CrowdStrike Falcon Reviews

I mainly use CrowdStrike Falcon to prevent threats and detect indicators of attacks or compromises in the network.

In the past, we regularly got alerts about suspicious activities in the network but couldn't understand where they were coming from. Since we deployed CrowdStrike, the network has become much calmer, and we now understand the sources of infections, which helps us prevent them from spreading. We now get immediate information about infections and can react much faster.

An improvement would be to extend support to legacy and unsupported servers. In the next release, CrowdStrike should include patch and vulnerability management, which would allow us to rely on just one solution.

I've been using CrowdStrike Falcon for over a year.

Falcon is pretty stable - we haven't seen any kinds of performance issues like lagging, which we did experience with other endpoint protection solutions.

CrowdStrike's technical support is very fast and responsive.

Positive

Previously, I used Microsoft Bitdefender, but CrowdStrike was faster and better protection-wise.

The initial setup was straightforward - it was very quick (about two and a half hours) without any downtime or issues. We also extended the installation to the remote side, which took another hour. I would rate the setup process four out of five.

We used an in-house team.

In the past, we have around four to five engineers managing our endpoint - we have now reduced this to two engineers, which has cut costs. We've also been able to cut the time needed to find the threats and their root causes from up to six hours a day to just half an hour. I would rate our ROI as five out of five.

We pay between $30-50 per user for a yearly license, which is more expensive than SentinelOne or Bitdefender. However, CrowdStrike gives better value for money, so I would rate their pricing four out of five. If you want to add modules or features, these are an additional cost per user.

We evaluated SentinelOne, but it was too heavy on the machine and slowed it down. We also did a threat simulation analysis with both SentinelOne and CrowdStrike, and SentinelOne wasn't able to detect or block the threats.

CrowdStrike Falcon is the best endpoint protection solution I've used so far. I would advise anybody thinking of implementing it to go for it, as CrowdStrike will provide more visibility, depth, and context to threats and allow you to understand what's going on. I would give Falcon a rating of ten out of ten.

I am using CrowdStrike Falcon to protect my endpoints from new zero-day threats.

One of the most valuable features of CrowdStrike Falcon is when there are upgrades there are no additional fees.

CrowdStrike Falcon could improve by adding manual scanning or serverless scanning. It is not available at this time.

I have been using CrowdStrike Falcon for two and a half years.

CrowdStrike Falcon is stable.

CrowdStrike Falcon is scalable enough for our needs.

We have approximately 250 people using this solution in my organization.

We have used the technical support for investigations, but not for installation or anything else.

I rate the support CrowdStrike Falcon a five out of five.

I previously used McAfee but zero-day threats are not being protected. We evaluate CrowdStrike Falcon and when compared to McAfee, it was far better. 

The initial setup of CrowdStrike Falcon is easy.

Our administrator of this solution had to configure the policy for the best detection.

There is no license required to use this solution.

My advice to others is this is a good solution that does not require a lot of attention. You can install it and it runs silently in the background.

I rate CrowdStrike Falcon a nine out of ten.

The most valuable feature of CrowdStrike Falcon is its accuracy.

CrowdStrike Falcon could improve the logs by making them free to the API.

I have used CrowdStrike Falcon for two years.

The solution is stable.

CrowdStrike Falcon is a scalable solution.

We have approximately 800 people using this solution in my organization.

CrowdStrike Falcon technical support has been fine in my experience.

I have used other solutions before CrowdStrike Falcon, such as Symantec.

Symantec does not have any advantage over CrowdStrike.

The initial setup of CrowdStrike Falcon is easy.

The price of CrowdStrike Falcon is reasonable.

I rate CrowdStrike Falcon a nine out of ten.

It also helps you with access, like we have dark web monitoring and admin protection management. So, the use cases can vary from organization to organization, but every organization has different value in it.

It helps to prevent unauthorized access or identity theft from external sites. If your identity is stolen, you can ban it.

Real-time monitoring is important because it runs multiple things on a single platform, like IDA, EDR, XDR, and SIM solutions. It captures all technology with one agent, which makes it easier for us to fix customer issues. 

Having a single console is helpful, especially when customers have multiple vendors for their products. It's easier to manage one partner. In this case, CrowdStrike Falcon helps.

One thing that is not yet available is attack simulation. For example, if someone tries to attack your Active Directory on inactive accounts, a cyber attacker could hack those accounts and try to get into your company. This could be a feature to add. It would give a fake reply each time someone tries to hack it. Multiple companies that I know of would like that.

I have been using it for two years. 

