Datadog Reviews

We use it mostly for logging log messages from our Kubernetes and EC2 instances, for example, system messages and errors. Also, we want log messages from our firewalls and other network infrastructure in case of network issues. We intend to use it for application logging, et cetera, to get insight into internal problems in the applications in Kubernetes pods. We want to use it for monitoring in case of system problems and hardware failures so that it can notify us.

It's good to have a single location for all the logs. If you have logs coming from a whole lot of sources, it makes it hard to find where the problem lies. 

We had to spend a lot of time logging into various systems and pursuing a billion different log files looking for something that stands out as a possible cause of the issue. That can take a lot of time and doesn't give much visibility into the possible interactions between systems.

Datadog has a lot of features to be able to drill down deep into the swath of logs that our platforms generate. 

It has a lot of ability to make fancy and deep searches using regular expressions and to graph them into useful and interesting dashboard graphs. 

The plethora of built-in/downloadable integrations make it much easier to set up for our platforms. Otherwise, we'd have to parse the log files ourselves, which would take a great deal of effort. Had to do it before when had to use an ELK stack for logging, which was painful.

Some of the interface is still confusing to use. It has many features, and it takes a lot of effort to figure out what they all mean. Maybe having tooltips or something would be helpful. Also, some of the integrations are better than others.

I've used the solution for a month.

The solution seems very stable.

Have used an ELK stack before. However, it took a lot of effort to maintain, and parsing the logs was difficult.

We implemented the solution in-house.

We are using Datadog for server metrics, log aggregation and searching, system monitoring, alerting the team about errors, and dashboards for our developers. It's used by the Site Reliability Engineering team and Management of all levels. 

It's assisting us in proving SOC II compliance. 

We're looking to improve our usage of Datadog's RUM and APM components to get better and more performance insights on our production environments. 

We're also looking to leverage more synthetic monitors and runbooks for anyone responding to incidents.

The ability to easily drill down into log queries quickly and efficiently has helped us to resolve several critical incidents so far this year, and we heavily rely on a series of dashboards showing us various queues and load on CPU and memory for servers. 

We also have a view of the information required when we begin the patch and/or upgrade processes. 

I've also set up several monitors to alert the Site Reliability Engineering team when various metrics show a server might be reaching capacity. We use it to send an email suggesting we increase the size of the cloud instance.

The ability to easily drill down into log queries quickly and efficiently has helped us to resolve several critical incidents. We heavily rely on dashboards that are showing us various queues and load on CPU and memory for servers. 

We also have a view of the information required when we begin the patch and/or upgrade processes. 

I've arranged several monitors to alert the Site Reliability Engineering team when various metrics show a server that might be reaching capacity. We use it to send an email suggesting we increase the size of the cloud instance.

Datadog could always lower the price! In general, more demos online and maybe more free hands-on tutorials for basic functionality would be good for less technical users. 

I would also prefer more chances to amend the contract more than twice a year. As a smaller but growing company, it can be difficult to adequately predict demand.

I've used the solution for more than three years.

We use the application for our application monitoring, data security monitoring, and log management. What we like about the application is that it helps us to track issues more proactively instead of reactively.

There are other improvements we would like to see.

1. Being able to restrict users from seeing or viewing specific dashboards once they log in

2. They can cut down the prices for Cloud SIEM. It seems very useful, however, the prices are high. Some organizations are finding it difficult to make decisions in terms of getting the tool.

We use the application for our application monitoring, data security monitoring, and log management. It helps us to track issues proactively instead of reactively.

It helps us better manage our logs.

We can effectively track down issues.

We have dashboards that give us an overview of our environment.

The tools I have found useful include the Datadog cloud security posture manager and cloud workload security.

Datadog is a great tool, and we value the services they offer. They should continue expanding and integrating with more third-party apps.

I've used the solution for three years. 

I love its stability.

It is very scalable.

Technical support has been great.

Positive

We previously used AWS.

The initial setup is not too complex.

We've seen an ROI of 50%.

It's a little pricy yet worth it.

We did not previously evaluate another solution.

