Freshdesk Reviews

I mainly use Freshdesk as a support system for our customers.

I am using, for the most part, the tickets, the solutions, and the forums in Freshdesk. These features are easy to use, and the filtering is really good, providing a good overview of active tickets and who's working on them. They are very effective overall.

I would like a better integration towards Azure DevOps. The current integration is more complicated and doesn’t work as well. There's not a really good one for Jira, which we are also using.

I have been using Freshdesk for a couple of years, maybe two.

I haven't faced any issues with the stability. It has been working nicely.

In our environment, which is a fairly small company in one country, Freshdesk is easy to scale. I would rate its scalability as eight out of ten due to some difficulties when more departments were involved.

I haven’t contacted technical support myself, but I've heard that it is good.

The system was already set up when I started using it, so I haven't done any initial setup.

The cost is reasonable. However, I don't have the exact numbers.

Freshdesk is a good solution that works nicely. I would rate the overall solution an eight out of ten due to integration concerns.

My primary use cases with Freshdesk involve help desk software as well as additional functionalities tailored to our operations.

For the industry that I'm working in, Freshdesk is used primarily for help in education and related tasks.

Some of the best features of Freshdesk include automation, user-friendly interface, and comprehensive support options that enhance our workflow.

With the existing capabilities in Freshdesk, they assist in manual assistance by streamlining communication and providing essential tools for support.

I have used the self-service portal for customers, and it has significantly helped in managing customer queries and reducing the workload.

The insights I gather have benefited my strategy by providing actionable data that informs our operations and decision-making.

More automation would be beneficial, as it could greatly improve our efficiency and reduce manual tasks.

I have had three years of experience with Freshdesk.

Freshdesk is stable solution and easy to use

Freshdesk is most definitely scalable and can be used company wide in various departments. 

They offer customer support, and I would rate them a nine on a scale of one to ten, as their service meets our expectations.

Positive

Did not have a solution before Freshdesk.

It took us about three weeks to deploy Freshdesk, which was manageable with our team's schedule.

I would rate this product setup as very good, as it suits our needs well.

With just myself facilitating the help, the experience was collaborative but primarily my responsibility.

Third parties, such as consultants, were not involved in my deployment process.

As the call center manager, I have been closely involved in all aspects of using Freshdesk.

Currently, it requires some maintenance from me, but it is not overwhelming, and it is a manageable part of my responsibilities.

Affordable with little cost to set up 

Yes, such as zendesk, salesforce etc but found freshdesk most suitable in terms of use and pricing 

My feedback can be shared with or without attribution.

I look forward to receiving the link, which I will be able to edit later.

I confirm that my company is just a customer with Freshworks and not resellers.

My review rating for Freshdesk is nine out of ten.

The customer's primary use case for Freshdesk is handling emails and social media queries. It is mostly used for managing transactional queries such as deposits and withdrawals. Our support team is responsible for responding to these customer inquiries, and automated responses help in establishing communication. Tickets are created and assigned to agents using a FIFO logic.

Freshdesk provides a plain vanilla solution, making it user-friendly and less complex. It offers insights into team performance, with ready-made reports and GenAI features that assist in creating reports. The tool allows automation through the use of keywords, which helps in routing queries efficiently or closing them automatically without agent intervention.

Freshdesk's major drawback is its limitation in integrating tools for App Store and Play Store reviews, and social channels like Twitter, which come with additional costs. 

Despite having third-party integration options, these features should be inherently available in the tool without additional expenses. Integration with social media and review platforms should be built-in.

I have been working with Freshdesk for about the last six months.

Freshdesk is stable overall, with minimal downtime and quick support in case of issues. The stability impacts operations positively, but there are times when technical support is needed, and the availability of product teams can be a concern during escalations.

Freshdesk is scalable and I would rate it at seven point five out of ten. The scalability is slightly hindered by the lack of built-in integration capabilities, which could add value if they were more readily available without additional charges.

Technical support for Freshdesk is rated at eight point five out of ten. While support is generally helpful, there are situations where they rely on product teams, which can delay solutions. In some use cases, technical support could be empowered with more capabilities to resolve issues directly.

The initial setup of Freshdesk was easy and straightforward. With a rating of ten out of ten for ease of installation, it was self-sufficient and did not require extensive support except for certain chatbot integrations.

An implementation partner was involved in the deployment process. They provided a detailed Statement of Work (SoW), and regular discussions helped with the timely execution of tasks. They also assisted with chatbot flows and live chat agent journey automation.

