No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Dell PowerEdge MX- Series vs HPE Integrity comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 8, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Dell PowerEdge MX- Series
Ranking in Blade Servers
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.3
Number of Reviews
43
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
HPE Integrity
Ranking in Blade Servers
11th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
5.4
Number of Reviews
21
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Blade Servers category, the mindshare of Dell PowerEdge MX- Series is 8.4%, down from 15.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HPE Integrity is 4.0%, up from 2.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Blade Servers Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Dell PowerEdge MX- Series8.4%
HPE Integrity4.0%
Other87.6%
Blade Servers
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2881110 - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 201-500 employees
Modern infrastructure has reduced our rack footprint and simplifies large-scale virtualization
No product is perfect, and there are improvements that can be done on Dell PowerEdge MX- Series. The first improvement is the complex matrix for firmware updates and patching. Managing the cycle for a modular chassis means managing alignment across multiple layers: the chassis management module, compute nodes including I/O, BIOS, and iDRAC, switch network OS such as SmartFabric OS, and the hypervisor driver.Upgrading firmware can feel challenging when an OS10 switch patch is out of sync with an iDRAC version and a VMware ESXi driver release, as it can trigger network instability or failed compliance checks. A simple, single-click, whole-stack update engine that completely guarantees baseline stability across switch OS, server BIOS, and hypervisor drivers without manual dependency checking would be beneficial. The second area for improvement is the high upfront cost and initial setup complexity. The initial capital expenditure for an MX7000 chassis, redundant management nodes, and fabric switching engines is steep compared to buying a few standalone 2U servers or rack servers. Additionally, initial configuration, particularly setting up SmartFabric services and inter-chassis stacking, has a steep learning curve. A lower barrier to entry price for smaller cities and a simplified deployment wizard for IT generalists who do not specialize in enterprise network fabrics would be improvements. The third improvement is the limited native GPU density for modern AI workloads. While composable PCIe fabric exists, running intensive AI training locally inside the chassis is restricted. Sleds designed with specialized cooling, specifically tailored to support high-wattage enterprise GPUs natively with the standard sled footprint, would be beneficial. Power and thermal management per rack is another area that can be improved. A fully populated MX7000 series loaded with high-wattage CPUs, dual switches, and NVMe drives consumes a significant amount of power in a compact 7U space. Racking three or four chassis in a single rack can typically exceed standard power density limits or require specialized rack power distribution units and high-CFM cooling airflow.
JQ
Oracle Database Administrator at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
Robust security layers have supported mission-critical banking and protected sensitive data
Where I have not really enjoyed is the flexibility of doing things. You are just in a straitjacket with what they give you. The flexibility of doing things is limited compared to other platforms. The backup and restore features on that module were a bit old. I couldn't create a snapshot and provision a server in minutes. The VM features that I can use now easily were not that easy with HPE Integrity and were not even available for us. I had a lot of interaction with HPE Integrity and wanted to move to a different platform for a different experience. I did not see any products matching the Dell PowerFlex environment in terms of server capabilities when it comes to HPE Integrity. We are now using Oracle products and Oracle Data Guard. Oracle on HPE Integrity was a bit more difficult because you have to get separate patches, separate tunables, and separate kernel settings for HPE Integrity. Everything was so proprietary on HPE Integrity, making it difficult to have one solution. The Dell Linux environment with Oracle Linux OS now will be much easier.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I prefer the central pane of glass management feature of Dell PowerEdge MX- Series the most."
"The biggest advantage of PowerEdge is that it is cost-effective, and its performance and infrastructure are much better than other competitors like Lenovo and HP, with very good performance even when you are using it at one hundred percent load."
"One of the best aspects of PowerEdge is that it provides a consolidated hardware infrastructure, allowing multiple servers in a simple ten-rack unit."
"Dell PowerEdge MX- Series enhances my IT department's operational efficiency through several valuable features, including modularity that allows for easy scaling and good planning, and advanced networking capabilities with SmartFabric that make upgrades plug and play while it takes care of everything."
"The low cost and high density of the solution has allowed us to place more compute assets per data center rack and increase our virtual machine count."
"The solution's most valuable feature is its interface."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"Using Dell PowerEdge MX- Series has helped reduce unplanned production downtime by approximately 60 to 70 percent."
"The product's most valuable features are troubleshooting and monitoring."
"When it comes to high-fault tolerance, HPE Integrity is very good, and we have had very good experience with the integrity of the servers for mission-critical functions and high-fault tolerance."
"It just keeps on going; we don't have any problems with any HPE equipment, to be fair."
"As a summary, I would say it's been the best high availability platform that HP has produced, at least that we have been able to use and forward to our customers with the highest service level availability."
"The Integrity series combined with the software layer presents an excellent Mission Critical landscape that brings simplicity in a complex landscape to the foreground."
"If one needs a system with first class stability that may be an expensive solution, HPE Integrity is a way to go."
"The added value of Integrity has always been the reliability of the processors and all the parts in the servers."
"What I like about HPE Integrity servers is how stable and easy to use they are."
 

