Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Datadog Logo

Top 10 Datadog Alternatives

Vendor: Datadog
4.3 out of 5
Badge Ranked 1
Leave a review

Top Datadog Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Datadog based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Wazuh, Wiz, and Zabbix. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Datadog surpasses its competitors by offering real-time visibility, flexible alerting, and seamless integrations, enabling comprehensive monitoring across cloud environments and enhancing operational efficiency for businesses.

Datadog Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Datadog, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Datadog Logo
Wazuh
3.7 out of 5
Datadog Logo
Wazuh
3.7 out of 5
Datadog offers flexible cloud deployment and comprehensive monitoring, appealing to those seeking multi-integration management despite high costs. In comparison, Wazuh is open-source, focusing on security with threat detection modules, drawing businesses looking for low-cost, self-supported infrastructures.
Download Datadog vs. Wazuh Report
Datadog typically incurs a higher setup cost given its range of advanced features, while Wazuh often presents a more cost-effective setup option, making it appealing for budget-conscious organizations seeking essential security monitoring.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog typically incurs a higher setup cost given its range of advanced features, while Wazuh often presents a more cost-effective setup option, making it appealing for budget-conscious organizations seeking essential security monitoring.
Datadog Logo
Wiz
4.5 out of 5
Datadog Logo
Wiz
4.5 out of 5
Datadog offers user-friendly dashboards and integrations for seamless monitoring, appealing to both technical and non-technical users. In comparison, Wiz excels in cloud security with advanced risk analysis and reveals critical threats, making it ideal for security-focused environments.
Download Datadog vs. Wiz Report
Datadog has a minimal setup cost, ensuring quick deployment, whereas Wiz requires a higher initial investment, potentially impacting initial budgeting.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog has a minimal setup cost, ensuring quick deployment, whereas Wiz requires a higher initial investment, potentially impacting initial budgeting.
Datadog Logo
Zabbix
4.2 out of 5
Datadog Logo
Zabbix
4.2 out of 5
Zabbix offers flexibility and no-cost access to comprehensive monitoring, ideal for cost-conscious enterprises. In comparison, Datadog provides rich features and ease of use but at a higher cost, appealing to those prioritizing seamless integration and professional support.
Download Datadog vs. Zabbix Report
Zabbix requires no setup cost, making it a cost-effective choice, while Datadog's setup costs might be higher, reflecting its comprehensive feature set. Note this key difference when evaluating the two solutions for your needs.
View comparison
Pricing
Zabbix requires no setup cost, making it a cost-effective choice, while Datadog's setup costs might be higher, reflecting its comprehensive feature set. Note this key difference when evaluating the two solutions for your needs.
Datadog Logo
Datadog Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security
4.3 out of 5
Datadog offers versatile infrastructure monitoring with real-time anomaly detection, while SentinelOne Singularity emphasizes cloud security through automated threat response. In comparison, Datadog excels in infrastructure monitoring, whereas SentinelOne Singularity provides robust security enhancements with competitive pricing options.
Download Datadog vs. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Report
Datadog's setup cost is straightforward, whereas SentinelOne Singularity has a more complex pricing structure; Datadog offers simplicity and transparency, while SentinelOne provides a detailed, customizable approach.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog's setup cost is straightforward, whereas SentinelOne Singularity has a more complex pricing structure; Datadog offers simplicity and transparency, while SentinelOne provides a detailed, customizable approach.
Datadog Logo
Dynatrace
4.4 out of 5
Datadog Logo
Dynatrace
4.4 out of 5
Dynatrace excels in AI-driven automation and full-stack monitoring, providing deep insights for complex environments. In comparison, Datadog's extensive integrations and real-time data analysis offer flexible solutions for diverse needs, with tiered pricing facilitating scalability and quicker investment returns.
Download Datadog vs. Dynatrace Report
Dynatrace setup cost is higher due to its comprehensive features, while Datadog offers a more affordable initial setup. This cost difference reflects their varying feature sets and target audiences, providing options based on budget considerations.
View comparison
Pricing
Dynatrace setup cost is higher due to its comprehensive features, while Datadog offers a more affordable initial setup. This cost difference reflects their varying feature sets and target audiences, providing options based on budget considerations.
Datadog Logo
Datadog Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security prioritizes integration and threat detection, appealing to those focused on security intelligence. In comparison, Datadog offers real-time infrastructure monitoring and scalable deployment, attracting organizations seeking flexible and simplified monitoring solutions.