Freshdesk's pricing is currently seen as expensive, especially considering the lack of built-in capabilities for social media and review platform integrations. If these were included within the existing pricing model, it would offer better value.

Advice for new users evaluating Freshdesk is to not solely rely on presentations. Instead, obtain a demo to test their specific use cases comprehensively. Freshdesk is rated eight out of ten. Negotiate for GenAI features to be included in the package and clarify any custom reporting needs before onboarding.

I use Freshdesk to manage IT support tickets for our team of 15 IT professionals across multiple countries. It has been effective in ticket management, and we find the price-to-functionality ratio satisfactory. As we expand operations to other countries, Freshdesk continues to meet our needs without excessive costs.

Freshdesk's multi-channel support has positively impacted our internal IT customer engagement. While email is the primary channel, users can also submit requests through the portal, though it is rarely used for ticket updates. The system allows us to track and assess channel performance efficiently.

Freshdesk significantly improved our customer issue resolution process. We can now easily record and track all customer requests, ensuring that no tickets are lost. This has given us a clear vision of our IT team's performance helps us efficiently address and prioritize customer issues and provides a streamlined and organized approach to support.

I would like to see improvements in the account management aspect, having a customer portal for better visibility into my subscription, invoices, and trouble tickets. Additionally, more flexibility in adding functions based on subscription levels would be beneficial for customization.

We have not had any stability issues with Freshdesk.

It is a quite scalable solution. In our organization, around 15 IT agents use Freshdesk to provide support, and approximately 300 users can submit support requests.

I have used the vendor's tech support, and they are very responsive, with room for improvement. Occasionally, dealing with paperwork for tasks like obtaining a new license can be a bit inconvenient, but it doesn't impact the functionality of the product itself.

Positive

Setting up Freshdesk was straightforward, and the tool is flexible. We initially opted for a basic license with limited reporting but considered upgrading. However, the higher subscription cost made us stick with our current level. While the tool is easy to deploy, upgrading to the next subscription level could provide more flexibility and additional features.

The benefits of using Freshdesk are significant for our organization. With a cost of about $10 per user monthly, the ROI is clear. The impact on efficiency and streamlined operations far outweigh the minimal cost, making it a worthwhile and cost-effective solution for us.

Freshdesk operates on an annual subscription basis, and it is very affordable.

Before using Freshdesk, I evaluated other customer experience management products like JIRA Service Desk and BMC. The main advantages of Freshdesk are its user-friendliness, ease of use, and quick adaptability. It stands out for being easy to start with and resolving problems seamlessly.

Automation and ticket routing rules in Freshdesk save us daily by streamlining routine tasks. We use reports to identify issues, allocate resources, and continuously improve our processes. It is a vital part of our daily operations, helping us stay proactive and efficient in handling various types of tickets.

The reporting and analytics tools in Freshdesk are effective for measuring customer service performance. While our current subscription level has some limitations in terms of reporting, the next level provides more options. Budget constraints currently prevent us from upgrading, but the available reporting features still meet our basic needs.

I highly recommend Freshdesk, especially for companies in their early stages. It is user-friendly, easy to configure, and great for those with a moderate volume of customer requests. The cost is reasonable, making it a quick and efficient solution to implement. Overall, I would rate Freshdesk as an eight out of ten.

We are using the free version. We are using it for the ticketing system, which helps us give support to our customers. We have almost 200 people using Freshdesk during our working hours.

Whenever our customers are in any need of support, they present their request via email or sign in to the Freshdesk portal and raise a ticket. Once a ticket is raised, it is automatically assigned to our team member, who sorts it out with the relevant solutions. 

The ticketing system is smooth, but since we use a free version, we do not have many facilities available. Facilities like CAN messages, FAQ facility, and Auto Resigning are really helpful.

Sometimes our requirements are not matched with Freshdesk's free version as most of the advanced features are not available to us. So we have to adapt and manage our day-to-day work with it.

We have been using the solution for the past two years. 

It is very stable and I would rate it a ten out of ten. 

I can rate the scalability a seven out of ten because it is a free version. Had it been a paid version with more features, I would rate it more. 

For maintenance and support, we have a dedicated team. In case we require support, it is assigned to someone who is relevant to the situation based on the software. It is automated and one person can manage it. In case of any issues, one person can easily troubleshoot them.

Positive

The initial setup is straightforward. I would rate the setup an eight out of ten. We deployed it on the cloud and on SaaS software. The deployment process took almost one day.

