Datadog Reviews

I implement this solution for clients.

I have found some of the most valuable features to be the way things all come together that gives us a point of view that is useful. The panel is very beautiful and customizable. The configuration file was really helpful, we were able to configure the solution in the way we needed. The portability of this solution is more flexible than other competitors, allowing us to change cloud services when we want. We are not locked into a particular one.

The solution is scalable.

We have used CloudWatch previously and this solution is better at meeting all our needs.

The installation is easy for me. However, if you are new to this solution it might not be so easy.

I am an implementor, I did the implantation of the solution.

I rate Datadog a nine out of ten.

We use it for monitoring and instrumentation of security. We secure our databases and servers. It is typically for the security of apps, services, and systems. We are using its latest version.

It has reduced some challenges, and it has optimized the time spent on monitoring and management activities. It has improved the visualization and the ability to monitor and control.

Datadog increases our visibility. It puts all the data in one log so that we can use that log in a contextual manner. Some operational optimizations definitely have happened with this solution. In general, the user community is happier than before. We are basically asking them every quarter how happy they are on a scale of zero to five. That needle has moved but not significantly. If it was 3 earlier, it is still less than 3.5 now, but the user experience is better than before. 

Because of this monitoring, we are empowered to publish certain dashboards for the business folks as well. We have three to five senior business folks who are looking at their investments and operations optimization. They are basically putting money on the table for this.

Its integration definitely stands out. It provides seamless monitoring of all our systems, services, apps, and whatever else we secure and monitor. 

Visualizations have become simpler with dashboards. We are getting visibility into systems, services, and apps stack through a single pane of glass, which is good. We are able to put logs in context.

It can have an artificial intelligence component. Even though I can seamlessly look at end-to-end security, it would be better to have alerts and notifications powered by an AI engine. I am not sure if they have an AI component. We have not reached out to them or looked at it, but this is something that I keep on talking about within our company in terms of features. Such a feature would be good to have, and it would further optimize my Security Ops team's abilities.

I have been using this solution for almost six months now.

It is stable. There is nothing critical about it. I've not heard of any significant issues in terms of operating this solution in the last six months.

We have only been using it for six months, and we haven't scaled it. Six months are nothing for such a solution.

We do monitoring as a service, and we have a hundred team members in the team. There are between 30 to 50 users who actively use it in some way.

We had Carbon Black. We didn't switch from Carbon Black to Datadog. Datadog was something different because of the visualization capability and bringing everything together. We acquired a couple of companies, and Datadog was being purchased. We just validated the purchase specification, features, and assessments. It was not a one-on-one sort of exchange of Carbon Black with Datadog.

It was easier than what we had been using in the past. It is a SaaS-based solution, and it was supposed to be a straightforward setup.

It is too early for that. I have not yet seen the impact on my budgetary lines or process optimization. I had ten people in my Security Ops team earlier, and I still have ten people. They are definitely happier as users than before, but what does that give to the organization is not yet clear to me. 

I would rate Datadog a seven out of ten. It is too early to say whether we are getting our money's worth, but we have felt the difference in terms of optimization and user experience.

We primarily use DataDog for performance and log monitoring of cloud environments, which include VMs and Azure Services like Azure compute, storage, network, firewall, and app services via event hubs.  

Alerting based on monitors via teams and PagerDuty. 

Logs collection for Azure services like Azure database, Azure Application Gateway, Azure AKS, and other Azure services.

Custom metrics using a Python script to collect metrics for components not natively supported by Datadog.

Synthetic testing to ensure uptime and browser tests via CI/CD pipeline.

Datadog has improved our visibility into infrastructure topology and performance. It provided a simplified view and ability to drill down to system performance, process usage, and logs.

We were able to set up monitors for infrastructure and applications, as the metrics were readily available in the platform. Fine-tuning monitors is very easy and the ability to configure monitor alerts with details on how to resolve the alert is a key value add. 

Integration with PagerDuty, teams ensure timely alerting. PagerDuty integration bring tags from Datadog to PagerDuty, which is very useful in routing incidents to the right service

The Host Map, Live Process provides performance metrics of our application. The support team likes using Datadog for identifying resources affected and obtaining the logs. 

Monitors are easy and quick to setup. Metrics are easily accessible and quick to use. The ability to send notifications based on metadata from the monitor is helpful. The setup for monitors is one time and it works for all workloads, whether it is Azure or any other cloud.

Logs rehydration helps us archive and rehydrate logs as we need. We don't need logs to be indexed at all times. Logs are required only for escalations and rehydrating does the job and provides cost savings.

We need the ability to create a service dependency map like Splunk ITSI. We have to build this in PagerDuty and it's not the best user experience. The ability to create custom inventory objects based on logs ingested would be a value add. It would be better if Datadog makes this a simple click and enable.

