AWS CodePipeline vs GoCD comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Thoughtworks are both solutions in the Build Automation category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.4, while Thoughtworks is ranked #15 with an average rating of 7.5. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 5.6% mindshare in BA, compared to Thoughtworks’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Thoughtworks users who would recommend it.

AWS CodePipeline

Read 23 AWS CodePipeline reviews

2,562 Views
2,013 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

GoCD

Read 7 GoCD reviews

635 Views
434 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

AWS CodePipeline

GoCD

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

GoCD and AWS CodePipeline are competitors in the CI/CD domain. AWS CodePipeline holds an edge due to its comprehensive integration capabilities and automation features, making it appealing for enterprises using AWS.

Features: GoCD offers pipeline flexibility, value-stream mapping, and hackability, facilitating complex workflow management. On the other hand, AWS CodePipeline integrates seamlessly with AWS services, simplifies orchestration, and supports a range of deployment strategies.

Room for Improvement: GoCD could enhance the variety of available plugins and streamline its setup complexity. AWS CodePipeline may benefit from more intuitive user experiences for users unfamiliar with AWS, improve cost management, and increase the variety of third-party integrations beyond the AWS ecosystem.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GoCD's self-hosted model offers high customization but requires significant setup expertise. It is noted for its responsive customer support. In contrast, AWS CodePipeline leverages cloud-based deployment via AWS infrastructure, simplifying the implementation process, supported by extensive community resources and AWS support.

Pricing and ROI: GoCD provides strong ROI with lower setup costs, attractive for open-source enthusiasts and those mindful of budget constraints. AWS CodePipeline pricing is service-based, generally higher, but is justifiable for enterprises seeking integrated AWS solutions and advanced automation, offering long-term value through scalability and optimized workflows.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS CodePipeline vs. GoCD Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodePipeline vs. GoCD

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 851,604 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS CodePipeline

Ranking in Build Automation

5th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

GoCD

Ranking in Build Automation

15th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (15th), Release Automation (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of AWS CodePipeline is 5.6%, down from 8.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GoCD is 1.5%, down from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

Udhay Prakash Pethakamsetty

Data Engineer Manager at Capgemini

A fully managed service with excellent integrations and a flexible architecture

Compared to any other tools, AWS products provide better integrations. We have tools for all our needs. The integrations are good. The product is a fully managed service. We specify the various stages in the CI/CD process. We can do it without any external tools. Going through everything is usually an overhead for developers. It is like a configuration. We need to configure it only once. The integration with other AWS services has helped us. Our life as a developer is easy. We need not focus on the integration manually. If we work with third-party tools, we must consider connectivity, role management, security, authentication, and authorization. In AWS CodePipeline, if we have IAM roles configured and KMS for the credentials, we need not worry about anything else. Everything can be done within the tool. The integrations are the best part. We can track everything. The connectivity and scalability are good. The architecture is also flexible enough. We can add multiple things.

Read full review

RajeshReddy

Dev Ops Engineer at Infosys

The UI is colorful, but the user experience must be improved

We can see all the pipelines with a simple search. The UI is colorful. The user experience is very rich. The product is very easy to learn if we know a bit of the basics. If we have someone to show us how to use it, it is very easy.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"CodePipeline allows integration with any source code and facilitates deployment to EC2 or ECS, which is highly valuable."

"It's a perfect solution if you are just using AWS."

"The product is a one-stop solution that you can use to integrate, deploy and host your application."

"The integration with other applications is fabulous."

"In AWS, the Cloud DevOps is a managed service from CodeCommit and this has removed the need for a lot of manual steps."

"Code deployment is the best feature."

"AWS CodePipeline has valuable integration features."

"The solution's technical support responds whenever you have an issue, especially whenever you need something sorted out from their side."

More AWS CodePipeline pros

"The UI is colorful."

"GoCD's open-source nature is valuable."

"Permission separations mean that we can grant limited permissions for each team or team member."

"The most notable aspect is its user interface, which we find to be user-friendly and straightforward for deploying and comprehending pipelines. We have the ability to create multiple pipelines, and in addition to that, the resource consumption is impressive."

Cons

"In AWS CodePipeline, we can only use certain tools for which AWS provisions plugins."

"It would be best if AWS CodePipeline provided multiple integration options directly by providing some URLs."

"If you're talking about multi-cloud, you can't use it."

