Datadog and Azure Monitor are key players in the cloud monitoring and application performance management category. Datadog seems to have an edge due to its hosted deployment model, rich integration ecosystem, and superior customer support.
Features: Datadog offers a hosted deployment, reducing infrastructure management for users. It includes sharable dashboards, extensive integrations with AWS and Slack, and intuitive metric visualization. Meanwhile, Azure Monitor provides robust real-time surveillance tools, tight integration with Azure services, and application performance insights.
Room for Improvement: Datadog users suggest more intuitive notifications and improved API consistency. They also seek better front-end support and AI-driven insights. Azure Monitor users desire enhanced log analytics, improved cross-platform integration, and clearer cost transparency.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Datadog is effective across various environments and is noted for its excellent technical support and proactive customer care, despite occasional response time issues. Azure Monitor offers smooth integration with Azure services and reliable support but can experience delays with complex support requests.
Pricing and ROI: Datadog offers significant value with a diverse toolset, though costs can escalate if not carefully managed. Users appreciate the insights provided, despite ROI being sometimes hard to quantify. Azure Monitor, with a pay-as-you-go model, is cost-effective for Azure-centric environments but may involve licensing complexities and storage costs. Datadog generally receives favorable ROI reviews for its comprehensive features, while Azure Monitor's pricing appeals to those within the Azure ecosystem.
Azure Monitor helps prevent impacts on their system.
Users end up getting no resolution from their team because they're outsourced vendors, and they don't have deeper expertise over any of the products they are referring to.
However, the second-line support is good.
I would rate the support for Azure Monitor as a seven.
Azure Monitor is very scalable; there are no issues with scalability for different kinds of businesses.
Azure Monitor is working fine, yet I face a costing issue as if there are a lot of logs collected in the workspace or in the center, it becomes very costly.
The challenges with Azure Monitor are that it's initially complex to set up because you need multiple components.
If Azure Monitor can independently add one gigabyte, two gigabytes, or five gigabytes at least to log storage, I can fix the logs without syncing with Log Analytics Workspace and Sentinel.
The cost skyrockets once you start using it, and there are complaints that the actual cost of the Kubernetes cluster was less than the cost they were incurring for Azure Monitor.
In future updates, I would like to see AI features included in Datadog for monitoring AI spend and usage to make the product more versatile and appealing for the customer.
The documentation is adequate, but team members coming into a project could benefit from more guided, interactive tutorials, ideally leveraging real-world data.
There should be a clearer view of the expenses.
When I export logs into the application, workspace, log analytic workspace, and into Sentinel to read reports, I need to add storage, which increases the cost.
The setup cost for Datadog is more than $100.
Azure Monitor full stack visibility in managing applications' health helps with APM, infrastructure monitoring, multi-cloud monitoring, security and compliance monitoring, and DevOps and automation monitoring.
Resource monitoring is essential.
The ease of access in Azure is significant because it's native to the platform and easy to integrate.
Our architecture is written in several languages, and one area where Datadog particularly shines is in providing first-class support for a multitude of programming languages.
The technology itself is generally very useful.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
Datadog | 8.5% |
Azure Monitor | 5.0% |
Other | 86.5% |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 23 |
Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
Large Enterprise | 29 |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 78 |
Midsize Enterprise | 42 |
Large Enterprise | 82 |
Azure Monitor is a comprehensive monitoring solution offered by Microsoft Azure. It provides a centralized platform for monitoring the performance and health of various Azure resources, applications, and infrastructure.
With Azure Monitor, users can gain insights into the availability, performance, and usage of their applications and infrastructure. The key features of Azure Monitor include metrics, logs, alerts, and dashboards. Metrics allow users to collect and analyze performance data from various Azure resources, such as virtual machines, databases, and storage accounts.
Logs enable users to collect and analyze log data from different sources, including Azure resources, applications, and operating systems. Azure Monitor also provides a robust alerting mechanism that allows users to set up alerts based on specific conditions or thresholds. These alerts can be configured to notify users via email, SMS, or other notification channels. Additionally, Azure Monitor offers customizable dashboards that allow users to visualize and analyze their monitoring data in a personalized and intuitive manner.
Azure Monitor integrates seamlessly with other Azure services, such as Azure Automation and Azure Logic Apps, enabling users to automate actions based on monitoring data. It also supports integration with third-party monitoring tools and services, providing flexibility and extensibility.
Overall, Azure Monitor is a powerful and versatile monitoring solution that helps users gain deep insights into the performance and health of their Azure resources and applications. It offers a wide range of features and integrations, making it a comprehensive solution for monitoring and managing Azure environments.
Datadog integrates extensive monitoring solutions with features like customizable dashboards and real-time alerting, supporting efficient system management. Its seamless integration capabilities with tools like AWS and Slack make it a critical part of cloud infrastructure monitoring.
Datadog offers centralized logging and monitoring, making troubleshooting fast and efficient. It facilitates performance tracking in cloud environments such as AWS and Azure, utilizing tools like EC2 and APM for service management. Custom metrics and alerts improve the ability to respond to issues swiftly, while real-time tools enhance system responsiveness. However, users express the need for improved query performance, a more intuitive UI, and increased integration capabilities. Concerns about the pricing model's complexity have led to calls for greater transparency and control, and additional advanced customization options are sought. Datadog's implementation requires attention to these aspects, with enhanced documentation and onboarding recommended to reduce the learning curve.
What are Datadog's Key Features?In industries like finance and technology, Datadog is implemented for its monitoring capabilities across cloud architectures. Its ability to aggregate logs and provide a unified view enhances reliability in environments demanding high performance. By leveraging real-time insights and integration with platforms like AWS and Azure, organizations in these sectors efficiently manage their cloud infrastructures, ensuring optimal performance and proactive issue resolution.
We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.