Forescout Platform Reviews

I am a freelance cybersecurity consultant. I provide and implement products for our clients.

Forescout Platform is a very good NAC solution.

It's a very good product.

The agentless visibility is definitely unmatched and outstanding. 

The actions that the agentless visibility, allow us to perform on the endpoint, are really amazing, especially in the way that it is done. 

It is a good solution, Garner rated because their leadership quadrant position is responsible for their market.

As a user, if I am using a laptop that is Wi-Fi connected, Forescout identifies my port connectivity as one user license, and if I take that same laptop with the same username to a wired network, which is also the same network that is used for the Wi-Fi connection, Forescout detects it as a separate license.

At times, I am working on wireless and sometimes I enter a zone where there is no wireless connection, which forces a land connection. This is an issue that needs to be resolved because it consumes another license for the same device and the same user.

This issue has been escalated to Forscout directly.

There was integration with Microsoft SCCM previously, and have suddenly stopped the open integration module for Microsoft. Customers are not aware of what is available to them in terms of the open integration module. 

Forescout Platform advised that there are many options available and many things they can do, but they don't tell customers exactly what they are. 

They need clear documentation and direction as to what the customer can expect from the open integration module. Customers need some clarity on what they can do and what is not possible to do.

When it comes to a full open integration we need to rely on the professional services from Forescout directly, no one can implement it as there is a limited amount of knowledge available.

They need to be more considerate, and there should be good documentation available to the customer.

They need to improve their selling approach or the consultant approach.

One of their use cases is an ITM use case, and ITSS asset management, but they don't really do ITSS management. They only detect the ITSS and all the parameters around that test, but they do not have any integration with any database system where they can store all these details and act like a typical ITSS management system. 

They should remove that use case in full. They should say that we complement your ITSS management by detecting the unknown assets in your network. This would be right.

I have been familiar with the Forescout Platform for more than four years.

In terms of technical support, their engineering team is very rigid. They must provide us with some clear answers and if they exceed the time it takes to resolve the issue, they will charge for that extra time. For example, if they go one day more, they will charge for that extra day.

We have completed significant deployments which are more than 4,000 endpoints. There was a complex network architecture.

All of the implementations have gone very well and the customers are satisfied.

They base the license on the number of devices, which is quite misleading. If I am one user, it should be based on that rather than how many devices I use with the same user name. 

To base it on the number of devices it can reduce one more license from my overall license allotment. It can result in four or five licenses for one user.

I was a partner of the company who was a Forescout Platform partner and I was responsible for bringing in Forescout, and establishing the service line for the Forescout Platform sales, pre-sales, and the implementation, but I am no longer with that company.

I would rate Forescout Platform an eight out of ten.

We needed some protection in our environment. We use this product in some areas in our network to monitor the security of the endpoints of our users. 

The environment was easy to configure. 

The user management has been very easy for the most part.

The initial setup is pretty easy.

Technical support has been very helpful.

The stability overall is good.

The licensing costs are quite high. With the amount of hardware we have, we need too many licenses to make the product effective and it's ultimately just too costly.

We may have some problems with compatibility - specifically with Cisco switches. We have the perimeter a Check Point firewall as an alarm for VPN connections. We have users integrating the VPN Check Point with Forescout. We can't seem to scale due to compatibility issues and price.

We have been working with the solution for around two years. It hasn't been that long. That said, we are moving away from the solution.

Overall, the stability of the product has been very good. It doesn't crash or freeze. There aren't bugs or glitches. It's been set up very well. We've found it to be reliable and the performance is good.

Our issue, in terms of scalability, is that we have a brittle machine. We struggled to get the licenses loaded. We would need to change the machine in order to develop a certain level of scalability capabilities.

At the moment, we have about 100 users on the solution, however, we require more licenses. Our goal was 1000 users on devices, however, it wasn't possible. The economics were against us.

While I have never personally opened a case with technical support in the past, my colleague has. He found them to be very responsive and helpful. He was satisfied with their level of service.

We did not previously use a different solution. Forescout was our first.