We use an enterprise version of a CMS platform which is enabling businesses to transmit content to their customers. The tool is fully customizable to the end user, including out-of-the-box integrations as well as APIs for custom plugin support. 

Our systems fully manage content using AWS as the back-end cloud provider. Assets are kept in secure buckets and utilize the Kubernetes infrastructure to deliver our product to end users and internal authors. Using the CMS allows for business people to manage content without needing development efforts.

This tool is the sole purpose of my company and the solutions we provide around it. Enabling customers to manage their content in a fast, reliable, and highly user-friendly setup has been critical to our success. 

Offering our product at SaaS, PaaS, cloud, and on-prem editions has enabled us to provide a solution for all types of customers. 

The platform appeals to companies spanning many industries on a global scale. 

Being based in SUI allows us to secure both the EU and other companies more easily.

The enterprise version of a CMS platform enables businesses to transmit content to their customers. 

The tool is fully customizable to the end user, including out-of-the-box integrations as well as APIs for custom plugin support. 

The content is fully managed within our systems using AWS as the back-end cloud provider. Assets are kept in secure buckets, and we can utilize the Kubernetes infrastructure to deliver our product to end users and internal authors. 

Using the CMS allows for business people to manage content without needing development efforts. Allowing this type of setup for business users has been a key reason for our success.

There is always room for improvement when dealing with cloud-based technologies. Mainly, I would say, it's just increasing our offerings to attract various other types of industries and businesses across more fields. 

New features as requested by our existing customers will help make the product better.

The product was self-developed.

We use a SaaS deployment. 

Ingesting data from various sources to monitor the log metrics of the system and enabling an alert mechanism to notify the teammates if something goes wrong.

More specifically, having Datadog agents as integration to different services provides easy access and management.

The solution has helped out organization by allowing us to ingest data from various sources to monitor log metrics and enabling alert mechanisms to notify teams if something goes wrong.

Datadog agents act as an integration to different services, providing easy access and management.

The solution is useful for ingesting data from various sources. This helps to monitor the log metrics of the system. It has alert mechanisms that can be enabled to notify the teams if something goes wrong.

Datadog offers good integration to different services. It provides for easy access and management.

Ingesting data from various sources to monitor the log metrics of the system can always improve so that, if something goes wrong, the right teams are alerted. 

We've used the solution for close to 1.5 years.

We use a SaaS deployment.

We have deep integration with Datadog for observability and monitoring.

We use everything from APM, logs, and RUM to monitor and dashboards for tracking system health. 

We are trying to move from many different solutions for error tracking/observability to a single platform (Datadog).

We are currently in the process of setting up logging in Datadog in order to maintain our logs better. We are looking to create more insights into the real user flows by using real user monitoring (RUM) too.

We use Datadog quite extensively. I primarily work with APM traces and logs to debug issues and unblock myself in my day-to-day role. I have found the traces and spans most useful in providing details about why certain services are performing poorly.

Datadog provides a lot of value in terms of adding monitoring and observability to our app. There are so many different solutions, it is sometimes difficult to gauge where to start, and I sometimes miss a lot of functionality (such as the very useful error-tracking dashboard mentioned in my review above).

As I mentioned above, we use Datadog quite extensively. In my day-to-day role, I primarily work with APM traces and logs to debug issues and unblock myself. 

I have found the traces and spans most useful in providing details about why certain services are performing poorly.

Additionally, the flexibility to create notebooks and dashboards and fully customize them gives us a lot of power to track the exact services and endpoints we are working on.

Furthermore, we are also using monitoring to page us if things break, and the Slack integration provides us instantaneous feedback on how things are performing.

We need more visibility into the error tracking dashboard. I only learned about it during a demo at Dash Con. That said, it seems to be a very useful tool.

Additionally, we want to export our dashboards and monitors to source control, and there doesn't seem to be any easy way to do so.

I've used the solution for four years.

For logging, we are moving from LogDNA to Datadog to have access to everything in one place. Also, searching and traversing through logs seems easier in Datadog

I did not evaluate others, however, my team probably did.

