Top 10 Datadog Alternatives

4.3 out of 5

188 reviews
97% willing to recommend

Top Datadog Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Datadog based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Wazuh, Wiz, and Dynatrace. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Datadog surpasses its competitors by offering comprehensive monitoring, robust analytics, seamless cloud integration, and intuitive dashboards, enabling organizations to optimize performance, enhance security, and drive efficient incident management across diverse infrastructures.

Datadog Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Datadog, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Wazuh

3.7 out of 5

Wazuh

3.7 out of 5

Datadog offers sharable dashboards and API integrations, supporting various platforms for efficient monitoring. In comparison, Wazuh provides file integrity and vulnerability detection for compliance. Datadog's infrastructure solution contrasts with Wazuh's open-source model suited for budget-conscious organizations.

Download Datadog vs. Wazuh Report

Pricing

Datadog's setup cost is straightforward while Wazuh offers flexibility with its open-source model, highlighting a key difference in initial investment requirements.

View comparison

Pricing

Datadog's setup cost is straightforward while Wazuh offers flexibility with its open-source model, highlighting a key difference in initial investment requirements.

Wiz

4.5 out of 5

Wiz

4.5 out of 5

Datadog offers a comprehensive suite of monitoring features and seamless integrations for diverse environments. In comparison, Wiz excels in cloud-native security and threat intelligence, making it ideal for compliance and vulnerability management in cloud settings. Datadog's straightforward deployment contrasts with Wiz's agentless setup for cloud environments.

Download Datadog vs. Wiz Report

Pricing

Datadog's setup costs can be prohibitive, while Wiz offers more affordable initial setup options. This highlights a significant difference in the initial investment required for using each product.

View comparison

Pricing

Datadog's setup costs can be prohibitive, while Wiz offers more affordable initial setup options. This highlights a significant difference in the initial investment required for using each product.

Dynatrace

4.4 out of 5

Dynatrace

4.4 out of 5

Dynatrace offers robust capabilities like end-to-end visibility and AI-driven insights that enhance root cause analysis. In comparison, Datadog integrates logging and monitoring with a focus on cloud environments, emphasizing automation and ease of deployment.

Download Datadog vs. Dynatrace Report

Pricing

Dynatrace requires a higher setup cost, offering robust monitoring capabilities. Datadog provides a more affordable initial setup, emphasizing ease of use.

View comparison

Pricing

Dynatrace requires a higher setup cost, offering robust monitoring capabilities. Datadog provides a more affordable initial setup, emphasizing ease of use.

Zabbix

4.2 out of 5

Zabbix

4.2 out of 5

Zabbix offers open-source flexibility and cost-efficiency for scalable monitoring. In comparison, Datadog provides extensive integrations and unified dashboards for cloud infrastructure. Zabbix suits enterprises seeking savings, while Datadog appeals to those prioritizing seamless SaaS deployment and advanced cloud tools despite higher costs.

Download Datadog vs. Zabbix Report

Pricing

Zabbix offers lower setup costs, making it budget-friendly, whereas Datadog provides more premium pricing aligned with its extensive features.

View comparison

Pricing

Zabbix offers lower setup costs, making it budget-friendly, whereas Datadog provides more premium pricing aligned with its extensive features.

Splunk Enterprise Security

4.2 out of 5

Splunk Enterprise Security

4.2 out of 5

Splunk Enterprise Security excels in robust analytics and incident response across environments, suited for large enterprises needing deep analytics. In comparison, Datadog excels in real-time monitoring and offers integration across multi-cloud environments, appealing to those seeking seamless operation and cost management.

Download Datadog vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report

Pricing

Splunk Enterprise Security tends to have a higher setup cost compared to Datadog, which offers a more flexible pricing approach.

View comparison

Pricing

Splunk Enterprise Security tends to have a higher setup cost compared to Datadog, which offers a more flexible pricing approach.

Microsoft Defender for Cloud

4.0 out of 5

Microsoft Defender for Cloud

4.0 out of 5

Datadog excels with its hosted setup and integration ecosystem, ideal for those needing comprehensive monitoring and intuitive dashboards. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Cloud focuses on regulatory compliance and multi-cloud flexibility, benefiting users seeking strong security enhancements and Microsoft tool integrations.

Download Datadog vs. Microsoft Defender for Cloud Report

Pricing

Datadog offers a transparent setup cost structure, while Microsoft Defender for Cloud provides competitive pricing with variable options based on cloud environments.

View comparison

Pricing

Datadog offers a transparent setup cost structure, while Microsoft Defender for Cloud provides competitive pricing with variable options based on cloud environments.

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks

4.2 out of 5

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks

4.2 out of 5

Datadog offers seamless monitoring solutions with actionable analytics and integrations. In comparison, Prisma Cloud excels at providing security features like threat detection for multi-cloud environments. Tech buyers might choose Datadog for monitoring flexibility or Prisma Cloud for robust security capabilities.

Download Datadog vs. Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Report

Pricing

Datadog offers a straightforward setup process with minimal costs, while Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks may involve more complex implementation and higher initial expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

Datadog offers a straightforward setup process with minimal costs, while Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks may involve more complex implementation and higher initial expenses.

Darktrace

4.1 out of 5

Darktrace

4.1 out of 5

Datadog offers extensive integration capabilities, enhancing monitoring and data visualization across multiple accounts. In comparison, Darktrace focuses on AI-driven cybersecurity, providing comprehensive threat detection and response. Tech buyers may choose Datadog for operational efficiency or Darktrace for advanced security insights.

Download Darktrace vs. Datadog Report

Pricing

Datadog's setup cost is more budget-friendly compared to Darktrace, which demands a higher initial investment, highlighting a significant cost disparity.

View comparison

Pricing

Datadog's setup cost is more budget-friendly compared to Darktrace, which demands a higher initial investment, highlighting a significant cost disparity.

New Relic

4.2 out of 5

New Relic

4.2 out of 5

Datadog offers intuitive monitoring with strong visualization, suitable for easy use without extensive infrastructure management. In comparison, New Relic excels in real-time application performance and synthetic testing, providing flexible pricing advantageous for smaller setups aiming for efficient application monitoring and performance improvement.

Download Datadog vs. New Relic Report

Pricing

Datadog offers straightforward setup costs, while New Relic has a more flexible pricing structure tailored to specific needs, emphasizing contrasting approaches in their initial cost strategies.

View comparison

Pricing

Datadog offers straightforward setup costs, while New Relic has a more flexible pricing structure tailored to specific needs, emphasizing contrasting approaches in their initial cost strategies.

IBM Security QRadar

4.0 out of 5

IBM Security QRadar

4.0 out of 5

IBM Security QRadar excels in scalability and compliance monitoring, ideal for enterprises needing robust security intelligence. In comparison, Datadog provides seamless integrations and real-time analytics, benefiting cloud-centric environments. Tech buyers might choose QRadar for security focus, whereas Datadog offers optimized application monitoring.

Download Datadog vs. IBM Security QRadar Report

Pricing

IBM Security QRadar involves a higher setup cost but offers a comprehensive security suite, while Datadog provides a lower initial investment with scalable monitoring options.

View comparison

Pricing

IBM Security QRadar involves a higher setup cost but offers a comprehensive security suite, while Datadog provides a lower initial investment with scalable monitoring options.

Show 40 more products

Related categories

Cloud Monitoring Software

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Network Monitoring Software