Cons

"Technical support from Dell is not good. I rate it a zero out of five."
"Regarding firmware updates, the complexity of seeing the compatibility matrix with the operating system and all the firmware that we have to install in Dell PowerEdge MX- Series blade servers, the chassis, and switches inside is challenging."
"In terms of improvement, it should also offer a hyper-converged option."
"The initial capital investment for Dell PowerEdge MX- Series chassis and its corresponding high-bandwidth fabric switches is very steep."
"The ever-increasing boot time due to ever-increasing POST checks with every new generation makes maintenance tasks somewhat of a headache."
"For the support of Dell PowerEdge MX- Series, I would rate it a seven; for EMC storage, Dell is not performing as well as EMC, but for servers, they are good, so I would say seven or eight."
"Can be improved by being proactive in making changes that could improve the solution."
"The only area for improvement is the price."
"Since Intel featured this product as a mainframe class, it should perform closer to a mainframe."
"The manageability must be improved."
"Where I have not really enjoyed is the flexibility of doing things. You are just in a straitjacket with what they give you."
"I don't know if Integrity will survive too much because if the Itanium processors are not going to be supportive anymore, I think in the midterm (4 or 5 years), Integrity's going to be replaced by another product line."
"The virtualization of HPE Integrity could be simplified. We have discussed this issue with HPE and hopefully, they will have an update."
"HPE Integrity is a pain. HPE hasn't put much work into developing the solution in the past few years because it will be discontinued soon."
"I would like to see a GUI interface to manage resources and deploy new servers."
"It's quite expensive, so we're considering moving some services to Linux services."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's pricing is slightly higher."
"If we would not have gone with the vendor we might have been charged unnecessarily for packages we did not need."
"Dell PowerEdge M price is comparable to other solutions but cheaper than IBM. However, the IBM solution is a higher grade solution whereas Dell PowerEdge M is a medium-level solution."
"The pricing of PowerEdge Next is higher than it was before."
"I know we get three years basic, and the on-site licensing model for business seems fine. I wouldn't pay for a support plus or anything."
"It was budget friendly."
"The cost varies significantly depending on the server's configuration and can range from $10,000 to $60,000 for the same server line family."
"The product is budget-friendly. The initial cost for each server was around 10,000 euros. It's a standard price, not too high or too low."
"The pricing is the best."
"HPE Integrity's pricing could be better."
"The price is not very expensive."
"Price-wise, the solution is very expensive."
"There is no license required to use HPE Integrity."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.
913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Outsourcing Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Construction Company
7%
Construction Company
18%
Outsourcing Company
16%
Marketing Services Firm
11%
Healthcare Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business19
Midsize Enterprise9
Large Enterprise21
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise12
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Dell PowerEdge M?
The best feature is the idrac tools, which allows me to manage/config the platform from the Linux level.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Dell PowerEdge M?
Total cost of ownership depends on the purchase cost plus deployment cost and other things such as maintenance cost and upgrade cost. TCO in Dell PowerEdge MX- Series has shared infrastructure that...
What needs improvement with Dell PowerEdge M?
For the time being, I do not see any particular weaknesses or room for improvement for Dell PowerEdge MX- Series; it's working perfectly fine with us with two environments, one for Citrix and one f...
What needs improvement with HPE Integrity?
Where I have not really enjoyed is the flexibility of doing things. You are just in a straitjacket with what they give you. The flexibility of doing things is limited compared to other platforms. T...
What is your primary use case for HPE Integrity?
We are still working with HP products, specifically HPE Integrity servers. We are about to migrate this year to Dell. For Unix, because we are using Unix now, we're going to move to Linux on that p...
What advice do you have for others considering HPE Integrity?
Data protection and application support features are important considerations. My total experience has been seven out of ten. Regarding disaster recovery, we just have the servers that we configure...
 

Also Known As

No data available
HP Integrity Superdome , HP Integrity, SGI Altix
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Newport City Homes, Neuroblastoma and Medulloblastoma Translational Research Consortium (NMTRC), Georgian College, AgreeYa Solutions, IIHT Cloud Solutions, Arizona State University, AudienceScience, University of the Incarnate Word (UIW), The Translational Genomics Research Institute (TGen), Holy Cross School
Home Credit Bank
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell PowerEdge MX- Series vs. HPE Integrity and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.