We are just now migrating to Cisco ISE. The problem is that we have around 500 users and we have only 100 licenses from Forescout due to the fact that it is a little expensive for us. We are trying instead to move to Cisco ISE, which has better pricing.

The initial setup was not complex. It was pretty easy. Installation maybe takes one or two days, and the implementation in total takes around two weeks.

We have a partner from Forescout in my country. He came to my company to meet with us. He helped explain a few things and assisted with network displays. 

There were about eight people that handled deployment between our end and the technical support side.

A Forescout representative ultimately came to our company for us. They assisted a little. They understood the cloud very well and were very helpful.

The licenses are quite expensive. Ultimately, we couldn't afford the amount we needed, and therefore we are moving off the product.

We might have paid in the ballpark of $20,000 yearly for our licenses. I do not recall there being other fees over and above the standard licensing fee.

We evaluated Cisco. The difference is the compatibility with our network. Other switches are Cisco devices, and therefore the compatibility and the integration were a little easier. With Forescout we have had some issues with some other access points. With Cisco ISE, we don't have that problem.

I do not recall which version of the solution we are using. We use the on-premises deployment model, however, we also have some clients on the cloud.

I would advise other organizations that, if they have multi-vendors in their network, use Forescout. However, if most of the devices are Cisco, it is best to use Cisco ISE.

It is a great tool and solution. We looked into it with the Magic Quadrant of Gartner and we have seen that it is a leader in the space. However, for us, it just doesn't work as well in terms of compatibility.

I'd recommend the solution. I would rate it at an eight out of ten.

On-premises

The feature has been most effective in managing network access for our primary use cases in the organization.

Forescout Platform's compliance enforcement has delivered significant cost savings for our organization.

The most effective feature has been network access management, which has been crucial for our primary use cases in the organization.

The compliance enforcement functionality has delivered significant cost savings for our organization.

The technical support could be improved in terms of response time and first-level support quality.

Forescout Platform could enhance its integration of AI to improve IoT and OT device security to better meet our needs.

I have been working with Forescout Platform as a consultant or developer.

We have had experience with their technical support and must pay additionally for maintenance, support, and regional service.

The overall pricing of Forescout Platform is reasonable for the functionality it provides.

We are not currently looking into other options to switch in the future. I would recommend Forescout Platform to others.

Forescout Platform is working effectively for our organization. I am currently working as an IT head for Sanad with the email address jdhakan@sanad.ae.

We use this solution for cyber-security purposes.

The 802.1X compliance authentication feature of this solution is very good.

We have found that the agent-based authentication, available within this solution could be improved.

The price-point for this solution is very high, which should be looked at in comparison with similar products currently on the market.

We have been using this solution for five years.

We have found this to be a stable solution.

We believe this product is easily scalable.

The technical support for this product has been good in our experience.

Neutral

The setup for this solution is very straightforward, but full deployment can take a number of years.

The cost of licensing for this product is quite high, but this cost covers all the features of the solution so it is a single payment for the term that has been selected.

I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.

On-premises

The most valuable features of the Forescout Platform are NAC for sharing, Network Access Control, and port sharing of the devices.

Forescout Platform could improve the vulnerability management as well as the control on the endpoint, which needs to be connected to my network.

In an upcoming release, they should add security features, such as malware and threat protection.

I have been using the Forescout Platform for approximately six years.

Forescout Platform was not a stable solution in 2015, but over the year it has become more and more stable. At this point in time, it is a stable solution.

The Forescout Platform is scalable.

The support from the Forescout Platform is great.

I rate the support from Forescout Platform a nine out of ten.

Positive

The price of the Forescout Platform is expensive. I purchased it for approximately 94 lakhs.

I rate Forescout Platform a nine out of ten.

Private Cloud

We use this solution to implement compliance on our client's systems and prevent access from outside the organization.

The virtual firewall available on this solution is great and assists us in securing our servers. Additionally, the threat prevention feature provides complete visibility. It is very helpful in detecting, blocking and monitoring heavy scanning on the system.