Download Datadog vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security's setup cost is significant, while Datadog offers a more budget-friendly setup, highlighting a clear price distinction.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security's setup cost is significant, while Datadog offers a more budget-friendly setup, highlighting a clear price distinction.
Datadog Logo
Snyk
4.1 out of 5
Datadog Logo
Snyk
4.1 out of 5
Datadog offers robust cloud monitoring with extensive integrations, excelling in operational analytics. In comparison, Snyk focuses on security solutions, offering a comprehensive vulnerability database integrated with DevOps tools. Each caters to specific needs, with Datadog enhancing monitoring and Snyk reinforcing security checks.
Download Datadog vs. Snyk Report
Datadog offers a straightforward setup with competitive costs, while Snyk presents a flexible setup with variable costs. This highlights distinct differences in initial investment, catering to diverse budgetary considerations.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog offers a straightforward setup with competitive costs, while Snyk presents a flexible setup with variable costs. This highlights distinct differences in initial investment, catering to diverse budgetary considerations.
Datadog Logo
Datadog Logo
Microsoft Defender for Cloud
4.0 out of 5
Datadog provides a unified platform for monitoring with extensive Amazon service integrations and real-time tagging. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers multi-cloud security management, focusing on regulatory compliance and AI-driven analytics, ideal for security-centric organizations seeking advanced features and automation.
Download Datadog vs. Microsoft Defender for Cloud Report
Datadog's setup costs are noted for being upfront, whereas Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers a more integrated setup cost within its service plans.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog's setup costs are noted for being upfront, whereas Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers a more integrated setup cost within its service plans.
Datadog Logo
Datadog Logo
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks
4.2 out of 5
Datadog offers extensive monitoring and integrations, ideal for proactive cloud management. In comparison, Prisma Cloud ensures robust security across diverse environments, suitable for comprehensive compliance needs. Datadog provides flexible deployment, while Prisma Cloud offers holistic security solutions, each with unique pricing models.
Download Datadog vs. Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Report
Datadog offers transparent setup costs, while Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks presents a more complex pricing model, highlighting significant differences in budget considerations between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog offers transparent setup costs, while Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks presents a more complex pricing model, highlighting significant differences in budget considerations between the two solutions.
Datadog Logo
Darktrace
4.1 out of 5
Datadog Logo
Darktrace
4.1 out of 5
Datadog offers powerful monitoring with easy cloud integration, ideal for those seeking hosted solutions. In comparison, Darktrace provides AI-driven threat detection for security-focused operations. Tech buyers might choose Datadog for ease and integration, while Darktrace suits those prioritizing automated security.
Download Darktrace vs. Datadog Report
Datadog offers a lower setup cost, making it more accessible for initial integration. Darktrace, on the other hand, involves a higher setup cost, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity features.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog offers a lower setup cost, making it more accessible for initial integration. Darktrace, on the other hand, involves a higher setup cost, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity features.
Datadog Logo
Datadog Logo
IBM Security QRadar
4.0 out of 5
IBM Security QRadar excels with its robust scalability and intuitive configurations, offering seamless integration with various tools. In comparison, Datadog efficiently integrates across applications with a strong ecosystem and excels at monitoring complex infrastructures, both providing comprehensive features that enhance threat detection and infrastructure monitoring.
Download Datadog vs. IBM Security QRadar Report
IBM Security QRadar has a lower initial setup cost compared to Datadog, which may appeal to budget-conscious businesses evaluating these security solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM Security QRadar has a lower initial setup cost compared to Datadog, which may appeal to budget-conscious businesses evaluating these security solutions.
Datadog Logo
New Relic
4.2 out of 5
Datadog Logo
New Relic
4.2 out of 5
Datadog excels in visual insights, extensive integrations, and proactive support, ideal for diverse cloud platforms. In comparison, New Relic offers transaction tracing and backend monitoring, making it suitable for comprehensive application insights, despite its more complex pricing and documentation needs.
Download Datadog vs. New Relic Report
Datadog has a higher setup cost compared to New Relic, which offers a more cost-effective implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog has a higher setup cost compared to New Relic, which offers a more cost-effective implementation.
