Databricks Reviews

Our primary use case for the solution is data analysis by providing a Spark cluster environment with a driver to analyze a huge amount of data and gigabytes of data and can create Notebooks in Databricks. We can write SQL commands, Python code, Scala, or Spark with Python. With Databricks, we get a cluster hosted in the public cloud and we adjust it based on how much we use it.

The most valuable features are data engineering and data science because we can create Notebooks on them. We can use any Python library to build data science models, or we can use libraries like Seaborn or Matplotlib to create charts based on data for data analysis. It is a really valuable capability.

Microsoft Azure has its learning environment on the Microsoft website. We can complete certifications, but the Databricks certification is more expensive than Microsoft. It costs between $2,000 and $2,500, and the knowledge is linked. They're also charged based on whether a person doesn't want to analyze large amounts of data. Hence, we want to have the capacity for free student users so that people can learn and build their professional skills.

We have been using the solution for approximately one year.

The solution is stable. Microsoft offers a public service, and we can get it from the Databricks website. Additionally, many companies use it to analyze their data or create a Spark cluster to run Python or SQL scripts based on their data. I rate the stability a nine out of ten.

The setup is quite easy, and Databricks has also partnered with Microsoft, so we get this service on Microsoft Azure.

We have seen a return on investment.

We have a pay-as-you-go subscription and pay for it based on our usage.

We chose this solution because my company uses Microsoft Azure for a project, and my role as a data engineer primarily focuses on data-related services. For storing data, we use Data Lake; similarly, for the data processing engine, we use Spark, which Databricks provides.

I rate the solution an eight out of ten. The solution is good but can be improved by including drag-and-drop features because it can be helpful for users who are unfamiliar with coding. I advise new users to have prior experience with Python or SQL before utilizing this solution if they use it for data science or model building. 

I would like to see the integration between Databricks and MLflow improved. It is quite hard to train multiple models in parallel in the distributed fashions. You hit rate limits on the clients very fast.

I have been using Databricks for three years.

I would rate the stability of this solution a nine out of 10, with one being not stable and 10 being very stable.

I would rate the scalability of this solution an eight out of 10, with one being not scalable and 10 being very scalable.

There are three people using this solution in our organization.

I would rate the available customer service a three. It's worth mentioning that this is Microsoft and not Databricks itself. I haven't spoken to Databricks people directly, but I know the people who have and they have been a lot more pleased.

Negative

I would rate their pricing plan a six (on a scale of one to 10, with one being cheap and 10 being expensive). I think the prices could be lowered a little bit.

Overall, I would rate this solution an eight out of 10, with one being quite poor and 10 being excellent. It is fast, it's scalable, and it does the job it needs to do.

Our company uses the solution for series-based and panel-based migrations. We collect and store user requirements, use apps to fetch data, and provide customers with better data for business reports. There are 30 to 40 users in our company.

The solution is an impressive tool for data migration and integration. 

The run time is very quick.

The solution has some scalability and integration limitations when consolidating legacy systems.

I have been using the solution for two years. 

The solution is stable. 

It is not really scalability but more about the combination of the structure, consolidation, and different formats we can split and merge. We do a lot of things while storing the target operational model. Snowflake is more flexible and scalable in that regard. 

We have contacted technical support a lot about replicating values in PDF files. So far, they have not been able to provide a viable solution. 

The setup is of average difficulty but tougher than Snowflake. 

Deployment is easy and run time is quick. 

We implemented the solution in-house.

One resource manages services for end-to-end monitoring and maintenance activities. 

The solution is based on a licensing model. Updates occur automatically by the task base. 

Snowflake is quite impressive in comparison to the solution because there is flexibility in the way you consolidate. In contrast, the solution has some scalability and integration limitations when consolidating legacy systems. Tool wise, Snowflake is easy from the technical perspective because connectors are included.  

We are evaluating options for one particular use case. The customer wants to replicate values from PDFs and enter them in the data model. We contacted the solution's technical support but do not yet have a viable answer. There are gaps in what we do and how we capture. The only option right now is for the customer to manually upload values that we integrate using Synapse to consolidate report data. We haven't yet found another tool that maps to meet our customer's requirement. 

I rate the solution a seven out of ten. 

We use Databricks for batch data processing and stream data processing.

Databricks provides a consistent interface for data engineers to work with data in a consistent language on a single integrated platform for ingesting, processing, and serving data to the end user.

The flexibility of Databricks is the most valuable feature. It gives us the ability to write analytics code in multiple languages.

There is a single workspace for different data roles like data engineers, machine learning engineers, and the end user, who can connect to the same system. 

Databricks computes separate from storage, so you are not coupled with the underlying data sets, allowing for multiple processes and multiple programs to be written on the same code.