The security features can be improved because we use it for sensitive information, such as compliance. Additionally, the system controls could be better.

We have been using this solution for approximately one year.

The solution is stable and provides real-time monitoring for users, switches and other available features.

The solution is scalable. We recommend it for all companies. It can be installed in enterprise, and we currently have it for over 4000 users.

The initial setup was easy to integrate with the customer's environment. It doesn't have any downtime. I rate the setup process an eight out of ten.

We implemented this solution through an in-house team.

I don't have details on the licensing costs or pricing because it changes frequently, and a different department deals with it.

I rate this solution an eight out of ten. The solution is good, but the systems control and security features could be better.

Forescout Platform allows actions to be automated, which reduces the response time to any suspicious or malicious activity.

The best parts of Forescout Platform are its orchestration features, discovery capabilities, classification buckets, and flexibility in creating policies.

Forescout Platform sometimes returns false positives, so there's some fine-tuning to be done there. There are also some limitations with the Mac and Linux versions - the company claims they're agentless, but they're actually agent-based. In addition, there are a few actions that don't work in conjunction when we apply multiple actions, such as wanting to send a notification and isolate a device. In the next release, I would want to see better compatibility and visibility on the cloud front, and the system needs to keep up with upcoming technologies and trends.

I've been working with Forescout Platform for four years.

Forescout Platform is stable.

Forescout Platform is scalable.

The initial setup was very simple.

I would rate Forescout Platform's pricing as four out of five.

I would give Forescout Platform a rating of eight out of ten.

Hybrid Cloud

It's a Network Access Control tool.

The ability to control to identify devices and control the actual devices was great.

It is easy to set up.

It's stable and reliable.

The scalability is good. 

It is an affordable solution. 

The product is easily deployable and it is agentless.

Custom integrations need to be better. I'd like to have the option, for example, to integrate the Forescout Platform with a customized application or any other software out there that I am using at the same time.

I would like the Forescout Platform to be deployable on cloud solutions, like Huawei. It's not compatible with Huawei at the moment. It can be deployed only on Amazon and AWS.

I've been using the solution for five years now. 

It's very stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It is reliable.

The solution can scale as necessary. You just pay more according to the number of users you are adding. 

We have about 70 users on the solution. 

We use it daily for our clients. 

The solution is very easy to set up. It's not overly complex or difficult.

I'd rate the solution a four out of five in terms of ease of setup.

The level of maintenance depends on the organization. If you are using more resources, you'll need more people. For an environment of maybe a thousand users, you can deploy one engineer. He can manage everything.

The cost of the solution is about 5000 South African rands per year for ten users. That's about $320 USD. If you want to increase usage, you can easily scale, you just pay more. 

I'd rate the solution four out of ten in terms of affordability. 

We are users and a reseller. 

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

This solution can be used to organize guest portals, integrate switches, and create policies.  Some of its standard use cases also include completing key process upgrades and anti-virus of Windows OS.

This solution could be improved if there was functionality or module integration to connect Forescout with open source, container areas or Terraform.  It would also be useful if this solution could run with network plugins to Kubernetes. 

I have been using this solution for three years. 

This is a stable solution but does require additional servers if we want to make use of the full functionality of the solution. 

This solution is not that easy to scale but this depends on a company's needs. 

For our business, if we want to connect to the host, we can do it from one main office and can connect an inventory to those remote hosts from one point. If we want to collect spam traffic, for example, we cannot collect this traffic from one point, because a wider connection channel is needed. So in this case, we need to deploy an additional server for Forescout that will collect spam traffic and send method data to the main management server.

We have hardly needed support from the Forescout team. 

The initial setup was not that straightforward and configuration took a long time and required technical specialists. When assisting customers, we need to have a technical specialist onsite to deploy the solution. 

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten. 

On-premises

The installation is not secure because it takes high admin privileges.

Forescout is stable.

The initial setup is easy, taking no more than two or three weeks.

Forescout is more expensive than Cisco because Cisco gives high discounts.

Forescout is better for smaller organizations in sectors like education or hospitality. I would rate Forescout as five out of ten.