IIS Reviews

• Easy to set-up
• Good to maintain

This made the security set-up easier and authentication simplified.

• Logging
• Monitoring

I've used Microsoft NPS for four years.

No issues encountered.

No issues encountered.

No issues encountered but always gor for two machines as one isn't enough and isn't fault redundant.

Customer Service:

Haven't needed it yet.

Technical Support:

Haven't needed it yet.

Yes, we used RSA Radius. It was very hard to maintain and outdated.

Straightforward, it's a feature of Windows Server and a basic knowledge of the radius principles are enough.

In-house implementation.

Pretty good. Authentication for network appliances, load balancing products and wireless devices became easy to do.

It came with the Microsoft contract.

No, we were unhappy with RSA Radius so we went for the 'free' solution.

It has many features, make sure they satisfy your needs.

IIS in windows 2003 onwards has become more secure by allowing the users to choose only the required components / features to install thereby reducing the surface area. High performance and stability by isolating worker processes, application pools. Essential for products like Exchange and SharePoint. Comes with Windows OS, no separate licenses.

Can be difficult to set up for new users and complex to troubleshoot.

IIS is a reliable and secure product, works very well along side other components such as SQL and dotnet.

1. It is Microsoft product that is easy to use and to host local and public websites. 2. Unfamiliar users can work on this product. No license required because it is integrated with the OS. 3. IIS has the ability to limit the bandwidth of your web pages. 4. If the application crashes then the server and other applications continue to run and the failed application restarts the next time with the request.

1. It is not compatible with other platforms due to limitations. 2. Users can not change the source code as per the requirements because source code is not editable. 3. Compatibility issue with other applications.

The tool shows us the operating systems where our servers and applications are running. 

There is an issue with the network. The tool's price is also high. 

I am using the tool for one year. 

I would rate the tool's stability a ten out of ten. 

The solution is fully scalable. We have around 10-20 users for the solution. 

The solution's setup is straightforward. The deployment took around two to three weeks to complete.  

The tool's deployment can be done in-house. 

The tool's pricing is on a yearly basis. 

I would rate the product a nine out of ten. 

On-premises

I am using IIS in our organization to manage the flow of the Active Directory.

The solution can be deployed on-premise and on the cloud.

The solution is highly reliable.

The solution is slow and could have better performance.

I used IIS within the last 12 months.

I rate the stability of IIS a six out of ten.

The solution is scalable.

The initial setup of IIS is easy.

I am able to deploy the solution myself.

There is a license needed for the solution.

I do not like the solution but I have no choice but to use it. I prefer open-source solutions, such as Linux.

I rate IIS a five out of ten. 

I use the solution to research and help our clients with dashboards and reports.

The most valuable feature of the solution is its capability to create different kinds of reports and charts. It has an intuitive user interface and provides a lot of options for building reports. The solution is also very user-friendly.

The initial setup could be made easier.

I have been using the solution for six months.

Our clients feel that other BI tools are more stable than IIS. I rate the stability an eight out of ten.

The solution is scalable. I rate the scalability a nine out of ten.

The initial setup is a bit complex. Our clients manage their own setups.

The deployment can be done in-house. A team of three or four people is required to deploy and maintain the solution.

We have seen a 50% return on investment on the product.

We have to pay a license fee to use the solution. The solution provides multiple licensing options.

I would recommend the solution to others. I rate the product an eight and a half or nine out of ten.

Hybrid Cloud

We primarily use the solution for our IT help desk interface.

All the features of Microsoft IIS are valuable.

The graphical user interface has room for improvement and can be more user-friendly.

The price of the solution has room for improvement.

I have been using the solution for over ten years.

The solution is very stable.

I give the scalability an eight out of ten.

We have around 150 end users.

The initial setup is complex because we are not familiar with the steps required to deploy. Over time, once we become familiar with the process the setup becomes easier.

I give the price of the solution a five out of ten.

I give the solution an eight out of ten.

I recommend Microsoft IIS to others.

On-premises

We use IIS for hosting service, user authentication, and Active Directory integration.

The product could be more compatible with Linux and macOS, particularly when applying user configuration policies. We have to download and configure other player controllers for the same.

The product is stable. We do not encounter any issues from IIS after configuration.

We have 80-90 IIS users in our organization. We might increase the usage in the future.

The product is straightforward to configure. However, there could be a component to add a feature for third-party system integration.

I recommend IIS to others and rate it a ten out of ten. I cannot apply any policies from Windows server to Linux and Mac machines.

On-premises