It would be helpful to have the ability to upgrade agents via the Datadog portal. Once agents are connected to the Datadog portal, we should be able to upgrade them quickly.

Security monitoring for Azure and Operating System (Windows and Linux) are features that need to be addressed.

Dashboards for Azure Active Directory metrics and events should be improved.

We have been using Datadog for more than six months.

Stability-wise, it has been good.

The scalability is good so far. 

Support team has been very responsive. Only complain is on issues they don't understand, they should have a quick call and unblock the customer.

We didn't have a solution in place. The only thing we had were logs.

Setup is hassle-free and pretty straightforward. 

I deployed it myself.

No returns yet. We are in growth mode. If this becomes expensive we may have to look at alternative options.

The cost is high and this can be justified if the scale of the environment is big.

Datadog needs to provide better pricing for large customers.

Prior to implementing Datadog, we evaluated Splunk.

Overall, the Datadog product is really good.

It doesn't need a sales team and yet, the sales team has screwed up on some occasions. It's a great product and the customer success needs to put an extra effort to help customers with best practices rather than passing them off to support.

Customer success doesn't evangelize product features and the customer doesn't know what new is coming unless they ask about it.

We use Datadog as a monitoring platform to achieve visibility into our container environments.

Almost all of our workloads are containerized and with DataDog, we are able to get metrics, logs, alerts, and events about all the containers that we are running. Our developers also extensively use APM to find and diagnose performance issues that might appear.

We use Terraform to automatically create all of the necessary monitors and dashboards that our developers need to make sure that our level of service is sufficient.

We implemented Datadog around the same time as the company was growing from 30 to 150 people. Before that, we didn't have a standard stack for monitoring. Each team used their own logging solutions, metrics were missing or non-existent, and it was impossible to correlates metrics collected by different teams. DataDog provided us with an out-of-the-box solution that allowed us to focus on putting in place practices and processes around monitoring, rather than focus on implementation details.

Every squad is now confident in their ability to quickly identify and diagnose issues when they arise.

The fact that everything is under a single pane of glass is really valuable, as developers don't have to spend their time copying correlation IDs across tools to find what they need.

Thanks to the unified tagging system, it's really easy to jump around the different Datadog products without losing the context. That makes debugging really easy for developers because they can go from APM to logs to metrics in a few clicks.

Watchdog is also a great feature that helped us identify overlooked issues more than once.

The incident management beta looks promising, but it is still missing the ability to automatically create incidents based on certain alerts.

SLOs are also a great way to visualize how you are doing with regard to the level of service that you are providing but it missing crucial components like:

• The ability to visualize the remaining error budget and how it evolved during the month. An error budget burndown graph would be helpful.
• The ability to display a different level of alert on an SLO based on how fast it is consuming the error budget. This is the slow burn versus fast burn.

We've been using Datadog for a bit more than two years.

There is extensive documentation and the support is very reactive.

Prior to using Datadog, each team was using their own solutions. This included a mix of custom tooling, third-party tools, and AWS tools.

The initial setup is very easy. 

We primarily use this product for availability and performance monitoring, log aggregation.

Datadog gave us awesome visibility across all of our applications.

The most valuable features are logging, the extensive set of integrations, and easy jumpstart.

In the past two years, there have been a couple of outages.

We have been using Datadog for two years.

The outages that we have had in the past two years were fixed in a matter of minutes.

So far we did not have any issues with scaling, and everything is working great.

Support is awesome.

We did use NewRelic, but the logging feature was not as good as it is in Datadog.

The initial setup is straightforward and everything is very well documented and easy to start using.

We implemented it in-house.

We evaluated a custom ELK solution, Sumo Logic, and Logentries.

Datadog is already covering much more than we normally need with exceptional quality. This is a great product.

Our primary use of Datadog includes: 

• Keeping a close look into our AWS resources. Monitoring our multiple RDS and ElastiCache instances play a big role in our indicators.
• Kubernetes. We aren't using all of the available Kubernetes integrations but the few of them that work out of the box adds great value to our metrics.
• Monitoring and alerting. We wired our most relevant monitoring and alerts to services like PagerDuty, and for the rest of them, we keep our engineers up to date with constant Slack updates. 
  

Observability is something that a lot of Companies are trying to achieve. Having a clear view, not only of our infrastructure but our apps and services as well, has brought a great added value to our customers.

For a logging solution, we use to have Papertrail. It did the trick but having a single point that manages and indexes all the logs is a BIG improvement. Also, having the option to generate metrics from logs is a game-changer that we're trying to include in our monitoring strategy.

I would like to say the same about APM but the support for PHP seems to be somewhat lacking. It works but I think this service could provide us more information.