"AWS CodePipeline functions well, but there's room for improvement in providing technical support to regular customers who haven't purchased developer support. I mean, having it available for everyone, even if it's not a 24-hour service. It would be more useful if specific support hours were available for assistance."

"One downside in AWS is that when you attempt to push a change in, it misses that part, or it could be because some variables are not set correctly."

"The migration process from one source code to another needs improvement."

"The product’s pricing needs improvement."

"From my perspective, some in-built capabilities could be enhanced."

More AWS CodePipeline cons

"The documentation really should be improved by including real examples and more setup cases."

"The aspect that requires attention is the user management component. When integrating with BitLabs and authenticating through GitLab, there are specific features we desire. One important feature is the ability to import users directly from GitLab, along with their respective designations, and assign appropriate privileges based on that information. Allocating different privileges to users is a time-consuming process for us."

"It is difficult to assign different access levels because it relies on separate keys for developer and admin access, which could be simplified."

"The tool must be more user-friendly."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is manageable."

"The pricing of this solution is dependent upon your needs including how many jobs you daily and how many times the developer will be changing codes and completing deployments."

"AWS charges you based on the number of pipelines you have and how active they are, and I also think that the root account user knows about all the price-related metrics."

"The price of the product depends on how many times you run it. The tool offers a pay-as-you-go model."

"Compared to other cloud services, AWS CodePipeline falls a bit more on the pricey side. I see that the price of the product has been increasing for the past few years."

"AWS offers free business or enterprise support services."

"I would rate the product's pricing a five out of ten."

"The product is quite expensive compared to other solutions."

More AWS CodePipeline pricing and cost advice

"It's an open-source and free tool."

"This is an open-source solution and it is inexpensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Retailer

12%

Real Estate/Law Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Which AWS solution would you choose - CodeStar or CodePipeline?

Both AWS solutions deliver solid options, with uniquely different features. AWS CodeStar allows for quick development, building, and deployments of apps. It also provides web application and web se...

See all answers

What do you like most about AWS CodePipeline?

Code deployment is the best feature.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS CodePipeline?

AWS CodePipeline's pricing is reasonable, and it is not too expensive. I estimated it costs around $5 monthly. On a scale from one to ten, where one is very cheap and ten is very expensive, I would...

See all answers

What do you like most about GoCD?

The UI is colorful.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GoCD?

The product is free of cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GoCD?

One area of product improvement is the access control system. It is difficult to assign different access levels because it relies on separate keys for developer and admin access, which could be sim...

See all answers

Comparisons

GitLab vs AWS CodePipeline

Compared 63% of the time

Jenkins vs AWS CodePipeline

Compared 11% of the time

GitHub Actions vs AWS CodePipeline

Compared 9% of the time

AWS CodeStar vs AWS CodePipeline

Compared 7% of the time

Tekton vs AWS CodePipeline

Compared 4% of the time

More AWS CodePipeline Competitors

GitLab vs GoCD

Compared 35% of the time

Jenkins vs GoCD

Compared 26% of the time

GitHub Actions vs GoCD

Compared 18% of the time

Tekton vs GoCD

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs GoCD

Compared 10% of the time

More GoCD Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodePipeline

May 2025

Download AWS CodePipeline product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

April 2025

Download GoCD product report

Also Known As

CodePipeline

Adaptive ALM, Thoughtworks Go

Overview

AWS CodePipeline is a fully managed continuous delivery service that helps you automate your release pipelines for fast and reliable application and infrastructure updates. CodePipeline automates the build, test, and deploy phases of your release process every time there is a code change, based on the release model you define. This enables you to rapidly and reliably deliver features and updates. You can easily integrate AWS CodePipeline with third-party services such as GitHub or with your own custom plugin. With AWS CodePipeline, you only pay for what you use. There are no upfront fees or long-term commitments.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers businesses a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility. It was designed for continuous delivery and the concepts essential to this practice are built in at the core.

Thoughtworks

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

Ancestry.com, Barclay Card, AutoTrader, BT Financial Group, Gamesys, Nike, Vodafone, Haufe Lexware, Medidata, Hoovers

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodePipeline vs. GoCD

April 2025

Free Report: AWS CodePipeline vs. GoCD

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS CodePipeline vs. GoCD and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS CodePipeline vs. GoCD report.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.