Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
IBM Security Secret Server Logo

IBM Security Secret Server Reviews

Vendor: IBM
4.1 out of 5

What is IBM Security Secret Server?

Featured IBM Security Secret Server reviews

IBM Security Secret Server mindshare

As of February 2026, the mindshare of IBM Security Secret Server in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category stands at 1.3%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Privileged Access Management (PAM) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
IBM Security Secret Server1.3%
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager11.2%
Delinea Secret Server5.0%
Other82.5%
Privileged Access Management (PAM)

PeerResearch reports based on IBM Security Secret Server reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryPrivileged Access Management (PAM)Feb 7, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersFeb 7, 2026Download
ComparisonIBM Security Secret Server vs CyberArk Privileged Access ManagerFeb 7, 2026Download
ComparisonIBM Security Secret Server vs One Identity SafeguardFeb 7, 2026Download
ComparisonIBM Security Secret Server vs Delinea Secret ServerFeb 7, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager4.311.2%95%229 interviewsAdd to research
Delinea Secret Server4.05.0%90%55 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers
Last updated Feb 1, 2026

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise2
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business15
Midsize Enterprise9
Large Enterprise30
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Insurance Company
13%
Computer Software Company
11%
Performing Arts
9%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Marketing Services Firm
6%
Energy/Utilities Company
6%
Outsourcing Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Comms Service Provider
4%
Consumer Goods Company
4%
Government
4%
Hospitality Company
4%
Logistics Company
4%
Renewables & Environment Company
4%
Legal Firm
2%
Healthcare Company
2%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
2%
Retailer
2%
Construction Company
2%
University
2%
Non Profit
2%
 
IBM Security Secret Server Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Chief Information Security Officer at a insurance company with 501-1,000 employees4.0I've used IBM Security Secret Server for over four years; it's effective for privileged user monitoring, password vaulting, and session recording. While it's scalable and integrates well, regional support and some integrations could be improved.
Head of IT Security at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees3.5No summary available
Chief Information Security Officer at a insurance company with 501-1,000 employees3.5I use IBM Security Secret Server primarily to monitor user activities and commands with a single-access console that is easy to manage. Although its support needs improvement, it integrates well with other IBM solutions, unlike BeyondTrust.
Cyber security consultant at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees4.5I use IBM Security Secret Server for managing privileged accounts, session recording, and as a jump server. While effective, it needs better shared storage management and out-of-the-box privilege account discovery. It's easier to use than CyberArk due to its SQL database.
Senior Presales Specialist at a computer software company with 11-50 employees5.0No summary available
IAM Consultant at a tech services company with 11-50 employees3.5No summary available
Security Consultant at a tech services company with 51-200 employees4.0No summary available
Information Security Officer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees4.5I use IBM Security Secret Server for dynamic and integration services, finding high availability its most powerful feature. However, improvements are needed for the nonclustered index issue, which sometimes affects performance. Overall, it offers a decent return on investment.