premises with hybrid-cloud options, providing steady technical support, albeit with occasional delays. Tenable Vulnerability Management is adaptable across public, private, and hybrid clouds, offering an agile deployment strategy with overall prompt customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Tenable Security Center is more expensive, justified by its asset-based licensing and comprehensive features, providing significant ROI through asset management and vulnerability reduction. Tenable Vulnerability Management's flexible cloud-based deployment caters to modern needs despite its high cost, also delivering considerable ROI by reducing manpower requirements.

To learn more, read our detailed Tenable Security Center vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management Report (Updated: February 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Tenable Security Center vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management

February 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,040 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Zafran Security

Featured Reviews

Israel Cavazos Landini

Associate Director IT Security Operations at Novartis

Weekly insights and risk analysis facilitate informed security decisions

I appreciate the weekly insights Zafran provides, which include critical topics for networks and IT security, allowing us to evaluate which insights apply to our environment. The organization score feature is valuable to keep the leadership team updated on how our infrastructure fares security-wise. The applicable risk level versus base risk level feature is beneficial because prior to Zafran, we only used the base risk level, but now understand that risk depends on the asset itself. Zafran is an excellent tool.

Read full review

OndrejKOVAC

Solution engineer at EXPERTience

Empower clients with risk-based vulnerability management through continuous workflow and valuable insights

Tenable Security Center could improve by implementing more dynamic data displays and translating reports into European languages. This is especially relevant in Central Eastern Europe, where clients often require reports in local languages. Additionally, the licensing model could be more flexible for managed security providers, similar to a pay-as-you-go model.

Read full review

Mani Bommisetty

Infrastructure patching Manager at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Streamlines vulnerability management with excellent reporting and potential AI integration

Tenable is user-friendly and excels in reporting. It allows me to easily fetch and schedule reports. The software's discovery feature aids in strengthening our security posture. The single-sensor installation process on various operating systems is smooth, unlike Rapid7, which requires different versions for separate systems. Furthermore, Tenable enables vulnerability management through potential AI integration that consolidates efforts and resolves multiple vulnerabilities simultaneously.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Zafran has become an indispensable tool in our cybersecurity arsenal."

"Zafran is an excellent tool."

"The valauble feature is compliance reporting system."

"Feature-wise, Tenable Security Center is a very fast tool with many dashboards and reports, and it covers all our systems."

"We really love the Security Center dashboard. It basically performs vulnerability scanning and then outputs a vulnerability data."

"It's a very useful tool."

"The tool gives us fewer false positives. Compared to its competitors, the solution’s reports are more accurate."

"It allows financial institutions to compare their vulnerability management to others in the same sector."

"The scans are the most valuable aspect of this solution."

"Their overall cost of service is pretty good."

More Tenable Security Center pros

"The solution can integrate with third parties and meets standard compliance."

"Tenable.io Vulnerability Management is an easy-to-use product. I"

"Tenable is user-friendly and excels in reporting."

"I would rate Tenable's dashboards and reporting capabilities for illustrating security posture a nine out of ten, with ten being the best."

"It is pretty stable. I would rate it nine or maybe ten."

"The vulnerability scanning is the most important aspect of the solution for us."

"The initial setup is not complex."

"The solution provides seamlessness, a perfect UI, and identity management for office operations. We are most vulnerable to users. Therefore, it is crucial to implement the right solution to ensure proper user access and resource management."

More Tenable Vulnerability Management pros

Cons

"Initially, we were somewhat concerned about the scalability of Zafran due to our large asset count and the substantial amount of information we needed to process."

"A good plugin editor would be a good additional option for the Security Center."

"The reports and plugins for reports and scans could benefit from enhancements."

"The tool's initial configuration is not so easy."

"The solution should provide better web application features and support."

"Tenable's technical support has declined in quality over time. While they used to be excellent, achieving ratings of eight or nine, they now rate around six or seven due to longer response times and less thorough assistance."

"I think the vendor training provided for Tenable.sc could be a lower price. It's quite expensive for the training."

"The web application scanning area can be improved."

"Its reporting can be improved. It is not easy to generate a scan report the way we want. The data is okay, but we can't easily change the template to make it look the way we want."

More Tenable Security Center cons

"The solution seems to focus too much on enterprises, and they really need a product that works for SMBs."

"The user interface could be improved by being able to change the user interface to fit your position or your job. The graphs are set in stone and you can only print reports."

"The tool's reports are bad. They're not very customizable or flexible. During audits, we often have to exclude things that aren't relevant to our organization, but we can't do that easily with the reports. They come in HTML or PDF format, and we can't compare current results with previous ones in Excel because we never receive reports in Excel."

"Tenable could improve visibility into assets, including automated asset tagging. You should be able to automatically tag assets based on location, function, ownership, etc. That would help us because we spend a lot of time identifying and tagging assets by hand."

"I'm not satisfied with the reporting structure."

"There needs to be better dashboard navigation."

"The price could be lower."

"The interface could be improved; right now it's running on two interfaces simultaneously."

More Tenable Vulnerability Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Tenable is open-source."

"The price of Tenable SC is expensive, we pay approximately €70,000 for the license annually. We have to pay for each IP test. The cost of other solutions is far less, such as Nessus Professional, which is €3,000 annually."

"We're happy with the licensing cost and find it affordable."

"My company needs to make yearly payments towards the licensing costs. The pricing of the solution falls in the mid-range level, so it is not too expensive"

"Though reasonable, the main competitor of Tenable SC, Rapid7, offers a more aggressive and better priced product."

"Tenable.sc is more expensive than its competitors."

"I rate the solution's price as seven on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive. The tool is quite expensive."