Datadog provides a lot of value in terms of adding monitoring and observability to our app. There are so many different solutions; it is sometimes difficult to gauge where to start, and I sometimes miss a lot of functionality. For example, the very useful error-tracking dashboard that I just discovered.

We use Datadog for application logs, error tracking, performance tracking, alerting, and overall production state surveillance. 

It helps us improve observability and ease of maintenance through better information for our support teams and their issue qualification. 

We also use dashboards to keep all the information at ready and easy to access. SLOs notably for our uptimes but also our feature usage. It also feeds our alerting for our on-call SREs into PagerDuty by launching alerts when specific parameters are exceeded.

Our usage of Datadog has allowed us to improve our observability at great lengths. We have been able to track pain points more easily with it, and be able to define custom metrics to track our user's usage of the features we roll out.

Being able to generate dashboards has given higher management a better view of our teams' work and has allowed for better client information by our sales team as they have a more transparent way ofdealing with our upcoming features.

Dashboards and their versatility are among the most valuable features. They allow us to have internal facing trackers of our application's issues, usages, and features. They also allow us to have a better understanding of how users react to new features, and to display more information to other teams or also clients through uptime SLOs, et cetera.

We also found the Synthetics Tests and especially the Browser Tests very helpful. It is a nicer way to create end-to-end tests in a more user-friendly way than through code. They are very valuable in saving time compared to code-based testing.

Documentation is also very clear and interesting.

We would like to see some versioning system for the Synthetic Tests so that we could have a backup of our tests since they are time-consuming to make and very easy to damage in a moment of error.

I look forward to seeing the next features that will be released.

I have been using the product for a year and a half. The company has been using it for longer. I don't know the exact details.

We have yet to have a large-scale problem with stability using Datadog. It's very satisfying.

The scalability is very good.

I've had only a few experiences with customer support, and it went well. They were fast!

Positive

We did not use a different solution previously.

I wasn't there for the initial setup.

I wasn't there for the initial setup.

I cna't speak to the ROI.

I don't give advice regarding that.

I wasn't part of the decision-making process.

It would be nicer if the pricing information was easier to find in the documentation. Sometimes it helps to get an overall idea of the cost of certain options.

We use the solution for monitoring, logging, and alerts. 

Thanks to Datadog, we report errors using the logger integrated into our services, which is crucial since we only do unit tests. The infrastructure team handles the monitoring part, so I can't give more insights about that. I am an API developer, so I use Datadog mainly for logging.

The alerts are connected to Microsoft Teams in a specific channel, and we pay a lot of attention to it, and we usually create tickets based on these alerts.

Thanks to the logs, we manage to make better reports through Jira and also to trace the request with more facility than we would be able to do otherwise. 

Since there are many teams in my company, the fact that we can share the trace of an error, for example, together with all the information about the log, we are able to save a lot of time when it comes to communication between everyone.

The most valuable feature for me so far is logging. We do not do integration tests, so we rely a lot on tracing all the requests and we report errors to different teams in the company together with logs that we take from Datadog.

Since I am an API developer, I do not use so much with the other features. Also, I have been in the company for only four months. I have only worked with monitors and alters.

I value tracing the request and being able to tell other teams which component, service, or line of code has an issue.

Since I have only been in the organization for four months, I only worked with the log, alerts, and monitoring. I do not have so many insights to share about what can be improved.

I am not an expert user, and not even an intermediate user yet. Rather, I am a beginner.

That said when the logs are too big, and Datadog splits them, the JSON format breaks and it is not so useful for us.

I've used the solution for four months.

I did not previously use a different solution.

I will get informed about this, I have no idea about costs as an API developer. But I get curious about it

I did not evaluate other options previously.

The product is used for APM solutions for the metrics and traces for the REST API requests and service maps to understand the upstream and downstream services.

We are creating dashboards and widgets to monitor the status. We are creating alerts and monitors as well. We integrated the alerts and ticketing system in our organization with SNOW and Netcool.

We are using Kubernetes, AWS, and infrastructure metrics. We are using Kafka and Aurora Postgres logs as well, and we are using HTTP status codes to identify the error types.