I would like to see improvement with the UI. It is functional and useful, but it's a bit clunky at times. It should be more user-friendly.

In future releases, Databricks would benefit from enhanced metrics and tighter integration with Azure's diagnostics.

I have been using Databricks for eight months.

Databricks is very stable.

The scalability of this solution is good. In our organization, users include analysts, data engineers, and data scientists.

I would give Databrick service and support a four and a half out of five overall.

Positive

Prior to using Databricks, we used Azure Stream Analytics. We made the switch because of the scalability and integrated platform.

The initial setup of Databricks is more complex. I would rate it a four out of five on the complexity of the setup. It took two days to deploy the solution.

We used a third party for some of the implementations of Databricks. The number of staff required to deploy and maintain this solution depends on the number of processes you have. Due to the cloud nature of the technology, it is easy to deploy and maintain. 

The licensing of Databricks is a tiered licensing regime, so it is flexible. I feel their pricing is a five out of five.

Databricks is a one-stop shop for everything data related, and it can scale with you.

I would rate this solution a 9.5 out of 10 overall.

We use this solution for finding anomalies and applying the rules to the streaming data.

There are around 50 people using this solution in my organization, including data scientists.

The ability to stream data and the windowing feature are valuable. There are a number of targeted integration points, so that is a difference between Stream Analytics and Databricks. The integrations input or output are better in Databricks. It's accessible to use any of the Python or even Java. I can use the third party, deploy it, and use it.

Support for Microsoft technology and the compatibility with the .NET framework is somewhat missing. There should be reliability between these two. Databricks is based on open sources. If it's more synchronous between the Microsoft technology and the programming languages, it'll be better. Python has better languages, but compatibility would be a great help.

I would like to have better support for Microsoft technology and better language components.

With Azure or Cosmo DB, I can store other data links or time series data tables. That would be a great help for analytics in real time.

I have been using Databricks for eight months.

The scalability is fine. We had thousands of devices and were sending data infrequently, so that worked for us. If the amount increases, the windowing function and job schedule may not perform as expected.

I would rate technical support 4 out of 5. We had some issues with setup, and they were finally solved but it was after following up a few times.

Azure Stream Analytics is easy to use and easy to deploy. It's a little bit better. Databricks is still having some stability issues. Azure Stream Analytics has a few input and output sources, and it's scalable to all types of third party or interfaces.

Setup was complex. There were some issues with setting up a database and installing the third party component on top of services. I would rate the setup 3 out of 5.

Implementation was done in-house.

The cost is around $600,000 for 50 users.

I would rate the price 2 out of 5.

I would rate this solution 8 out of 10.

I use Databricks to manage the setting up of data lakes for SaaS.

The biggest problem associated with the product is that it is quite pricey. We cannot find a better solution than Databricks in the market currently.

I have been using Databricks for a year.

It is an expensive tool. The licensing model is a pay-as-you-go one.

The tool helps with data processing and analytics with large-scale data or big data since it is associated with managing data at a large scale.

For my general use cases, I would say that I am not a technical person, so I cannot explain to you how the tool helps with the area of data engineering tasks.

There is another team in my company that is involved in the use of machine learning and AI features in Databricks. My team is mostly into operations. The tool is used in a multi-country project.

For example, in my company, they make some shopping decisions related to solutions based on what is the product chosen by the whole company.

I rate the tool an eight out of ten.

We use Databricks for data science work in projects that create data pipelines, pre-processing, data wrangling, big data cluster management and ML, machine learning and deep learning tasks.

Databricks collaborates very well with the Azure platform, Dataiku, and enterprise AI tool. Databricks is a new connection to pull the data or connect to the Spark cluster. It is helpful for us to instance it or distribute the load through the Spark cluster, and it is very user-friendly.

The most valuable feature is the Spark cluster which is very fast for heavy loads, big data processing and Pi Spark.

Databricks as a solution is integrated with Azure, but Google Cloud has some restrictions. I'm not sure about AWS Cloud, but it would be great if Databricks could integrate all the cloud platforms. Regarding additional features, we would like to see them mostly on the data engineering side, where we have a Spark cluster and some inbuilt ML. In addition, pre-processing steps will be useful.

We have been using this solution for two years and are using the latest update.

It is a stable solution as long as the Microsoft Azure Platform is stable too.

It is a scalable solution, both vertically and horizontally, which is good. My organization is big, and we have a lot of users. In my department, we have about 15 people using Databricks.

We have not escalated any issues to technical support, but we initially struggled with configuration and the settings of Hive metastore, but we resolved it. I rate the technical support a nine out of ten.

Positive

We were using the looped EMR elastic MapReduce from AWS before using Databricks. We switched to Databricks because the whole platform changed from AWS to Azure platform, and Databricks comes as a package.

