Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Forescout Platform vs Nozomi Networks comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 3, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Forescout Platform
Ranking in IoT Security
4th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
78
Ranking in other categories
Network Access Control (NAC) (5th), Endpoint Compliance (3rd), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (18th)
Nozomi Networks
Ranking in IoT Security
2nd
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
9
Ranking in other categories
Operational Technology (OT) Security (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the IoT Security category, the mindshare of Forescout Platform is 8.6%, down from 14.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nozomi Networks is 15.4%, down from 31.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
IoT Security Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Nozomi Networks15.4%
Forescout Platform8.6%
Other76.0%
IoT Security
 

Featured Reviews

AshishKumar Rai - PeerSpot reviewer
Security Consultant at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Comprehensive visibility has strengthened endpoint control and automated threat response across networks
When it comes to improving Forescout Platform, I have faced some issues recently, particularly with the switch integration part. When integrating a switch, it asks for the vendor type, and often it does not match. For example, one series of HP switches may not be found in that vendor list. This leads to frustration because you have to check again with different HP models, and once you integrate a switch, you cannot edit the vendor list without removing it. Other issues are being worked on, particularly related to switch integration. I believe they will be fixed in the next upgrade or patch fix. There are no major issues, but the configuration changes needed for the switch model are necessary, and I think it would help if during integration, an admin user could check the password or credential used, as they currently cannot see the password after it is entered and saved.
reviewer2803332 - PeerSpot reviewer
Country Sales Manager at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
Critical networks have gained real-time visibility and detect threats with intelligent monitoring
I would like to see improvements in Nozomi Networks, probably more AI-based integration and better native integration with SOC and SOAR platforms. I would like to see specific features included in the next releases of Nozomi Networks, such as improvements in threat intelligence. They have competition from Dragos, which I believe is better in threat intelligence. I do not have much of an answer about the key differences of Nozomi Networks in comparison to other cyber defense solutions because I only work with Nozomi Networks. However, I heard from the market that they might lack in threat intelligence compared to Dragos. Other than that, I see Nozomi Networks as the best platform for customers, easy to manage, deploy, and operate. The cons might be that they lack some threat intelligence features that Dragos offers.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"ForeScout is a powerful network access control tool that has some features found in insider threat solutions, though it is not exactly made for that."
"This solution can be used to organize guest portals, integrate switches, and create policies. Some of its standard use cases also include completing key process upgrades and anti-virus of Windows OS."
"ForeScout provides some of the greatest visibility into network traffic, showing you exactly who is doing what, down to the port and protocol being used, capturing entire conversations between endpoints."
"The platform enables automated policy enforcement, allowing us to simulate and test policies before enforcement, streamlining our security operations."
"Being able to actively identify the client without a certificate allows you to control every device on your network regardless of the make, model, and software running. This allows for end-to-end security."
"The most valuable features are remote access and administration scripts."
"The user interface is quite simple."
"The valuable feature of the product stems from the fact that it is easy to implement."
"Nozomi Networks is an easy-to-use and powerful tool."
"The most valuable features of Nozomi Networks are the visibility of OT protocols and the versatility in finding the details of the assets feeding the tool."
"The feature I like best is its stability."
"Provides security for our operational technology environment for OT and IoT."
"The network visualization feature of Nozomi impacts security operations positively."
"It has impacted security operations in a better way."
"The tool's visibility is good. We can see the traffic flow."
"I chose Nozomi because it is far ahead of other competitors, like Curator and Elastic."
 

Cons

"We have found that the agent-based authentication, available within this solution could be improved."
"Two things can be improved in the Forescout Platform. First of all, the support for some certain proprietary protocols from other vendors, but they are very widely used. If the TechEx from Cisco, was added to Forescout, then it will be a full solution for me."
"Forescout Platform needs to improve how the device works in preventing rogue servers."
"For improvements, I think technical support could be enhanced. The time zone difference makes remote support difficult - I'm in Indonesia, and they're in the US. Maybe the Forescout Platform could provide engineers from Asia Pacific."
"As a product, there is nothing to complain about. However, they should improve their overall support. You need that level of knowledge, that level of information is clearly not available. First and foremost, that information is not accessible. The second point to mention is that once you purchase the later support and services. That is, they will continue to charge you for every service."
"Other solutions have TACACS+, but Forescout does not. In the next release, I would like to see Forescout have accounting."
"The solution should include integration with other firewalls."
"The reporting feature needs improvement."
"Proof of concept could be improved. It could be more tangible to the customer and the end users to have a video presentation or something like that."
"I believe there is room for improvement regarding on-premises AI."
"The solution should include an integration library."
"It should support more programmable logic controllers (PLCs)."
"Creating custom queries is time-consuming."
"Nozomi Networks should improve its pricing."
"We have faced downtimes, crashes, or performance issues with certain implementations."
"Nozomi Networks currently offers add-ons, such as ARP agents, that can be installed on machines to expand the information we receive from sensors. However, these are part of a licensing structure, which can be costly."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"For one license, we pay around 3,000 Indian rupees."
"The solution’s pricing is fine."
"The solution is not priced low. There are no hidden costs."
"We might have paid in the ballpark of $20,000 yearly for our licenses. I do not recall there being other fees over and above the standard licensing fee."
"Forescout Platform is on the expensive side."
"We have a very clear licensing model for business. I don't have to have a Ph.D. to be able to understand the licensing model as you might need for other solutions. If I know exactly what we want, it can tell you which license you need. The solution is easy for purchasing, ordering, and ease of deployment as well."
"It might not be the cheapest solution, but you get what you pay for."
"5,000 user licenses will cost you between seven and eight million dollars, compared to 20 million for Aruba."
"I have not seen any competition in terms of pricing, and it is quite reasonable."
"The solution's pricing is good and cheaper than that of Claroty."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IoT Security solutions are best for your needs.
884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Computer Software Company
8%
Government
7%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Energy/Utilities Company
11%
Computer Software Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business30
Midsize Enterprise10
Large Enterprise44
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Large Enterprise2
 

Questions from the Community

What advice do you have for others considering Forescout Platform?
Forescout is a very powerful NAC product that does not rely on port level configuration. It can detect and block unauthorized devices very quickly. But it has a lot of capabilities and really would...
What advice do you have for others considering Forescout Platform?
I would rate the Forescout Device and Visibility Control Platform at a six out of ten.
What advice do you have for others considering Forescout Platform?
I recommend doing a compression demo. If people use it, they will buy it. So they have to see the product in place. That's the main recommendation is to do a proof of concept. If they do, they will...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nozomi Networks?
Nozomi Networks is priced moderately. Its cost is not too expensive, but it is not low either.
What needs improvement with Nozomi Networks?
I would like to see improvements in Nozomi Networks, probably more AI-based integration and better native integration with SOC and SOAR platforms. I would like to see specific features included in ...
What is your primary use case for Nozomi Networks?
We use Nozomi Networks as an intrusion detection system for OT deployments, automation systems, and IoT systems such as medical equipment to protect medical systems and smart meters. We detect any ...
 

Also Known As

Forescout Platform, CounterACT for Endpoint Compliance, ForeScout CounterACT
SCADAguardian
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

NHS Sussex, SAP, SEGA, Vistaprint, Miami Children's Hospital, Pioneer Investments, New York Law School, OmnicomGroup, Meritrust
Enel, FireEye, GlaxoSmithKline, VEC, TAGSEC Group
Find out what your peers are saying about Forescout Platform vs. Nozomi Networks and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.
884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.