Datadog Logo
Splunk AppDynamics
4.1 out of 5
Datadog Logo
Splunk AppDynamics
4.1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics offers detailed application insights that aid in diagnosing issues, appealing to those needing in-depth monitoring. In comparison, Datadog excels in infrastructure monitoring with broad integrations, attracting buyers seeking a unified system health view.
Download Datadog vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics involves a higher setup cost compared to Datadog, offering a more tailored solution for complex environments while Datadog provides a cost-effective setup with straightforward scalability suitable for smaller organizations.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics involves a higher setup cost compared to Datadog, offering a more tailored solution for complex environments while Datadog provides a cost-effective setup with straightforward scalability suitable for smaller organizations.
Datadog Logo
Elastic Security
3.9 out of 5
Datadog Logo
Elastic Security
3.9 out of 5
Datadog offers seamless operations with its robust integration ecosystem and comprehensive monitoring capabilities. In comparison, Elastic Security emphasizes affordability and flexibility through open-source options, catering to those seeking budgeting advantages alongside effective threat detection and high customization levels.
Download Datadog vs. Elastic Security Report
Datadog offers a straightforward setup process with minimal initial costs, whereas Elastic Security requires a more complex setup with higher initial expenses. This highlights a significant difference in ease of onboarding and financial entry requirements between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog offers a straightforward setup process with minimal initial costs, whereas Elastic Security requires a more complex setup with higher initial expenses. This highlights a significant difference in ease of onboarding and financial entry requirements between the two solutions.
Datadog Logo
Azure Monitor
3.9 out of 5
Datadog Logo
Azure Monitor
3.9 out of 5
Datadog offers extensive integrations and detailed metrics ideal for multi-account AWS environments. In comparison, Azure Monitor provides seamless real-time analytics within Azure, beneficial for businesses using Azure services seeking efficient data exporting and visualization. Each serves distinct operational needs effectively.
Download Azure Monitor vs. Datadog Report
Datadog offers a straightforward setup with minimal initial cost, while Azure Monitor may have higher setup expenses, highlighting the cost difference at the initial stage.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog offers a straightforward setup with minimal initial cost, while Azure Monitor may have higher setup expenses, highlighting the cost difference at the initial stage.
Datadog Logo
Grafana Loki
4.1 out of 5
Datadog Logo
Grafana Loki
4.1 out of 5
Datadog offers versatility and comprehensive features, ideal for structured logging and tracing across various environments. In comparison, Grafana Loki is cost-effective and simple, suitable for microservices and on-premises setups, though it requires more effort for complex integrations and lacks advanced features.
Download Datadog vs. Grafana Loki Report
Datadog setup costs are higher, offering extensive features, while Grafana Loki is more budget-friendly with essential logging capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog setup costs are higher, offering extensive features, while Grafana Loki is more budget-friendly with essential logging capabilities.
Datadog Logo
Cribl
4.3 out of 5
Datadog Logo
Cribl
4.3 out of 5
Datadog offers intuitive dashboards and seamless integrations, appealing to non-technical users with real-time monitoring and automation features. In comparison, Cribl efficiently handles data pipelines, offering flexible data manipulation without sacrificing usability, making it suitable for handling large data volumes effectively.
Download Cribl vs. Datadog Report
Datadog's setup cost is straightforward, whereas Cribl offers a more flexible pricing model with detailed options.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog's setup cost is straightforward, whereas Cribl offers a more flexible pricing model with detailed options.
Datadog Logo
SolarWinds NPM
4.1 out of 5
Datadog Logo
SolarWinds NPM
4.1 out of 5
SolarWinds NPM is ideal for strong network management and SNMP capabilities. In comparison, Datadog excels in comprehensive observability across applications but may be cost-intensive, though its broad monitoring scope is suited for cloud-focused environments.
Download Datadog vs. SolarWinds NPM Report
SolarWinds NPM incurs a one-time setup fee, offering a straightforward pricing model, while Datadog includes setup in its flexible subscription plans, highlighting versatility and potentially lower upfront costs.
View comparison
Pricing
SolarWinds NPM incurs a one-time setup fee, offering a straightforward pricing model, while Datadog includes setup in its flexible subscription plans, highlighting versatility and potentially lower upfront costs.
