Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
it_user471432 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Services - Corporate Manager at a tech company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Vendor
Jul 1, 2016
Our customers that require high availability are those that are running on the Superdome 2.
Pros and Cons
  • "As a summary, I would say it's been the best high availability platform that HP has produced, at least that we have been able to use and forward to our customers with the highest service level availability."
  • "With the announcement last year from Hewlett-Packard Enterprise that they are no longer supporting Itanium 2 processors, which means HP-UX is going to die soon in a couple of years."

What is most valuable?

We've been with Superdome since Superdome 1 and then we used Superdome 2. We are a large service provider for the Indian region, Northern part of South America and Central America, around the SAP Ecosystem. So all our infrastructure is Hewlett-Packard, we've been a platinum partner for Hewlett-Packard since 1991, so it's been a 25 year relationship. On top of all the infrastructure we have SAP customers - customers from SAP Ecosystem running SAP in different flavors. The customers that require high availability are those that are running on the Superdome 2. We've had a magnificent experience reliable, trustable, confident infrastructure. Unfortunately, Superdome on top of a Itanium processor is no longer supported. We're looking into Superdome X, but we're currently very happy and our customers are happy. We've had one hardware failure within 10 years, which is almost 100% availability in the platform.

Some of our customers are going to miss Superdome on HP-UX. We're moving them to some Superdome X, some we will move to the DL580 platform, running SAP HANA, but as a summary, I would say it's been the best high availability platform that HP has produced, at least that we have been able to use and forward to our customers with the highest service level availability.

How has it helped my organization?

As a service provider, our end customers have looked into us as the company to rely on to manage their core business. So Superdome essentially as the high end platform in the Integrity line has been the way we have given our customers the best platform to run the core business because they're not running a simple payroll, or something like that. It's the core business, all the invoicing, everything around what moves their business and makes their business operate. So, Superdome has been there for a while. Now it's going to be Superdome X, we hope we can move to that Intel based platform, but for the time it's on top of a Itanium, we have to say congratulations HP because it's been the best platform we ever ran.

What needs improvement?

It's hard to say in terms of improvement, I mean. With the announcement last year from Hewlett-Packard Enterprise that they are no longer supporting a Itanium 2 processors, which means HP-UX is going to die soon in a couple of years. Definitely we need to move to Superdome X, or at least think about moving customers to the Superdome X product line. We expect the same we have expected always - a reliable high availability platform with almost 100% if not more. Well that's impossible, but we can talk about 100% up time, and that's what we're expecting from the line, what we have received for the couple of years, 10 years before we used it, we expect it to be improved or at least the same thing.

Since we're in the SAP Ecosystem, one thing that we have there that's not very comfortable for our customers is the SAP HANA platform only runs on Linux operating system. So it will be great to see the HANA platform, HANA database running on top of Windows, which would be on top of Superdome X. I don't know if it's far away, but right now we have a restriction which is thqt we only have HANA on top of Linux. Either SUSE or Red Hat. It would be interesting to see if in the future we could have a pyramid where you have the Superdome X as a hardware, and on top of it you have an operating system like Windows, and on top of it you have HANA. That would be like an interesting dream to approach in the future.

What other advice do I have?

I would say go for it. Superdome X, if it's as good as the one we've had with the Superdome on the Integrity line, if it took parts of it or if the hardware is similar, I would say go for it.

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Partners
PeerSpot user
it_user362220 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Architect at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Vendor
Jan 7, 2016
It allows us to sync between the different methods of banking -- mobile and internet systems -- that we run through data. It's quite expensive, so we're considering moving some services to Linux.
Pros and Cons
  • "We need to be able to offer our customers continuous service 24/7, and we are able to do all this with Integrity."
  • "It's quite expensive, so we're considering moving some services to Linux services."

What is most valuable?

We need to be able to offer our customers continuous service 24/7. We also need to be able to sync between the different methods of banking -- mobile and internet systems -- that we run through data. We're able to do all this with Integrity.

What needs improvement?

It's quite expensive, so we're considering moving some services to Linux services.

For how long have I used the solution?

It's for databases and transaction servers in our bank environment.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It's always stable. Our system has a lot of good resiliency, so we have a very good, very stable system with it.

