Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
GoCD Logo

Top 10 GoCD Alternatives

Vendor: Thoughtworks
3.8 out of 5
Leave a review

Top GoCD Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to GoCD based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include GitLab, Microsoft Azure DevOps, and Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Thoughtworks Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Thoughtworks, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
GoCD Logo
GitLab
4.2 out of 5
GoCD Logo
GitLab
4.2 out of 5
GoCD appeals to teams needing detailed workflow control through its pipeline-as-code feature. In comparison, GitLab offers a comprehensive DevOps suite, attracting those seeking an integrated experience with project management, collaboration, and security tools despite higher initial costs.
Download GitLab vs. GoCD Report
GoCD has a low initial setup cost compared to GitLab, which offers a more comprehensive solution with higher setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
GoCD has a low initial setup cost compared to GitLab, which offers a more comprehensive solution with higher setup expenses.
GoCD Logo
GoCD Logo
Microsoft Azure DevOps
4.1 out of 5
GoCD excels in value stream mapping and pipeline modeling for managing complex workflows. In comparison, Microsoft Azure DevOps integrates extensively with Azure services, offering scalability alongside collaboration tools, appealing to larger teams seeking advanced functionalities and seamless deployment with other Microsoft products.
Download GoCD vs. Microsoft Azure DevOps Report
GoCD offers a competitive setup cost, whereas Microsoft Azure DevOps presents a higher initial investment. This highlights a notable difference in their pricing models, catering to distinct budgetary needs.
View comparison
Pricing
GoCD offers a competitive setup cost, whereas Microsoft Azure DevOps presents a higher initial investment. This highlights a notable difference in their pricing models, catering to distinct budgetary needs.
GoCD Logo
GoCD Logo
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
4.3 out of 5
GoCD attracts cost-sensitive teams with its efficient CI/CD processes and pipeline visualization. In comparison, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform suits those investing in comprehensive automation, leveraging its configuration management and compatibility across diverse infrastructures to maximize long-term enterprise integration and automation strategies.
Download GoCD vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Report
GoCD has lower setup costs compared to Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, which requires a higher initial investment. The choice reflects the balance between cost and the breadth of features offered by each tool.
View comparison
Pricing
GoCD has lower setup costs compared to Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, which requires a higher initial investment. The choice reflects the balance between cost and the breadth of features offered by each tool.
GoCD Logo
Tekton
3.9 out of 5
GoCD Logo
Tekton
3.9 out of 5
GoCD's powerful visualization and pipeline management make it ideal for complex workflows seeking straightforward deployment and support. In comparison, Tekton's Kubernetes-native design suits cloud-native environments, offering flexibility for teams adept in container orchestration despite potential challenges in integration.
Download GoCD vs. Tekton Report
GoCD's setup cost is significantly higher with extensive configuration needs, while Tekton offers a more streamlined and low-cost setup process.
View comparison
Pricing
GoCD's setup cost is significantly higher with extensive configuration needs, while Tekton offers a more streamlined and low-cost setup process.
GoCD Logo
Jenkins
4.0 out of 5
GoCD Logo
Jenkins
4.0 out of 5
Jenkins offers superior plugin support, making it highly customizable for varied environments. In comparison, GoCD provides value stream visualization and simpler installation. Jenkins's extensive features suit complex needs, while GoCD's pricing and customer service appeal to those seeking predictable costs and accessible support.
Download GoCD vs. Jenkins Report
GoCD offers a lower setup cost compared to Jenkins, which might benefit organizations seeking budget-friendly solutions. Jenkins, however, provides extensive community support, making it suitable for teams needing robust assistance during setup.
View comparison
Pricing
GoCD offers a lower setup cost compared to Jenkins, which might benefit organizations seeking budget-friendly solutions. Jenkins, however, provides extensive community support, making it suitable for teams needing robust assistance during setup.
GoCD Logo
GitHub Actions
4.3 out of 5
GoCD Logo
GitHub Actions
4.3 out of 5
GoCD offers precise pipeline control with on-premise deployment, ideal for detailed workflow customization. In comparison, GitHub Actions provides seamless GitHub integration, cloud deployment, and extensive community support, appealing for its simplicity and rapid implementation with flexible pricing.