Datadog Logo
Datadog Logo
PRTG Network Monitor
4.1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor is valued for rapid deployment and resource efficiency, ideal for smaller infrastructures. In comparison, Datadog offers extensive integrations and real-time analytics, suited for cloud-based environments. PRTG's clear pricing suits small setups, while Datadog's flexibility meets advanced, scalable needs.
Download Datadog vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor offers a one-time payment setup, making it cost-effective for long-term use, while Datadog requires monthly or yearly subscriptions, which might escalate costs over time.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers a one-time payment setup, making it cost-effective for long-term use, while Datadog requires monthly or yearly subscriptions, which might escalate costs over time.
Datadog Logo
Grafana
3.9 out of 5
Datadog Logo
Grafana
3.9 out of 5
Datadog offers extensive integrations and a user-friendly hosted environment, ideal for users prioritizing convenience and detailed monitoring. In comparison, Grafana provides open-source flexibility and lower cost, appealing to those needing customization and community support for in-house data management.
Download Datadog vs. Grafana Report
Datadog's setup cost is notably higher compared to Grafana, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog's setup cost is notably higher compared to Grafana, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
Datadog Logo
Sentry
4.3 out of 5
Datadog Logo
Sentry
4.3 out of 5
Datadog excels in integration and monitoring with extensive features for both technical and non-technical users. In comparison, Sentry focuses on error tracking and performance monitoring, offering detailed insights into code issues. Datadog is more feature-rich, while Sentry is cost-effective for smaller teams.
Download Datadog vs. Sentry Report
Datadog's setup costs are higher compared to Sentry's, potentially affecting initial investment decisions. Sentry offers a more cost-effective setup, which may be more appealing to budget-conscious users.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog's setup costs are higher compared to Sentry's, potentially affecting initial investment decisions. Sentry offers a more cost-effective setup, which may be more appealing to budget-conscious users.
Datadog Logo
Datadog Logo
Elastic Observability
4.0 out of 5
Datadog offers comprehensive monitoring with user-friendly features and extensive APIs, ideal for seamless integration. In comparison, Elastic Observability excels in customizable analytics and search capabilities. Datadog's cloud focus contrasts with Elastic's affordability for smaller organizations with open-source options.
Download Datadog vs. Elastic Observability Report
Datadog requires a higher initial setup investment compared to Elastic Observability, which offers a lower entry cost for users seeking quick deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog requires a higher initial setup investment compared to Elastic Observability, which offers a lower entry cost for users seeking quick deployment.
Datadog Logo
Security Onion
3.8 out of 5
Datadog Logo
Security Onion
3.8 out of 5
Datadog excels in observability with integrations and simple deployment, appealing to those prioritizing extensive monitoring solutions. In comparison, Security Onion's focus on robust security features and cost-effectiveness makes it attractive for organizations valuing layered security monitoring and incident response capabilities.
Download Datadog vs. Security Onion Report
Datadog offers a straightforward setup with competitive initial costs, while Security Onion requires a more complex installation process, potentially leading to higher upfront expenses. This difference highlights the varying ease of deployment between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog offers a straightforward setup with competitive initial costs, while Security Onion requires a more complex installation process, potentially leading to higher upfront expenses. This difference highlights the varying ease of deployment between the two solutions.
Datadog Logo
Datadog Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security
4.1 out of 5
Datadog excels in IT infrastructure monitoring offering APM, RUM, and dashboards ideal for developers. In comparison, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security provides advanced threat detection and endpoint protection, making it a strong choice for security-focused enterprises seeking minimal system impact.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs. Datadog Report
Datadog offers an accessible setup cost, whereas CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security is higher yet comprehensive. The distinct pricing structures highlight Datadog's focus on affordability compared to CrowdStrike's investment in expansive features.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog offers an accessible setup cost, whereas CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security is higher yet comprehensive. The distinct pricing structures highlight Datadog's focus on affordability compared to CrowdStrike's investment in expansive features.
Datadog Logo
Graylog Enterprise
4.0 out of 5
Datadog Logo
Graylog Enterprise
4.0 out of 5
Datadog provides robust cloud monitoring with seamless AWS integration and intuitive tagging. In comparison, Graylog excels in log management with powerful search capabilities and real-time insights, appealing to those prioritizing log analysis.
Download Datadog vs. Graylog Enterprise Report
Datadog's setup costs are straightforward with pay-as-you-go pricing, while Graylog Enterprise requires a more traditional licensing model, often resulting in higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog's setup costs are straightforward with pay-as-you-go pricing, while Graylog Enterprise requires a more traditional licensing model, often resulting in higher initial expenses.