So far, the solution works very well and solves most of the problems we have. Currently, we are trying to integrate the trace ID into Datadog and correlate the logs and metrics. However, Datadog is not supporting the spring-generated trace IDs, and they are not shown in the Datadog UI. It works in reverse. This means Datadog injects the DD-specific trace ID into the application logs, and those logs can be in other tools, for example, Cloud Watch and Splunk. 

The most valuable aspect is the APM which can monitor the metrics and latencies. There's a low error rate, and any alerts can be tagged to the service requests and sent via email to the required DLs. 

We can create incidents as well in our internal tools, like SNOW and Netcool.

The monitoring enables different dimensions of metrics to monitor the services and infrastructure. 

We have cloud infrastructure monitoring in Kubernetes nodes, pods containers, and ingress metrics.

Alerts are sent to an email in case of any issues. The metrics are used to create alerts.

The solution offers good dashboards, service maps, traces and flame graphs, HTTP status codes, power packs, service catalogs, and profiling.

While the logs module is not activated, we are using all other modules.

The correlation between the logs and the metrics needs improvement as most cases, we might use another logging tool (that is cheaper in cost) which then we have to link together. 

They can improve the SSO logging as well. Currently, we are logging in every two to three days by sending the login link explicitly.

I've been using the solution for two years. 

The stability is awesome. 

We are expanding beyond observability right now.

They offer pretty awesome customer support.

Positive

We did not previously use a different solution.

The initial setup was easy.

We implemented the solution with the help of a vendor team.

I'd rate the ROI ten out of ten.

I would recommend Datadog to others.

We also evaluated ECE and Splunk.

The solution has a great support model.

The RUM is implemented for customer support session replays to quickly route, triage, and troubleshoot support issues which can be sent to our engineering teams directly. 

Customer Support will log in directly after receiving a customer request and work on the issue. Engineers will utilize the replay along with RUM to pinpoint the issue combined with APM and Infra trace to be able to look for signals to find the direct cause of the customer impact. 

Incident management will be utilized to open a Jira ticket for engineering, and it integrates with ITSM systems and on-call as needed.

The RUM solution has improved our ability to triage faster and hand more capabilities to our customer support.

The RUM is implemented for customer support. It can quickly route, triage, and troubleshoot support issues that are sent to our engineering teams. 

Customer support can log in and start troubleshooting after receiving a customer request. The replay and RUM help pinpoint the issue. This functionality is combined with APM and Infra trace to be able to look for the cause of the issue. Incident management is leveraged to open a Jira ticket for engineering, and it can integrate with ITSM systems and on-call as needed.

RUM with session replay combined with a future use case to support synthetics will help to identify issues earlier in our process. We have not rolled this out yet but plan for it as a future use case for our customer support process. This, combined with integrated automation for incident management, will drive down our MTTR and time spent working through tickets. Overall, we are hoping to use this to look at our data and perfection rate over time in a BI-like way to reduce our customer support headcount by saving on time spent.

I would like to see retention options greater than 30-days for session replay. I'd also like to see forwarding options for retention to custom solutions, and a greater ability to event and export data from the tooling overall to BI/DW solutions for reporting across the long term and to see trends as needed.

I've used the solution for about nine months.

So far, stability has been great.

I'd like to see more bells and whistles added over time. Widgets are coming soon to help with RUM.

Support is very good. They are responsive and gave us the help we need.

Positive

We have utilized New Relic, however, not for RUM. We went with Datadog to potentially switch the entire platform into an all-in-one solution that makes sense for a company of our size.

We started on the beta, and the documentation was lagging behind. We also needed direct instructions and links from the customer support/account representative that was not immediately available by searching online.

We implemented the solution ourselves.

Ideally, this will inform our strategy to not increase our customer support headcount as significantly into 2023 and beyond.

The pricing is a bit confusing. However, the RUM session replay, in general, is very inexpensive compared to whole solutions.

We looked into LogRocket and New Relic.

I'd advise other users to try it out.