With respect to logs, we used to integrate various kinds of tools to achieve very basic tasks and it always felt like a very fragile solution. I think logs are by far the most useful feature and at the same time, the one that we could improve.

APM - This is either a hit or miss, allow me to explain: we use various programming languages, mainly PHP and Ruby, and the traces generated don't always provide all of the information we want. For example, we get a great level of detail for the SQL queries that the app generates but not so much for the PHP side. It's hard to track where exactly where all of the bottlenecks are, so some analysis tools for APM could make a good addition.

Please add PHP profiling; you already have it for other popular programming languages such as Python and Java, which is great because we have a little bit of those, but our main app is powered by PHP and we don't have profiling for this yet. I guess it's only a matter of time for this to be added, so in the meanwhile, you can consider this review as a vote for the PHP profiling support.

The pricing model could be simplified as it feels a bit outdated, especially when you look at the billing model of compute instances vs the containers instances.

We have been using Datadog for one year.

It's pretty stable for the main integrations. There was only one time where Datadog was down and that was scary since all of our monitoring is handled by Datadog. There was a lot of uncertainty while the outage was in place.

For everyday use, it's adequate, but for very specific tasks, not so much. There was a time where I had to do a big export and as expected, the API is somewhat limited. Since it was a one-time task, it was not a big deal but if this was a regular task, I wouldn't be happy about it.

For small tasks, I think it's great. For specialized support, it feels like you're under-staffed, having to wait days/weeks for a solution is a big NO-NO.

I've used a few other products such as NewRelic and AppDynamics. The switch is usually affected by two factors: pricing and convenience.

Getting APM metrics out of Kubernetes is always a painful task. We got support to take a look at this and we had to go through various iterations to get it right, and then AGAIN the next year. This was a bad experience.

It was all implemented in-house. The documentation is fairly up to date, for the most part.

Pricing is somewhat affordable compared to other solutions but in order to really lower the costs of other products you need to plan very carefully your resources usage, otherwise, it can get expensive real quick.

Unfortunately, it wasn't my call to include Datadog for this Company but sure I'm glad that the Lead Architect took this decision. It brought many improvements in a small span of time.

Please add PHP profiling soon!

I'm a senior cloud security engineer and we are customers of Datadog. 

In terms of the public cloud provider integration of AWS, I would say it's very easy and straightforward to integrate. We can automate that way as well, because it also provides the cloud formation template and is a way to have a central place to monitor and visualize metrics in a multi-account structure. It's something we really need because the company has many AWS accounts. Rather than jumping from one account to another, Datadog gives us the functionality of having everything on one platform, in one place.

I believe there is room for improvement with this solution. It wasn't easy for me to get a quick understanding of what this tool offers us as opposed to the added tools of AWS. By that, I mean in regards to finding a better way to apply some filters or to create some alarms. I don't get more advanced features in comparison to AWS but at least I get a centralized way of doing things, which can be done on the AWS side as well. It's more complicated because you have to configure some other services to stream their logs from multi accounts to one account. It could be more user friendly and include advanced examples in the documentation showing some use cases or customer case studies, so you can get a clear idea that this functionality provides something extra. 

I've been using this solution for about a month. 

This is a stable solution. 

It's an SaaS solution, so it should be scalable although I don't know the architecture of it.

We have support from a technical engineer during the POC, which is still ongoing. It's amazing. Their customization and support during the POC include weekly meetings, with a follow up of any issues through email and Slack. 

The initial setup in regards to integration with AWS was very simple.

I would recommend this solution even though I don't have much experience with it yet. The company is currently using New Relic and we are now investigating Datadog for two reasons; the cost and also the integration with microservices and Kubernetes. I feel like this is a good solution. 

There is some room for improvement, so I would rate this solution an eight out of 10. 

We are a solution provider and Datadog is one of the products that I was working on with one of my clients. They are currently evaluating it for use in cloud monitoring.

Specifically, Datadog is used for monitoring cloud applications in terms of performance. The logs come into this solution from AWS and it provides dashboards for various environments.

The most valuable features are the graphs, dashboards, metrics, and the interface.

Additional metrics should be included.

Better integration with other solutions is needed.

I used Datadog in a project that lasted between one and two years. 

In terms of stability, I have not seen any issues and don't have any complaints.

Datadog is easy to scale.

We have not contacted technical support.

The initial setup was okay. I was not part of the implementation team but from my understanding, it was not complex.

Our in-house team handled the deployment.

My client is currently evaluating several monitoring tools including Datadog, Dynatrace, and AppDynamics. Compared to Dynatrace, Datadog has some room for improvement.

This is definitely a good product and I would consider them one of the leaders within the application monitoring and cloud monitoring space. My advice to anybody who is researching this solution is to consider it within the top three. That said, there are some features and metrics that are available in other products, such as Dynatrace, that are not available in Datadog.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.