Datadog Logo
AWS Security Hub
3.8 out of 5
Datadog Logo
AWS Security Hub
3.8 out of 5
Datadog offers robust integrations and dashboards for effective monitoring across multiple clouds. In comparison, AWS Security Hub excels in centralizing AWS security alerts but lacks extensive monitoring features. Datadog prioritizes broader deployment flexibility, whereas AWS Security Hub emphasizes AWS-native compliance and affordability.
Download AWS Security Hub vs. Datadog Report
Datadog's setup cost is lower compared to AWS Security Hub, providing a cost-effective option for businesses seeking efficient monitoring solutions. AWS Security Hub, while priced higher, offers comprehensive security features that might justify the expense for some organizations.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog's setup cost is lower compared to AWS Security Hub, providing a cost-effective option for businesses seeking efficient monitoring solutions. AWS Security Hub, while priced higher, offers comprehensive security features that might justify the expense for some organizations.
Datadog Logo
NinjaOne
4.1 out of 5
Datadog Logo
NinjaOne
4.1 out of 5
Datadog offers advanced monitoring with integrations like AWS and Docker, making it suitable for complex setups. In comparison, NinjaOne excels in remote management and affordable scaling, appealing to smaller businesses needing comprehensive device oversight and negotiable pricing models.
Download Datadog vs. NinjaOne Report
Datadog's high setup cost contrasts with NinjaOne's affordable initial setup, highlighting significant pricing differences.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog's high setup cost contrasts with NinjaOne's affordable initial setup, highlighting significant pricing differences.
Datadog Logo
Datadog Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud
4.1 out of 5
Datadog offers real-time monitoring and comprehensive dashboards with numerous integrations, appealing for its configurability and insights. In comparison, Splunk Observability Cloud excels in data visualization and AI analytics, making it ideal for integrating with AWS and Azure environments.
Download Datadog vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Datadog offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while Splunk Observability Cloud may incur higher setup expenses due to more intricate configurations.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while Splunk Observability Cloud may incur higher setup expenses due to more intricate configurations.
Datadog Logo
Orca Security
4.5 out of 5
Datadog Logo
Orca Security
4.5 out of 5
Datadog offers customizable metrics and alerts with strong cloud support for comprehensive monitoring. In comparison, Orca Security focuses on agentless insights prioritizing critical risks. Datadog emphasizes hybrid solutions, while Orca provides security with straightforward pricing and effective support.
Download Datadog vs. Orca Security Report
Datadog's setup costs are generally considered higher than those of Orca Security, which is often praised for its cost-effectiveness.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog's setup costs are generally considered higher than those of Orca Security, which is often praised for its cost-effectiveness.
Datadog Logo
ThousandEyes
4.1 out of 5
Datadog Logo
ThousandEyes
4.1 out of 5
Datadog offers extensive monitoring features including dashboards and integrations, while ThousandEyes focuses on network insights. In comparison, Datadog's comprehensive analytics aids operational efficiency. Datadog excels in APM and logging, whereas ThousandEyes targets network connectivity and troubleshooting. Pricing concerns exist for both.
Download Datadog vs. ThousandEyes Report
Datadog typically incurs higher setup costs compared to ThousandEyes, which offers more budget-friendly options.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog typically incurs higher setup costs compared to ThousandEyes, which offers more budget-friendly options.
Datadog Logo
Cisco DNA Center
4.0 out of 5
Datadog Logo
Cisco DNA Center
4.0 out of 5
Datadog, ideal for diverse cloud environments, offers extensive integrations and customizable monitoring. In comparison, Cisco DNA Center is well-suited for network management with deep device integration. Tech buyers may prefer Datadog for flexibility and Cisco DNA Center for specialized network features.
Download Cisco DNA Center vs. Datadog Report
Datadog has a straightforward setup cost, while Cisco DNA Center involves a more complex initial setup process.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog has a straightforward setup cost, while Cisco DNA Center involves a more complex initial setup process.
Datadog Logo
Nagios XI
4.0 out of 5
Datadog Logo
Nagios XI
4.0 out of 5
Nagios XI is highly customizable with robust plugin support for real-time monitoring, appealing to those needing flexibility. In comparison, Datadog's cloud-based, feature-rich suite excels in integration and enterprise capabilities, ideal for users prioritizing simplicity and extensive support services.