Download GitHub Actions vs. GoCD Report
GoCD offers no setup costs making it cost-effective initially, while GitHub Actions requires a more flexible pricing model that scales with usage, highlighting a clear difference in their initial financial commitment.
View comparison
Pricing
GoCD offers no setup costs making it cost-effective initially, while GitHub Actions requires a more flexible pricing model that scales with usage, highlighting a clear difference in their initial financial commitment.
GoCD Logo
Harness
3.9 out of 5
GoCD Logo
Harness
3.9 out of 5
GoCD offers intuitive workflow visualization, catering to businesses valuing open-source solutions. In comparison, Harness provides advanced AI-driven features, appealing to those prioritizing time-saving processes. GoCD emphasizes cost-effectiveness, whereas Harness delivers greater ROI through operational efficiencies despite higher initial costs.
Download GoCD vs. Harness Report
GoCD has lower setup costs, offering a cost-effective solution, while Harness presents a more premium setup, reflecting its advanced features.
View comparison
Pricing
GoCD has lower setup costs, offering a cost-effective solution, while Harness presents a more premium setup, reflecting its advanced features.
GoCD Logo
Bamboo
3.7 out of 5
GoCD Logo
Bamboo
3.7 out of 5
GoCD offers flexibility with its customizable features like pipeline as code and YAML configuration, appealing to teams seeking tailored environments. In comparison, Bamboo excels in seamless integration with Atlassian products, providing smooth scalability and a comprehensive suite suitable for larger teams.
Download Bamboo vs. GoCD Report
GoCD offers competitive setup costs that appeal to cost-conscious teams, while Bamboo may require higher initial investment due to its feature-rich environment.
View comparison
Pricing
GoCD offers competitive setup costs that appeal to cost-conscious teams, while Bamboo may require higher initial investment due to its feature-rich environment.
GoCD Logo
AWS CodePipeline
4.2 out of 5
GoCD Logo
AWS CodePipeline
4.2 out of 5
GoCD's customizable workflows and value stream mapping appeal to those seeking control and attractive pricing. In comparison, AWS CodePipeline offers seamless AWS integrations and scalability, ideal for enterprises prioritizing cloud-native capabilities and comprehensive features in a pay-as-you-go model.
Download AWS CodePipeline vs. GoCD Report
GoCD offers a lower setup cost compared to AWS CodePipeline, making it a more affordable option. AWS CodePipeline, on the other hand, provides a more complex initial setup that can be costlier for users.
View comparison
Pricing
GoCD offers a lower setup cost compared to AWS CodePipeline, making it a more affordable option. AWS CodePipeline, on the other hand, provides a more complex initial setup that can be costlier for users.
GoCD Logo
CircleCI
3.3 out of 5
GoCD Logo
CircleCI
3.3 out of 5
GoCD offers granular control over complex workflows with strong pipeline visualization tools. In comparison, CircleCI provides ease of setup and a vast range of integrations ideal for dynamic environments. GoCD's on-premise deployment enhances security, while CircleCI's cloud model ensures flexibility and scalability.
Download CircleCI vs. GoCD Report
GoCD setup costs are generally lower, making it appealing for budget-conscious teams, while CircleCI may involve higher initial expenses due to its comprehensive feature set.
View comparison
Pricing
GoCD setup costs are generally lower, making it appealing for budget-conscious teams, while CircleCI may involve higher initial expenses due to its comprehensive feature set.
GoCD Logo
Digital.ai Agility
4.3 out of 5
GoCD Logo
Digital.ai Agility
4.3 out of 5
GoCD offers cost-effectiveness and simplicity, attracting teams focused on software deployment. In comparison, Digital.ai Agility provides comprehensive features for Agile project management, appealing to larger organizations seeking enhanced collaboration and project oversight. Each tool caters to specific needs based on organizational priorities.
Download Digital.ai Agility vs. GoCD Report
GoCD offers a straightforward setup at potentially lower costs, while Digital.ai Agility's setup may involve higher expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
GoCD offers a straightforward setup at potentially lower costs, while Digital.ai Agility's setup may involve higher expenses.
GoCD Logo
GoCD Logo
BMC Release Lifecycle Management
1 out of 5

Software release management doesn’t have to be difficult when you choose the right release management tools. As the volume, frequency, and complexity of your applications grow, so does the risk with each application release. With BMC Release Lifecycle Management you can mitigate risk and meet demand by enabling your DevOps team to automate and coordinate application release processes across the development and deployment lifecycle.

View comparison

Related categories

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
Build Automation
Release Automation