The initial setup was easy to complete and not complex. It may initially be challenging for a new user, but it improves over time. The CICD pipeline works well with the Microsoft Azure platform because the continuous integration, development and deployment come with the Git integration. It makes it easier for Databricks and the CICD. The deployment should be improved from the perspective of auto ML functionality, so it doesn't have intensive automation learning capability.

We don't use Databricks directly because we work on a data science project. It requires an auto ML and inbuilt machine learning capability. We found capabilities like the large language model using NLP and other deep learning models that are not that intensive. It is meant for data engineering purposes rather than data science purposes. It'll be great if Databricks could be intensive for data science.

We used a third-party, Dataiku platform for the deployment, where we connected to Databricks and completed the ML ops. We required about three people for deployment, and it is easy to maintain the solution.

We have seen an ROI but cannot differentiate because it also comes with the Azure platform.

I do not have details about the pricing.

I rate this solution a nine out of ten. Regarding advice, Databricks is a very good platform, popular and easy to use daily for data engineers and data scientists who rely on a large dataset to do advanced analytics reporting. It's a very good tool.

We are using Databricks for machine learning workloads specifically.

Databricks aligns well with our skillset and overall approach. We sought out their solution specifically for a big data application we are currently working on, as we needed a platform capable of handling large amounts of data and building models. Additionally, the fact that they use open-source software and can integrate data warehouse and data lake systems was particularly appealing, as we have encountered such issues in the past. We determined that Databricks would be an effective solution for our needs.

The most valuable feature of Databricks is the integration of the data warehouse and data lake, and the development of the lake house. Additionally, it integrates well with Spark for processing data in production. 

The solution could be improved by adding a feature that would make it more user-friendly for our team. The feature is simple, but it would be useful. Currently, our team is more familiar with the language R, but Databricks requires the use of Jupyter Notebooks which primarily supports Python. We have tried using RStudio, but it is not a fully integrated solution. To fully utilize Databricks, we have to use the Jupyter interface. One feature that would make it easier for our team to adopt the Jupyter interface would be the ability to select a specific variable or line of code and execute it within a cell. This feature is available in other Jupyter Notebooks outside of Databricks and in our own IDE, but it is not currently available within Databricks. If this feature were added, it would make the transition to using Databricks much smoother for our team.

The most important feature other than the Jupyter interface would be to have the RStudio interface inside Databricks. This would be perfect.

We have been using Databricks for approximately one year.

The stability of Databricks is good.

I rate the stability of Databricks a nine out of ten.

Databricks is scalable.

I rate the scalability of Databricks a nine out of ten.

I have been receiving responsive answers from Databricks's support. I have been pleased with the support.

I rate the support from Databricks a ten out of ten.

Positive

The initial setup of Databricks is simple. I did not experience any challenges. The time it takes for the deployment is approximately four hours.

I rate the initial setup of Databricks.

We did the deployment of the solution in-house. There were three people involved in the deployment. A data engineer, data analyst, and machine learning engineer.

We have only incurred the cost of our AWS cloud services. This is because during this period, Databricks provided us with an extended evaluation period, and we have not spent much money yet. We are just starting to incur costs this month, I will know more later on the full cost perspective.

We only pay standard fees for the solution. 

We use a data engineer, data analyst, and machine learning engineer for the maintenance of the solution.

I rate Databricks a nine out of ten.

Our team is currently utilizing machine learning for various applications, and a few members are also exploring Databrick's use for ML operations.

In the manufacturing industry, Databricks can be beneficial to use because of machine learning. It is useful for tasks, such as product analysis or predictive maintenance.

I have been using Databricks for approximately six months

The stability of the clusters or the instances of Databricks would be better if it was a much more stable environment. We've had issues with crashes.

The scalability of Databricks is good as long as you have a data lake, and it's easy to scale.

We have approximately 50 users using this solution in my company.

We have a different team who handles the support. I do not have contact with Databricks support.

I have not used a similar solution to Databricks.

I have seen an ROI using Databricks.

I rate the price of Databricks as eight out of ten.

Having a good understanding of physical security in relation to cybersecurity in an OT (Operational Technology) environment would be beneficial, and utilizing an existing data lake prior to implementing a Databricks initiative would greatly aid in its success.

I rate Databricks an eight out of ten.

I am using Databricks in my company.

The most valuable feature of Databricks is the notebook, data factory, and ease of use.

I have been using Databricks for approximately nine months.

The performance and stability of Databricks are good. It is quick and I have not had problems.

Databricks is highly scalable.

We have 200 people using the solution in my organization.

When I used the support, I had communication problems because of the language barrier with the agent. The accent was difficult to understand.

I have not worked with another solution prior to Databricks.

The price of Databricks is reasonable compared to other solutions.

I rate Databricks an eight out of ten.