Download Datadog vs. Nagios XI Report
Nagios XI setup costs may require a larger initial investment, whereas Datadog has more flexible pricing options. These differences can significantly impact the budget allocation for smaller businesses considering these solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Nagios XI setup costs may require a larger initial investment, whereas Datadog has more flexible pricing options. These differences can significantly impact the budget allocation for smaller businesses considering these solutions.
Datadog Logo
LogRhythm SIEM
4.2 out of 5
Datadog Logo
LogRhythm SIEM
4.2 out of 5
Datadog offers a vast feature set for cloud-focused performance, while LogRhythm SIEM targets security and compliance strengths. In comparison, Datadog is seen as complex and costly, whereas LogRhythm SIEM may have issues with scalability and reporting but offers competitive pricing.
Download Datadog vs. LogRhythm SIEM Report
Datadog has a straightforward setup cost, while LogRhythm SIEM's setup cost is higher due to its comprehensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog has a straightforward setup cost, while LogRhythm SIEM's setup cost is higher due to its comprehensive features.
Datadog Logo
Elastic Stack
4.0 out of 5
Datadog Logo
Elastic Stack
4.0 out of 5
Datadog excels in hosted features with extensive integrations and intuitive navigation, ideal for seamless public cloud monitoring. In comparison, Elastic Stack appeals with its robust search and analytics capabilities, suitable for those prioritizing effective data insights and flexible budget options with open-source availability.
Download Datadog vs. Elastic Stack Report
Datadog requires a setup cost that can be seen as higher compared to Elastic Stack, which offers a lower entry barrier with minimal setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog requires a setup cost that can be seen as higher compared to Elastic Stack, which offers a lower entry barrier with minimal setup expenses.
Datadog Logo
LibreNMS
1 out of 5
Datadog Logo
LibreNMS
1 out of 5
Datadog addresses cloud-focused capabilities with real-time dashboards and extensive integrations, appealing to businesses prioritizing cloud infrastructure. In comparison, LibreNMS offers open-source flexibility and customizable server monitoring, ideal for organizations seeking cost-effective, community-driven solutions with extensive on-premises customization.
Datadog's setup cost is higher due to its extensive feature set, while LibreNMS offers a more budget-friendly setup option suitable for smaller networks.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog's setup cost is higher due to its extensive feature set, while LibreNMS offers a more budget-friendly setup option suitable for smaller networks.
Datadog Logo
LogicMonitor
4.5 out of 5
Datadog Logo
LogicMonitor
4.5 out of 5
Datadog offers extensive monitoring features with centralized dashboards and strong APM capabilities, suitable for diverse environments. In comparison, LogicMonitor provides customizable dashboards and predictive analytics, ideal for technology leaders focused on storage and network monitoring with transparent pricing.
Download Datadog vs. LogicMonitor Report
Datadog has a higher setup cost, while LogicMonitor offers a more economical initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog has a higher setup cost, while LogicMonitor offers a more economical initial investment.
Datadog Logo
Checkmk
4.2 out of 5
Datadog Logo
Checkmk
4.2 out of 5
Datadog offers extensive features for comprehensive insights, appealing to those needing centralized data and broad monitoring capabilities. In comparison, Checkmk attracts budget-conscious buyers with its essential monitoring tools and cost-effective pricing, ideal for straightforward deployments and critical monitoring needs.
Download Checkmk vs. Datadog Report
Datadog's setup cost is typically higher, emphasizing its comprehensive analytics, while Checkmk offers a more cost-effective setup, appealing to businesses looking for essential monitoring without additional expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog's setup cost is typically higher, emphasizing its comprehensive analytics, while Checkmk offers a more cost-effective setup, appealing to businesses looking for essential monitoring without additional expenses.
Datadog Logo
Datadog Logo
Amazon OpenSearch Service
3.8 out of 5
Datadog provides an extensive monitoring suite with integrations and dashboard capabilities appealing for diverse cloud environments. In comparison, Amazon OpenSearch Service offers efficient data searches and a managed service model, simplifying infrastructure management while being economically appealing for large data volumes.
