SmartBear TestLeft vs Tricentis Tosca comparison

SmartBear and Tricentis are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. SmartBear is ranked #38, while Tricentis is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.1. SmartBear holds a 0.4% mindshare in FT, compared to Tricentis’s 14.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of SmartBear users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Tricentis users who would recommend it.

SmartBear TestLeft

Read 1 SmartBear TestLeft review

266 Views
231 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Tricentis Tosca

Read 113 Tricentis Tosca reviews

18,670 Views
10,455 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

SmartBear TestLeft

Tricentis Tosca

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 16, 2025

Tricentis Tosca and SmartBear TestLeft are competitors in the software testing market. Tricentis Tosca holds an advantage in pricing and customer support, while SmartBear TestLeft's feature set makes it a worthy investment.

Features: Tricentis Tosca delivers model-based test automation, comprehensive end-to-end testing, and strong customer support. SmartBear TestLeft integrates smoothly into development environments, supports efficient automated testing within CI/CD pipelines, and offers significant flexibility for developers.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tricentis Tosca supports a variety of testing types with efficient customer service aiding deployment. SmartBear TestLeft integrates seamlessly with development workflows but may lack immediate customer support compared to Tricentis Tosca.

Pricing and ROI: Tricentis Tosca features a competitive pricing strategy and favorable ROI due to cost-effective licensing. SmartBear TestLeft has a higher initial setup cost but provides long-term value with its advanced features, positioning it as a valuable ROI investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

SmartBear TestLeft

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

38th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Tricentis Tosca

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

113

Ranking in other categories

Service Virtualization (1st), Mobile App Testing Tools (1st), Regression Testing Tools (1st), API Testing Tools (3rd), Test Automation Tools (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of SmartBear TestLeft is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tricentis Tosca is 14.2%, down from 19.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Tricentis Tosca	14.2%
SmartBear TestLeft	0.4%
Other	85.4%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer1378161

Sr. Consultant at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

Simple to set up and the test execute feature is helpful, but the cost could be reduced

Our primary use case is Point of Sale (POS) testing The most valuable features are test executor and development. TestLeft captures a lot of space in terms of memory, which is one issue that can be improved. We have been using SmartBear TestLeft for the past month. Stability-wise, TestLeft is…

Read full review

reviewer2740515

Senior Software Engineer 2 at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Automation test development becomes accessible and effective for functional testers

Tricentis Tosca is a codeless tool, making it easy for everyone to understand the transition of how to develop scenarios or test cases. In Tricentis Tosca, analyzing failures is straightforward because every time it fails somewhere, I get the screenshot, which helps me analyze how and why it failed. It has all the modules, including some pre-built ones that can be reused efficiently. Compared to other code tools such as Selenium, where I used to develop one script in one day, with Tricentis Tosca I can easily develop one script in four hours or three hours, saving four to five hours in a day.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features are test executor and development."

"I rate the overall solution a ten out of ten as I am satisfied with it."

"It is easy to automate tasks, highly flexible, straightforward to learn, and easy to maintain."

"One notable feature is its ability to handle negative XPath healing processes. If one XPath fails, Tosca can utilize backup XPaths to ensure test cases do not fail due to locator issues, thereby focusing on identifying application-side issues, which is the ultimate goal."

"The initial setup isn't too difficult."

"For beginners, the product is good, especially for those who are interested in the quality side of software testing."

"Makes optimal use of Model-based Test practice in getting Object-references from the application."

"The features I find most valuable in Tricentis Tosca are that it's the easiest way to build the scripts and to do the CI/CD process; using Tricentis Tosca is very useful and easy."

"We have to automate thousands of test cases and complete end-to-end SAP on business processes. To manually execute these tasks, it would take us at least two months. By automating these tasks using Tosca, now it takes five to 10 days maximum. Tricentis Tosca is a codeless or scriptless automation tool."

More Tricentis Tosca pros

Cons

"TestLeft captures a lot of space in terms of memory, which is one issue that can be improved."

"The solution should work with the Linux platform. Right now, it only runs on Windows."

"The user management could improve in Tricentis Tosca because it is confusing. It would be better to have it in one place. Having to add it to the cloud and to a specific project can be a mess."

"In Tricentis Tosca, we need to capture the element each time. If they could implement an auto-heal feature, it would capture automatically by detecting it from the page."

"The tool lags in client-based applications. We have also encountered issues with the features in integrations."