"Compared to other companies or other products it could maybe be a little bit less, but the price is okay. I would say it's not very expensive."

More Tenable Security Center pricing and cost advice

"The product costs us around $137,000 annually for 4000 to 5000 assets."

"Tenable charges around $40 per device."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is low, and ten is high price, I rate the pricing an eight. So, it is a pretty expensive solution."

"Compared to other VM solutions, Tenable.io Vulnerability Management is expensive."

"The tool is reasonably priced."

"I would rate the pricing a five out of ten. It is in the middle."

"The total cost we pay for this solution is over 45K. This is for a large education organization."

"Yearly payments are to be made toward the licensing cost of the product. It is neither a cheap nor an expensive product."

More Tenable Vulnerability Management pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Educational Organization

21%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

10%

Educational Organization

29%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zafran Security?

Pricing for Zafran Security is not expensive. We have a contract for five years, and the cost is lower than other too...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zafran Security?

I would like to see an integration with Check Point firewalls. It's essential for us and they are currently working o...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Zafran Security?

We use Zafran Security for threat prioritization. We establish priority to understand which risks should be patched o...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tenable SC?

The tool's dashboard and reporting capabilities match our company's needs since we are able to modify the basic view ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Tenable SC?

Tenable Security Center is quite expensive, particularly for the CEE region, causing us to lose cases due to its pric...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tenable SC?

Tenable Security Center could improve by implementing more dynamic data displays and translating reports into Europea...

See all answers

What's the difference between Tenable Nessus and Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?

Tenable Nessus is a vulnerability assessment solution that is both easy to deploy and easy to manage. The design of ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?

The tool has an easy-to-use interface.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?

I would suggest HP WebInspect as a better option than Tenable.io. My current client doesn't have access to it. Howeve...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dazz.io vs Zafran Security

Compared 53% of the time

Vulcan Cyber vs Zafran Security

Compared 21% of the time

ServiceNow Security Operations vs Zafran Security

Compared 16% of the time

More Zafran Security Competitors

Qualys VMDR vs Tenable Security Center

Compared 12% of the time

Rapid7 InsightVM vs Tenable Security Center

Compared 11% of the time

Tenable Nessus vs Tenable Security Center

Compared 10% of the time

The NodeZero Platform vs Tenable Security Center

Compared 7% of the time

Tanium vs Tenable Security Center

Compared 6% of the time

More Tenable Security Center Competitors

Tenable Nessus vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 24% of the time

Amazon Inspector vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 9% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 5% of the time

Rapid7 InsightVM vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 4% of the time

Snyk vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 4% of the time

More Tenable Vulnerability Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)

March 2025

Download Zafran Security product report

Buyer's Guide

Tenable Security Center

March 2025

Download Tenable Security Center product report

Buyer's Guide

Tenable Vulnerability Management

March 2025

Download Tenable Vulnerability Management product report

Also Known As

No data available

Tenable.sc, Tenable Unified Security, Tenable SecurityCenter

Tenable.io

Overview

Zafran Security integrates with existing security tools to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities effectively, proving that most critical vulnerabilities are not exploitable, optimizing threat management.

Zafran Security introduces an innovative operating model for managing security threats and vulnerabilities. By leveraging the threat exposure management platform, it pinpoints and prioritizes exploitable vulnerabilities, reducing risk through immediate remediation. This platform enhances your hybrid cloud security by normalizing vulnerability signals and integrating specific IT context data, such as CVE runtime presence and internet asset reachability, into its analysis. No longer reliant on patch windows, Zafran Security allows you to manage risks actively.

What are the key features of Zafran Security?

Threat Exposure Management: Utilizes existing tools to prioritize vulnerabilities and manage threats.
Integrative Analysis: Combines security data with IT context for precise vulnerability management.
Real-time Risk Reduction: Enables immediate risk management without waiting for patches.
Hybrid Cloud Compatibility: Functions across diverse cloud environments for comprehensive security.

What benefits can users expect from Zafran Security?

Improved Security: Enhances protection by efficiently identifying and mitigating risks.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces unnecessary patching expenses by confirming non-exploitable vulnerabilities.
Time Savings: Frees developers to focus on root causes by handling immediate threats.
Comprehensive Insight: Offers a holistic view of security threats and vulnerabilities.

In industries where security is paramount, such as finance and healthcare, Zafran Security provides invaluable protection by ensuring that only exploitable vulnerabilities are addressed. It allows entities to maintain robust security measures while allocating resources efficiently, fitting seamlessly into existing security strategies.

Zafran Security

Get a risk-based view of your IT, security and compliance posture so you can quickly identify, investigate and prioritize your most critical assets and vulnerabilities.

Managed on-premises and powered by Nessus technology, the Tenable Security Center (formerly Tenable.sc) suite of products provides the industry’s most comprehensive vulnerability coverage with real-time continuous assessment of your network. It’s your complete end-to-end vulnerability management solution.

Tenable

Managed in the cloud and powered by Tenable Nessus, Tenable Vulnerability Management (formerly Tenable.io) provides the industry's most comprehensive vulnerability coverage with real-time continuous assessment of your organization. Built-in prioritization, threat intelligence and real-time insight help you understand your exposures and proactively prioritize remediations.

Tenable

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

IBM, Sempra Energy, Microsoft, Apple, Adidas, Union Pacific

Global Payments AU/NZ

Buyer's Guide

Tenable Security Center vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management

February 2025

Free Report: Tenable Security Center vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable Security Center vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management and other solutions. Updated: February 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Tenable Security Center vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management report.

See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors and best Risk-Based Vulnerability Management vendors.

We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.