

Wiz and Vulcan Cyber compete in the cybersecurity domain. Wiz appears to have the upper hand in cloud-centric environments, while Vulcan Cyber is preferred for traditional setups.
Features: Wiz offers proactive cloud security, real-time threat detection, and flexible integration into cloud environments. Vulcan Cyber provides detailed vulnerability management, remediation orchestration, and comprehensive risk assessment capabilities.
Room for Improvement: Wiz could enhance its on-premise support, expand its threat management features, and improve user interface customization. Vulcan Cyber might benefit from refining its cloud-security capabilities, increasing scalability, and reducing complexity in deployment procedures.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Wiz provides seamless cloud-based deployment and customer service centered on cloud dynamics. Vulcan Cyber offers on-premise and hybrid deployment options with strong support geared toward vulnerability management.
Pricing and ROI: Wiz has a moderate setup cost with promising ROI, particularly for cloud infrastructure. Vulcan Cyber may involve higher initial costs but offers substantial ROI through comprehensive risk mitigation.
With our vulnerability management platform, I used to get reports weekly, but with Vulcan Cyber, I get them daily.
Our security team probably spends 15 minutes instead of two hours daily notifying the teams.
We have seen ROI from Wiz and we continued to see value in Wiz.
I think we're reaching the point where we'll see a return on investment, and we'll be there by the end of the year.
We estimate a cost reduction of around 35% to 50%, or even more, due to consolidating our security management into one platform.
We do not necessarily have visibility of when those feature requests are going into the development pipeline.
It would enhance my experience if Vulcan informed customers of forthcoming maintenance or changes that might cause website downtime.
Their technical support team is very good, knowledgeable, and helpful.
On a scale from 1 to 10, I would give Wiz's support a 10.
The vendor was readily available to assist us over calls, clarifying both technical aspects and theoretical insights.
If I were to put Wiz support on a scale from one to ten, I would give them a ten.
We have a lot of assets under management, and it effectively scales up to accommodate hundreds or even thousands of assets.
I'd rate the scalability ten out of ten.
I would rate it ten out of ten for scalability, as integration with multiple connectors is possible without exceeding licensing limits.
We have deployed Wiz in three organizations on AWS, each with approximately 70 to 80 accounts, totaling more than 120 accounts.
Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.
Our environment quadrupled in size. We didn’t have to make any adjustments or configuration changes; it just accommodated the growth.
It would be better if Vulcan notified me, the customer, about upcoming maintenance or changes, indicating when the website might be down.
The product's stability is commendable, with no noticeable lags or slowness.
I would rate it a nine out of ten in terms of stability.
The stability of Wiz has been good, with no downtime, bugs, or glitches.
The services were stable, and we did not experience any downtime.
Stability-wise, I rate the solution an eight to nine out of ten.
It would be beneficial if the platform allowed remote access to devices for immediate remedies.
Providing real-world examples of how to construct a ticket format for Jira, Azure DevOps, or ServiceNow with specific examples would help us understand how it might work in our environment.
Having it more customized or providing more customization options for me would be beneficial.
We would like to see preventive controls that can be applied through Wiz to protect against vulnerabilities that we're not going to be able to remediate immediately.
One significant area for improvement would be increasing automation. While they excel at identifying issues, we need assistance in minimizing the human hours required for tasks.
Adding AI-driven features could significantly assist developers in addressing vulnerabilities more efficiently, thereby improving deployment times and adherence to deadlines.
For our use case, the solution is lacking some features, and the cost savings don't make it worth it.
We are paying 250k per year.
In some cases, it has a very aggressive price, so very cheap.
I don’t think there’s anyone else out there offering the same level, scale, or efficiency.
It offers a comprehensive view of the assets and their associated vulnerabilities, which aids in assessing and mitigating threats.
The automation capabilities using the Vulcan API platform or the API feature allow me to easily automate scripts and reports and schedule them.
Instead of having 100 vulnerabilities and not knowing how to prioritize and assign all your FTEs there, you now have only ten that you know you need to fix, and you're assigning the right number of FTEs.
The ability to scan every layer without agents is a huge selling point because we're multi-agent.
The feature leads to minimal false positives and a low volume of alerts, which is highly valuable for our operations.
It's highly customizable, allowing us to manage many custom features effectively.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Wiz | 5.0% |
| Vulcan Cyber | 0.7% |
| Other | 94.3% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 10 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 10 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 24 |
Vulcan Cyber centralizes data from multiple scanners for a unified view, helping prioritize crucial vulnerabilities efficiently and enabling advanced analytics through seamless integration with numerous tools.
Vulcan Cyber offers a holistic vulnerability and asset management platform, integrating findings from scanners such as Wiz and BlackRock and aligning with Jira and ServiceNow for efficient ticketing. It automates processes and enhances threat analysis through its intuitive interface, allowing users to manage vulnerabilities and assets efficiently, even in post-merger scenarios. Users can centralize scanner data, ensuring streamlined processes and comprehensive reporting. Despite its performance and interface speed challenges, Vulcan Cyber remains a valuable tool for managing risk-based notifications and stakeholder communications.
What features define Vulcan Cyber?Industries employing Vulcan Cyber for vulnerability management experience streamlined processes concerning scanner data centralization and asset assessment post-merger. Its integration with service solutions like Jira fosters efficient ticketing and communication, improving risk assessments and remediation actions.
Wiz offers cloud security management with key capabilities in visibility, risk prioritization, and comprehensive analysis. It supports multi-cloud environments, ensuring robust integration and streamlining security tasks effectively.
Known for its advanced features like CSPM module, Security Graph, and Threat Intelligence, Wiz enables cloud integration while minimizing false positives. Its agentless deployment and high-risk analysis granularity improve operational efficiency. Users note desires for better reporting, more security features, enhanced integration, notably for APIs and cloud services like Kubernetes. Challenges include dashboard customization limits, remediation automation, scanning frequency, and cost concerns, particularly in Brazil. Users adopt Wiz for tasks including cloud security posture management, vulnerability identification, automated security measures, and integrating security tools, effectively managing security in AWS, Azure, and GCP.
What are the key features of Wiz?Companies in industries with complex cloud architectures, like finance and healthcare, leverage Wiz for its multi-cloud support, managing risks and compliance efficiently. Its integration with container technologies aids sectors reliant on Kubernetes. Retailers benefit from visibility into misconfigurations, ensuring robust customer data protection.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.