"Tricentis Tosca could improve on the ease of use. There is a steep learning curve. The reporting section could be better and some of the new features could be simplified. Additionally, the user management of the client and the server are confusing. There should not be two."

"Tricentis Tosca could improve on its mobile automation solution."

"I would like to see more implementation of AI on the self-healing aspect. That would be like the next step."

"Making it more stable would be good because we get around 90% stability."

More Tricentis Tosca cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost should be reduced."

"I would like to see better costing packs. There are several features but USD $11,000 for one license is expensive."

"A yearly license costs around 20,000 euros."

"The licensing cost for Tricentis Tosca is expensive. It has multiple features, but to use all of its features, you have to pay for additional licenses."

"The tool is expensive. It has become overpriced, especially after Tricentis Tosca grew as a company. Initially, we bought a license with an annual support fee, which wasn't too expensive. However, they changed the model, and now we have to purchase a license yearly, which has become quite costly."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is very cheap and ten is very expensive, I rate the pricing a ten. The licensing model is based on a yearly basis."

"They are probably more expensive than other comparable tools, but you also get the full suite of testing tools."

"I give the cost of Tricentis Tosca a six out of seven."

"I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. It is on the higher side."

More Tricentis Tosca pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	24
Large Enterprise	72

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?

We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...

See all answers

How does Tricentis Tosca compare with Worksoft Certify?

Tosca fulfills our business needs better because it is an end-to-end solution across technologies. We like that it is scriptless, so even non-experienced staff can use it. To put it simply, with To...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tricentis Tosca?

For beginners, the product is good, especially for those who are interested in the quality side of software testing.

See all answers

Comparisons

SmartBear TestComplete vs SmartBear TestLeft

Compared 100% of the time

More SmartBear TestLeft Competitors

Worksoft Certify vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 9% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 7% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 6% of the time

Testim vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 6% of the time

More Tricentis Tosca Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

December 2025

Download SmartBear TestLeft product report

Buyer's Guide

Tricentis Tosca

January 2026

Download Tricentis Tosca product report

Also Known As

No data available

Orchestrated Service Virtualization

Overview

SmartBear TestLeft a functional testing tool fully embedded in standard IDEs. TestLeft is a powerful yet lean functional testing tool for dev-testers working in Agile teams. It fully embeds into standard development IDEs. A built-in access to object and method library is also available with TestLeft. Dev-testers can thereby easily and quickly create robust functional automated tests without leaving their favorite IDEs such as Visual Studio. It also works well with other tools in dev eco-systems such as source control or continuous integration systems.

SmartBear

Tricentis Tosca offers model-based testing that supports both technical and non-technical users through a user-friendly interface, enabling scriptless automation and seamless integration with UI and non-UI applications.

Tosca's modular approach enhances test maintenance and reuse while delivering comprehensive automation for diverse testing environments. Backed by risk-based testing and automated data management, it supports end-to-end testing across API, SAP, and desktop applications. Tosca's integration capabilities extend to environments like Salesforce, PHP webshops, and mobile apps, effectively enhancing Agile team workflows. Despite its strengths, room remains for improved reporting, object recognition, and more efficient upgrade processes. Enhancing documentation and mobile testing support could further elevate its functionality for many.

What key features does Tricentis Tosca offer?

User-friendly interface: Simplifies interactions for non-technical users.
Model-based testing: Facilitates the easy creation of automated test cases.
Scriptless automation: Enables quick test development without coding.
Integration capabilities: Supports connections with multiple platforms like SAP and Salesforce.
Modular approach: Enhances the reuse and maintenance of test components.

What benefits to expect from Tricentis Tosca?

Efficiency: Streamlines the testing process for faster release cycles.
Versatility: Suitable for diverse application environments including web and desktop.
Productivity: Boosts Agile team integration for comprehensive testing.
Risk-based testing: Prioritizes testing efforts based on potential impact.

In retail, Tricentis Tosca automates inventory and transaction testing, ensuring efficient system updates. Financial services employ it for regulatory compliance through automated test scenarios in mainframe and PDF environments. Telecommunication companies utilize Tosca for API testing, aligning services across network platforms seamlessly.

Tricentis

Sample Customers

American Red Cross, CISCO, HONDA, ADIDAS, TBC bank

HBO, AMEX, BMW Group, ING, Bosch, Austrian Airlines, Deutsche Bank, Henkel, Allianz, Bank of America, UBS, Orange, Siemens, Swiss Re, Vodafone

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

December 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, BrowserStack and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.