It is a stable product.

I would rate the scalability a nine out of ten.  It's a scalable solution that is very easy to deploy.

It is suitable for every kind of business, including small, medium, or enterprise businesses.

Technical support depends on a system integrator.

CrowdStrike technical support regarding Identity Protection has a team, but if there's no issue with the agent, you can work it out yourself.

The support is good.

Positive

The initial setup is easy. We only have one option available right now: on the cloud. It gets applied to endpoints, but it's cloud-based.

It is very easy to integrate this product into our existing environment.

It's a premium product.

From my end, it works. But it can be recommended or viewed by a personal customer. We are not the sole user of CrowdStrike Falcon. It's the end user.

I would recommend using it. For me, it is the best product ever. Overall, I would rate it an eight out of ten.  

We use CrowdStrike Falcon for endpoint protection and cybersecurity.

We implemented CrowdStrike Falcon to ensure our systems were secure and there were no infiltrations to our system.

We deploy CrowdStrike Falcon across a variety of platforms, including cloud and edge environments. We ensure it meets rigorous security standards, is properly certified, and adheres to our data management policy.

We integrated CrowdStrike Falcon with our end-user systems and servers.

Since implementing CrowdStrike Falcon, we haven't experienced any serious threats, and we've seen a decrease in phishing and ransomware emails. This suggests it's been very effective in mitigating those threats.

The UI is easy to use and comprehensive.

CrowdStrike Falcon's performance has improved our user productivity.

CrowdStrike Falcon offers a comprehensive dashboard that is highly effective in protecting against and blocking external infiltration attempts.

The pricing structure should allow for some flexibility.

I have been using CrowdStrike Falcon for almost 3 years.

CrowdStrike Falcon is stable.

I would rate the scalability of CrowdStrike Falcon 8 out of 10.

The technical support is good. We have not had any issues with them.

Positive

The initial deployment was straightforward. The deployment doesn't take more than one day. Those involved with the deployment are system engineers, IT analysts, and software engineers.

The implementation was completed in-house.

The price is fixed with no room for negotiation.

I would rate CrowdStrike Falcon 8 out of 10.

We have deployed CrowdStrike Falcon in multiple departments, locations, and satellite offices.

CrowdStrike Falcon doesn't require maintenance from our end other than the updates.

I recommend CrowdStrike Falcon to others.

The solution is primarily utilized for EDR and XDR capabilities, with some identity management features integrated through Falcon. In essence, it is employed like other endpoint protection platforms.

CrowdStrike Falcon no longer stands out compared to other endpoint protection platforms like Carbon Black or Microsoft Defender. Therefore, neither is superior to the other when used in our organization.

Regarding features, I appreciate its integration capabilities with identity providers, but it would have been better if they had their own identity product. The documentation is well-done in the solution.

CrowdStrike needs to quit making up stuff about its features and functionality to bash its competition.

I would like to see CrowdStrike become closer to an agentless solution where I wouldn't have to deploy software and maintain the version of the solution.

I have been using CrowdStrike Falcon for a year. Also, I am using the solution's latest version.

There is no doubt about the stability of the solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

The solution has been successfully deployed in thousands of enterprises, so it is proven to be scalable. Major customers are using it, indicating that scalability is not a concern.

There are two numbers to reach out to the technical support team. Considering the time taken to reach out to them with a request and get a response, I rate them a ten. Based on the technical skills of the customer support team to solve a problem, I rate them between a six and seven.

Positive

The initial setup process of the solution was straightforward. However, it is important to note that I was only setting up the solution in a POC (Proof of Concept) environment and not in a production one.

That's a difficult question to answer because CrowdStrike Falcon was implemented to replace a previous solution. While it was cheaper than the previous solution, the only initial return on investment was cost savings, as we have not yet developed key performance indicators to measure the security benefits of using CrowdStrike Falcon.

The effectiveness of a solution is not always easily measurable by simply avoiding a hack on a given day. Instead, it often requires analyzing reporting data to determine its environmental impact. This data must then be used to calculate the return on investment and compare it to the cost of ownership. In my experience, the only clear return on investment has been in the initial deployment of the solution. The solution's price has typically been lower than that of previous solutions.

In my opinion, the pricing of CrowdStrike Falcon seems aggressive.

I recommend anyone planning to use CrowdStrike Falcon to ensure that they have an integration team. This is because the solution does not have many built-in features, and it relies on partnership integration with other significant players, such as identity and network vulnerability solutions. Consequently, when deploying CrowdStrike, hiring additional personnel is necessary to comprehend the integration process. If CrowdStrike is ranked number one, then Microsoft is above CrowdStrike due to its fully integrated features. If Microsoft ever got details of incorrect licenses, it would run CrowdStrike out of business. Overall, I rate the product eight point nine out of ten.