During the deployment, we had to create our company ID, categories and users, and assign auto resigning and CAN messages. We also included FAQs which are another essential feature.

We performed an in-house deployment and it only required one person.

We used other open source software which was free. We switched to Freshdesk because it was easy to use, and we didn't have any technical knowledge.

It is a stable service. If you are willing to pay, you can get more features. I would rate it a nine out of ten. 

It's our main ticketing portal. We track all records, deploy responses to customers, and assign separate credentials so they can comment on the status of their tickets. It's a good tool to track, respond, and manage tickets and customer portfolios.

It has a user-friendly interface and manages tickets very well. It's easy to use and integrates with other tools. We can embed Jira into it, link Jira tickets with Freshdesk tickets, and use it for our knowledge base. If we want, we an upload our knowledge base. The canned responses feature is great for reducing response time.

It would be helpful to pull reports or schedule them based on agents, users, ticket numbers, or responses.

I have been using this solution for six years. 

I would rate the stability a nine out of ten. 

I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten. 

The customer service and support are very friendly and respond fast. Overall, it is good. 

It was very easy to set up. 

The pricing is pretty manageable and acceptable. For the powerful tool that it is, the pricing is justified.

We reviewed all the ticketing systems such as Zendesk and thought Freshdesk was the best.

I would recommend it to other companies looking for a good ticketing system. Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten.

We are using Freshdesk for a help desk and a call center for documentation and ticketing for customers.

Freshdesk allows our customers easy and simple way to consume the documentation as well as manage all tickets 

The most valuable features of Freshdesk are the automation of tickets to assign them to different agents, and the managing of documents is easy.

Freshdesk could improve its capabilities. It's missing the article formatting, and the overall look and feel make it not easy to use. The administration instructions on how to manage the automation, capability, and integration with third parties, such as chat or bots, are very important in these types of solutions.

In a future release, it would be beneficial if Freshdesk added the ability to publish files. For example, if I have an FTP site and I need to publish something for customers, such as installation files, I cannot do it in Freshdesk. I have to upload that on another system and bring it in as a link instead of being able to do everything in one place.

I have been using Freshdesk for approximately three years.

Freshdesk is 90 percent stable.

Freshdesk is scalable. This is a SaaS solution, which is not managed by us.

We have approximately 500 agents and managers that are working with this solution which are outside customers.

The technical support from Freshdesk is great, they are responsive.

Positive

We previously used JIRA Service Management, but it was very expensive. We decided to go with Freshdesk because of the price. However, today I'm considering moving to Zendesk because they are richer in features and integrations and it allows me to do much more than Freshdesk.

The initial setup of Freshdesk is not straightforward because there is a lot of preparation. However, this is something that would take time in any solution because you need to build your own look and feel.

I rate the initial setup of Freshdesk a five out of ten.

The deployment of Freshdesk was done in-house.

The maintenance of Freshdesk is not simple. This includes directly the overall capabilities, such as formatting documents that you want to load and the ticket life cycle process.

I rate the maintenance of Freshdesk a five out of ten.

Freshdesk helps us to manage the customers and requests and documentation. With all the difficulties, we did receive an ROI that helps us to work with customers.

We pay approximately $70 per agent to use Freshdesk. We have 10 agents, which is approximately $700 or $800 per month. It is a fixed license, there are not any additional fees.

we did evaluated other tools like SalesForce service and zendesk as well 

My advice to others is they should check that Freshdesk services all their use cases, mainly on the documentation. It is standard ticketing, usually, it's fine. However, the documentation which you publish in the portal is not rich enough. You need to know what to do.

I rate Freshdesk a six out of ten.

I used it within my team because the team came from different locations. So we used FreshStack as part of our CRM. When it came to our clients, we used it for anything customer-related. If there was any increase for the client, we used it.

We used Freshdesk as a customer service platform. We used it to deal with client inquiries, log issues, and requests. We used it to answer any questions that the customers might have about the LMS platform that we built because the platform was integrated with Freshdesk. If they had any inquiries, they would log into our platform, and we received them through Freshdesk.

We had about ten Freshdesk users in our company, and anywhere between a hundred and a thousand customers using it.

What I found the most valuable about Freshdesk is that it generated reports for us, which helped us identify the status of requests and the aging of requests. There are certain levels to a ticket depending on the category. Whenever we downloaded the report, we were able to see the aging of the tickets, ensuring that we were 100% with the SMAs that we've committed to your client.