Stable. Of course. Always stable. We have a lot of good resiliency on our systems, so we have a very, very, good and stable system.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It's scalable over a horizontal line, so we're typically adding to the system. If we need to move power control systems, we can just add the additional system and scale up that way.

How are customer service and technical support?

We're generally satisfied with technical support.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We have other vendors for storage and replication, such as EMC.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was relatively complex. We have many systems -- databases, services, application servers, etc. -- which are all connected, so our system is complex.

What about the implementation team?

We implemented it in-house.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
HPE Integrity
March 2026
Learn what your peers think about HPE Integrity. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2026.
884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.
PeerSpot user
Master SAP Architect / SAP HANA Systems Engineer at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Consultant
Top 20
Oct 31, 2015
It has high I/O throughput of both storage-layer and networking.
Pros and Cons
  • "The Integrity series combined with the software layer presents an excellent Mission Critical landscape that brings simplicity in a complex landscape to the foreground."

    Valuable Features:

    • The RAS features at application, file, OS, hardware, and memory levels.
    • High I/O throughput of both storage-layer and networking.

    Use of Solution:

    I assisted customers with deploying the solution since HP started selling Integrity systems.

    Deployment Issues:

    No issues encountered.

    Stability Issues:

    It's a highly stable environment. The NPAR and VPAR technology combined with HP-UX is a solid solution.

    Scalability Issues:

    It's got good scalability.

    Initial Setup:

    The Integrity series combined with the software layer presents an excellent Mission Critical landscape that brings simplicity in a complex landscape to the foreground.

    Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
    PeerSpot user
    it_user324381 - PeerSpot reviewer
    Consultant System Engineer with 501-1,000 employees
    Vendor
    Oct 8, 2015
    Replacing PA-RISC with the IA CPU has helped the HPUX perform better. There is still a bias, however, of Oracle towards HP Integrity servers, an issue that should be addressed.
    Pros and Cons
    • "Except running Oracle on Integrity servers, its ROI is well justified in customer environments."
    • "Since Intel featured this product as a mainframe class, it should perform closer to a mainframe."

    What is most valuable?

    • Availability
    • Performance

    How has it helped my organization?

    HP used the IA CPU and replaced the PA-RISC. The IA has helped the HPUX perform better and covered all the bits those were exposed with PA-RISC.

    What needs improvement?

    Since Intel featured this product as a mainframe class, it should perform closer to a mainframe. Secondly, there should be some initiative regarding bias of Oracle towards HP integrity servers.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I've used it for about eight years.

    What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

    No issues encountered.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    No issues encountered.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    No issues encountered.

    How are customer service and technical support?

    Integrity servers are serving customer very well, but usage has reduced since HP iIntegrity is no longer a favorable platform to run Oracle, as conceived by Telco level customers.

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    I have been using SUN S6900, HP Proliant and IBM X series servers for SMB and tier 1 and 2 in large corporates. Integrity solutions are vendor specific so support is very specific as well.

    How was the initial setup?

    It is straightforward.

    What was our ROI?

    Except running Oracle on Integrity servers, its ROI is well justified in customer environments. EOSL’s are very justified.

    What other advice do I have?

    The true benefit of this hardware platform comes with HPUX implementations.

    Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. We are an HP partner.
    PeerSpot user
    it_user5067 - PeerSpot reviewer
    Systems Analyst at a energy/utilities company with 501-1,000 employees
    Real User
    Mar 13, 2013
    Versatility and redundancy are great. But requires manual work to manage resources
    Pros and Cons
    • "We currently deployed HP Integrity blade servers; they offer great versatility, redundancy, and a rapid method of deploying multiple virtual guests within 10 minutes."
    • "I would like to see a GUI interface to manage resources and deploy new servers."

    Valuable Features:

    We currently deployed HP Intergrity blade servers, They offer great versitility, redundancy, and a rapid method of deploying multible virtual guest within 10 minutes. The blade server packaging offers the ability to add addtional blades without downtime. The integrated networking, power, and san storage reduces the need to run new cabling just to add a new server when addtional blades are added.

    Room for Improvement:

    I would like to see a GUI interface to mange resources and deploy new servers. The current method requires a lot of hands on with a lot of check and recheck. SAN storage lun assignment is lost on the guest side without running commands on the master server and the guest to extrapolate which physical luns are assigned to which file system.
    Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
    PeerSpot user