Download Amazon OpenSearch Service vs. Datadog Report
Datadog offers a streamlined setup process that reduces time and effort for users, while Amazon OpenSearch Service involves a more complex setup, potentially increasing initial costs and implementation time.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog offers a streamlined setup process that reduces time and effort for users, while Amazon OpenSearch Service involves a more complex setup, potentially increasing initial costs and implementation time.
Datadog Logo
WhatsUp Gold
3.9 out of 5
Datadog Logo
WhatsUp Gold
3.9 out of 5
WhatsUp Gold attracts those valuing its user-friendly interface and quick deployment. In comparison, Datadog justifies higher costs with extensive integrations and detailed cloud metrics. WhatsUp Gold offers budget-friendly visibility, while Datadog suits complex environments needing scalable, detailed analytics.
Download Datadog vs. WhatsUp Gold Report
WhatsUp Gold has a higher setup cost compared to Datadog, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
WhatsUp Gold has a higher setup cost compared to Datadog, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
Datadog Logo
SCOM
3.9 out of 5
Datadog Logo
SCOM
3.9 out of 5
SCOM suits enterprises focused on on-premises Microsoft integration, offering deep customization and robust monitoring. In comparison, Datadog excels in cloud environments with comprehensive integration across platforms, appealing to tech buyers seeking advanced monitoring and flexibility despite higher costs.
Download Datadog vs. SCOM Report
SCOM typically involves higher initial setup costs, while Datadog offers a more streamlined, cost-effective setup process. These differences in setup costs can significantly influence the preference for either solution based on budget considerations.
View comparison
Pricing
SCOM typically involves higher initial setup costs, while Datadog offers a more streamlined, cost-effective setup process. These differences in setup costs can significantly influence the preference for either solution based on budget considerations.
Datadog Logo
Datadog Logo
Auvik Network Management (ANM)
4.4 out of 5
Datadog excels in integration and real-time analytics, ideal for complex networks needing comprehensive monitoring. In comparison, Auvik Network Management prioritizes ease with automated mapping and alerts, appealing to small teams seeking intuitive features. Datadog's robust features suit large operations, while ANM provides accessible value.
Download Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. Datadog Report
Datadog's setup cost involves subscription fees, while Auvik Network Management requires both subscription and additional implementation fees, highlighting a cost difference in initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog's setup cost involves subscription fees, while Auvik Network Management requires both subscription and additional implementation fees, highlighting a cost difference in initial setup.
Datadog Logo
Nagios Core
4.1 out of 5
Datadog Logo
Nagios Core
4.1 out of 5
Datadog's hosted model simplifies infrastructure management with features like integrations and intuitive dashboards, appealing to those prioritizing ease of use. In comparison, Nagios Core offers customization and flexibility with its plugins, attracting users needing tailored configurations despite a steeper learning curve.
Download Datadog vs. Nagios Core Report
Datadog typically incurs higher setup costs compared to Nagios Core, which is known for its open-source, cost-effective installation. While Nagios is more budget-friendly, Datadog offers advanced features that may justify the initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog typically incurs higher setup costs compared to Nagios Core, which is known for its open-source, cost-effective installation. While Nagios is more budget-friendly, Datadog offers advanced features that may justify the initial investment.
Datadog Logo
Amazon CloudWatch
4.0 out of 5
Datadog Logo
Amazon CloudWatch
4.0 out of 5
Datadog enhances usability with sharable dashboards and seamless integrations. In comparison, Amazon CloudWatch focuses on AWS integration. Datadog provides intuitive features and real-time data visualization, while Amazon CloudWatch offers cost-effective monitoring with essential metric collection and alerting capabilities.
Download Amazon CloudWatch vs. Datadog Report
Datadog offers a flexible setup cost with scalable pricing options, while Amazon CloudWatch provides a more straightforward setup cost with clear pricing tiers.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog offers a flexible setup cost with scalable pricing options, while Amazon CloudWatch provides a more straightforward setup cost with clear pricing tiers.
Datadog Logo
AWS X-Ray
3.9 out of 5
Datadog Logo
AWS X-Ray
3.9 out of 5
Datadog excels with numerous integrations, dashboards, anomaly detection, and intuitive setup. In comparison, AWS X-Ray offers superior tracing and bottleneck identification. Datadog's hosted nature reduces infrastructure reliance, while AWS X-Ray suits AWS-focused deployments with effective support and cost management.