I would say that Freshdesk is a little blunt. I would like to see a little bit more color in the solution. Other than that, I had no other issues with it. Our company didn't need anything highly technical, and Freshdesk was a helpful tool that did whatever we needed at the time. Even though we are located in the Philippines, we were able to assist our clients in Singapore and Indonesia through Freshdesk.

I've used Freshdesk for about three years.

Since it was cloud-based, we didn't have any issues with the stability of the solution at the time. It was a really good tool for us.

We did not have any issues with the scalability of Freshdesk. We had anywhere from a hundred to a thousand users but never had any problems with the solution.

Before switching to Freshdesk, I had used Zendesk. I used Freshdesk for about three years and then started using Mojo Helpdesk.

Freshdesk was set up by our tech team. We needed the tech team to integrate it with our platform since we could not do it ourselves, but I would say that the setup was user-friendly and that the solution does not require much maintenance.

I don't know much about Freshdesk's pricing since my managing director was the one who purchased the solution.

If I were to choose from Freshdesk, Zendesk, and Mojo Helpdesk, I would opt for Freshdesk just because I was using it more extensively than other solutions. Zendesk was also good but I only used it for a year. When it comes to Mojo Helpdesk, the onboarding was not very extensive, and there were questions I had that were not answered. That was not directly the fault of Mojo Helpdesk, but the people who made us use it. Additionally, some of the functions ended up not working properly.

I think good onboarding and good training are key to ensuring that the person using the solution will be able to understand all of its features and maximize its use. In addition, a good onboarding program for the client and for the user is crucial in order to optimize the platform.

Overall, I would rate it a nine out of ten.

We are a health insurance company that uses the solution to communicate with our customers through chat, as well as health providers and other prospects. We use it according to teams; the customer success team is divided into three teams: those who attend to voice only, those who attend to emails only, and those who attend to chats only.

For every request that comes in via any of these channels, the agents in these channels take charge there.

We currently don't use calls for Freshworks because of our IT provider in Nigeria. However, we use email and chat, and they both work well. Some new features that they recently released will give the chat, Freshchat, more functionality than Freshdesk. We were using Freshdesk before, but we are right now on Freshchat.

The UI is also easy to use.

Currently, they have Freshchat as the central platform. But for email, I would still like to have assistance around how our agents can assist our customers, such as on-the-go translation; as we are expanding to the emerging market, we would not be able to hire and pay customer support agents in those areas immediately, so we won't be able to attend to their conversation if we do not speak the same language. That is something similar platforms have, which I would like to have included in Freshdesk.

We have been using Freshdesk for over three years.

I rate Freshdesk's stability as eight out of ten. There is room for improvement with the chatbots.

It is scalable. We currently have about 16,000 chatbot sessions monthly, which keeps growing every month.

Support is very knowledgeable, so they know their products very well. They can almost always resolve your problem immediately.

The initial setup was relatively easy.

One of the issues we are looking into is the cost. As we keep on expanding, it means that we will need more licenses. Currently, that would blow our budget. That's the main concern right now because the cost is very expensive.

Aside from the license, we have chatbot conversation costs.

One should go for the solution if cost is not a problem or if they will not expand to major markets and require many licenses. There is still room for improvement, but the UI is easy to use, compared to some other platforms. I rate Freshdesk a seven out of ten.

The product helps centralize information about our customer's cases and issues. 

The candidate's response has been the most valuable aspect of the solution. They are up-to-date and respond well to users.

Technical support is outstanding.

It has a lot of features and integrates with a lot of systems. 

It's very straightforward and does what it does. It's really, really good.

The solution scales well.

It's stable and reliable.

We are using Freshservice as it is bigger and more extensive. We'd like Freshdesk to be more extensive as well. 

It should enhance its service and its reporting capabilities. 

I've been using the solution for eight months. 

I'd rate the stability nine out of ten. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It is reliable. 

I'd rate the scalability nine out of ten. It is easy to extend as required. 

Technical support is excellent. It's one of the best support providers I've ever worked with. 

Positive

We are now working with Freshservice, Freshdesk's bigger brother. 

The solution is moderate to deploy. It's not complex, however, it isn't easy. It's average. 

We have witnessed an ROI while using it.

The pricing is average. We did get some deals when we subscribed to it. 

I'm an administrator and end-user for the platform. 

I have been using the latest version. It's online and automatically updates. This is a cloud-only service.

I'd advise people to first understand what they need from the tool. Once they have a full idea of what they need, then they can start with the deployment. 

I would rate the solution ten out of ten.