Our company's line of business includes financial transactions with an insurance policy that requires EDR protection. Compliance is part of our policy and agreement with customers. 

We currently have 1,100 users of the solution. 

The solution is silent and sits on your system as one single agent.

Only one or two MB of memory are consumed which is much less than other products. 

The solution is AI-driven so it self-activates to find issues and provide alerts or notifications rather than running all the time.

The portal is very user-friendly so it is not difficult to manage. 

The solution doesn't require system restarts. That is one disadvantage of Symantec or Kaspersky because they require restarts when you uninstall or reinstall. 

Technical support could be better than what is currently offered. 

I have been using the solution for three months. 

The solution is stable with no issues. 

We have only used the solution for three months so will continue to monitor stability for the next several months. 

I rate stability an eight out of ten. 

The solution is scalable. We do not yet have the requirement to take an in-depth look at scalability. 

I rate scalability an eight out of ten. 

Technical support could be better because there are ownership issues. 

For example, when you raise a support case there is not much communication between the account manager and support. The account manager is supposed to own the case but instead is disconnected from it. 

I rate support a six out of ten. 

Neutral

We previously used Symantec and Kaspersky. 

The setup is pretty easy to walk through without much trouble. 

I rate setup an eight out of ten. 

We utilized a third-party for implementation. They helped us with the admin console, training, and the pilot setup that we eventually took over. Our internal team included two security staff and four support staff.

We were moving from Symantec and Kaspersky. We targeted our servers first because Symantec is difficult to uninstall and there is an interim process for removal. Once completed, we installed the solution. 

It took about two months to complete implementation across all systems. 

We did our homework in advance for cost or other things to calculate ROI. The solution met our expectations so ROI is rated a seven out of ten. 

The pricing is competitive and includes all features and support.

I rate pricing an eight out of ten. 

We evaluated Microsoft Defender, Sophos, Symantec, and Trend Micro before choosing CrowdStrike Falcon. 

I recommend using the solution and rate it an eight out of ten. 

We use CrowdStrike Falcon to detect and alert us to any malware in our system. In our organization, we integrated CrowdStrike with a SIEM tool, which does the alerting. If the solution detects malware and issues an EDR alert, it notifies us and begins gathering data about the detection, including the hostname, user name, the hash value of the downloaded file, and the file's reputation. Then, we can ask the user the delete the file from the PC and drives, such as USB drives, if necessary. Following removing any malicious files, we can use CrowdStrike to run an AV scan on the affected device or devices.

We use the solution's Horizon module to protect multi-cloud work environments and integrate with SIEM tools. Detections in CrowdStrike trigger a response from the SIEM tool, allowing us to face threats via a coordinated approach.

Horizon simplifies security management of multi-cloud environments, and the improvement has been significant. Integration with a SIEM tool makes alerting and detection very rapid, which significantly helped.

To give an example, one of our employees mistakenly downloaded a malicious phishing video. The solution quarantined the file, protecting our organization from attack.

The feature I like the most is the solution's detection.

The fact that CrowdStrike Falcon is a cloud-native solution provides us with a lot of flexibility and always-on protection. This is very important to us because it enables automatic detection and quarantining of malicious files, and that's one of the features we like most about working with the tool. 

The visibility provided by the solution in multi-cloud environments is excellent; it's one of the best features. 

The malware analysis could be improved, as that's what we use the solution for the most and that change would make it a better EDR tool. 

I've been using the solution for about three years. 

The product's stability is good. 

The scalability is excellent; top tier. There are about 15 end users in our company, and they are members of the security team. We plan to increase our usage of the solution. 

It isn't challenging to deploy the solution's sensor to endpoints, and it becomes even more straightforward with some experience and understanding of the tool. 

The deployment is relatively quick, though it takes a little longer than other products.

We implemented via an in-house team as we had a lot of experience with the solution. 

The solution isn't very costly; it's affordable.

We evaluated a McAfee solution, and CrowdStrike has a lot more automation. 

I rate the product nine out of ten. 

CrowdStrike is excellent at preventing breaches, and our security operations are more robust as a result. The automatic quarantining of malicious downloads keeps our system safe and our information out of the hands of attackers.  

The solution reduces our security risk significantly; it's an advanced tool.  

We learned about the solution when some of our employees saw a promotion campaign.