Download AWS X-Ray vs. Datadog Report
Datadog's setup cost is moderate, offering easy integration, while AWS X-Ray features a lower setup cost, emphasizing cost efficiency but potentially requiring more complex initial configurations.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog's setup cost is moderate, offering easy integration, while AWS X-Ray features a lower setup cost, emphasizing cost efficiency but potentially requiring more complex initial configurations.
Datadog Logo
Icinga
3.8 out of 5
Datadog Logo
Icinga
3.8 out of 5
Datadog, as a hosted service, excels in cloud flexibility and customer support, appealing to organizations that thrive on comprehensive integration. In comparison, Icinga, with its open-source nature and plugin support, offers customization for users prioritizing control and cost-effectiveness.
Download Datadog vs. Icinga Report
Datadog presents a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, contrasting with Icinga, which involves more complex installation procedures and potentially higher setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog presents a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, contrasting with Icinga, which involves more complex installation procedures and potentially higher setup expenses.
Datadog Logo
ScienceLogic
4.3 out of 5
Datadog Logo
ScienceLogic
4.3 out of 5
ScienceLogic offers a versatile, customizable platform ideal for complex infrastructures and detailed monitoring across varied technologies. In comparison, Datadog provides extensive integrations and advanced real-time data visualization, making it a preferred choice for application monitoring with flexible deployment across cloud environments.
Download Datadog vs. ScienceLogic Report
ScienceLogic involves a significant initial investment for setup costs, while Datadog offers a more accessible and budget-friendly initiation. This key cost difference may influence user preferences when comparing these two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
ScienceLogic involves a significant initial investment for setup costs, while Datadog offers a more accessible and budget-friendly initiation. This key cost difference may influence user preferences when comparing these two solutions.
Datadog Logo
Datadog Logo
Trend Vision One - Cloud Security
4.3 out of 5
Datadog excels in user-friendly monitoring with extensive integrations and shared dashboards, ideal for diverse cloud environments. In comparison, Trend Vision One offers robust security with threat detection and flexible pricing, attracting those prioritizing fine-tuned policy control. Both support multiple cloud providers simultaneously.
Download Datadog vs. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security Report
Datadog offers low setup costs, while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security has higher startup expenses, impacting budget considerations differently.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog offers low setup costs, while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security has higher startup expenses, impacting budget considerations differently.
Datadog Logo
Datadog Logo
Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline
4.3 out of 5
Datadog excels in integrations and customizable dashboards, offering a broad monitoring spectrum. In comparison, Gigamon focuses on network visibility with packet filtering. Datadog's strength is in hosted solutions. For deep network analysis, Gigamon is preferred, emphasizing encryption management and reduced network noise.
Download Datadog vs. Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline Report
Datadog offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline entails a more complex and costlier initial configuration.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline entails a more complex and costlier initial configuration.
Datadog Logo
Datadog Logo
ServiceNow IT Operations Management
4.1 out of 5
Datadog offers sharable dashboards and API integrations for cloud monitoring without local infrastructure. In comparison, ServiceNow IT Operations Management excels in IT operations with modules like Discovery. Datadog's flexible deployments suit varied environments, whereas ServiceNow addresses asset management for large enterprises.
Download Datadog vs. ServiceNow IT Operations Management Report
Datadog's setup cost is generally lower compared to ServiceNow IT Operations Management, highlighting a more cost-effective entry for businesses seeking efficient IT monitoring solutions. ServiceNow offers a comprehensive setup, but this comes with a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog's setup cost is generally lower compared to ServiceNow IT Operations Management, highlighting a more cost-effective entry for businesses seeking efficient IT monitoring solutions. ServiceNow offers a comprehensive setup, but this comes with a higher initial investment.
Datadog Logo
Centreon
4.2 out of 5
Datadog Logo
Centreon
4.2 out of 5
Datadog provides robust integrations and tools for centralized, real-time monitoring. In comparison, Centreon offers customizable modular solutions suitable for detailed infrastructure views and personalized setups, appealing to businesses requiring extensive customization with plugins and third-party scripts.
Download Centreon vs. Datadog Report
Datadog has a higher setup cost than Centreon, highlighting a potential cost difference for initial investment, while Centreon offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog has a higher setup cost than Centreon, highlighting a potential cost difference for initial investment, while Centreon offers a more budget-friendly setup option.

Related categories

Cloud Monitoring Software
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
Network Monitoring Software